Practical Tips on Policyholder Claims for Insurer Bad Faith

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Defenses Contributory Negligence Comparative Negligence Assumption of Risk Last Clear Chance Immunity Ultra Vires.
Advertisements

The Honorable L. Brad Taylor Presiding Judge for the Oklahoma Workers’ Compensation Court of Existing Claims.
 Two Privileges; Different Purposes ◦ Attorney-Client Privilege ◦ Attorney Work Product Privilege ◦ Implicit assumption: “privilege and work product.
Coverage Issues: Pennsylvania Unfair Insurance Practices Act, Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Regulations, Reservation of Rights Letters and Non-Waiver.
Chapter 18: Torts A Civil Wrong
Law I Chapter 18.
“In the vast area of legal jurisprudence, there are undoubtedly many instances where being the first, or only, jurisdiction to grant rights to persons.
A [Drunk] Wolfe at the Door (handling covered combined with uncovered claims) Thomas, Thomas & Hafer, LLP Peter J. Speaker, Esquire Joshua J. Bovender,
INTERNATIONAL MARINE CLAIMS CONFERENCE 2004 BILL MILLIKEN HAYDEN AND MILLIKEN P.A. FLORIDA.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning BUSINESS LAW Twomey Jennings 1 st Ed. Twomey & Jennings BUSINESS LAW Chapter 16 Legality.
1 Chapter 6 - The role of the Judiciary Part II. State Secrets 2.
Follow the Fortunes Clauses in Reinsurance Law – Practical Problems in Ensuring their Effectiveness Ralph Fearnhead.
Evaluating the Impact of Heightened Enforcement of Anti- Corruption Legislation Around the World on your D&O Policies; Experience to Date, What Coverages.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN PENNSYLVANIA BAD FAITH LITIGATION Presented to: BELL & CLEMENTS BELL & CLEMENTS APRIL 4, 2006 S. David Fineman, Esquire S. David.
. Insurance Litigation For Non-legal Insurance Professionals.
Law Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake Brooke Group LTD v Williamson Tobacco (1993) Basic Facts: For 18 months, Brown Williams Tobacco (B&W) wages.
Chapter 3 Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
CHAPTER THREE Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Gordon A. Einhorn, Esquire Thomas, Thomas & Hafer, LLP 305 N Front Street, 6 th FL Harrisburg, PA COVERAGE ISSUES IN CLAIMS FOR FAULTY.
American National Insurance Not a UFLP for employer to bargain for a “management functions” clause where that clause addresses terms and conditions of.
Final Exam Options 1.In class exam Tuesday, May 3, 20051:00-2:20 pm 134 Temple Hoyne Buell Hall 2.Normal final exam time Friday, May 13, :30-3:30.
THE TRIBAL COUNSEL’S RELATIONSHIP WITH PLAINTIFF’S ATTORNEYS PAUL SPRUHAN NAVAJO NATION DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.
Multi-Claimant Cases With Insufficient Policy Limits and Practical Suggestions on How to Deal With the Issue Clay Crawford Foland, Wickens, Eisfelder,
Reptile Theory in Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Litigation
Judicial Review Part III. 2 Arbitrary and Capricious Review Old definition Highly deferential to the agency Same as rational relationship test in conlaw.
A Year In Review: The Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s Most Significant Insurance Coverage Decisions RIMS – Pittsburgh Chapter November 10, 2015.
Violation of Uberrimae Fidei: Void Ab Initio or Voidable? That is the question By: Alberto J. Castañer, Esq. © Castañer Law Offices P.S.C. Tel
Residential Funding Corp. v. DeGeorge Financial Corp., 306 F.3d 99 (2d. Cir. 2002).
But I Thought That Was Covered! 1.Does Your Company’s Property Policy Cover Losses Where Both Covered and Non-Covered Perils Combine to Cause a Catastrophic.
Third Party Insurance Defense Work: Who is really the Client? Michael McTaggart Counsel Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP November 7, 2015.
TORTS: A CIVIL WRONG Chapter 18. TORTS: A CIVIL WRONG Under criminal law, wrongs committed are called crimes. Under civil law, wrongs committed are called.
Tues. Feb. 16. pleading and proving foreign law Fact approach to content of foreign law.
Citation Exercises.
Medical Law and Ethics, Second Edition Bonnie F. Fremgen ©2006 Pearson Education, Inc. Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ Professional.
Professional Liability and Medical Malpractice Chapter Pearson Education, Inc Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ Medical Law and.
Medical Malpractice Insurance Crisis: Round Three Current developments Rounds one and two Tort reform proposals Impact of interest rates on cost of insurance.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN PENNSYLVANIA BAD FAITH LITIGATION
Elements of a Crime Chapter 2.
UNEARTHING THE TRUTH IN CLAIMS INVESTIGATIONS
ACC Financial Services Committee Panel on Supreme Court
SRMC Montreal Conference
Chapter 3 Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
How Wisconsin’s Mediation Privilege Protects Confidentiality
Professional Engineering Practice
© 2015 Messing, Rudavsky & Weliky, P.C.
ARE BOTH SIDES’ COVERAGE PRIVILEGES DISAPPEARING?
Medical Law and Ethics Chapter 6
Chapter 42 Liability of Accountants & Other Professionals
UTMOST GOOD FAITH A PRACTICAL GUIDE TO AVOIDING BAD FAITH CLAIMS
INSURANCE BAD FAITH: When, What and How
FC&S Legal presents: Hot Issues in the Insurance Bad Faith Arena
Cooper & Dunham LLP Established 1887
Lecture 10 Feb. 12, 2018.
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) & Reasonable Accommodations
Mon., Aug. 29.
Suing the Federal Government
Chapter 16 LEGALITY AND POLICY
Sonja Kerr Hollingsworth & Zivitz, P.C. Austin, Texas
CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION INTRODUCTION TO PLEADINGS
WesternGeco v. ION: Extraterritoriality and Patents
Attorneys’ fees: When will you or your client be on the hook?
Thurs., Oct. 18.
ARENA LAND & INV. CO., INC. v. PETTY 69 F.3d 547 (10th Cir. 1995)
Agenda for 12th Class Admin Name plates Handouts Slides
By : DeAndre Thomas 5th period #2k12 we going in!
Judicial Review Part II.
Pitfalls and privilege in a post-halo World
A QUICK REVIEW OF RECURRING LABOR LAW ISSUES FOR NECA CONTRACTORS
Bad Faith Hard to Define
Presentation transcript:

Practical Tips on Policyholder Claims for Insurer Bad Faith Wednesday, February 8, 2017 Practical Tips on Policyholder Claims for Insurer Bad Faith Presented by Sean T. Carnathan Sponsoring Section/Committee(s): • Insurance and Tort Litigation Section • Insurance and Reinsurance Committee

176D Liability Advantage: The Section 9 Plaintiff Chapter 93A, Section 9 Any person, other than a person entitled to bring action under section eleven of this chapter, who has been injured by another person's use or employment of any method, act or practice declared to be unlawful by section two or any rule or regulation issued thereunder or any person whose rights are affected by another person violating the provisions of clause (9) of section three of chapter one hundred and seventy-six D may bring an action in the superior court . . . . Example: Peabody Essex Museum v. United States Fire Ins. Co., 802 F.3d 39 (1st Cir. 2015)

176D Liability Advantage: A Subsection 3(9)(f) Claim – Failure to Settle When Liability Reasonably Clear That means reasonably clear: (1) Coverage (2) Liability (3) Damages If Liability is not reasonably clear, the other species of claims are difficult or impossible to get a 176D determination. E.g., . . . Subsection 3(9)(d) – failure to conduct reasonable investigation Subsection 3(9)(e) – failure timely to affirm or deny coverage Subsection 3(9)(g) – forcing insured to litigate Example: House of Clean, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins., 705 F. Supp. 2d 102 (D. Mass. 2010).

176D Liability Advantage: Insured Reasonably Cooperative An insured who refuses to cooperate with insurer requests for information may have more difficulty persuading a court that the insurer violated Chapter 176D even if the policy did not require that the insurer provide the requested information. Example: Michael v. Trustmark Ins. Co., 2003 Mass. Super LEXIS 129 (Jan. 14, 2003).

Chapter 176D Liability Advantage: Simple Coverage Situation Complex coverage determinations make it hard to contend the insurer is acting in bad faith if it does not accept coverage. Examples: House of Clean (environmental contamination, coverage but no 176D liability) Gore v. Arbella, 77 Mass. App. Ct. 518 (2010)

Chapter 176D Liability Advantage: Simple Factual Situation Complex and/or disputed key facts make it hard to contend an insurer is acting in bad faith by declining coverage or to make a substantial settlement offer. Examples: Gore (simple facts – car accident, 176D liability) Thomas v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 40 F.3d 505 (1st Cir. 1994).

Chapter 176D Liability Advantage: Inattentive Claims Representative A claims representative who properly requests additional information and continues to investigate after denying coverage does much to inoculate the insurer from Chapter 176D liability. Examples: Thomas (no Chapter 176D/93A liability; evidence showed that claims representative investigated insured’s assertions) Sterlin v. Commerce Ins. Co., 2009 Mass. Super. LEXIS 17 (Feb. 2, 2009) Federal Ins. Co. v. HPSC, Inc., 480 F.3d 26 (1st Cir. 2007)

Chapter 176D Liability Advantage: Shifting Defense Theories If an insurer asserts a defense to coverage, and then shifts to a totally different defense when the first defense is proven wrong, it had better be right about there being no coverage. Examples: Federal Ins. Co. (when insurer was shown its defense to coverage was erroneous, it shifted to a new theory). Wasserman v. Commerce Ins., 2002 Mass. Super. LEXIS 319 (July 9, 2002) (ignored SJC decision) Hejinian v. General American Life, 2009 Mass. Super LEXIS 70 (Jan. 13, 2009)

Policyholder Uphill Battle • Section 11 Plaintiff • Complex coverage or facts • Attentive Claims Representative • Uncooperative Insured • Good Insurer Communication, Consistent Position

Insurer In Trouble • Section 9 Plaintiff • Simple coverage and facts • Sloppy Claims Representative • Cooperative Insured • Shifting Defense Theories

Your Case