Recent Updates in v6.40 Chris Emery, Bonyoung Koo, Prakash Karamchandani, Gary Wilson, Greg Yarwood March 2, 2017.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
POMI Po Valley Model Intercomparison Exercise CAMx model overview In cooperation with AMA - MI.
Advertisements

Template Development and Testing of PinG and VBS modules in CMAQ 5.01 Prakash Karamchandani, Bonyoung Koo, Greg Yarwood and Jeremiah Johnson ENVIRON International.
Photochemical Model Performance for PM2.5 Sulfate, Nitrate, Ammonium, and pre-cursor species SO2, HNO3, and NH3 at Background Monitor Locations in the.
Development of a Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation Mechanism: Comparison with Smog Chamber Experiments and Atmospheric Measurements Luis Olcese, Joyce.
R. Ahmadov 1,2, S. McKeen 1,2, R. Bahreini 1,2, A. Middlebrook 2, J.A. deGouw 1,2, J.L. Jimenez 1,3, P.L. Hayes 1,3, A.L. Robinson 4, M. Trainer 2 1 Cooperative.
Preliminary Results CMAQ and CMAQ-AIM with SAPRC99 Gail Tonnesen, Chao-Jung Chien, Bo Wang, UC Riverside Max Zhang, Tony Wexler, UC Davis Ralph Morris,
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 2008 CAMx Modeling Model Performance Evaluation Summary University of North Carolina.
Incorporation of the Model of Aerosol Dynamics, Reaction, Ionization and Dissolution (MADRID) into CMAQ Yang Zhang, Betty K. Pun, Krish Vijayaraghavan,
V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt Baton Rouge 8-hr Ozone Modeling Technical Review Meeting Presentation to the LDEQ/AQSD & 8-hr Ozone SIP Coalition July.
Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA
1 Modelling Activities at LAC (PSI) in Switzerland Ş. Andreani-Aksoyo ğ lu, J. Keller, I. Barmpadimos, D. Oderbolz, A.S.H. Prévôt Laboratory of Atmospheric.
METO 637 Lesson 16.
1 Mass Flux in a Horizontally Homogeneous Atmosphere A useful tool for emissions and lifetimes. Assume an atmosphere well- mixed in latitude and longitude;
Impact of chemistry scheme complexity on UK air quality modelling Met Office FitzRoy Road, Exeter, Devon, EX1 3PB United Kingdom Tel: Fax:
Session 9, Unit 17 UAM and CAMx. UAM and CAMx UAM - Urban Airshed Model Currently available versions:  UAM-V 1.24  UAM-V 1.30  Available from Systems.
Template CAMx Ancillary Input Development Chris Emery ENVIRON International Corporation, Novato CA November 14, 2012.
The Sensitivity of Aerosol Sulfate to Changes in Nitrogen Oxides and Volatile Organic Compounds Ariel F. Stein Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.
Beta Testing of the SCICHEM-2012 Reactive Plume Model James T. Kelly and Kirk R. Baker Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards US Environmental Protection.
1 CCOS Seasonal Modeling: The Computing Environment S.Tonse, N.J.Brown & R. Harley Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory University Of California at Berkeley.
Sensitivity Modeling Update University of North Carolina (UNC-IE) ENVIRON International Corporation (ENVIRON) April 29, 2015 Western States Air Quality.
Modeling Aerosol Formation and Transport in the Pacific Northwest with the Community Multi-scale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System Susan M. O'Neill Fire.
WRAP Update. Projects Updated 1996 emissions QA procedures New evaluation tools Model updates CB-IV km MM5 Fugitive dust NH 3 emissions Model.
Ozone MPE, TAF Meeting, July 30, 2008 Review of Ozone Performance in WRAP Modeling and Relevance to Future Regional Ozone Planning Gail Tonnesen, Zion.
Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Air Quality Modeling University of California at Riverside CMAQ Tagged Species Source Apportionment (TSSA)
PM Model Performance & Grid Resolution Kirk Baker Midwest Regional Planning Organization November 2003.
Wildland Fire Impacts on Surface Ozone Concentrations Literature Review of the Science State-of-Art Ned Nikolov, Ph.D. Rocky Mountain Center USDA FS Rocky.
Model & Chemistry Intercomparison CMAQ with CB4, CB4-2002, SAPRC99 Ralph Morris, Steven Lau, Bongyoung Koo ENVIRON International Corporation Gail Tonnesen,
OThree Chemistry Modeling of the Sept ’00 CCOS Ozone Episode: Diagnostic Experiments--Round 3 Central California Ozone Study: Bi-Weekly Presentation.
Evaluation of the VISTAS 2002 CMAQ/CAMx Annual Simulations T. W. Tesche & Dennis McNally -- Alpine Geophysics, LLC Ralph Morris -- ENVIRON Gail Tonnesen.
Applications of Models-3 in Coastal Areas of Canada M. Lepage, J.W. Boulton, X. Qiu and M. Gauthier RWDI AIR Inc. C. di Cenzo Environment Canada, P&YR.
An Exploration of Model Concentration Differences Between CMAQ and CAMx Brian Timin, Karen Wesson, Pat Dolwick, Norm Possiel, Sharon Phillips EPA/OAQPS.
GEOS-CHEM Modeling for Boundary Conditions and Natural Background James W. Boylan Georgia Department of Natural Resources - VISTAS National RPO Modeling.
Diagnostic Study on Fine Particulate Matter Predictions of CMAQ in the Southeastern U.S. Ping Liu and Yang Zhang North Carolina State University, Raleigh,
1 Prakash Karamchandani 1, David Parrish 2, Lynsey Parker 1, Thomas Ryerson 3, Paul O. Wennberg 4, Alex Teng 4, John D. Crounse 4, Greg Yarwood 1 1 Ramboll.
Climatic implications of changes in O 3 Loretta J. Mickley, Daniel J. Jacob Harvard University David Rind Goddard Institute for Space Studies How well.
Georgia Institute of Technology SUPPORTING INTEX THROUGH INTEGRATED ANALYSIS OF SATELLITE AND SUB-ORBITAL MEASUREMENTS WITH GLOBAL AND REGIONAL 3-D MODELS:
Peak 8-hr Ozone Model Performance when using Biogenic VOC estimated by MEGAN and BIOME (BEIS) Kirk Baker Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium October.
Photochemical grid model estimates of lateral boundary contributions to ozone and particulate matter across the continental United States Kirk Baker U.S.
Western Air Quality Issues and Photochemical Modeling - An Industrial Perspective Doug Blewitt, CCM AQRM Dana Wood, PE BP.
Template A screening method for ozone impacts of new sources based on high-order sensitivity analysis of CAMx simulations for Sydney Greg Yarwood
AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 WRAP 2002 Visibility Modeling: Summary of 2005 Modeling Results Gail Tonnesen, Zion Wang, Mohammad Omary, Chao-Jung.
Template Comparison of PM Source Apportionment and Sensitivity Analysis in CAMx Bonyoung Koo, Gary Wilson, Ralph Morris, Greg Yarwood ENVIRON Alan Dunker.
W. T. Hutzell 1, G. Pouliot 2, and D. J. Luecken 1 1 Atmospheric Modeling Division, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling.
Emission reductions needed to meet proposed ozone standard and their effect on particulate matter Daniel Cohan and Beata Czader Department of Civil and.
MRPO Technical Approach “Nearer” Term Overview For: Emissions Modeling Meteorological Modeling Photochemical Modeling & Domain Model Performance Evaluation.
Western Air Quality Study (WAQS) Intermountain Data Warehouse (IWDW) Model Performance Evaluation CAMx and CMAQ 2011b University of North Carolina (UNC-IE)
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Office of Research and Development.
Donna Schwede U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Overview and Recent Updates
Single-Source Impacts with SCICHEM and CAMx
Ozone Transport Analysis Using Back-Trajectories and CAMx Probing Tools Sue Kemball-Cook, Greg Yarwood, Bonyoung Koo and Jeremiah Johnson, ENVIRON Jim.
Adverse Effects of Drought on Air Quality in the US
Mobile Source Contributions to Ambient PM2.5 and Ozone in 2025
SAPRC07T Implementation within the CMAQ model.
SEMAP 2017 Ozone Projections and Sensitivities / Contributions Prepared by: Talat Odman - Georgia Tech Yongtao Hu - Georgia Tech Jim Boylan - Georgia.
Lupu, Semeniuk, Kaminski, Mamun, McConnell
CRC NARSTO-Northeast Modeling Study
Performance of CMAQ for Inorganic Aerosol Compounds in Greater Tokyo
2017 Projections and Interstate Transport of Ozone in Southeastern US Talat Odman & Yongtao Hu - Georgia Tech Jim Boylan - Georgia EPD 16th Annual.
Characteristics of Urban Ozone Formation During CAREBEIJING-2007 Experiment Zhen Liu 04/21/09.
Organic Aerosol is Ubiquitous in the Atmosphere
Changes to the Multi-Pollutant version in the CMAQ 4.7
Stephen Mueller & Jonathan Mallard Tennessee Valley Authority
Deborah Luecken and Golam Sarwar U.S. EPA, ORD/NERL
7th Annual CMAS Conference
Results from 2018 Preliminary Reasonable Progress Modeling
PGM Boundary conditions
Improving Regional PM2.5 Modeling along Utah’s Wasatch Front
Climatic implications of changes in O3
Presentation transcript:

Recent Updates in v6.40 Chris Emery, Bonyoung Koo, Prakash Karamchandani, Gary Wilson, Greg Yarwood March 2, 2017

Outline Sponsored updates Miscellaneous updates Condensed halogen chemistry (TCEQ) Gas/PM chemistry and wet deposition updates (EPA) Parallel updates in OSAT/PSAT and DDM Land/ocean mask to support oceanic halogen emissions Miscellaneous updates ACM2 solver speed Landuse-dependent snow parameters Anthropogenic & biogenic SOA precursors in VBS

Updates in CAMx v6.4 Condensed Halogen Chemistry (TCEQ) Issue Oceanic halogen emissions are important for ozone depletion CB6r2h (v6.2) adds 88 reactions involving 40 I, Br, Cl species Approach CB6r2 + 16-reaction mechanism involving 9 Ix species (I-16b) Most important Ix reactions determined from DDM rate sensitivity analysis Add in-line Ix emissions = f(O3, SST, wind speed) Ix emission fluxes output to deposition file for diagnostics/reporting CB6r2h and I16-b result in similar ozone decrements (~5 ppb) over the Gulf of Mexico

Updates in CAMx v6.4 Condensed Halogen Chemistry (TCEQ) Schematic of the full iodine chemistry mechanism (I-30) in CB6r2h.

Updates in CAMx v6.4 Condensed Halogen Chemistry (TCEQ)

Updates in CAMx v6.4 Chemistry Updates (EPA) CB6r4 photochemistry Combine I-16b halogen mechanism + CB6r3 CB6r3 (v6.3): T/P dependent organic nitrate branching from alkanes Important for cold/high altitude photochemical applications Add pseudo-heterogeneous hydrolysis of isoprene-derived organic nitrate (INTR) INTR hydrolysis to HNO3 can be an important NOx loss pathway Add heterogeneous sulfate chemistry on fine crustal aerosols Negligible/minor sulfate impacts typically; larger impacts with high dust CB6 halogen chemistry (CB6r2h and I-16b) is disproportionately slow Inorganic Ix reactions are numerically “stiff” to solve Fast EBI solver for I species and improved EBI performance overall by ~20%

Updates in CAMx v6.4 Chemistry Updates (EPA) EPA 2011 Modeling Platform (July 28, 2015 NODA) CB6r4 1-hr O3 performance statistics (40 ppb cutoff) for July 2011   NMB (%) NME (%) R Region CB6r2 CB6r4 Change Northwest 2.3 1.6 -0.7 13.2 0.90 California -2.6 -3.7 -1.1 16.9 16.7 -0.2 0.75 0.77 +0.02 Rockies 1.0 0.6 -0.4 11.1 0.71 Southwest -8.5 -9.1 -0.6 16.0 16.3 +0.3 0.51 0.50 -0.01 Northern Plains 9.2 8.0 -1.2 15.6 15.2 0.73 0.72 Southern Plains 8.6 6.2 -2.4 18.7 17.8 -0.9 0.68 0.70 Midwest 10.5 -1.3 14.9 0.74 Southeast 21.3 18.9 23.7 21.8 -1.9 Northeast 8.9 7.4 -1.5 14.4 13.6 -0.8 0.85

Updates in CAMx v6.4 Chemistry Updates (EPA) 1-hr O3 at 4 rural sites along Gulf coastline, July 2011 CB6r2 CB6r4

Updates in CAMx v6.4 Chemistry Updates (EPA) 1-hr O3 at 4 rural sites along Atlantic coastline, July 2011 CB6r2 CB6r4

Updates in CAMx v6.4 Chemistry Updates (EPA) Land/ocean mask Necessary to ensure that in-line Ix emissions are emitted from ocean bodies only Removed from O3MAP file (optional field) Now explicitly defined in the landuse file LU = 1: “water” Historically all water coverage was assigned here Now used for ocean coverage LU = 3: “lake” Historically empty Now used for fresh water A "watermask" program allows for converting LU files if needed WRFCAMx may or may not be able to make this distinction Depends on LU database used in WRF

Updates in CAMx v6.4 Chemistry Updates (EPA) SOAP organic aerosol chemistry Remove 3 CG-SOA pairs and SOAH (17 species reduced to 10) 2 anthropogenic CG-SOA pairs by volatility (aromatics) 2 biogenic CG-SOA pairs by volatility (isoprene and terpenes) 2 non-volatile products (SOPA for anthropogenic and SOPB for biogenic) Add anthropogenic IVOC precursor (but not for biogenics due to greater uncertainties) Add aqueous SOA pathway from biogenic isoprene products (glyoxal) Literature update for SOA yields, saturation, water solubility You can still run CAMx with the original parameters Higher SOA with updated parameters – SOAP2 (over predictions) Lower SOA with original parameters – SOAP (under predictions)

Updates in CAMx v6.4 Chemistry Updates (EPA) Total SOA averaged over July 2011 SOAP (v6.3) SOAP2 – SOAP (v6.3) SOAP (v6.4) – SOAP (v6.3) SOAP2+newH – SOAP2

Updates in CAMx v6.4 Chemistry Updates (EPA) Total OC MPE over July 2011 SOAP (v6.3) SOAP2 SOAP2+newH SOAP (v6.3) SOAP (v6.4)

Updates in CAMx v6.4 Chemistry Updates (EPA) RADM-AQ aqueous PM chemistry Literature update for metal-catalyzed and peroxide sulfate oxidation Mostly minor impacts to sulfate concentrations SO2: v6.4 – v6.3 June 20, 2011 PSO4: v6.4 – v6.3 June 20, 2011

Updates in CAMx v6.4 Chemistry Updates (EPA) Probing Tools Tie in CB6r4 into OSAT and H/DDM OSAT accounts for an additional ozone destruction pathway by iodine and conversion of nitrogen tracer classes involving iodine nitrate (INO3) No change to tracer number, so OSAT runtimes are not be affected Tie in CB6r4, SOAP and RADM-AQ updates into PSAT (PM-DDM updates forthcoming) SOAP update reduces OA tracers, so PSAT will run faster for OA class

Updates in CAMx v6.4 Wet Deposition Update (EPA) Formulation/efficiency improvements (more removal, less “vertical transport” of semi-soluble species) June 20, 2011

Updates in CAMx v6.4 Wet Deposition Update (EPA) June 20, 2011

Updates in CAMx v6.4 Miscellaneous Updates ACM2 solver speedup as in CMAQ v5.1 CAMx/ACM2 runtimes are now similar to the default K-theory option. Extend ACM2 to work with H/DDM (has always worked with SA) Internal landuse-dependent snow parameters Changes for urban and shrub land to increase snow cover (and thus albedo) for a given snow depth Based on results reported by the Utah DAQ Simplified anthropogenic vs. biogenic VBS SOA classification Reflects the fact that aromatic precursors are mostly anthropogenic and isoprene and terpenes are mostly biogenic No impact to SOAP, no impact on VBS model results Use the updated PREPVBS tool to develop VBS emission inputs

Thank you www.camx.com