Yuqiang Zhang1,2, Owen R, Cooper3,4, Audrey Gaudel3,4, Anne M

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Aircraft GC 2006 ems GC Streets ems East Asian contrib Lightning contrib Aircraft GC 2006 ems GC Streets ems No Asian No Lightning Long-range transport.
Advertisements

Space-Based Constraints on Lightning NOx Emissions Randall V. Martin 1,2, Bastien Sauvage 1, Ian Folkins 1, Christopher Sioris 2,3, Christopher Boone 4,
CO budget and variability over the U.S. using the WRF-Chem regional model Anne Boynard, Gabriele Pfister, David Edwards National Center for Atmospheric.
Variability in Ozone Profiles at TexAQS within the Context of an US Ozone Climatology Mohammed Ayoub 1, Mike Newchurch 1 2, Brian Vasel 3 Bryan Johnson.
Interpreting MLS Observations of the Variabilities of Tropical Upper Tropospheric O 3 and CO Chenxia Cai, Qinbin Li, Nathaniel Livesey and Jonathan Jiang.
The Atmosphere: Oxidizing Medium In Global Biogeochemical Cycles EARTH SURFACE Emission Reduced gas Oxidized gas/ aerosol Oxidation Uptake Reduction.
REFERENCES Maria Val Martin 1 C. L. Heald 1, J.-F. Lamarque 2, S. Tilmes 2 and L. Emmons 2 1 Colorado State University 2 NCAR.
Intercontinental Transport and Climatic Effects of Air Pollutants Intercontinental Transport and Climatic Effects of Air Pollutants Workshop USEPA/OAQPS.
Constraining global isoprene emissions with GOME formaldehyde column measurements Changsub Shim, Yuhang Wang, Yunsoo Choi Georgia Institute of Technology.
(a)(b)(c) Simulation of upper troposphere CO 2 from two-dimensional and three-dimensional models Xun Jiang 1, Runlie Shia 2, Qinbin Li 1, Moustafa T Chahine.
Impact of Mexico City on Regional Air Quality Louisa Emmons Jean-François Lamarque NCAR/ACD.
 Among all CO source/sink terms, the loss due to CO reaction with OH and the emission from biomass burning appear to be main causes for seasonal fluctuation.
Future prediction of tropospheric ozone over south and east Asia in 2030 Satoru Chatani* Toyota Central R&D Labs., Inc. Markus Amann and Zbigniew Klimont.
Background Air Quality in the United States Under Current and Future Emissions Scenarios Zachariah Adelman, Meridith Fry, J. Jason West Department of Environmental.
Trans-Pacific Transport of Ozone and Reactive Nitrogen During Spring Thomas W. Walker 1 Randall V. Martin 1,2, Aaron van Donkelaar.
Observational Evidence: Ozone and Particulate Matter EMEP SB, 13 September summary Chapter 2 Kathy Law LATMOS-CNRS,
Biogenic Contributions to Methane Trends from 1990 to 2004 Arlene M. Fiore 1 Larry W. Horowitz 1, Ed Dlugokencky 2, J. Jason West.
Effect of NO x emission controls on the long-range transport of ozone air pollution and human mortality J. Jason West, Vaishali Naik, Larry W. Horowitz,
. s Yuqiang Zhang 1, J. Jason West 1, Meridith M. Fry 1, Raquel A. Silva 1, Steven J. Smith 2, Vaishali Naik 4, Zachariah Adelman 1, Susan C. Anenberg.
The effect of pyro-convective fires on the global troposphere: comparison of TOMCAT modelled fields with observations from ICARTT Sarah Monks Outline:
Source vs. Sink Contributions to Atmospheric Methane Trends:
Connecting Climate Change, Air Pollution, and Human Health J. Jason West Department of Environmental Sciences & Engineering University of North Carolina,
Application of Satellite Observations for Timely Updates to Bottom-up Global Anthropogenic NO x Emission Inventories L.N. Lamsal 1, R.V. Martin 1,2, A.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Using Dynamical Downscaling to Project.
Goal: “What are the sources and physical mechanisms that contribute to high ozone concentrations aloft that have been observed in Central and Southern.
INTERCONTINENTAL TRANSPORT OF OZONE AND ITS SEASONAL VARIATIONS IN EUROPE Dick Derwent rdscientific 2 nd ICAP Workshop Chapel Hill, North Carolina October.
Itsushi UNO*, Youjiang HE, Research Institute for Applied Mechanics, Kyushu University, Kasuga, Fukuoka, JAPAN Toshimasa OHARA, Jun-ichi KUROKAWA, Hiroshi.
OVERVIEW OF ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES: Daniel J. Jacob Ozone and particulate matter (PM) with a global change perspective.
William G. Benjey* Physical Scientist NOAA Air Resources Laboratory Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division Research Triangle Park, NC Fifth Annual CMAS.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer Studying.
Chemical Condition and Surface Ozone in Urban Cities of Texas During the Last Decade: Observational Evidence from OMI, CAMS, and Model Analysis Yunsoo.
Co-benefits of mitigating global greenhouse gas emissions for future air quality and human health J. Jason West Department of Environmental Sciences &
Climatic implications of changes in O 3 Loretta J. Mickley, Daniel J. Jacob Harvard University David Rind Goddard Institute for Space Studies How well.
Future Air Quality in Representative Concentration Pathway Scenarios: Relationships Between Economic Wellbeing and Air Quality J. Jason West Steven J.
The Double Dividend of Methane Control Arlene M. Fiore IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria January 28, 2003 ANIMALS 90 LANDFILLS 50 GAS 60 COAL 40 RICE 85 TERMITES.
Picture: METEOSAT Oct 2000 Tropospheric O 3 budget of the South Atlantic region B. Sauvage, R. V. Martin, A. van Donkelaar, I. Folkins, X.Liu, P. Palmer,
TOAR Workshop 1.03 January 25-27, 2016 Xijiao Hotel, Beijing, China Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Chapter 6: Present day ozone distribution and trends relevant to climate change A. Gaudel, O. R. Cooper, G. Ancellet, J. Cuesta, G. Dufour, F. Ebojie,
OsloCTM2  3D global chemical transport model  Standard tropospheric chemistry/stratospheric chemistry or both. Gas phase chemistry + essential heteorogenous.
Co-benefits of Global Greenhouse Gas Mitigation for US Air Quality and Health J. Jason West Department of Environmental Sciences & Engineering University.
HYMN: Hydrogen, Methane and Nitrous oxide: Trend variability, budgets and interactions with the biosphere GOCE-CT TM4 model evaluations
Potential of Observations from the Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer to Constrain Continental Sources of Carbon Monoxide D. B. A. Jones, P. I. Palmer,
Yuqiang Zhang1, Owen R, Cooper2,3, J. Jason West1
Using TEMPO to Evaluate the Impact of Ozone on Agriculture
Meteorological drivers of surface ozone biases in the Southeast US
Adverse Effects of Drought on Air Quality in the US
Xiaomeng Jin1, Arlene Fiore1, Lee Murray2, Luke Valin3
The impacts of dynamics and biomass burning on tropical tropospheric Ozone inferred from TES and GEOS-Chem model Junhua Liu
Reducing tropospheric ozone with methane controls:
A Performance Evaluation of Lightning-NO Algorithms in CMAQ
16th Annual CMAS Conference
Impact of Solar and Sulfate Geoengineering on Surface Ozone
Preliminary Ozone Results from the TF HTAP Model Intercomparison
The Double Dividend of Methane Control
Daniel J. Jacob Harvard University
Analysis of CO in the tropical troposphere using Aura satellite data and the GEOS-Chem model: insights into transport characteristics of the GEOS meteorological.
Satellite Remote Sensing of Ozone-NOx-VOC Sensitivity
Space-based Diagnosis of Surface Ozone Sensitivity to Anthropogenic Emissions Randall Martin Aaron Van Donkelaar Arlene Fiore.
WEST AFRICAN MONSOON EXPERIMENT (WAM)
The effect of tropical convection on the carbon monoxide distribution in the upper troposphere inferred from Aura Satellite data and GEOS-Chem model Junhua.
Shiliang Wu1 Loretta J. Mickley1, Daniel J
Presented By : Dhurba Neupane NRES 701C March 27,2017
Intercontinental Transport, Hemispheric Pollution,
Research connecting air quality, climate change, energy, policy and health J. Jason West Department of Environmental Sciences & Engineering University.
Linking Ozone Pollution and Climate Change:
INTEX-B flight tracks (April-May 2006)
Effects of global change on U.S. ozone air quality
Using satellite observations of tropospheric NO2 columns to infer trends in US NOx emissions: the importance of accounting for the NO2 background Rachel.
Rachel Silvern, Daniel Jacob
Climatic implications of changes in O3
Presentation transcript:

Equatorward redistribution of emissions dominates the 1980 to 2010 tropospheric ozone change Yuqiang Zhang1,2, Owen R, Cooper3,4, Audrey Gaudel3,4, Anne M. Thompson5, Philippe Nedelec6, Shin-Ya Ogino7, J. Jason West1 1 Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 2 now at US Environmental Protection Agency 3 Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado 4 Chemical Sciences Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory 5 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center 6 CNRS Universite Paul Sabatier Toulouse 7 Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology Title Carolina First Steering Committee October 9, 2010 Paper in press with Nature Geoscience

Global ozone precursors shifting southwards 1950 2010 2000 1990 1970 1980 1960 Ozone precursors are increasing globally from 1980 to 2010. CO & NMVOCs increases at south of 30˚N, but decreases north of this latitude from 1980 to 2010. NOx increase south of 40˚N, but decreases north. The peak emission regions shifts southwards. Anthropogenic NOx emissions (including biomass burning) from ACCMIP and RCP8.5.

Global tropospheric O3 burden much more sensitive to emissions from the tropics and SH Sensitivity of global trop. O3 burden to changes in NOx emissions, based on simulations of 10% NOx reductions from 9 world regions (West et al., 2009).

Global Tropics (23°S-23°N) +21% +49% +6% +22% +16% Global Anthropogenic Emission Changes, 1980-2010 Global Tropics (23°S-23°N) NOx +21% +49% CO +6% +22% NMVOCs +16% Global CH4 mixing ratio +15% Anthropogenic emissions (including biomass burning) from ACCMIP and RCP8.5.

Objectives Separate the changes in the global tropospheric ozone burden (BO3) from 1980 to 2010 into contributions from changes in: the spatial distribution of anthropogenic short-lived pollutant emissions, the global magnitude of these emissions, and the global CH4 mixing ratio.

Methods Global CTM: CAM-chem (Lamarque, 2012) Anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions are from ACCMIP for 1980 and RCP8.5 for 2010 (Lamarque, 2010; Riahi, 2011). Biogenic emissions are calculated on-line using MEGAN-v2.1 (Guenther, 2012) Global meteorology is from NASA GEOS-5 for 2008-2012. Simulations carried out for this study   Emission total in year Spatial pattern in year CH4 concentration S_2010 2010 1798 ppb S_1980 1980 1567 ppb S_Distribution S_Magnitude S_CH4 All the models are run for consecutive five years and we use four years average for the data analysis. We apply the same meteorology for all the simulations, neglecting the effects of climate change or variability. Explain the three sensitivity scenarios.

Tropospheric O3 burden change, 1980 to 2010 Methane Distribution Total Magnitude 1. Global BO3 have increased by 28.12 Tg from 1980 to 2010, with NH accounting for 57%. 2. slightly greater than the combined influence of the change in emission magnitude (8.59 Tg) and the global CH4 change (7.48 Tg) The change in the emission spatial distribution contributes slightly more to the total BO3 change than the emission magnitude and methane changes combined.

Tropospheric O3 burden change, 1980 to 2010 Greatest BO3 increases are over South and Southeast Asia.

Tropospheric O3 burden change, 1980 to 2010 Total Spatial distribution Magnitude Methane The change in spatial distribution of emissions best explains the magnitude and pattern of the overall change.

Zonal distributions of tropospheric O3 changes Total Spatial distribution Magnitude Global CH4 Latitude Latitude O3 increases most over 0°N-35°N from the surface to the upper troposphere, and over 30°S-0°S The spatial distribution change best explains the overall change.

Zonal distributions of tropospheric NOy changes Total Spatial distribution Magnitude Global CH4 Latitude Latitude Emission increases <35ºN are transported efficiently upward, due to strong Hadley cell convection. Emission decreases >35ºN stay at higher latitudes and lower elevation.

OMI/MLS Modeled 2010 Model - OMI/MLS

11-year OMI/MLS satellite O3 column trends (2004-2015), white circles show statistically significant positive trends. Modeled O3 burden change (1980 to 2010)

SE Asia ozone profiles First observed significant O3 increase over SE Asia. IAGOS commercial aircraft O3 profiles to/from several airports (incl. Hong Kong, Bangkok, Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City, Guangzhou), SHADOZ ozonesondes over Hanoi.

Change in NOx emissions (1980-2010) Change in O3 burden due to regional emission changes Sensitivity of O3 burden to NOx emissions (West et al. 2009)

Y. Zhang et al., Nature Geoscience, in press Conclusions Changes in the spatial distribution of global anthropogenic emissions dominate the 1980-2010 tropospheric O3 burden change, slightly larger than the combined effect of the global emission magnitude and global CH4 change. O3 production is much more sensitive to emissions from tropical and subtropical regions due to strong photochemical rates, NOx- sensitivity, and strong convection, despite a shorter O3 lifetime. Emissions increases from South and Southeast Asia may be particularly important for the global BO3 increase. The future ozone burden will be determined mainly by emissions from the tropics and subtropics. A continued equatorward shift may cause BO3 to increase, even if global emissions decrease. Y. Zhang et al., Nature Geoscience, in press

UNC Climate Health and Air Quality Lab Thank you Thanks for help, data, and analysis tools from: Jerry Ziemke, Louisa Emmons, Simone Tilmes, Jim Schwab, and Paul Young. Funding Sources: EPA STAR Grant #834285 NIEHS Grant #1 R21 ES022600-01 834285 UNC Climate Health and Air Quality Lab www.unc.edu/~jjwest 17

Model evaluation 1. We compare the O3 trend from 1980 to 2010 at six long-term remotes sites between model outputs and observations, and found that the model reproduces the trend well. 2. By comparing model output with multi-year ozonesonde data, satellite data, aircraft campaigns, and ground-based observation data, though with a tendency to overestimate surface O3 The model reproduces the O3 trend from 1980 to 2010 at six long-term remote sites well. The model also performs well for O3 seasonal, spatial, and vertical distribution in 2010.

ΔBO3 at different latitudinal bands Then we take a look at the global O3 burden changes at different latitudinal bands. ∆BO3 from 1980 to 2010 are greatest over the tropical regions, from 30ºS to 30ºN (17.93 Tg). For different latitudinal bands, the effect of the change in emission spatial distribution changes is always larger than that from emission magnitude and global CH4, except for north of 60ºN.

O3-NOx-VOCs sensitivity Annual average surface ratios VOC-sensitive← → NOx-sensitive VOC-sensitive← →NOx-sensitive H2O2/HNO3 ratio H2O2/NO2 ratio Strong NOx-sensitivity is prevalent over tropical regions, especially in the middle and upper troposphere (not shown here), and emission trends show greater increases of NOx than of VOCs.

Global O3 chemical production and loss rate Tropical regions have fast chemical reaction rates due to strong sunlight and high temperature.

IAGOS commercial aircraft O3 profiles to/from several airports (incl IAGOS commercial aircraft O3 profiles to/from several airports (incl. Hong Kong, Bangkok, Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City, Guangzhou), SHADOZ ozonesondes over Hanoi. First observed significant O3 increase over SE Asia.

IAGOS commercial aircraft O3 profiles over northeastern China to/from several airports. Extends observations of positive trend by Ding et al. (2008).

IAGOS commercial aircraft O3 profiles over southern India to/from several airports.