Understanding the fluid mechanics behind transverse wall shear stress

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Date of download: 6/21/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: In Vitro Quantification of Time Dependent Thrombus Size Using Magnetic Resonance.
Advertisements

Date of download: 6/26/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Numerical Study of Cerebroarterial Hemodynamic Changes Following Carotid Artery.
Date of download: 7/7/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Effects of Cyclic Motion on Coronary Blood Flow J Biomech Eng. 2013;135(12):
Date of download: 7/8/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Effect of Inlet Velocity Profiles on Patient-Specific Computational Fluid Dynamics.
Date of download: 9/25/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
5th International Conference on Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies (NN08) July, 2008 Thessaloniki, GREECE.
Hemodynamics of patient-specific aorta-pulmonary shunt configurations
Johnson Ho, Zhou Zhou, Xiaogai Li, Svein Kleiven 
Statistical shape modeling describes variation in tibia and femur surface geometry between Control and Incidence groups from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.
Disturbed flow in a patient-specific arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis: Multidirectional and reciprocating near-wall flow patterns  Bogdan Ene-Iordache,
A computational study on the influence of catheter-delivered intravascular probes on blood flow in a coronary artery model  Ryo Torii, Nigel B. Wood,
Modeling leaflet correction techniques in aortic valve repair: A finite element study  Michel R. Labrosse, Munir Boodhwani, Benjamin Sohmer, Carsten J.
MRI and CFD studies of pulsatile flow in healthy and stenosed carotid bifurcation models  Ian Marshall, Shunzhi Zhao, Panorea Papathanasopoulou, Peter.
Simulated elliptical bioprosthetic valve deformation: Implications for asymmetric transcatheter valve deployment  Wei Sun, Kewei Li, Eric Sirois  Journal.
Date of download: 10/21/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Prepared BY: Helwan University Faculty Of Engineering
Date of download: 10/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Annalisa De Paolis, Hirobumi Watanabe, Jeremy T
A mathematical model to simulate the cardiotocogram during labor
Pieter-Paul A. Vergroesen, Albert J. van der Veen, Kaj S
The influence of boundary conditions on wall shear stress distribution in patients specific coronary trees  Alina G. van der Giessen, Harald C. Groen,
Visualization of vortex flow and shear stress in the aortic root during left ventricular assist device support  Shohei Yoshida, MD, Satsuki Fukushima,
Comparing Experimental and Simulated Pressure-Area Isotherms for DPPC
Multiparticle Adhesive Dynamics
The influence of early-phase remodeling events on the biomechanical properties of engineered vascular tissues  Zehra Tosun, Carolina Villegas-Montoya,
Sukant Mittal, Ian Y. Wong, William M. Deen, Mehmet Toner 
Time-resolved three-dimensional magnetic resonance velocity mapping of aortic flow in healthy volunteers and patients after valve-sparing aortic root.
Successful use of retrograde branched extension limb assembling technique in endovascular repair of pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm  Jiang Xiong,
Computer modeling for the prediction of thoracic aortic stent graft collapse  Salvatore Pasta, PhD, Jae-Sung Cho, MD, Onur Dur, PhD, Kerem Pekkan, PhD,
Time-resolved magnetic resonance angiography and flow-sensitive 4-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla for blood flow and wall shear stress.
Jeffrey E. Hull, MD, Boris V. Balakin, PhD, Brad M
A new imaging method for assessment of aortic dissection using four-dimensional phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging  Rachel E. Clough, MBBS, BSc,
Initial experience characterizing a type I endoleak from velocity profiles using time- resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI  Thomas A. Hope, MD,
Successful use of retrograde branched extension limb assembling technique in endovascular repair of pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm  Jiang Xiong,
Physical Properties of Escherichia coli Spheroplast Membranes
Hemodynamic conditions in a failing peripheral artery bypass graft
Introduction of a New Optimized Total Cavopulmonary Connection
Lindsay C.H. John, MD, FRCS  The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 
Platelet Adhesive Dynamics
Joseph V. Tranquillo, Nima Badie, Craig S. Henriquez, Nenad Bursac 
Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aortic Thrombus Formation Following Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair  Foeke J.H. Nauta, MD, PhD, Kevin D. Lau, PhD,
Harry A. Dwyer, PhD, Peter B
Hemodynamics of human carotid artery bifurcations: Computational studies with models reconstructed from magnetic resonance imaging of normal subjects 
David A. Vorp, PhD, M.L. Raghavan, BS, Marshall W. Webster, MD 
Computational fluid dynamics in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device support show hemodynamic alterations in the ascending aorta 
A computational fluid dynamic study of stent graft remodeling after endovascular repair of thoracic aortic dissections  Stephen W.K. Cheng, MS, Edward.
Three-dimensional visualization of velocity profiles in the porcine abdominal aortic trifurcation  Erik Morre Pedersen, MD, Jesper Østergaard Hjortdal,
Russell C. Lam, MD, Stephanie C
Singular Behavior of Slow Dynamics of Single Excitable Cells
Flow Velocity and Turbulence in the Transverse Aorta of a Proximally Directed Aortic Cannula: Hydrodynamic Study in a Transparent Model  Ikuo Fukuda,
Traction Forces of Neutrophils Migrating on Compliant Substrates
Flow reversal promotes intimal thickening in vein grafts
Computational fluid dynamic study of hemodynamic effects on aortic root blood flow of systematically varied left ventricular assist device graft anastomosis.
Wall stress distribution on three-dimensionally reconstructed models of human abdominal aortic aneurysm  M.L. Raghavan, PhD, David A. Vorp, PhD, Michael.
A numerical model to study mechanically induced initiation and progression of damage in articular cartilage  S.M. Hosseini, W. Wilson, K. Ito, C.C. van.
Analysis of Dynamic Brain Imaging Data
Volume 80, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
The impact of model assumptions on results of computational mechanics in abdominal aortic aneurysm  Christian Reeps, MD, Michael Gee, PhD, Andreas Maier,
Comparison of abdominal aortic hemodynamics between men and women at rest and during lower limb exercise  Christopher P. Cheng, MSa, Robert J. Herfkens,
Use of computational fluid dynamics studies in predicting aneurysmal degeneration of acute type B aortic dissections  Eric K. Shang, MD, Derek P. Nathan,
Matadial Ojha, PhD, Richard S. C. Cobbold, PhD, K
Examination of near-wall hemodynamic parameters in the renal bridging stent of various stent graft configurations for repairing visceral branched aortic.
Nobuhiko Watari, Ronald G. Larson  Biophysical Journal 
Matadial Ojha, PhD. , C. Ross Ethier, PhD. #, K
Comparing Experimental and Simulated Pressure-Area Isotherms for DPPC
John E. Pickard, Klaus Ley  Biophysical Journal 
Actin-Myosin Viscoelastic Flow in the Keratocyte Lamellipod
Kevin McHale, Andrew J. Berglund, Hideo Mabuchi  Biophysical Journal 
Brian P. Helmke, Amy B. Rosen, Peter F. Davies  Biophysical Journal 
Longitudinal computational fluid dynamics study of aneurysmal dilatation in a chronic DeBakey type III aortic dissection  Christof Karmonik, PhD, Sasan.
Presentation transcript:

Understanding the fluid mechanics behind transverse wall shear stress Yumnah Mohamied, Spencer J. Sherwin, Peter D. Weinberg  Journal of Biomechanics  Volume 50, Pages 102-109 (January 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.11.035 Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 Aortic flow waveforms applied at the aortic root (inlet), and at branch outlets in cases where branch flow was modeled. Five phases of the cycle that were investigated further are delineated by dotted lines (a); the five time-points (numbered) chosen to represent each phase are indicated by the circles on the waveform. Journal of Biomechanics 2017 50, 102-109DOI: (10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.11.035) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 Distributions of WSS metrics on the unwrapped luminal surface, viewed en face, for the anatomically and physiologically realistic simulation. TAWSS, transWSS and the product of time-averaged WSS and CFI are given in Pascals. Mean flow is from top to bottom, from the aortic root, over the arch (with two branch holes) and past the 5th intercostal pair. Anatomical left and right correspond to the right and left of each map, respectively. Note the different colour bars. Journal of Biomechanics 2017 50, 102-109DOI: (10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.11.035) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. 3 Maps of instantaneous WSS, CFI and transWSS for the physiological case, demonstrating the decomposition of the instantaneous transWSS vector into its magnitude (WSS) and direction (CFI_i) components. Three points in the cardiac cycle (a-c) represent three scenarios: (a) where WSS is spatially uniform and non-zero, (b) where WSS is near 0, and (c) where WSS is non-zero and varies spatially. WSS and transWSS_i are in Pascals. Journal of Biomechanics 2017 50, 102-109DOI: (10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.11.035) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. 4 Distribution of instantaneous WSS (a), CFI (b) and transWSS (c) at five times in the cardiac cycle (columns t1–t5) for the physiological case. The five time-points are defined in Fig. 1a. WSS and transWSS_i are in Pascals. Journal of Biomechanics 2017 50, 102-109DOI: (10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.11.035) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. 5 WSS vectors over the arch for the physiological case. (a) Temporal mean WSS vectors, (b)–(f) instantaneous WSS vectors for the five time-points shown in Fig. 1a. Note that arrows point in the reverse direction to the flow. Journal of Biomechanics 2017 50, 102-109DOI: (10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.11.035) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. 6 Distributions of transWSS (Pa) for different inflow waveforms: (a) the physiological case, (b) the physiological case with reverse flow removed and (c) a sinusoidal waveform. (d) and (e) give transWSS for physiological waveforms at a physiological Womersely number of 4.4 and a non-physiological value of 8, respectively. (These two simulations were run in a geometry from a different immature rabbit.) Journal of Biomechanics 2017 50, 102-109DOI: (10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.11.035) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. 7 Distributions of transWSS (Pa) for: (a) the original anatomically-realistic geometry, (b) the original geometry with flow down all branches removed for better comparison with the idealised, branch-less cases, (c) an idealised non-tapered case with torsion and curvature of the original geometry preserved (“non-planar”) and (d) an idealised non-tapered case with torsion removed and only curvature preserved (“planar”). Journal of Biomechanics 2017 50, 102-109DOI: (10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.11.035) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. 8 Isocontours of the Q-criterion showing vortical structures at time-point t3 (defined in Fig. 1a) for the geometrical cases described in Fig. 7. Two viewpoints are shown for the idealised “non-planar” and “planar” cases. Journal of Biomechanics 2017 50, 102-109DOI: (10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.11.035) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions