Act 1 of 2006 Workshop The Local Tax Study Commission

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Seekonk Board of Assessors
Advertisements

Budget Committee Roles & Responsibilities
League of Women Voters of New York State Constitutional Convention Delegation Selection Process Position Update Prepared by the League of Women Voters.
Joint Task Force on Local Effort Assistance Staff Presentation June 13, 2002 Bryon Moore, Senate Ways and Means Committee Staff Denise Graham, House Appropriations.
DEBT SERVICE EXTENSION BASE REFERENDUM Hartsburg-Emden District #21.
Chapter 43 An Act Relative to Improving Accountability and Oversight of Education Collaboratives Presentation to Board of Elementary and Secondary Education.
Conservation District Supervisor Accreditation Module 2: District Clerk: Roles & Responsibilities.
Wisconsin Public Schools Equalized (General) Aid.
Wisconsin Public Schools Revenue Limits. History 1949 –State adopted a system to address property- wealth differences among districts, which provided.
2010 – 2011 Budget Workshop Jessica N. Hunt, CPA Business Manager Industrial Independent School District May 27, 2010.
School Budgets and Levies New Superintendents Meeting Matt Storm Idaho State Department of Education Division – Public School Finance.
Setting The Tax Rate Sponsored by: MASA & MoASBO Presenter: Chris Straub.
Property Tax & Referendum Adams/Franklin Ernest W. Werstler, Jr. Business Manager/Board Secretary Exeter Township School District.
2009 Payable 2010 Levy Certification Independent School District 196 Rosemount-Apple Valley-Eagan Public Schools December 14, 2009 Educating our students.
School District of Waupaca Budget Hearing Tax Levy Certification October 29, 2013.
Juniata County Tax Collection Committee Act 32. Act 32 New law which overhauls earned income tax in Pennsylvania – signed into law on July 2, 2008 Will.
Charter Review Recommendations - 1 Presentation Title Subtitle (optional) Date Vancouver City Council Workshop/Public Hearing Staff, Title Charter Review.
 Utilization of a timeline  Defining influence  Establishing members  Meet and network  ORGANIZATION!
City of Shorewood 2013 Budget Truth-in-Taxation Hearing December 3, 2012.
Budget Committee Workshop February16, Oregon’s local budget law is a group of statutes that require local governments to prepare and adopt annual.
Fiscal Monitoring and Oversight Tecumseh Local School District January 8, 2013 Roger Hardin, Assistant Director Finance Program Services (614)
Indiana Code Township Board IC
Basic Legal Requirements for the Budget and Audit Bill Longley TML Legal Counsel.
Impasse Dos and Don’ts FEN 35 th Annual Conference May 20, 2015 Prepared by Leonard J. Dietzen, III, Esquire © 2015 Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell, P.A.
Solanco School District July 24 th 2001 A Hearing for Act 24 of 2001 Occupational Tax / Earned Income Tax Resolution & Referendum Questions.
Dauphin County Tax Collection Committee. New Government Entity – TCC Dauphin County TCC is new government entity Requires immediate school district and.
Legal Requirements for School Bonds C.A.S.H. Local Workshop Planning for 2016 Local Bond Success September 22, 2015 and September 29, 2015 Presented by:
Governance and Finance Robert C. McCracken
LOCKPORT CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT Budget Development Process for An Overview of the New Property Tax Cap Presented by Michelle T. Bradley Superintendent.
School District of Waupaca Budget Hearing Tax Levy Certification October 29, 2015.
Josephine County Overview of Budget Process – Part 1 Presented at Weekly Business Session April 1, 2015.
December 16, SeptemberBuilding level budgets are prepared and reviewed. OctoberExecutive Council members review and modify controllers’ requests.
Niagara Wheatfield Central School District Preliminary Budget March 5, 2014.
2016 – 2017 General Fund Preliminary Budget Presentation January 6, 2016.
Franklin Public Schools Audit Presentation For the Year Ended August 31, 2012 DANA F. COLE & COMPANY, LLP CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS.
Local Funding of Public Schools in North Carolina Rebecca Troutman, NC Association of County Commissioners Kara A. Millonzi, UNC-CH School of Government.
Impasse Dos and Don’ts FEN 36 th Annual Conference May 18, 2016 Prepared by Leonard J. Dietzen, III, Esquire © 2016 Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell, P.A.
Legal Services Public Information Policy Administration Board Services
Sebago Elementary School Withdrawal Committee
CITY SERVICES INSTITUTE
Discussion Topics Election Results Capital Facilities Financing
State College Borough Historic and Architectural Review Board
FY17 Proposed Budget Fiscal Year
The Role Of The Citizens’ Oversight Committee
Tax Budget – Putting the puzzle pieces together
MASA Great Start Workshop
Expenditure Limitation/Home Rule Option
Spring-Ford Area School District
Money Bills Amendment Procedure and Related Matters Bill [B 75–2008]
Budget Update Governing Board Meeting - November 17, 2010
St. Francis Public School Proposed Levy Payable 2018
City of chandler Home RULE
Seekonk Board of Assessors
How do we carry out the election process last year?
Roselle Park School District
SCHOOL TRAINING District Contact Information Dr. Peter Straker: ext Rachelle Fougere:
Budget Public Engagement: Wednesday,
Five-Year Financial Forecast
WASHINGTON COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL 2017 Tax Levy
Board Organizational Meeting
Roles and Responsibilities
SPRING-FORD AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [A Brief Overview of Draft Approval.
Effective Budgeting in County Government
Roles and Responsibilities
Town Hall on Budget & Taxes
Budget office overview
Prospective Board Member Orientation
SCHOOL TRAINING District Contact Information Dr. Peter Straker: ext Britt Bell:
Oak Park Elementary School District 97 Presentation of FY 2020 Final Budget September, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Act 1 of 2006 Workshop The Local Tax Study Commission Presented by: Bonnie A. Sheehan, Esquire bsheehan@foxrothschild.com A. Kyle Berman, Esquire aberman@foxrothschild.com October 3, 2006

Major Components Adopted June 27, 2006. Applies to all school districts. Designed to reduce real estate taxes through state-wide sharing of gaming revenues. Requires front-end voter referenda on tax shifting.

Major Components Requires back-end voter referenda on future real estate tax increases above an “index”. New budget timeline and process. Establishes formula for the distribution of state funds raised through gambling proceeds. Allows public to participate in local tax decisions. Requires state reimbursement to school districts for income tax loss due to residents working in Philadelphia.

First Step under Act 1: Local Tax Study Commission By September 14, 2006, school boards must appoint a Local Tax Study Commission. Purpose of LTSC is to make a recommendation on the tax rate for the Spring 2007 front-end referendum question on shifting taxes from property to income tax. LTSC must study existing taxes and how tax policies could be improved by funding tax relief through the levy of income taxes.

Composition of Membership 5, 7 or 9 residents or taxpayers of the district. 1 member may be a school board member. Must reflect the diversity of the district by: Age Occupation Socio-economic status No officer or employee of the district, or any of their “relatives” . Act 1 does not define “relative”.

Establishing the LTSC Board should adopt a resolution establishing the LTSC, its functions, operational procedures, a budget and resources of the commission. Among the procedures: How the commission will vote When meetings will take place Public participation/public comment Access to the superintendent, business manager and solicitor Budget and expenditures

Which Brings Us to Today  Demographic diversity studied by the board for selection of LTSC members  Resolution for appointment passed, effective September 14, 2006  Operating procedures for LTSC adopted  Study of required areas complete

What is the LTSC required to do? LTSC must study 4 items: Historic and present rates of district revenue from current taxes. The percentage of total district revenues provided by current taxes.

What is the LTSC required to do? 3. The age, income, employment and property use characteristics of the existing tax base. 4. Projected district revenue from current taxes, including possible new taxes authorized under Act 1 (new EIT or PIT).

LTSC - Time to Completion Commission must hold at least one public hearing. Commission must make a nonbinding recommendation to school board within 90 days of appointment: If appointed Sept. 14 2006, report due by December 13, 2006. If appointed earlier than Sept. 14, the report will be due earlier.

Local Tax Study Commission Commission must make a nonbinding recommendation to school board whether to levy an EIT or PIT for the next fiscal year. Recommendation must be presented at a public school board meeting. School board votes to accept or reject recommendation.

Local Tax Study Commission Sunshine Law applies to Commission. School board must make recommendation available to public. All “records” of the LTSC must be turned over to the Board and retained for review. Board has defined “records” within the operating procedures

Board Action: Procedural Issues If LTSC fails to report within 90 days, the Board is required to discharge the commission. Once the 90 day period has elapsed, the Board then has until March 13, 2007 to decide to accept or reject the recommendation.

Board Action: Procedural Issues Prior to adopting the 2007 Front-End Referendum Resolution, school board must: Public Vote – Must take a public vote to accept or reject the recommendation. Public Notice – Must provide public notice in accordance with the LTEA. Public Hearing – Must conduct at least one public hearing.

Contact: Jeffrey T. Sultanik, Esquire Bonnie A. Sheehan, Esquire 215.661.9407 jsultanik@foxrothschild.com Bonnie A. Sheehan, Esquire 215.661.9418 bsheehan@foxrothschild.com A. Kyle Berman, Esquire 215.661.9483 aberman@foxrothschild.com

Disclaimers A school district should consult with and receive recommendations from its financial advisor and solicitor before proceeding with a plan of financing. Act 1 is a new law and the options set forth herein are untested. It is possible that Act 1 may be interpreted inconsistent with our interpretation. A school district should consult with and receive legal advice from its solicitor. Market conditions and investor response to Act 1 may influence the financing options the school district may have.