Arizona High School Mock Trial

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TRIAL EVIDENCE.
Advertisements

Rules of Evidence and Objections
Hearsay and Its Exceptions
Jail Call Analysis 4 th Amdt – Waiver because of Consent (Banargent, Scheinman, Poyck) 4 th Amdt. – Society not ready to recognize prisoner’s expectation.
PRIOR INCONSISTENT STATEMENTS FRE 801(d) Non Hearsay by definition Rule 801(d)(1) Prior Statement by Witness is not hearsay If declarant testifies and.
The Roles of Judge and Jury Court controls legal rulings in the trial Court controls legal rulings in the trial Jury decides factual issues Jury decides.
Mock Trial Modified by Dennis Gerl from Evidence PPT by John Ed-Bishop
Evidence and Argument Evidence – The asserted facts that the arbitrator will consider in making a decision – Information – What is presented at the hearing.
Chapter is based on two parties battling to win the case, each acting as the adversary of the other. ROLE: to provide a procedure for the parties.
AJ 104 Chapter 5 Witnesses. 5 Issues Related to a Trial Witness 1. Who is competent to testify 2. How the credibility of a witness is attacked 3. What.
Chapter 13 Testifying in Court. Testifying in Court  To effectively testify in court:  Be prepared.  Look professional.  Act professionally.  Attempts.
OBJECTIONS IN COURT. WHAT ARE THEY? An attorney can object any time she or he thinks the opposing attorney is violating the rules of evidence. The attorney.
Chapter 20 Writing Reports, Preparing for and Presenting Cases in Court.
Unit 3 Seminar! K. Austin Zimmer Any question from Unit 2! Please make sure you have completed your Unit 1 & 2 Papers!
Basic Evidence and Trial Procedure. Opening Statement  Preview the evidence “The evidence will show”  Introduce theme  Briefly describe the issues,
Questioning Witnesses Miss Getsch Crime and Justice.
Trial. Trial: broken down  Pre-Trial hearings: Judge makes decisions on various motions  Opening statement: attorneys tell the story of the case. No.
ADVANCED DIRECT AND CROSS-EXAMINATION Module 2. Organization Of Discussion  Direct examination techniques  Refreshing recollection, past recollection.
Presentation by Jim and Josh McGuire Permission granted for any education use in connection with MBA Mock Trial Program November 18, 2002 Pirated and modified.
THE TRIAL IN CANADIAN COURTS – Part 3 RULES AND TYPES OF EVIDENCE LAW 12 MUNDY
Objections Criminal law – unit #3.
The Criminal Trial Process Section 11 (d) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms states that each person charged with an offence is to be ‘presumed innocent.
Introduction to Law Mr. Calella
Evidence and Expert Testimony. Expert Testimony  Two Types of Witnesses: Fact and Expert  Fact -- have personal knowledge of facts of case  Cannot.
Trial Procedure. Theory of a case  Attorneys must present a logical argument demonstrating what really happened to the jury  This is prepared prior.
PROCEDURES IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM, 8 th ed. Roberson, Wallace, and Stuckey PRENTICE HALL ©2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ
CJ305 Criminal Evidence Welcome to our Seminar!!! (We will begin shortly) Tonight – Unit 3 (Chapter 5 – Witnesses -- Lay & Expert) (Chapter 6 – Credibility.
Mock Trial Team Strategies and Formalities. Opening Statements 3 minutes Objective – Acquaint court with the case and outline what you are going to prove.
I NTRODUCTION TO D IRECT E XAMINATION & O BJECTIONS March 27, 2013.
CJ227: Criminal Procedure Unit 6 Seminar Mary K Cronin.
2:05 sec Today you will be learning about how to conduct and participate in a mock trial. You will become familiar with some basic courtroom procedures.
Mock Trial Rules of Evidence Arkansas Bar Association Mock Trial Committee Anthony L. McMullen, J.D., Vice Chair ( )
OBJECTIONS! 13 Most Commonly Used Mock Trial Objections
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
Direct Examination Direct is when you tell your side of the story
Experts and Lay Witness
Impeachment 证人弹劾.
WHAT IS EVIDENCE TESTIMONY OF WITNESSES DOCUMENTS
Opening Statements & Closing Arguments
Chapter Sixteen Rules of Evidence  .
The basics of every objection allowed in the Mock Trial universe.
The basics of every objection allowed in a Mock Trial.
The basics of every objection allowed in the Mock Trial universe.
ADVANCED CROSS-EXAMINATION
ROBBERY VICTIM AND LINEUP PHOTOGRAPH
Mark Pollitt Associate Professor
Rules of Evidence Miss Orr.
"Seasoned" Superior Court Judges
HEARSAY DEFINITIONS [RULE 801, PARED DOWN].
By: The Mock Trial Class of 4B
OBJECTIONS.
How Witnesses are Examined
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
Who may impeach a Witness
"Seasoned" Superior Court Judges
12 MOCK TRIAL 12.1 Concepts of Advocacy 12.2 Evidentiary Quest
Objections Criminal law – unit #3.
THE TRIAL IN CANADIAN COURTS – Part 2
Character Evidence Rules - In General
Objections How, when, why…...
The basics of every objection allowed in the Mock Trial universe.
What is Mock Trial? Steps in what we do…...
Civil Pretrial Practice
CHAP. 8: IMPEACHMENT P. JANICKE 2010.
The basics of every objection allowed in the Mock Trial universe.
THE TRIAL IN CANADIAN COURTS – Part 3
Rules of Evidence and Objections
Law 12 Criminal Trial Process.
Mock Trial Objections Part II.
Business Law Final Exam
Presentation transcript:

Arizona High School Mock Trial Rules of evidence Part I Metro Tech High School Mock Trial Program

Relevance Evidence is Relevant if has tendency to make a fact more probable AND That fact is of consequence to the determining action Relevant evidence is admissible. Irrelevant evidence is NOT admissible.

Example, in our stabbing scenario: Where the victim ate dinner the night before is not relevant so would not be allowed in. UNLESS, It could be shown it was relevant someway such as if he had dinner with the Defendant it may be used to show they know each other.

Character Evidence Cannot be used to show that on a specific occasion the person acted in conformity with that trait. Ex. Mr. Navazo is frequently late. We cannot use that as evidence to show that he was late last Thursday.

Motive, Opportunity, Plan, Knowledge, ID In a criminal case, evidence of crime or wrong not admissible to show acted that way that day. CAN be allowed in to show other things such as Motive, Intent, Preparation, Plan, Knowledge, Identity, Absence of Mistake or Lack of Accident.

Ex: Mr. Navazo frequently late Cannot use it to show he was late last Thursday. May be able to use it to show that he ran a red light because he was late and caused an accident because it shows his motive for running the light and that he had the opportunity to do it.

Impeaching a Witness Usually done on Cross Examination Anyone can attack a witnesses credibility Usually cannot bring in extra evidence So you can ask Witness B if they know Witness A has a reputation for not telling the truth. But you cannot bring in a tape recording of Witness A lying last year about something not to do with the current case.

Refreshing Witness Recollection If witness cannot remember something on the stand Can use their prior written statement to Refresh their Recollection Have to be prepared to show opposing side and Judge what you are using Ask witness, would it refresh your memory if I showed you your written statement? Show them Statement, let them read it. Reask the original question.

Impeaching With Prior Statement If witness says something inconsistent with their written statement. You may ask them if they remember saying XXXX in their previous statement. You do not have to show written statement to witness, but you do have to show opposing attorney. Opposing attorney has right to then ask witness clarifying questions about the impeachment.

Opinion Testimony Under most circumstances, only Expert Witnesses are allowed to give Opinion Testimony. In the Mock Trial case, there is usually one Expert Witness per side. They are an expert on their subject: Doctor, Professor, Coroner, Psychologist, last year even Exterminator.