WP1 - INERTIA Framework Requirements, Specifications and Architecture

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

New market instruments for RES-E to meet the 20/20/20 targets Sophie Dourlens-Quaranta, Technofi (Market4RES WP4 leader) Market4RES public kick-off Brussels,

Advertisements

1 st Review Meeting, Brussels 5/12/12 – Technical progress (P. Paganelli, Bluegreen) iCargo 1st Review Meeting Brussels 5/12/12 Technical.

CLRN Evaluation Update Educational Support Systems May 28, 2009

Evaluation Process. Why an Evaluation plan now at the beginning of our project? Now that you have been successful it allows you to re-confirm the objectives.

1 ARTISAN 1st Plenary Meeting May 8th – 9th 2012 ARTISAN 1st Plenary Meeting May 8th – 9th 2012 Overview of activities of the first six months and of the.

Work plan for the upcoming year. What has been done so far Our Deliverables D2.1 Description of the constructed database, data quality and data collection.

1 ARTISAN 1st Plenary Meeting May 8th – 9th 2012 ARTISAN 1st Plenary Meeting May 8th – 9th 2012 WP2 “Design and implementation of infrastructure capturing.

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under.

Work package 7 Dissemination and Concertation EuropeanaConnect Plenary Meeting Berlin, May 2010 Monika Segbert, Eremo srl.

ENV-NCP-TOGETHER PARTNER MEETING WORK PACKAGE 3 02/03/2010 c Beta Technology.

WP3 – Representation of requirements This document produced by Members of the Helix Nebula consortium is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution.

Work Package 1: Progress and Focus on specific issues 5th Steering Committee Meeting Rijeka, 26/2/2015 Presented by: Mrs Maria Poulou.

1 WP7 Presentation WP7 -- Project Evaluation Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory, ETH Zurich Lukas Ruf.

Data Center Energy: Going Forward John Tuccillo, APC by Schneider Electric Founding Board of Director Member.

Integration of Demand Side Management, Distributed Generation, Renewable Energy Sources and Energy Storages Task status report, Task XVII EXCO meeting.

Validation Architecture in the ESS CSPA Workshop, Geneva June 2016 Geneva June 2016 Eurostat, Vincent TRONET, Unit B1.

WP7 - Dissemination of Results & Exploitation

Future Power System Control Architecture

WP2 - INERTIA Distributed Multi-Agent Based Framework

Task 4.2 Grid Coordination & DR Activation Module

User Profiling and Ambient UIs

29th November 2016 Teleconference

WP3 Local Control and Automation Hub,

T1.3 Pilot Sites Survey and Audit,

California Product Offerings

WP4 - INERTIA Aggregators Monitoring, Management and Control Hub

WP3: D3.1 status, pending comments and next steps

[WP1] T1.2 User and Business Requirements

[WP1] T1.2 User and Business Requirements

WP3 INERTIA Local Control and Automation Hub

Quality Control Plan: Introduction

BSS Load Information in ax Follow up

Dissemination Activities Report

Usage scenarios, User Interface & tools

/ California Energy Demand (CED) 2011 Revised Electricity and Natural Gas Forecast SCE February 7, 2012 Chris.

Project Management Status

WP1 – Smart City Energy Assessment and User Requirements

Project Management Status

WP2 INERTIA Distributed Multi-Agent Based Framework

WP2 - INERTIA Distributed Multi-Agent Based Framework

/ California Energy Demand (CED) 2011 Revised Electricity and Natural Gas Forecast PG&E February 7, 2012.

Task 5.2 INERTIA Simulation Test Suite TECNALIA Joseba Jimeno

WP3 Local Control and Automation Hub,

PROGRAM CONSULTATIVE FORUM Meeting pack

Presentation of the three technological pilots

Task 5.2 INERTIA Simulation Test Suite TECNALIA Joseba Jimeno

Insert - dipole common issues

WP5 INERTIA Integration & Lab Testing

WP1 INERTIA Framework Requirements, Specifications and Architecture

Building a Complex System in a Standards-Driven Environment

Unit4 Partner Portal for Case Creator

PROGRAM CONSULTATIVE FORUM Meeting pack

Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation System M E S

STF 442 Specialist Task Force initiated by ETSI MTS Manpower Duration

Presentation WP7 Dissemination & Exploitation

29th November 2016 Teleconference

Software Engineering I

The ENDORSE services: any potential for market exploitation?

WP4 Proposed Structure of the Outcome “Tool Kit and Recommendations”

Quality Control Plan: Introduction

PLUG-N-HARVEST ID: H2020-EU

PRESENTATION ON 30 DAY PAYMENT OF INVOICES

SISAI STATISTICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE AND INTEGRATION

Unit 4 - A06 – Review Grade Criteria To get a c

Green Infrastructure: Working method

(Project) SIGN OFF PROCESS MONTH DAY, YEAR

Final Confirmation For HR Professionals

Project intervention logic

Learn how to report products in MEL in 1 minute

CEOS Work Plan Progress Report

Presentation transcript:

WP1 - INERTIA Framework Requirements, Specifications and Architecture D1.2 – User and Business Requirements Specifications Resubmission ENG

BS Status Proposed Business Scenarios BS-01 - BS02 Qualitative  Business Case – A plenary meeting Quantitative Challenges (indicate quantitative indicator) Decrease 20% of the peak load at LV point in one year Increase 10% of the Energy Saving at LCH BS02 Qualitative  Business Case – A politically unstable situation Decrease 10% on energy price for LH Our intention is to insert a quanlitative example of what INERTA can do respect to current status

BS Status Proposed Business Scenarios BS03 BS04 Qualitative  Business Case – A transmission congestion situation Quantitative Challenges (indicate quantitative indicator) To be defined BS04 Qualitative  Business Case – – A severe windily day Decrease on fees due to unbalancement 2% per day Develop of car electric vehicle 1% per year Our intention is to insert a quanlitative example of what INERTA can do respect to current status

BS Status Quantitative Evaluation Partner’s Contributions Challenges (indicate quantitative indicator) section: Definition [Done] Feedback (using track changes) [Pending] Partner’s Contributions The BSs may need to be extended or further detailed (Please Use track changes) Expected contributions (mainly ETC, PPC) Our intention is to insert a quantitative example of what INERTA can do

Use Cases Status Quantitative Evaluation Quantitative section Challenges (indicate quantitative indicator) section: Definition [Working in progress] Feedback (using track changes) [Pending]

UC Partner’s Contributions Reviced Use Cases UC-01 (CERTH) [Pending] UC-02 (CERTH) [Pending] UC-03 (CERTH) [Pending] UC-04 (CERTH) [Pending] UC-05 (CERTH) [Pending] UC-06 (CERTH) [Pending] UC-07 (ETC_EL) [Pending] UC-08 (HYPERTECH) [Done] UC-09 (PPC/TECNALIA) [Done] by HYPERTECH UC-10 (ETC_EL/TECNALIA/HYPERTECH) [Pending] UC-11 (PPC) [Pending] UC-12 (PPC) [Pending]

Deliverable Plan Feedback from all partners by 10th September Circulate D1.2 preliminary version by 17th September Gather last feedback by 24th September D1.2 ready for peer review 30th September