Business Assessment Test Results

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
South Dakota Accountability System – Year 2 School Performance Index Guyla Ness September 10, 2013.
Advertisements

Academic Outcomes of 4-Year University Freshman Cohorts: A Comparison of Dual Enrollees & Advanced Placement (AP) Credit Recipients Shoumi Mustafa and.
ASSURANCE OF LEARNING. WRITTEN COMM (MKT 305) current areas of assessment goates.2011 ORAL COMM (MGT 497) TEAMWORK (MGT 305) KNOWLEDGE computers & tech.
CSU BAT Results. Results 1. Cal Poly Mean = 46.4 ± San Diego Mean = 41.3 ± Sonoma Mean = 40.5 ± Sacramento Mean = 39.9 ± Long.
Assurance of Learning The School of Business and Economics SUNY Plattsburgh.
1 NAEP th Grade Economics Assessment. 2 ► First NAEP assessment of economics ► Content areas: market economy, national economy, and international.
James Scott Ford Northside ISD, San Antonio, TX DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS IN THE NEW TEXAS SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM: GROWTH AND ACHIEVEMENT.
Data Analysis of Sweetwater High School Presented by: LeLycia Henderson & Zorayda Delgado.
San Diego State University  80 Multiple Choice Qs covering all business topics  Administered to 2,025 test takers on 10 CSU campuses during the.
What do our students know?. What do we want our UG students to know? Student Learning Outcome Cycle #1 Assessed in: Cycle #2 Assessed in: Cycle #3 Assessed.
The Information Systems Analyst National Assessment Exam: Factors for Success Mark Segall Loren Gollhardt Joe Morrell.
San Diego State University  80 Multiple Choice Qs covering all business topics  Administered to 1,106 test takers on 8 CSU campuses during the.
College of Business San José State University Business Assessment Test Spring 2005.
Grade 3-8 English Language Arts English Language Arts Grades 3, 4, and 5 Total Public.
+ General Education Assessment Spring 2014 Quantitative Literacy.
The Nation’s Report Card: U.S. History National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
THE 2005 NAEP HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY. THE 2005 HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY Today ’ s Presentations.
ASSURANCE OF LEARNING. WRITTEN COMM (MKT 305) current areas of assessment goates.2011 ORAL COMM (MGT 497) TEAMWORK (MGT 305) KNOWLEDGE computers & tech.
 Committed to the principle that all students deserve an opportunity to participate in rigorous and academically challenging courses and programs. All.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics February 21, 2013.
CAHSEE Results Board Report 1 Lodi Unified School District 2009 California High School Exit Examination Results September 15, 2009.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
What do our students know? A complete cycle of assessment: the common learning outcomes we hold for our UG students: Round IV,
A Pilot Program Using Skillsoft. Goal: Demonstrate an understanding of the major functional areas of Business. Learning Outcomes:  Describe basic concepts.
College Comparisons. Mean Total Score by College (Possible Score Range 400 to 500) SSD = Total Scores for Colleges of Business, Education, Health and.
Academic Achievement Gaps in WCPSS Presented To Raising Achievement, Closing Gaps Taskforce September 18, 2009 Wake County Public School System.
San Diego State University  80 Multiple Choice Qs covering all business topics  Administered to 1,374 test takers on 9 CSU campuses during the.
1 Mississippi Statewide Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress Model Improving Mississippi Schools Conference June 11-13, 2003 Mississippi Department.
What do our students know? A complete cycle of assessment: the common learning outcomes we hold for our UG students: Round III,
Kingsville ISD Annual Report Public Hearing.
Department of Human Resources Equal Opportunity in Employment 2011 Annual Report October 22, 2012.
SUPPORTING DATA 1 Pipeline Subcommittee June 29, 2010 DRAFT.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics Injury and illness episodes.
2  Introduction  Enrollment Trends  Demographic Characteristics  Transfers  Financial Aid  Math Sequence Content.
INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH FAST FACTS ACADEMIC YEAR Source:
Report of Achieving the Dream Data Team
To revise our MBA curriculum:
Director of Institutional Accreditation and Assessment
Spotlight College: San Diego State University
Chancellor’s Office Data Resources for Student Success October 7, 2015
Student Experience Survey Spring 2009 Report
UMCP Student Loan Default Study & Financial Literacy Initiatives
Florida State University College of Nursing Tallahassee, Florida
Business Assessment Test Results
Mesa Union School District “A Day in the Life of Data”
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
The Impact of a Special Advising Program on Students’ Progress
Texas Academic Performance Report TAPR)
National Conference on Student Assessment June 2016
MIRACOSTA COLLEGE ISLOs
Business Assessment Test Results
Access Center Assessment Report
Mercer University Over 175 years of excellence Over 8,000 students
Business Assessment Test Results
Engagement Survey Results: Demographics
MIRACOSTA COLLEGE ISLOs
MBA Appendix B Attachments 1 – 29 - Index
Notes Over 11.2 Number Compared to Base is Unknown
University of Washington Tacoma School of Engineering & Technology Student and Faculty Demographics.
Meaningful Methods For Outcomes Assessment: A Case Study
A comparative study of UNA students vs

Did not have a usual source of care Went without care because of cost
School Profile Andy Dekaney High School
Disproportionate Impact Study
Advanced Placement Enrollments & Exam Results
MIMIC ACCOUNTABILITY USING BENCHMARK DATA ! ?.
Objective of the workshop
USG Dual Enrollment Data and Trends
Presentation transcript:

Business Assessment Test Results San Diego State University 2012

General Method 80 Multiple Choice Qs covering all business topics Administered to 1,248 test takers on 6 CSU campuses during the 2011-2012 Academic Year Questions come from a pool of questions developed across the CSU system Exam was significantly revised in 2010 by a consortium of CSU schools. Revision aimed at improving validity and comprehensiveness. As a result of revision, BAT now includes measures of: Global Operations Ethics

SDSU Method Exam administered in Spring sections of MGT 405, during regular class time*, 74.1% of all Spring 405 students took the exam. 404 students took the exam (40% of all students taking 405 in the 2011-2012 year). All students received some form of extra credit incentive Not true with all other CSU campuses Following 2008 findings that calculator use did not make a difference in performance, test administration has maintained “No Calculators Allowed” rule. *MWF sections excluded due to lack of in-class time.

Average Performance All CSU SDSU Mean 55.54% 58.93%

Comparative Statistics CAMPUS MEAN #1: San Diego 58.93% #2 55.56% #3 54.88% #4 51.38% #5 47.91% #6 40.15%

Subject Area Results – SDSU vs Subject Area Results – SDSU vs. all CSU Percent of questions answered correctly within each subject area SDSU ALL CSU Ethics 94.06% Management 73.76% Marketing 64.16% Finance 60.23% Statistics 58.74% Operations 58.42% Information Systems 55.66% Accounting 52.00% Economics 47.46% Global/International Bus 42.92% Business Law 40.41%

SDSU Subject Area Results Percent of questions answered correctly within each subject area All Majors Ethics 94.06% Management 73.76% 75.82% Marketing 64.16% 70.53% Finance 60.23% 71.37% Statistics 58.74% Operations 58.42% Information Systems 55.66% 75.50% Accounting 52.00% 70.37% Economics 47.46% Global/International Bus 42.92% 50.91% Business Law 40.41%

A closer look at statistics Overall Performance: 58.7% 301 Non-Takers 53.9% 34.6% of the test takers (FIN – 54.4%, IS – 51.2%, IB – 54.9%) 301 Takers 61.6% (ACC, MGT, MKT) 65.4% of the test takers Among 301 Takers: MKT (requires “C”) 59.7% Others (ACC, 64.9% & MGT, 60.4%)

Some interesting demographic comparisons . . . Status Full-Time Part-Time Mean Score 57.6 56.0 Age 20-25 26-30 31-35 36+ Mean Score 56.9 59.5 60.1 70.4 Gender Male Female Mean Score 60.1 55.1 Hrs Worked Mean Score 0-10 58.9 11-20 56.9 21-30 55.7 31-40 56.6 Ethnicity Mean Score Asian 55.5 Black 56.3 Hispanic 54.9 White 59.2 Status Native Transfer Mean Score 57.0 58.0 Home Language English Other English/Other Equal Mean Score 58.7 54.1 54.4

SDSU Longitudinal Comparisons Year Revised Test Mean Unadjusted Mean Adjusted Mean 2012 57.52% 2011 57.92% 2010 53.14% 56.41% 2009 51.48% 55.33% 2008 50.80% 54.86% 2007 50.25% 2006 50.10% 2005 2004 50.63%