Journal of Vision. 2008;8(11):3. doi: /8.11.3 Figure Legend:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
From: System gamma as a function of image- and monitor-dynamic range
Advertisements

From: Statistics for optimal point prediction in natural images
From: Holistic integration of gaze cues in visual face and body perception: Evidence from the composite design Journal of Vision. 2017;17(1):24. doi: /
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(12):7. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Asymmetric interference between the perception of shape and the perception of surface properties Journal of Vision. 2009;9(5):13. doi: /
From: Salience of unique hues and implications for color theory
From: Why the long face? The importance of vertical image structure for biological “barcodes” underlying face recognition Journal of Vision. 2014;14(8):25.
Journal of Vision. 2012;12(13):19. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2004;4(9):3. doi: /4.9.3 Figure Legend:
From: Occlusion-related lateral connections stabilize kinetic depth stimuli through perceptual coupling Journal of Vision. 2009;9(10):20. doi: /
From: What are the units of storage in visual working memory?
From: Neural bandwidth of veridical perception across the visual field
From: Hue shifts produced by temporal asymmetries in chromatic signals depend on the alignment of the first and second harmonics Journal of Vision. 2017;17(9):3.
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(6):6. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Event-related potentials reveal an early advantage for luminance contours in the processing of objects Journal of Vision. 2011;11(7):1. doi: /
Figure Legend: From: The modern Japanese color lexicon
Journal of Vision. 2015;15(16):13. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Temporal eye movement strategies during naturalistic viewing
Journal of Vision. 2013;13(4):21. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: The attenuation surface for contrast sensitivity has the form of a witch's hat within the central visual field Journal of Vision. 2012;12(11):23.
From: Illumination assumptions account for individual differences in the perceptual interpretation of a profoundly ambiguous stimulus in the color domain:
From: How the unstable eye sees a stable and moving world
From: Metacontrast masking within and between visual channels: Effects of orientation and spatial frequency contrasts Journal of Vision. 2010;10(6):12.
From: Metacontrast masking within and between visual channels: Effects of orientation and spatial frequency contrasts Journal of Vision. 2010;10(6):12.
From: Hue shifts produced by temporal asymmetries in chromatic signals
From: Motion processing with two eyes in three dimensions
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(8):11. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Saccadic suppression during voluntary versus reactive saccades
From: Noise masking of White's illusion exposes the weakness of current spatial filtering models of lightness perception Journal of Vision. 2015;15(14):1.
From: Crowding is tuned for perceived (not physical) location
Journal of Vision. 2012;12(6):33. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Contextual effects on real bicolored glossy surfaces
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(3):33. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Color constancy and hue scaling
From: Does spatial invariance result from insensitivity to change?
Journal of Vision. 2010;10(4):22. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Color constancy and hue scaling
From: Surface color perception and equivalent illumination models
Figure Legend: From: Gating of remote effects on lightness
From: Maximum likelihood difference scales represent perceptual magnitudes and predict appearance matches Journal of Vision. 2017;17(4):1. doi: /
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(4):27. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Perceptual entrainment of individually unambiguous motions
From: What #theDress reveals about the role of illumination priors in color perception and color constancy Journal of Vision. 2017;17(9):4. doi: /
From: Perception of light source distance from shading patterns
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(5):6. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2010;10(12):1. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2014;14(14):2. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Motion processing with two eyes in three dimensions
From: Expertise with multisensory events eliminates the effect of biological motion rotation on audiovisual synchrony perception Journal of Vision. 2010;10(5):2.
From: Size-induced distortions in perceptual maps of visual space
From: The perceptual basis of common photographic practice
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(6):12. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2006;6(10):3. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Binocular combination of luminance profiles
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(15):21. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Perceived surface color in binocularly viewed scenes with two light sources differing in chromaticity Journal of Vision. 2004;4(9):1. doi: /4.9.1.
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(10):11. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: What predicts the strength of simultaneous color contrast?
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(10):9. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: The resolution of facial expressions of emotion
Journal of Vision. 2013;13(7):20. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(8):11. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(3):28. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: The fine structure of multifocal ERG topographies
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(11):18. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2010;10(4):15. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: StarTrek Illusion—General object constancy phenomenon?
Journal of Vision. 2006;6(5):2. doi: /6.5.2 Figure Legend:
From: Flash suppression and flash facilitation in binocular rivalry
Figure Legend: From: The color constancy of three-dimensional objects
Presentation transcript:

Effects of stimulus configuration and instructions on brightness and lightness judgments Journal of Vision. 2008;8(11):3. doi:10.1167/8.11.3 Figure Legend: Test patch brightness matching luminance (apparent luminance) as a function of matching background. Matches for the two stimulus configurations ( Figure 1) are plotted separately for each observer in the upper (stimulus A) and lower (stimulus B) panels. Matches to the test patch on the dark/black background (left side) are indicated by circles; matches to the test patch on the bright/white background (right side) are indicated by squares. Filled symbols represent conditions in which the spotlight was “OFF” and subjects were instructed to assume that the brightness (apparent luminance) difference between the right and left background was due to reflectance differences. Open symbols represent conditions when the spotlight was “ON” and subjects were instructed to assume that the right half of the display was illuminated by the spotlight and that the brightness difference between the right and left backgrounds was due to illumination. Error bars are the 95% confidence intervals and the dashed red line indicates the veridical luminance of the test patches. The filled red triangles in the upper and lower left panels plot brightness matching data for observer BB obtained in the corresponding reflectance and illumination conditions of Experiment 2. Date of download: 11/3/2017 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Copyright © 2017. All rights reserved.