From: Mate choice plasticity in a coral reef fish

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Figure 1. Heat Map Summarizing Question Types by Agency

Advertisements

From: The World Price of Credit Risk

Figure 1. Flow diagram of participants recruited into the study.

Figure 2. CONSORT flow diagram.

Figure 1. Study area south of Milne Point, Alaska, where artificial den forward-looking infrared sampling took place in March From: Factors Influencing.

Figure 1. Structural Equation Model: Effects of Valence Framing on Perceived Truth of Statements and Source Trustworthiness. Standardized path-coefficients.

From: Soil temperature modifies effects of soil biota on plant growth

Figure 1 Effects of playbacks on the time of night when badgers began foraging at the first food patch, measured in minutes after sunset, comparing extant.

Figure 1. Meta-analysis of prospective biomarker studies examining associations between eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and total, low-, and high-grade prostate.

Figure 1 The pattern reversal stimuli

Figure 1 Mean number of total invertebrates collected (100 l/h) from drift nets in control and drift-depleted pools during day and night. The number of.

Fig. 1. proFIA approach for peak detection and quantification

Figure 1. Standardized coefficients for the SEM group model for heterosexual males. Latent constructs are shown in ellipses, and observed variables are.

Figure 4 SNR profiles of 6 of 12 species tested

Figure 1. Logos appearing in the choice experiment

Figure 1. Conceptual model of well-being related to involvement in theatre. From: Theatre Involvement and Well-Being, Age Differences, and Lessons From.

Fig. 1 Overview of model components to identify if hormonal pleiotropy constrains or facilitates phenotypic responses to selection. The environment imposes.

Figure 2 Nonparametric thin-plate spline visualizations of the response surface for each pair of traits. The unbroken line gives the WHR that intersects.

From: Unmasking Masks in Makkah: Preventing Influenza at Hajj

From: Where do we go from here

Figure 1. Overall survival of patients receiving alternative medicine (solid lines) vs conventional cancer treatment (dashed lines). Overall survival of.

Example 14. Schubert, Quartet in G Major, D

Figure 1: Changing American Attitudes toward Marijuana and Same-Sex Marriage. Mean support for marijuana and same-sex marriage legalization. N=4,079. Source:

From: Estimating the Location of World Wheat Price Discovery

Figure 1. Time of initiation of therapeutic hypothermia according to who initiated it. Note the logarithmic scaling of the vertical axis. From: Initiation.

Figure 1 Chemical structures of tested agonists

From: Trust Busting: The Effect of Fraud on Investor Behavior

Figure 1 The amount of recalled words (%) from List 1 and List 2, after the 2-hour delay in the wake (in the left) and the sleep groups (in the right),

Figure 1 Map of the Mediterranean Sea showing the location of Lampedusa island and the main area in which the study was carried out. From: Anthropogenic.

Figure 1. Percentage of participants in each group (holocaust survivors, prewar immigrants, and postwar immigrants) by the main coded strategies. From:

From: Herpes Zoster and Recurrent Herpes Zoster

Figure 1 Measured differences in preference for the stimulus colors chosen for the experiment. The total percent chosen for each color averaged across.

From: Refugee Migration and Electoral Outcomes

Figure 1 Weighted social networks for (a) chase behavior and (b) display behavior. Each node represents an individual, and individuals are in the same.

Figure 1 Experimental arena to study female locations in response to a green LED. The LED was switched on in the LED ... Figure 1 Experimental arena to.

Figure 1 Female receptivity in the Playback Experiment

Figure 1 Waveforms of example stimuli illustrating how within-individual variation was manipulated. Invariant signals ... Figure 1 Waveforms of example.

Figure 1 The study area within Vienna Zoo is outlined in red

Figure 1 Overall lag-cumulative exposure–response relationships between air temperature and myocardial infarction ... Figure 1 Overall lag-cumulative exposure–response.

Figure 1 (a) Predicted dispersal success of hatchling turtles as a function of the interaction between hatchling body ... Figure 1 (a) Predicted dispersal.

Figure 1 Top: Annual modal paternity distance (PDc) estimated for each of 23 cohorts by MasterBayes ... Figure 1 Top: Annual modal paternity distance (PDc)

Figure 1 Movement of 10 individuals during the last 5000 time steps of 2 example simulations, without (a) or with (b) ... Figure 1 Movement of 10 individuals.

Figure 4 ROMs have a morph-specific effect relative to active aggression but not display behavior in dominant males. ... Figure 4 ROMs have a morph-specific.

Figure 1 Fecal egg counts (eggs per gram = epg) (A through C) and corresponding infection probabilities estimated by ... Figure 1 Fecal egg counts (eggs.

Figure 1 Flow diagram detailing the systematic review process.

Figure 1 Schematic representation of the experimental design.

Figure 1 Relationships between probability of prey discard and each parameter explored. To show the most robust ... Figure 1 Relationships between probability.

Figure 5 The effect of the spider color morph encountered by honeybees in Experiment 2 on the proportion of honeybees ... Figure 5 The effect of the spider.

Figure 1 Stegodyphus dumicola build retreats and 2-dimensional capture webs on (a) trees and (b) fences, 2 very ... Figure 1 Stegodyphus dumicola build.

Figure 1 Mean (±SE) egg investment in female zebra finches shortly after a second injection with either tetanus toxoid ... Figure 1 Mean (±SE) egg investment.

Figure 1 The probability of sighting a Cooper’s hawk (Accipiter cooperii) is significantly higher in the morning than ... Figure 1 The probability of sighting.

Figure 1 (A) Distributions of model (prey; dashed line) and Mimic (predator; solid line) cue values, showing ... Figure 1 (A) Distributions of model (prey;

Figure 1 Maternal relatedness between calves and non-calf unit members correlates with babysitting rate. Relatedness ... Figure 1 Maternal relatedness.

Figure 2 Boxplots indicating male (top) and female (bottom) mate preferences for native (positive numbers) or foreign ... Figure 2 Boxplots indicating.

Black: diagnosis ... Black: diagnosis from any department; grey: diagnosis at a rheumatology department. Unless provided in the caption above, the following.

Figure 1 (a) The distribution of paternity amongst 84 hatchlings sampled at a HDS on the western coastline of Little ... Figure 1 (a) The distribution.

Figure 2 (a) Color hexagon calculated for the stimuli used in the experiment, centered on the background; following ... Figure 2 (a) Color hexagon calculated.

Figure 1 Mean ± standard error proportions of (a) courtship and (b) copulation by female-male type pairing. Error bars ... Figure 1 Mean ± standard error.

Figure 1 The difference between dominance scores of individual male native Gehyra dubia (n = 10) and introduced male ... Figure 1 The difference between.

Figure 1 (A) Proportion of major prey types found in the diet of 9–10-day-old pied flycatcher nestlings in the Drenthe ... Figure 1 (A) Proportion of major.

Figure 1 Relationships between pair indices of dance performance (joint entropy or mutual information) and the past ... Figure 1 Relationships between.

Chapter 3: Central Tendency

Public Versus Personal Information for Mate Copying in an Invertebrate

Schematic diagram of the experimental setup.

Figure 2 Model flowchart: (1) Look for a resource; (2) determine whether there are one or more resources in the ... Figure 2 Model flowchart: (1) Look.

Figure 1 Changes in average first serve speed (km/h) over age in women (dark gray; online version red) and men (light ... Figure 1 Changes in average first.

Figure 1 Pace-of-life should mediate behavior

Figure 1 Percentage of male and female helpers in different categories

Figure 1: Trade shares of South Korea's major trading partners (% of South Korea's total trade in goods) Figure 1: Trade shares of South Korea's major.

Figure 1. Estimated weight functions (dotted-dashed lines) and pointwise 95% bootstrap confidence intervals (shaded ... Figure 1. Estimated weight functions.

Presentation transcript:

From: Mate choice plasticity in a coral reef fish Figure 1 (a) Male Chrysiptera cyanea photographed under standardized conditions, (b) orange tail quantification, and (c–f) examples of variation in male tail coloration. The area outlined in (b) indicates the orange part of the tail, which was measured in size (relative to the whole fin) and color quality. The shown tails are examples of bright (c,e) and dull (d,f) males used in the study. Males (c) and (d) differ mainly in the relative size of the orange area, whereas males (e) and (f) differ mainly in the quality of the orange color. From: Mate choice plasticity in a coral reef fish Behav Ecol. 2016;27(5):1331-1342. doi:10.1093/beheco/arw050 Behav Ecol | © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com

From: Mate choice plasticity in a coral reef fish Figure 2 Aquarium setup, as seen from above, in a test for female mate choice in Chrysiptera cyanea. Dashed lines indicate dividers, separating the aquarium into 2 male compartments and 1 female compartment. The divider between the 2 males was opaque in Step 1 of the study and transparent in Step 2. The divider between the female and the 2 males was transparent. Each compartment was equipped with a PVC tube (shaded boxes), which served as a shelter and mimicked a potential nest for the males. Grey solid lines indicate zones used to record the position of fish during scan sampling. These zones indicate where an individual would be considered to be in proximity (<1 fish length) to another individual’s compartment (horizontal: male–female; vertical: male–male) and, for the female compartment, a neutral zone in which the female was considered not to associate with either male. From: Mate choice plasticity in a coral reef fish Behav Ecol. 2016;27(5):1331-1342. doi:10.1093/beheco/arw050 Behav Ecol | © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com

From: Mate choice plasticity in a coral reef fish Figure 3 Female preference for male tail coloration in Chrysiptera cyanea in relation to the date the trial took place, measured as days after the first trial. Female preference was tested in (a–c) the presence (Step 1) and (d–e) the absence (Step 2) of male–male competition. Female preference is quantified as the bias in (a,d) position, (b,e) female fin displays, and (c) female sigmoid displays, calculated as the proportion of scans or behaviors associated with the more colorful male. A score above 0.5 thus indicates a preference for the bright male, a score below 0.5 a preference for the dull male. The size of points indicates the number of behaviors or scan-sampled positions underlying the calculated proportion for a particular female (sizes not comparable among panels), reflecting the weighting of data points in the models. Solid lines represent relationships estimated by GLMs and dashed lines their 95% confidence intervals. Female sigmoid displays were not analyzed for Step 2 because they occurred in too few trials. From: Mate choice plasticity in a coral reef fish Behav Ecol. 2016;27(5):1331-1342. doi:10.1093/beheco/arw050 Behav Ecol | © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com

From: Mate choice plasticity in a coral reef fish Figure 4 Frequencies of male Chrysiptera cyanea courtship (sum of approaches, fin displays, and lead swims) and agonistic behaviors (fin displays) in a female choice test. Males were either prevented from interacting by an opaque divider (Step 1) or allowed to interact visually (Step 2). Agonistic behaviors were recorded over 5min only but multiplied by 3 to match 15-min observation time for courtship behavior. From: Mate choice plasticity in a coral reef fish Behav Ecol. 2016;27(5):1331-1342. doi:10.1093/beheco/arw050 Behav Ecol | © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com