Beyond geometrical overlap: a Dosimetrical Evaluation of automated volumes Adaptation (DEA) in head and neck replanning  Gian Carlo Mattiucci, Luca Boldrini,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2015 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures Alzheimer's & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer's Association Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March.
Advertisements

Adaptation of the Stanford technique for treatment of bulky cutaneous T-cell lymphoma of the head  Safia K. Ahmed, MD, Michael P. Grams, PhD, Sarah E.
Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
Management of independent motion between multiple targets in lung cancer radiation therapy  Feng Liu, PhD, An Tai, PhD, Ergun Ahunbay, PhD, Elizabeth.
John Boyle, MD, Brad Ackerson, MD, Lin Gu, MS, Chris R. Kelsey, MD 
Lactate-Base 1H Magnetic Spectroscopy Does Not Predict Response and Outcomes in Patients With Stage IV Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma  Q. Le, A.
Automatic treatment planning improves the clinical quality of head and neck cancer treatment plans  Christian Rønn Hansen, Anders Bertelsen, Irene Hazell,
Incidence and clinical impact of chemotherapy induced myelotoxicity in cancer patients: An observational retrospective survey  Lazzaro Repetto  Critical.
Volume 64, Pages e1-e3 (January 2017)
Correlation between urinary dose and delayed radiation cystitis after 78Gy intensity- modulated radiotherapy for high-risk prostate cancer: A 10-year follow-up.
Anti PD-L1 DUrvalumab combined with Cetuximab and RadiOtherapy in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A phase I/II study (DUCRO) 
Evaluation of diffusion weighted imaging for tumor delineation in head-and-neck radiotherapy by comparison with automatically segmented 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose.
Adaptation of the Stanford technique for treatment of bulky cutaneous T-cell lymphoma of the head  Safia K. Ahmed, MD, Michael P. Grams, PhD, Sarah E.
Postoperative Proton Therapy in the Management of Stage III Thymoma
Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
Automatic treatment planning improves the clinical quality of head and neck cancer treatment plans  Christian Rønn Hansen, Anders Bertelsen, Irene Hazell,
Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
Safety of differential radiation dosing in lymph node positive necks treated with IMRT  Stephen Sozio, MBS, Zorimar Rivera-Núñez, PhD, Omar Mahmoud, MD,
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Efficacy of butylscopolamine in obtaining clear MR image for intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer  Osamu Tanaka, Hisao Komeda, Masayoshi.
Dosimetric Benefits and Practical Pitfalls of Daily Online Adaptive MRI-Guided Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer  Nancy El-Bared, MD,
Patient-reported symptoms and performance status before palliative radiotherapy in geriatric cancer patients (octogenarians)  Carsten Nieder, Thomas A.
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
VMAT radiation-induced nausea and vomiting in adjuvant breast cancer radiotherapy: The incidental effect of low-dose bath exposure  G. Lazzari, A. Terlizzi,
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Action Levels on Dose and Anatomic Variation for Adaptive Radiation Therapy Using Daily Offline Plan Evaluation: Preliminary Results  Baoshe Zhang, PhD,
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Prospective analysis of in vivo landmark point-based MRI geometric distortion in head and neck cancer patients scanned in immobilized radiation treatment.
Comparison of complexity metrics for multi-institutional evaluations of treatment plans in radiotherapy  Victor Hernandez, Jordi Saez, Marlies Pasler,
Beyond geometrical overlap: a Dosimetrical Evaluation of automated volumes Adaptation (DEA) in head and neck replanning  Gian Carlo Mattiucci, Luca Boldrini,
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Breast cancer patients report reduced sensitivity and pain using a barrier film during radiotherapy – A Danish intra-patient randomized multicentre study 
Efficacy of fiducial marker-based image-guided radiation therapy in prostate tomotherapy and potential dose coverage improvement using a patient positioning.
Optimizing radiosurgery with photons for ocular melanoma
Evaluating the prevalence and predictive factors of vasomotor and psychological symptoms in prostate cancer patients receiving hormonal therapy: Results.
A dose based approach for evaluation of inter-observer variations in target delineation  Ingrid Kristensen, Kristina Nilsson, Måns Agrup, Karin Belfrage,
Volume 130, Issue 6, (September 2007)
Cone-Beam CT-based position verification for oesophageal cancer: Evaluation of registration methods and anatomical changes during radiotherapy  A. van.
Jean-Emmanuel Bibault, Ingeborg Tinhofer 
Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
FORECAST – A cloud-based personalized intelligent virtual coaching platform for the well-being of cancer patients  Sofoklis Kyriazakos, Vincenzo Valentini,
Fast 4D cone-beam CT from 60 s acquisitions
Skin dose calculation during radiotherapy of head and neck cancer using deformable image registration of planning and mega-voltage computed tomography.
Thijs Perik, Jochem Kaas, Frits Wittkämper 
Callistus M. Nguyen, Alan H. Baydush, James D
Clinical and radiobiological evaluation of a method for planning target volume generation dependent on organ-at-risk exclusions in magnetic resonance.
In This Issue Journal of Thoracic Oncology
Comparison of organ-specific-radiation dose levels between 70kVp perfusion CT and standard tri-phasic liver CT in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
Clinical Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Hodgkin Lymphoma: Which Patients Benefit the Most?  Georgios Ntentas, DPhil, Katerina Dedeckova, MD, Michal.
Whole-ventricular irradiation for intracranial germ cell tumors: Dosimetric comparison of pencil beam scanned protons, intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
Plasma proteins as prognostic biomarkers in radiotherapy treated head and neck cancer patients  Line Brøndum, Jesper Grau Eriksen, Brita Singers Sørensen,
Cone beam CT based dose calculation in the thorax region
Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
Aisling Krishnan, Yat Man Tsang, Adéle Stewart-Lord 
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
Observed high incidence of prostatic calculi with the potential to act as natural fiducials for prostate image guided radiotherapy  A.G.M. O'Neill, S.O.
Reduction of vasopressor requirement by hydrocortisone administration in a patient with cerebral vasospasm  J.A. Alhashemi  British Journal of Anaesthesia 
Clinical implementation of magnetic resonance imaging guided adaptive radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer  Shyama U. Tetar, Anna M.E. Bruynzeel,
Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
Target definition in radiotherapy of prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging only workflow  Adalsteinn Gunnlaugsson, Emilia Persson, Christian.
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
Volume 134, Issue 6, (September 2008)
Probabilistic optimization of dose coverage in radiotherapy
MRI basics for radiation oncologists
Volumetric and dosimetric comparison of two delineation guidelines for the radiation treatment of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma  C. Bondue, S. Racadot,
Presentation transcript:

Beyond geometrical overlap: a Dosimetrical Evaluation of automated volumes Adaptation (DEA) in head and neck replanning  Gian Carlo Mattiucci, Luca Boldrini, Lorenzo Placidi, Luigi Azario, Nicola Dinapoli, Giuditta Chiloiro, Danilo Pasini, Danila Piccari, Maria Antonietta Gambacorta, Mario Balducci, Giovanna Mantini, Vincenzo Valentini  Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology   Volume 3, Pages 1-6 (September 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2017.06.002 Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 IMRT plan realization and evaluation of plan A and B on benchmark PTV C. Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology  2017 3, 1-6DOI: (10.1016/j.tipsro.2017.06.002) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 Correlation between the DSI and mHD distance comparing the PTV C-PTV A (■) and PTV C-PTV B (○) overlap. Linear correlations between the DSI and mHD comparing PTV C-PTV A and PTV C-PTV B result, respectively, in a R2=0.84 and R2=0.82. Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology  2017 3, 1-6DOI: (10.1016/j.tipsro.2017.06.002) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. 3 Correlation between the DSI and PTV volume reduction (cc) comparing PTV C and PTV A (■) and between PTV C and PTV B (○). Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology  2017 3, 1-6DOI: (10.1016/j.tipsro.2017.06.002) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. 4 Correlation between the DSI and PTV C V95% coverage difference for Plan A (■) and for Plan B (○). Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology  2017 3, 1-6DOI: (10.1016/j.tipsro.2017.06.002) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. 5 Correlation between the DSI and PTV C D99% coverage difference for Plan A (■) and for Plan B (○). Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology  2017 3, 1-6DOI: (10.1016/j.tipsro.2017.06.002) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. 6 PTV dose coverage (isodose levels: 75–95%) for different plans. Left: plan A, middle: plan B, right: plan C (benchmark) on benchmark structure set. Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology  2017 3, 1-6DOI: (10.1016/j.tipsro.2017.06.002) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions