Reciprocity and power balance for partially coupled interfaces

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Relations between reflection and transmission responses of 3-D inhomogeneous media Kees Wapenaar Department of Applied Earth Sciences Centre for Technical.
Advertisements

Elastodynamic reciprocity theorems for time-lapse seismic methods Kees Wapenaar Menno Dillen Jacob Fokkema Centre for Technical Geoscience Delft University.
Green’s function representations for seismic interferometry Kees Wapenaar 75 th SEG meeting, Houston November 8, 2005.
Reciprocity relationships for gravitational-wave interferometers Yuri Levin (Monash University) 1. Example: creep noise 2. Formalism 3. Creep noise again.
So far Geometrical Optics – Reflection and refraction from planar and spherical interfaces –Imaging condition in the paraxial approximation –Apertures.
Session: Computational Wave Propagation: Basic Theory Igel H., Fichtner A., Käser M., Virieux J., Seriani G., Capdeville Y., Moczo P.  The finite-difference.
1 Enikö Madarassy Vortex motion in trapped Bose-Einstein condensate Durham University, March, 2007.
Time Domain Analysis of the Multiple Wires Above a Dielectric Half-Space Poljak [1], E.K.Miller [2], C. Y. Tham [3], S. Antonijevic [1], V. Doric [1] [1]
Electromagnetic Theorems & Principles
Seismic interferometry: Who needs a seismic source? Roel Snieder Center for Wave Phenomena Colorado School of Mines
One-way acoustic reciprocity and its application in time-lapse seismic By Kees Wapenaar Jacob Fokkema Menno Dillen Pieter Scherpenhuijsen Delft University.
Project Overview Reconstruction in Diffracted Ultrasound Tomography Tali Meiri & Tali Saul Supervised by: Dr. Michael Zibulevsky Dr. Haim Azhari Alexander.
Fig. 3-1, p. 67. Fig. 3-2, p. 67 Fig. 3-3, p. 68.
Stokes’ Theorem Divergence Theorem
Theory of acoustic daylight imaging revisited
PA214 Waves and Fields Fourier Methods Blue book New chapter 12 Fourier sine series Application to the wave equation Fourier cosine series Fourier full.
Seismic interferometry by cross-correlation or deconvolution?
The Electromagnetic Field. Maxwell Equations Constitutive Equations.
By Paul Delgado Advisor – Dr. Vinod Kumar Co-Advisor – Dr. Son Young Yi.
Electromagnetic NDT Veera Sundararaghavan. Research at IIT-madras 1.Axisymmetric Vector Potential based Finite Element Model for Conventional,Remote field.
Seismic interferometry for passive and exploration data:
Seismic interferometry-by- deconvolution for controlled-source and passive data Kees Wapenaar, Joost van der Neut, Elmer Ruigrok, Deyan Draganov, Juerg.
1 EEE 498/598 Overview of Electrical Engineering Lecture 11: Electromagnetic Power Flow; Reflection And Transmission Of Normally and Obliquely Incident.
1 Challenge the future Gradient based technique for electromagnetic layered earth model data inversion Claudio Patriarca, Andrea Di Matteo and Evert Slob.
1 SIMULATION OF VIBROACOUSTIC PROBLEM USING COUPLED FE / FE FORMULATION AND MODAL ANALYSIS Ahlem ALIA presented by Nicolas AQUELET Laboratoire de Mécanique.
Adaptive shunted piezoelectric metacomposite: a new integrated technology for vibroacoustic control Dr M. Collet(1), Dr M. Ouisse(1), F. Tatéo, Pr M. Ichchou(2),
ELECTROMAGNETICS AND APPLICATIONS Lecture 3 Waves in Conducting / Lossy Medium. Electromagnetic Power & Energy. Luca Daniel.
Nelson Research, Inc – N. 88 th St. Seattle, WA USA aol.com Non-Contacting Eddy Current Conductivity Sensor for Measuring.
Linear optical properties of dielectrics
1/20 Joyce McLaughlin Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Interior Elastodynamics Inverse Problems I: Basic Properties IPAM – September 9, 2003.
Forward modelling The key to waveform tomography is the calculation of Green’s functions (the point source responses) Wide range of modelling methods available.
Extension of the BLT Equation to Incorporate Electromagnetic Field Propagation Fredrick M. Tesche Chalmers M. Butler Holcombe Department of Electrical.
S A N T A C L A R A U N I V E R S I T Y Center for Nanostructures September 25, 2003 On-Chip Interconnects in Sub-100nm Circuits Sang-Pil Sim Sunil Yu.
Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations CAAM 452 Spring 2005 Lecture 12 Instructor: Tim Warburton.
Seismic interferometry Kees Wapenaar with many contributions from: Deyan Draganov, Joost van der Neut, Elmer Ruigrok, Evert Slob, Juerg Hunzicker, Jan.
Industrial Noise and Vibration Solution for Session 2 Physical Acoustics
Green function retrieval versus Interferometric imaging Kees Wapenaar Deyan Draganov Delft University of Technology 2005 Joint Assembly May 25, 2005 New.
Green’s function retrieval by iterative substitution or inversion (
1 Spring 2003 Prof. Tim Warburton MA557/MA578/CS557 Lecture 30.
The Fundamental Theorem for Line Integrals
Inverse functions: if f is one-to-one function with domain X and range Y and g is function with domain Y and range X then g is the inverse function of.
AdS/CFT “Applications” Jorge Casalderrey-Solana LBNL.
2. Geometrical spreading Introduction Ray theory Green’s function Relative geometrical spreading in a vertically heterogeneous VTI medium Stack of horizontal.
Seismic interferometry: a comparison of approaches Kees Wapenaar Deyan Draganov Joost van der Neut Jan Thorbecke Delft University of Technology.
Unit #1 Linear Systems Fall Dr. Jehad Al Dallal.
Simulation of the acoustics of coupled rooms by numerical resolution of a diffusion equation V. Valeau a, J. Picaut b, A. Sakout a, A. Billon a a LEPTAB,
Response of an Elastic Half Space to an Arbitrary 3-D Vector Body Force Smith and Sandwell, JGR 2003 Develop the three differential equations relating.
Seismic interferometry, the optical theorem and a non-linear point scatterer Kees Wapenaar Evert Slob Roel Snieder Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
UPB / ETTI O.DROSU Electrical Engineering 2
Chapter 11. The uniform plane wave
Spring Dr. Jehad Al Dallal
Maxwell's equations Poynting's theorem time-harmonic fields.
Thermal noise and thermal deformations of mirrors
HOCIGs and VOCIGs via Two-way Reverse Time Migration
Solving the Taylor problem with horizontal viscosity
Nonlinear Optics Tobias J. Kippenberg
A general variational formulation of the hydroelastic problem with application to VLFS over variable bathymetry G.A. Athanassoulis & K.A. Belibassakis.
Fields and Waves I Lecture 19 K. A. Connor Y. Maréchal
Coupled seismoelectric wave propagation in porous media
ENE 325 Electromagnetic Fields and Waves
Linear Algebra Lecture 3.
Maxwell’s Equations and Electromagnetic Waves
{(1, 1), (2, 4), (3, 9), (4, 16)} one-to-one
Remarks on Green’s Theorem for seismic interferometry
Comparison of CFEM and DG methods
Codas in reflection and transmission responses
Notes 24 ECE 6340 Intermediate EM Waves Fall 2016
1st Week Seminar Sunryul Kim Antennas & RF Devices Lab.
Bogdan G. Nita *University of Houston M-OSRP Annual Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Reciprocity and power balance for partially coupled interfaces Kees Wapenaar Evert Slob Jacob Fokkema Centre for Technical Geoscience Delft University of Technology

Review of reciprocity theorems Convolution type Correlation type Unified notation Acoustic Elastodynamic Electromagnetic Poroelastic Seismoelectric Review of boundary conditions Extension of reciprocity theorems Conclusions

Review of reciprocity theorems Convolution type Correlation type Unified notation Acoustic Elastodynamic Electromagnetic Poroelastic Seismoelectric Review of boundary conditions Extension of reciprocity theorems Conclusions

A B A B ‘State A’ ‘State B’

A B A B ‘State A’ ‘State B’

‘State B’ ‘State A’ kA, rA kB, rB V n PB QB QA PA State A State B PA, Vk,A QA,Fk,A kA, rA PB, Vk,B QB,Fk,B kB, rB Wave fields Sources Medium

V n PB QB QA PA ‘State B’ ‘State A’

‘State B’ ‘State A’ V n PB QB QA PA Convolution-type reciprocity theorem: forward problems

Review of reciprocity theorems Convolution type Correlation type Unified notation Acoustic Elastodynamic Electromagnetic Poroelastic Seismoelectric Review of boundary conditions Extension of reciprocity theorems Conclusions

‘State B’ ‘State A’ V n PB QB QA PA Correlation-type reciprocity theorem

‘State B’ ‘State A’ V n Q Q P P Power-flux through boundary Power dissipated in medium Power radiated by sources

‘State B’ ‘State A’ V n PB QB QA PA Correlation-type reciprocity theorem: inverse problems

Review of reciprocity theorems Convolution type Correlation type Unified notation Acoustic Elastodynamic Electromagnetic Poroelastic Seismoelectric Review of boundary conditions Extension of reciprocity theorems Conclusions

‘State B’ ‘State A’ V n PB QB QA PA Convolution-type reciprocity theorem

Unified notation (convolution type):

Unified notation (convolution type):

Unified notation (convolution type):

Review of reciprocity theorems Convolution type Correlation type Unified notation Acoustic Elastodynamic Electromagnetic Poroelastic Seismoelectric Review of boundary conditions Extension of reciprocity theorems Conclusions

Acoustic: Poroelastic: Elastodynamic: Seismoelectric: Electromagnetic:

‘State B’ ‘State A’ V n PB QB QA PA Correlation-type reciprocity theorem

V n PB QB QA PA ‘State B’ ‘State A’

Unified notation (convolution type): Unified notation (correlation type):

Review of reciprocity theorems Convolution type Correlation type Unified notation Acoustic Elastodynamic Electromagnetic Poroelastic Seismoelectric Review of boundary conditions Extension of reciprocity theorems Conclusions

‘State B’ ‘State A’ n n V V PB QB QA PA Perfectly coupled interfaces: No consequences for reciprocitytheorems of convolution type and correlation type Next: consider partially coupled interfaces

Review of linear slip model Displacement jump:

Review of linear slip model of Schoenberg

Review of linear slip model of Pyrak-Nolte et al.

Review of linear slip model of Pyrak-Nolte et al. Frequency domain

Review of linear slip model of Pyrak-Nolte et al.

Review of linear slip model Schoenberg, Pyrak-Nolte et al: diagonal Nakagawa et al.: full matrix, with Generalization:

Horizontal interface: Arbitrary interface:

Generalized boundary condition:

Acoustic: Poroelastic: Elastodynamic: Seismoelectric: Electromagnetic:

Review of reciprocity theorems Convolution type Correlation type Unified notation Acoustic Elastodynamic Electromagnetic Poroelastic Seismoelectric Review of boundary conditions Extension of reciprocity theorems Conclusions

n n V V PB QB QA PA ‘State B’ ‘State A’

n n V V PB QB QA PA ‘State B’ ‘State A’

‘State B’ ‘State A’ n n V V PB QB QA PA Convolution-type reciprocity theorem: forward problems

‘State B’ ‘State A’ n n V V PB QB QA PA Correlation-type reciprocity theorem

‘State B’ ‘State A’ n n V V Q P Q P Power-flux through boundary Power dissipated in medium Power radiated by sources Power dissipated by interfaces

‘State B’ ‘State A’ n n V V PB QB QA PA Correlation-type reciprocity theorem: inverse problems

Review of reciprocity theorems Convolution type Correlation type Unified notation Acoustic Elastodynamic Electromagnetic Poroelastic Seismoelectric Review of boundary conditions Extension of reciprocity theorems Conclusions

Unified reciprocity theorems have been formulated of the convolution and correlation type

Unified reciprocity theorems have been formulated of the convolution and correlation type Valid for acoustic, elastodynamic, electromagnetic, poroelastic and seismoelectric waves

Unified reciprocity theorems have been formulated of the convolution and correlation type Valid for acoustic, elastodynamic, electromagnetic, poroelastic and seismoelectric waves Boundary condition for imperfectly coupled interface:

Unified reciprocity theorems have been formulated of the convolution and correlation type Valid for acoustic, elastodynamic, electromagnetic, poroelastic and seismoelectric waves Boundary condition for imperfectly coupled interface: No effects on source-receiver reciprocity

Unified reciprocity theorems have been formulated of the convolution and correlation type Valid for acoustic, elastodynamic, electromagnetic, poroelastic and seismoelectric waves Boundary condition for imperfectly coupled interface: No effects on source-receiver reciprocity Imaginary part of accounts for dissipation by interfaces