Inter-comparison of Particle production (2)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Short-range, high-LET recoil tracks in CR-39 plastic nuclear track detector E. R. Benton 1, C. E. Johnson 1, J. DeWitt 1, N. Yasuda 2, and E. V. Benton.
Advertisements

SUPERCONDUCTING SOLENOIDS - SHIELDING STUDIES 1. N. Souchlas BNL (Oct. 5, 2010)
Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
P HI T S Exercise ( II ) : How to stop , ,  -rays and neutrons? Multi-Purpose Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System title1 Feb revised.
EAR2 simulation update Collaboration board meeting Christina Weiss & Vasilis Vlachoudis.
Pion yield studies for proton drive beams of 2-8 GeV kinetic energy for stopped muon and low-energy muon decay experiments Sergei Striganov Fermilab Workshop.
Neutral Particles. Neutrons Neutrons are like neutral protons. –Mass is 1% larger –Interacts strongly Neutral charge complicates detection Neutron lifetime.
G4NAMU meeting March 6th, 2006 Validation Activities at SLAC of Relevance to Medical Users Koi, Tatsumi SLAC/SCCS.
Bruce Faddegon, UCSF Inder Daftari, UCSF Joseph Perl, SLAC
Induced Activity Calculations in Support of D&D Activities at SLAC Joachim Vollaire, Radiation Protection Department.
Design on Target and Moderator of X- band Compact Electron Linac Neutron Source for Short Pulsed Neutrons Kazuhiro Tagi.
1 JASMIN Activation Experiments (T-972/993/994) Yoshimi Kasugai on behalf of JASMIN Activation team JASMIN Activation team Y. Kasugai, K. Oishi, H. Matsumura,
Preliminarily results of Monte Carlo study of neutron beam production at iThemba LABS University of the western cape and iThemba LABS Energy Postgraduate.
Future usage of quasi-infinite depleted uranium target (BURAN) for benchmark studies Pavel Tichý Future usage of quasi-infinite depleted uranium target.
Inter-comparison of Medium-Energy Neutron Attenuation in Iron and Concrete (8) H. Hirayama and Attenuation Length Sub-Working Group in Japan.
Tungsten Calorimeter Model Calculations and Radiation Issues Pavel Degtiarenko Radiation Control Group, Jefferson Lab.
Experimental studies of spatial distribution of neutron production around thick lead target irradiated by 0.9 GeV protons Antonín Krása&Vladimír Wagner.
Simulations on “Energy plus Transmutation” setup, 1.5 GeV Mitja Majerle
Modeling Production, Interactions and Transport Fermilab November 14, 2005 Fermilab ILC-CAL Nikolai Mokhov, Fermilab.
Particle Production at 3 GeV (update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies Sept. 23, /23/13.
Radiation damage calculation in PHITS
Monte Carlo methods in ADS experiments Study for state exam 2008 Mitja Majerle “Phasotron” and “Energy Plus Transmutation” setups (schematic drawings)
Systematic studies of neutrons produced in the Pb/U assembly irradiated by relativistic protons and deuterons. Vladimír Wagner Nuclear physics institute.
Francis H. Burr Proton Therapy Center Massachusetts General Hospital December 2005 CRONUS Annual Meeting Irradiations at LANSCE May 2 – Flight.
Studies of Helium proportional counters response on fast neutrons, at NCSR “Demokritos” M. Zamani, M. Manolopoulou, S. Stoulos, M. Fragopoulou School of.
P HI T S Melt a snowman by proton beam Multi-Purpose Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System title1 Aug revised.
Charged Kaon Production Yield Studies with Stretcher Sergei Striganov Fermilab Future of Kaon Physics at Fermilab August 21, Fermilab.
Experimental Studies of Spatial Distributions of Neutrons Produced by Set-ups with Thick Lead Target Irradiated by Relativistic Protons Vladimír Wagner.
Initial (FLUKA) calculations for synchrotron radiation at TLep April 4 th, 2013 F. Cerutti, A. Ferrari, L. Lari* *BE Dept.
Overview of Ion-Ion validation KOI, Tatsumi SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory 1Geant4 Collaboration workshop
Mitja Majerle for the “Energy Plus Transmutation” collaboration.
Carbon Target Design and Optimization for an Intense Muon Source X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Winter Collaboration.
ANITA workshop, Uppsala, december 2008 ANITA neutron source Monte Carlo simulations and comparison with experimental data Mitja Majerle Nuclear Physics.
CERF simulation Mitsu 14th Feb Simulation components Production Transportation Detector response
Neutron measurement with nuclear emulsion Mitsu KIMURA 27th Feb 2013.
Dec 2004 Simulation of Low Energy backgrounds in the TESLA IR Impact on feedback BPMs FONT collaboration  QMUL: P Burrows, G Christian, C Clarke, G White,
1 Neutron Effective Dose calculation behind Concrete Shielding of Charge Particle Accelerators with Energy up to 100 MeV V. E Aleinikov, L. G. Beskrovnaja,
Simulations on “Energy plus Transmutation” setup, 1.5 GeV Mitja Majerle, V Wagner, A Krása, F Křížek This document can be downloaded.
Meson Production at Low Proton Beam Energy (Update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies May 9, /9/113.
AWAKE: D2E for Alexey beam properties Silvia Cipiccia, Eduard Feldbaumer, Helmut Vincke DGS/RP.
Alex Howard PH-SFT LCG-PV 10 th May 2006 Neutron Benchmark for Geant4 using TARC – initial status 1)TARC – experimental set-up and aims 2)Geant4 Simulation.
4th International Summer School « Nuclear Physics Methods and Accelerators in Biology and Medicine » Monte-Carlo simulations : FLUKA vs. MCNPX Maxime ODEN.
Neutron production and iodide transmutation studies using intensive beam of Dubna Phasotron Mitja Majerle Nuclear Physics Institute of CAS Řež, Czech republic.
N_TOF EAR-1 Simulations The “γ-flash” A. Tsinganis (CERN/NTUA), C. Guerrero (CERN), V. Vlachoudis (CERN) n_TOF Annual Collaboration Meeting Lisbon, December.
Neutron double differential distributions, dose rates and specific activities from accelerator components irradiated by 50 – 400 MeV protons F. Cerutti.
Monte Carlo methods in spallation experiments Defense of the phD thesis Mitja Majerle “Phasotron” and “Energy Plus Transmutation” setups (schematic drawings)
Nam-Suk Jung, Arim Lee, Hee-Seock Lee,
Induced-activity experiment:
X. Ding, UCLA MAP Spring 2014 Meeting May 2014 Fermilab
Measurements and FLUKA Simulations of Bismuth and Aluminum Activation at the CERN Shielding Benchmark Facility(CSBF) E. Iliopoulou, R. Froeschl, M. Brugger,
Report to Delta Review: Hadronic Validation
Summary of hadronic tests and benchmarks in ALICE
Final Focus Synchrotron Radiation
for collaboration “Energy plus transmutation”
Tas and Q0: Simple parametric study for Tas 15/03/07
Irradiations at LANSCE May 2 –
Guidance for hands-on exercise Neutron target
Gamma-ray Albedo of the Moon Igor V. Moskalenko (Stanford) & Troy A
Mitja Majerle NPI CAS Řež, The Czech Republic
Ryuji Hosoyamada2, Hiroshi Iwase3, Hiroshi Nakashima1, and Koji Niita2
Setting of various sources A
How to stop a, b, g-rays and neutrons?
Russian Research Center “ Kurchatov Institute”
The n-3He Simulation Using Geant4
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
The n-3He Simulation Using Geant4
Performed experiments Nuclotron – set up ENERGY PLUS TRANSMUTATION
LAHET code simulations in comparison with bare Pb spallation target experiment Daniela Henzlova.
Setting of various source Part II
Background Simulations at Fermilab
Presentation transcript:

Inter-comparison of Particle production (2) H. Hirayama1,2 and T. Sanami1 1KEK, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization 2Nuclear Regulation Authority

Problems for an Inter-comparison of particle production proposed for SATIF-12 Incident particle Pencil beam of protons with following energy 1 GeV, 10 GeV and 100 GeV Target materials and their sizes Targets geometry is the cylinder Source protons incident on the center of the cylinder bottom Target detector distance from the center of the cylinder is 500cm Al : length 40cm, diameter 4.0cm and density 2.7g/cm3 Cu : length 16cm, diameter 1.6cm and density 8.63 g/cm3 Au : length 10cm, diameter 1.0cm and density 19.3 g/cm3 Quantities to be calculated Neutron spectrum above 20 MeV in n/MeV/sr/proton at 15, 30, 45, 60 ,90,120,150 degrees with angular width ±0.5 degrees

General Tendency Comparison of neutron spectra There are large differences between codes in this simple calculation. Reflect particle production model used Relations between codes are different on targets, proton energies and angles. Comparison of Neutron Fluence above 20 MeV Differences between code are small for 1 GeV proton. For 10 and 100 GeV protons at Al and Cu targets, differences become larger by increasing of the angle.

Future Themes Compare total cross section used at each code Compare total neutron fluence and total energy fluence at each angle and emitted from the target Comparison with experimental results Selection of experiments to be compared Others items

Revised problems for an Inter-comparison of particle production proposed for SATIF-13 Incident particle Pencil beam of protons with following energy 1 GeV, 10 GeV and 100 GeV Target materials and their sizes Targets geometry is the cylinder Source protons incident on the center of the cylinder bottom Target detector distance from the center of the cylinder is 500cm Al : length 40cm, diameter 4.0cm and density 2.7g/cm3 Cu : length 16cm, diameter 1.6cm and density 8.63 g/cm3 Au : length 10cm, diameter 1.0cm and density 19.3 g/cm3 Quantities to be calculated (1) Neutron spectrum above 20 MeV in n/MeV/sr/proton at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60 ,90,120,150 degrees with angular width ±0.5 degrees. (2) Angular integral neutron spectrum above 20 MeV in n/MeV/cm2 proton (3) Energy integral neutron fluence for (1) and (2)

Summary of contributors for particle production calculation (2) Name of participants and organizations Code Data Base Physical model Norihiro MATSUDA (JAEA) and PHITS development team PHITS Original (PHITS) INCL4.6(<3GeV)+JAM(>3GeV)+GEM Koi Tatsumi (SLAC) Geant4 v10.02.p02 (use "Shielding" physics list) BERT style cascade up to 5GeV and from 4 GeV Fritof (FTF) string model Pedro Vaz, Yuriy Romanets (INST) MCNPX version 2.7.0 Default Toshiya Sanami (KEK) MARS 1516 Original MARS

Comparison of neutron fluence above 20 MeV Difference is relatively small. Al : within 96 % Cu : within 60 % Au : within 103 % Difference of total neutron energy above 20 MeV emitted from the target is within almost factor 2 between Al, Cu and Au for protons from 1 GeV to 100 GeV.

Comparison of neutron energy fluence above 20 MeV Difference is small. Al : within 46 % Cu : within 76 % Au : within 39 % Difference of total neutron energy above 20 MeV emitted from the target is less than 76 % between Al, Cu and Au for protons from 1 GeV to 100 GeV.

Comparison of Neutron Spectrum at 0 degree Large differences exist between codes especially for 1 GeV proton.

Comparison of angular integral neutron energy fluence above 20 MeV For 1 GeV proton, differences are relatively small except 0 degree. For 10 GeV protons, similar differences exit for all angle. For 100 GeV, differences at 0 degree are smaller than other angle.

General tendency Differences between code are small for total neutron and total neutron energy emitted from target on 1 GeV Relatively large differences exist in the comparison angular spectrum especially at 0 degree.

Future action Fluka results are desired for this intercomparison. It is desired to check models especially for angular distributions by code developers and reflect to this comparison. Experimental results are necessary for 0 degree. Other items

Supplement slides