Energy investigation Sn isotopic beams Beam Br57 (Tm) E78 (AMeV)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Helium Bag Readiness. Scattering chamber Clamshell flange (not here yet) Coffee can collimator Polyurethane Balloon (sides only) 10 m Mylar Balloon.
Advertisements

Beam direction and flux measured by MUMON K. Matsuoka (Kyoto) for the MUMON group Contents: 1.Beam stability (direction/flux) 2.Absolute  beam flux.
Technical Board, 18 September 2002Børge Svane Nielsen, NBI1 Laser rays on TPC mylar strips Technical Board, 18 September 2002 Børge Svane Nielsen and Jørn.
Ken Andersen. H1 H5 Extract Brightness from Neutron Measurement Needs end-of-guide position with chopper and TOF analysis Readily available on H1: Figaro,
Cryomodule Quad Doublet Solutions – M Church 9/12/07 1 NML Cryomodule Quad Doublet Lattice Solutions  Question  Are quadrupoles required as part of the.
E-field calculations for the TPC/HBD N. Smirnov Upgrade Working Group Meeting 05/13/03, BNL.
Target Shaft Simulation with G4Beamline M. Apollonio, IC.
GEANT4 simulations for the Lund R 3 B prototype Douglas Di Julio Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Accurate  Spectroscopy for Ultracold Neutrons Jeff Martin University of Winnipeg See also: J.W. Martin et al, Phys. Rev. C (2006) J.W. Martin.
TPC for 2p radioactivity studies Bertram Blank, CENBG.
Tagging spectrometer and photon beamline Review January 23-24, Response to Questions Bremsstrahlung Tagging Spectrometer and Photon Beam Review.
GLAST LAT Project Test Beam Meeting, June 6, 2006 S. Funk 1/6 PS Positron Simulations Stefan Funk June 6, 2006.
As viewed by camera 83.0 mm Beamspot at center of target Viewer on downstream side of target ladder (target camera looks upstream) Expt – 74 Kr Beam.
Neutron Structure Functions and a Radial Time Projection Chamber The Structure of the Neutron The BoNuS Experiment at CLAS A New Proton Recoil Detector.
HPS Beamline: Background Rates, Sensitivity to Field Uncertainties M. Ungaro1HPS Collaboration Meeting, JLAB, May Concrete Wall thickness Study.
NuMI NBI03 November 7-11, 2003 FNAL thin beam windows Jim Hylen / FNAL Page 1 FNAL experience with thin beam windows Issue is: Survival of window in high.
Update on the Hall C Monte Carlo simulation for 12 GeV Mark Jones.
22 September 2005 Haw05 1  (1405) photoproduction at SPring-8/LEPS H. Fujimura, Kyoto University Kyoto University, Japan K. Imai, M. Niiyama Research.
Neutron Flux Measurement at the CYRIC T. Horiguchi and A. Ishikawa (Tohoku University) For the FPCCD group.
Linac Status June 16, 2015 Time Meeting D. Raparia.
Material and thickness for pi0 Y.Sudo Univ. of Tsukuba 2008/07/18.
Summary of RIKEN visit. Chamber Top plate Bottom plate Middle cylinder.
Implantation rates at the focal plane of Super-FRS Some Simulations for AIDA Detectors.
Progress Report on GEANT Study of Containerized Detectors R. Ray 7/11/03 What’s New Since Last Time?  More detailed container description in GEANT o Slightly.
1 Updated Run Plans. K.Tilley, MICO, 07/02/08 - pre-commissioning - Target, - beamline functionality - detectors, particle production - decay solenoid.
Beam Studies December 2014 Runs: 7821, 7822, and 7860 December 29, 2014.
100MeV/u 12 C+ 12 C Scattering at RCNP Weiwei Qu 、 Gaolong Zhang 、 Satoru Terashima 、 Isao Tanihata 、 Chenlei Guo 、 Xiaoyun Le 、 Hoo Jin Ong 、 Harutaka.
Present status of production target and Room design Takashi Hashimoto, IBS/RISP 2015, February.
CdTe prototype detector testing Anja Schubert The University of Melbourne 9 May 2011 Updates.
N_TOF EAR-1 Simulations The “γ-flash” A. Tsinganis (CERN/NTUA), C. Guerrero (CERN), V. Vlachoudis (CERN) n_TOF Annual Collaboration Meeting Lisbon, December.
Maintenance and improvement of beam-line detectors for the BigRIPS fragment separator Yuki Sato RIKEN Nishina Center Detector team.
The reading is 7.38 mm. The reading is 7.72 mm.
SAMURAI magnet Hiromi SATO SAMURAI Team, RIKEN Requirements Geometry Magnetic field Superconducting coil and cooling system Present status of construction.
Focal plane detector discussion Kwangbok Lee Low Energy Nuclear Science team Rare Isotope Science Project Institute for Basic Science July 11,
Seoul National University On behalf of J-PARC E18 Collaboration
instrumentation examples
Physical Science Chapter 4 Review Game
Improvement of beam current in KIRAMS-13 using upgrade of
IF Separator Design of RAON
Efficiency versus energy resolution
Progress of GEM R&D in Lanzhou University
Updates on the Micromegas + GEM prototype
T. Ishiwatari Stefan Meyer Institut, Vienna, Austria
PCID – Projectile Charge Identification Detector
Monte Carlo simulation of the GEM-based neutron detector
Question 3 The proponents should show more details about the modification of the detector system to be built in P42 Answers 3-1. Liquid-Hydrogen Target.
Prototype production and test
Production of Short-Lived 37K
Thin Target effusion calculations using GEANT4
DESY TB05: Drift Chambers simulation
ATOMIC HISTORY & ISOTOPES
Magnetic gap calculation
Dan Burke1, P. Colas2, M. Dixit1, I. Giomataris2, V. Lepeltier3, A
Can you continue the questions you started last lesson?
7. Describe the structure of a typical atom.
Stability (fitted beam center)
Option 1: Running Reactions in Reverse
Ch. 25 Discovery of Electron/Nucleus and Radiation
Transition Radiation Studies with Xe GlueX Collaboration Meeting
Ашық сабақ 7 сынып Файлдар мен қапшықтар Сабақтың тақырыбы:
Windows басқару элементтері
LSO: Energy resolution
SksMinus status 04 HB meeting 2008/5/09 白鳥昂太郎.
MEG Summary T. Mori for MEG Collaboration February 9, 2005.
Efficiency versus energy resolution
I251Y-R C Expt –(06/01/2010) viewed by camera beam Viewer 0 mm
Қош келдіңіздер!.
Информатика пән мұғалімі : Аитова Карима.
Magnet design, field calculations
He Zhang, David Douglas, Yuhong Zhang MEIC R&D Meeting, 09/04/2014
Presentation transcript:

Energy investigation Sn isotopic beams Beam Br57 (Tm) E78 (AMeV) E tgt (AMeV) Sn132 7.129 293.11 269.04 Sn124 6.7383 295.89 270.07 Sn112 6.1263 298.42 270.22 Sn108 5.9152 298.68 269.09

Energy calculated at center of target using LISE++ Energy measured between these two points using beamline detectors Energy calculated here by BigRIPS

Methodology Use measurement of Br57 performed by BigRIPS team – I believe this is made using beamline detectors between F5 and F7 They calculate E78 from this measurement Check beamline detectors in between F78 drift and target I provide energy at center of target using E78 from BigRIPS notebook I assume charge state Z=50 for LISE++ physical calculator

Sn 132 (Runs 2819-3039) Brho 57 = 7.129 -> E78 = 293.11 AMeV -> 269.04 AMeV center of target (Sn 124) (assuming 0.417 mm effective thickness to center) Br57 (Tm) E78 (AMeV) Etgt (AMeV) 7.129 293.11 269.04

Sn132 material list Name Material Thickness (mm) Density(g/cm^3) SBT1 mylar H8C10O4 0.012 1.397 SBT1 H10C9 0.2 1.105 SBT1&2 mylar 0.024 SBT2 SBT2 mylar BDC1 kp window C22H10N2O4 0.08 1.42 BDC1 gas H10C4 90 9.54E-05 BDC1 cathode BDC2 kp window BDC2 gas BDC2 cathode Vacuum window 0.05 Air air 141.8 0.0012 AC Entrance Window Foil 0.004 S-TPC Gas Ar90C10H40 274.18 0.001534 Target (1st half) 124Sn 0.4175 7.282

Sn 124 (Runs 3044-3184) Brho 57 = 6.7383 -> E78 = AMeV -> AMeV center of target (Sn 112) (assuming 0.385 mm effective thickness to center) Br57 (Tm) E78 (AMeV) Etgt (AMeV) 6.7383 295.89 270.07

Sn 124 material list Name Material Thickness (mm) Density(g/cm^3) SBT1 mylar H8C10O4 0.012 1.397 SBT1 H10C9 0.2 1.105 SBT1&2 mylar 0.024 SBT2 SBT2 mylar BDC1 kp window C22H10N2O4 0.08 1.42 BDC1 gas H10C4 90 9.54E-05 BDC1 cathode BDC2 kp window BDC2 gas BDC2 cathode Vacuum window 0.05 Air air 141.8 0.0012 AC Entrance Window Foil 0.004 S-TPC Gas Ar90C10H40 274.1 0.001534 Target (1st half) 112Sn 0.3852 7.282

Sn 112 (Runs 2542-2653) Brho 57 = 6.1263 -> E78 = 298.42 AMeV -> AMeV center of target (Sn124) (assuming 0.417 mm effective thickness to center) Br57 (Tm) E78 (AMeV) Etgt (AMeV) 6.1263 298.42 270.22

Sn112 material list Name Material Thickness (mm) Density(g/cm^3) SBT1 mylar H8C10O4 0.012 1.397 SBT1 H10C9 0.2 1.105 SBT1&2 mylar 0.024 SBT2 SBT2 mylar BDC1 kp window C22H10N2O4 0.08 1.42 BDC1 gas H10C4 90 9.54E-05 BDC1 cathode BDC2 kp window BDC2 gas BDC2 cathode Vacuum window 0.05 Air air 141.8 0.0012 AC Entrance Window Foil 0.004 S-TPC Gas Ar90C10H40 274.18 0.001534 Target (1st half) 124Sn 0.4175 7.282

Sn 108 (Runs 2225-2509) Brho 57 = 5.9152 -> E78 = 298.68 AMeV ->269.09 AMeV center of target (Sn112) (assuming 0.385 mm effective thickness to center) Br57 (Tm) E78 (AMeV) Etgt (AMeV) 5.9152 298.68 269.09

Sn 108 material list Name Material Thickness (mm) Density(g/cm^3) SBT1 mylar H8C10O4 0.012 1.397 SBT1 H10C9 0.2 1.105 SBT1&2 mylar 0.024 SBT2 SBT2 mylar BDC1 kp window C22H10N2O4 0.08 1.42 BDC1 gas H10C4 90 9.54E-05 BDC1 cathode BDC2 kp window BDC2 gas BDC2 cathode Vacuum window 0.05 Air air 141.8 0.0012 AC Entrance Window Foil 0.004 S-TPC Gas Ar90C10H40 274.1 0.001534 Target (1st half) 112Sn 0.3852 7.282

Summary Energies calculated at center of target using LISE++, E78 calculated values from BigRIPS: Beam Br57 (Tm) E78 (AMeV) E tgt (AMeV) Sn132 7.129 293.11 269.04 Sn124 6.7383 295.89 270.07 Sn112 6.1263 298.42 270.22 Sn108 5.9152 298.68 269.09