Technology Commercialization Office

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The University of Sydney © 2003 Commercialising Research and Protecting Intellectual Property Kevin W L Croft Deputy Director Business Liaison Office Kevin.
Advertisements

Intellectual Property HEY Trusts New IP Policy and Role of Medipex Will it enable me to turn this…. into.
Research Compliance NEW MEXICO THE UNIVERSITY of.
Managing Conflicts of Interest
Conflict of Interest, Conflict of Commitment, and Outside Activities UTSA HOP 1.33 Non-covered UTSA staff 1.
The Office of Research CRC Grants Workshop 1 May 2008 W. Ross Ellington, Associate VP for Research & Greenberg Professor of Biological Science.
1 RIT: Support Infrastructure, Policies and Procedures – Perceptions, Myths and Reality Varda Main Director Technology Licensing Office.
1 UMass Dartmouth Conflicts of Interest Policies UMass Dartmouth Liz Rodriguez February 17, 2011.
Policies and Issues Regarding Intellectual Property Developed at Iowa State University Presentation to Energy Center Grantees/ BECON Users 12/12/03 Kenneth.
Technology and Economic Development Intellectual Property Issues in Research Jim Baker Director Office of Technology and Economic Development
Placement of Funds CReATE 5/13 Policy set forth in memorandum of 4/5/1994 from President D’Alemberte)
History 2002 – Director of research and sponsored program develops IP policy Fall 2002 – Referral to review the policy February 2003 – Faculty affairs.
Technology Transfer at UIC © 2009 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois Presentation to the Software Commercialization Symposium April.
Policy On Intellectual Property. Differences With Senate Approved Version Format and structure Definition page is added Consolidates copyright and patent.
SPS Round Table The Use of Human Participants in Research Office of Research Integrity and Assurance (ORIA) April 17, 2007.
IP Management at Massey 1.national collaborative infrastructure.
OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY COMMERCIALIZATION Title of Invention Invention Disclosure Form Date Name Department School CONFIDENTIAL.
Intellectual Property: Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State University Research Foundation (ISURF) Director, Office of Intellectual Property.
Intellectual Property and Senior Design Projects.
ECOI electronic Conflict of Interest User Guide 1 Emory University, Office of Research Administration.
TEAM-IFPTE Local Collective Bargaining January 14 - Brandon January 16 - Winnipeg (Masonic Temple) January 17 - Winnipeg (Fairmont Hotel)
Welcome Elizabeth Schanbacher Assistant Superintendent of Educational Technology.
Technology Transfer at Rice
Federal Emphasis on Accountability in Higher Education and Regional Accreditation Processes Carla D. Sanderson Commissioner, Southern Association of Colleges.
Managing Your Grant Roberta Teliska Vice President for Sponsored Programs Operations The Research Foundation of SUNY October 6, 2008.
Five UF Policies Every Faculty Member Should Know Barbara C. Wingo Associate Vice President and Deputy General Counsel.
KUIC - Copyright 2014 KU Innovation and Collaboration (KUIC) is the commercialization arm of the University of Kansas (all campuses): Intellectual property.
The Patent Process. Protection of Ideas or Inventions An idea/know how Generally speaking, we would like to protect inventions that have significant commercial.
“Today, the Department of Veterans Affairs takes credit for the work our researchers did in the past and will do in the future.” Anthony J. Principi Secretary.
UARC Intellectual Property Management Burney Le Boeuf Director, Aligned Research Program of UARC Professor Emeritus UC Santa Cruz November 12, 2009.
1 Knowledge | Innovation | Technology Overview of Risk Management in University Technology Transfer David N. Allen, Ph.D. Associate Vice President for.
+ Faculty Orientation UAMS BioVentures September 23, 2015 Christopher A. Fasel Associate Director of Licensing Patent Attorney UAMS BioVentures.
Chapter 5 Organizing Center Structure and Working with a Board.
Managing Your Grant Award August 23, 2012 Janet Stoeckert Director, Research Administration Sr. Administrator, Basic Sciences Keck School of Medicine 1.
Developing an IP Policy at Smaller Institutions James R. Zanewicz, J.D. Director Office of Technology Development.
Introduction to the Offices of Biotechnology & Business Development John L. Harb Director, Office of Biotechnology __________________________________ October.
University of North Texas Technology Transfer Process.
UNT Technology Transfer Process For additional details see the UNT Intellectual Property Policy UNT retains ownership of the technology Intellectual.
Policies Promoting IP Development in Universities and Higher Institutions of Learning In Africa OGADA Tom WIPO National Workshop on Intellectual Property.
Proposed Revisions Copyright Policy WSU Intellectual Property Committee.
Creation of Copyrighted Materials Policy (Revision of Current Policy) AUGUST 2015.
UMBC POLICY ON ESH MANAGEMENT & ENFORCEMENT UMBC Policy #VI
Office of Technology Commercialization Chuck Rancourt Director.
General Guidelines for Institutional IP Policies: What Should be There Franco G. Teves, Ph.D., Dipl. PAM Director of Research MSU-IIT.
1 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND RELATED RIGHTS What Goes Out the Door When a Researcher Does? Presented by Gail Norris University of Rochester Office of Technology.
Moscow, Russia, 10 September 2012 HSE Intellectual Property Policy Aliya Ermakova, Head of IP Department, Innovation and Enterprise Office, HSE
ATIS Intellectual Property Rights Policy Review Thomas Goode General Counsel, ATIS DOCUMENT #:GSC13-IPR-08 FOR:Presentation or Information SOURCE:ATIS.
Overview of Proposed Changes to the Special Rules for Procedure of the General Assembly and the Standing Rules for the General Assembly, General Board,
DRAFTING AN EFFECTIVE CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY William H. Jordan, Esq. Sowell, Gray, Stepp & Laffitte, LLC (803)
+ Departmental Research Administrator Training Series FS 206 Compliance Topics: Institutional Committees, Ethics and Professionalism Judith Grant James.
COI 101: What is Conflict of Interest and How Can it Affect You? Jennifer Morales Research Compliance Specialist Office of Research Integrity & Compliance.
SOUTH AFRICAN REVENUE SERVICE AMENDMENT BILL, 2002.
University of Iowa Research Foundation We help you identify, protect and commercialize your discoveries. We can help you start a company. We will help.
Technology Transfer Office
Legal Services Public Information Policy Administration Board Services
The Basics of Intellectual Property Reporting
Intellectual Property 101
IRB Open House Conflicts of Interest and Financial Conflicts of Interest in Research May 19, 2017 Office of Policy Coordination, Division of Outside.
GUKEYEH GUK’EH GU’SANI Kaska Dena Good Governance Act
Universities and the Commercial World
UCR PRO Reviewer Placemat
N.J.A.C. 6A:30, Evaluation of the Performance of School Districts: New Jersey Quality Single Accountability Continuum (NJQSAC) Adoption Level Robert.
Intellectual Property 101
IP Ownership, Benefit Sharing and Incentive for Researchers
University of Iowa Research Foundation
Technology Commercialization, UI, and You
The Bayh–Dole Act: Where Are We Today?
Office of Technology Transfer and Economic Development
Collective Bargaining
Presentation transcript:

Technology Commercialization Office James Taylor Director Patrick Thomas Associate Director 104 Miller building Phone: 626-6055 jamestaylor8@weber.edu

PATENT POLICY

Reasons and Background for Patent Policy 1. WSU PPM 5-13(II)(b)(1) reads, “Patents developed by University personnel using University time, material or facilities are the property of the University subject to conditions specified by University policies.” 2. Currently, there are no such “University policies” that govern patents comprehensively at the University including inventorship rights to share in University revenues and compliance with the Bayh-Dole Act. 3. All other universities in Utah have comprehensive policies on patents which grant inventorship rights to share University revenues and ensure compliance with the Bayh-Dole Act. 4. This policy grants inventorship rights to share University revenues and provides the means by which the University can comply with the Bayh-Dole Act. 5. The policy does not modify current PPMs dealing with copyrights or PPM 5-13 (e.g. textbooks, curriculum, etc.).

Income Distribution WSU- the income distribution is 50% of Net Revenues (NR) to Inventor. UVU- 50% of NR to Inventor. USU-50% of NR to Inventor less than $500,000; and 40% of NR to Inventor equal to or greater than $500,000. BYU- 45% of NR to Inventor. U of U- 40% of NR to Inventor less than $100,000; 35% of NR to Inventor from $100,000 to 300,000; and 33% of NR to Inventor $300,000 and up.

Bayh-Dole Act Compliance The act was passed in 1980 and is significant because it drives most IP policies at universities. The act allows universities to own IP developed through federal funding. In exchange for ownership, the act requires universities to disclose IP to the federal government. WSU PPM 5-13 was last modified in 1977 and provides no mechanisms to comply with the Bayh-Dole Act. The Patent Policy provides mechanisms to comply with the Bayh-Dole act and designates the TCO as being responsible for ensuring compliance.

Other Contents of Patent Policy Creates an Invention Committee to perform the following: Advises the President on policy matters relating to Inventions; Proposes amendments to the IP policies; Develops internal procedures to implement this policy Arbitrates disputes; and Approves any deviations from this policy. Membership of the Invention Committee is comprised of: One or more faculty and/or staff members; The Director of the TCO; One representative from the Office of University Legal Counsel; and One representative from the Research Foundation Board. Delineates the process by which all employees and staff assign rights to WSU resulting from: Assigned employment duties; and Effort normally associated with one’s discipline or position. Provides administrative procedures to perform the following: The disclosure of patents to the TCO; and The means for the TCO to provide business and legal services.