Minimum Contract Level Support Programme Lead Providers and Performance Management Michael Gray, LSIS Adviser Jim Austin, Head of Adult.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Key Stage 3 National Strategy
Advertisements

Welcome to Site Management Amy Thompson. Agenda I.Foundation Introductions Setting the Session Agenda II.Site Management Principles III.Site Management.
Options appraisal, the business case & procurement
School Development Plan
Child Safeguarding Standards
Building Better Opportunities Skills to successfully apply for and manage ESF funding - the Governance workshop.
Buying Better Outcomes Workshop 4 Equalities and Contract Management If you do not take it seriously, why should the supplier?
Evaluating public RTD interventions: A performance audit perspective from the EU European Court of Auditors American Evaluation Society, Portland, 3 November.
Introduction & Background Laurene Christensen National Center on Educational Outcomes National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO)
FMSiS and benchmarking a seminar at the bursars conference 05 July 2010 Presented by Simon Maddocks Dave Phillips David Dilling.
With libraries, registration & archives An introduction to our services and the way we do things Cath Anley – April 2012 connect.
ESIF Technical Compliance Requirements May 2015 WORKSHOP Helen Joicey.
Ofsted Good Practice South East Provider Event Matthew Coffey HMI Director, Further Education and Skills 11 July 2013.
Registering the care sector – next steps Dr Linda Hutchinson Director, Care Quality Commission National Care Association Conference, 21 October 2010.
National Council for Voluntary Organisations Third Sector Foresight Look out: the future of the relationship between the third sector and local government.
1 Hertfordshire County Council Knowing your school.
Targeted Selection This workforce solution was funded by a grant awarded under the President’s Community- Based Job Training Grants as implemented by the.
Primary National Strategy Bedfordshire LA Middle School Intensifying Support Programme October 2006 © Crown Copyright 2006.
@theEIFoundation | eif.org.uk Early Intervention to prevent gang and youth violence: ‘Maturity Matrix’ Early intervention (‘EI’) is about getting extra.
Attending Meetings at School Louise Mottershead Aspire North West 2015.
© Tesseract Management Systems / Managing by Design / Development Process These slides provide an outline structure for a development process.
1 The Workbook Process The Workbook starts by building an understanding of the context of the school and the Prevent agenda. It then focuses on 4 aspects.
Quality Standard Quality standards provide a set of criteria that can be used to monitor the management and provision of services, the quality of services.
Action West London –Changing Lives through Employment, Education and Enterprise.
Minimum Contract Level Support Programme Risk Management for Partnerships Chris Bealey, LSIS Partnership Adviser Terry McHale, Open4learning Partnership.
ON-LINE TOPIC THE ROLE OF THE TUTOR.  Spend a few minutes thinking about and making notes of all the different roles you fulfil as a tutor. Once you.
The Common Assessment Framework (CAF) & Lead Professional (LP)
Minimum Contract Level Partnership Planning Cycles November 2011 Barry Langfield, LSIS Partnership Adviser.
Action West London –Changing Lives through Employment, Education and Enterprise.
Minimum Contract Level Support Programme Minimum Contract Level Policy Milestones and Guidance July 2011.
Developing classroom practice to raise standards Rosemarie Sadler, Primary Performance Adviser Val Phillips – Primary Performance Adviser.
Minimum Contract Level Key issues on management information Online seminar – July 2011 Carolyn Medlin, LSIS Adviser Stephen Howard, Learning Plus Richard.
Minimum Contract Level Localism and Accountability November 2011 Barry Langfield, LSIS Partnership Adviser.
Using evidence to review and moderate students’ progress against the Teachers’ Standards Explain that the review will relate directly to three different.
Fitness and Conditioning
GOVERNING BODY SELF-EVALUATION TOOLKIT
Using evidence to review and moderate students’ progress against the Teachers’ Standards Explain that students should have provided their TP files and.
Approaches to Partnership
Minimum Contract Level Data, Management Information and Data Sharing January 2012 Barry Langfield, LSIS Partnership Adviser Emphasise for contractors.
Continuing Professional Development Assessor Briefing
What is HEA Fellowship? What’s the UK PSF?
Self-Evaluation Cycle for Governing Bodies
Minimum Contract Level Support Programme Shared Leadership and Governance Michael Gray, LSIS Adviser, December
Rebecca Rhodes, Senior Associate, UVAC
Customer Satisfaction Surveys – What are they good for?
ANTI - MONEY LAUNDERING
NLDC information meeting
Welcome The aim of this toolkit is to support the club and its development aims and ambitions. It is also used to help the club to submit an application.
Minimum Contract Level Support Programme Collaborating for Learner Benefit Michael Gray, LSIS Adviser Jim Austin, Head of Adult Education Service,
Rebecca Rhodes, Senior Associate, UVAC
Outdoor Programme Accreditation Schemes
Minimum Contract Level Delivery Models January 2012 Barry Langfield, LSIS Partnership Adviser Emphasise for contractors (lead/sub –contractors): existing.
Minimum Contract Level Collaborative Quality Assurance July 2011 Chris Bealey, LSIS Adviser Richard Mole, Skills Funding Agency Emphasise for contractors.
Minimum Contract Level Collaborative Self Assessment October 2011 Chris Bealey, LSIS Adviser Emphasise for contractors (lead/sub –contractors): existing.
Activity Agreement Service
Starting Points Planning for progress.
Starting Points Planning for progress.
Minimum Contract Level Collaborative Quality Improvement December 2011 Chris Bealey, LSIS Adviser Emphasise for contractors (lead/sub –contractors):
Continuing Professional Development Assessor Briefing
Minimum Contract Level Support Programme Partnerships ‘Beyond the Honeymoon’ 13 December 2011 Caroline Wilkinson - LSIS Partnership Adviser.
Minimum Contract Level Collaborative Self Assessment October 2011 Chris Bealey, LSIS Adviser Emphasise for contractors (lead/sub –contractors): existing.
To critically review aspects of your provision to an agreed criteria
Implementing your school improvement plan
ICS Staff One person is responsible for overall ICS and can delegate the responsibilities so that for each procedure or task of the ICS, one person is.
OTLA Report Writing Training
The Early Help Assessment Journey
Tracie Wills Senior Commissioning Officer
National data opt-out - Preparing for implementation
The Early Help Assessment Journey
Presentation transcript:

Minimum Contract Level Support Programme Lead Providers and Performance Management Michael Gray, LSIS Adviser Jim Austin, Head of Adult Education Service, Gloucestershire County Council, October 2011 1

Outcomes You will be aware of the key issues in managing subcontractor performance You will have reflected on your own practice or plans You will be able to plan to manage the performance of subcontractors effectively Emphasise that this stimulates questions and reflection and action – it doesn’t give you a ‘manual’ 2

What is top of your agenda? Agreeing learner numbers and targets with subcontractors Carrying out due diligence checks Meeting Agency requirements in respect of subcontracting Ensuring compliance by subcontractors Getting timely and accurate information from subcontractors Reallocating contract values between subcontractors Identifying high quality potential subcontractors Quality assurance and improvement of subcontractors For the poll; gather up other issues too Use Agency due diligence checklist to elaborate on the compliance issues: Legislation H and S, and safeguarding Resources of subcontractor

Some Performance Management Issues The monitoring process between lead provider and subcontractor – how you do it specifically, and the cost Auditing Compliance v support How the subcontractor is involved in the Agency’s quarterly or other review processes How under- and over-performance are managed, and rewarded or penalised How changes to contract value (up or down) are managed How contract values might be reallocated between the lead provider and the subcontractor and/or between the subcontractor and other subcontractors of the lead provider Point 1: this is the first part of the equation; some lead providers adopt the same words as the Agency uses in its contract with lead provider; others talk more about processes 2: elaborate on auditing options: what sample size? How often? Invite sharing of comments later 3: what’s the balance? How do you use risk assessment? Does it depend on the maturity of the relationship? 4: explain that the Agency contracts only with the lead provider; numbers can be moved around between subcontractors; the lead provider has to have ways of involving the subcontractor; explain that in Agency note 8 the profile and tolerances are explained; the lead has to make sure the subs understand these and any implications, for example for cash flow 5: are there penalties and rewards/ 6: tough decisions; sort early on 7: what criteria do you use? What about new work? Who gets that? Give examples of what lead providers are doing.

Questions to ask yourself Have we defined exactly how we monitor performance? Do all subcontractors understand and agree the results of over- or underperformance? Do we monitor and take action in a supportive and robust way? Questions to ask yourself First and second point: about clear agreements in a contract, and commitment Third point: About robust actions when needed but also about providing support when things go a bit wrong. Remember also that the Agency doesn’t guarantee to fund overperformance!

Best practice for lead providers Ensuring compliance without micro-managing Building relationship beyond the contract and the fee Ensuring there are clear agreements about who does what and by when, and about cashflow Ensuring the subcontractor(s) is/are a part of the lead contractor’s quality improvement process– e.g. that they measure impact on learners, not just improvement actions Dealing with the trickier aspects – redistributing or clawing back monies, for example, or distributing new funding This is much more than the Agency requirements How do you build a better and broader relationship? Does it matter?

Any questions?

Over to Jim… Jim Austin… 8

Resources Support for Collaborative Contracting Case Studies Toolkits: Managing Risk Partnership Planning and Working Shared Leadership and Governance Shared Services Sub-contracting Quality Management Sub-contracting (Nov 2011) Annual planning and operations cycle (Nov 2011) http://www.excellencegateway.org.uk/page.aspx?o=MCLsupport

Wrapping Up We’ll send you evaluation form and a link to the recording Slides from the seminar will be on the Excellence Gateway You may be be interested in further support from the LSIS MCL Support Programme. A range of resources are available on the Excellence Gateway site www.excellencegateway.org.uk/MCLsupport  Further web seminar events are planned,  you can find details and registration on events.lsis.org.uk/Pages/Event/Stage1/Events.aspx If you would like to talk to an MCL Partnership Adviser please send an e-mail to mclsp@lsis.org.uk