Globular Cluster Astrometry

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Magellanic Clouds Exploration. Motivation VO tools enable quick comparison of catalogs: position, photometry, proper motion, when available Cross match.
Advertisements

LesvePhotometry an automatic photometry solution
6dF Galaxy Survey Work Shop K. Wakamatsu (Gifu University) Redshift Survey near the Galactic Plane with 6dF.
Pushing Astrometry to the Limit Richard Berry. Barnard’s Star Location: Ophiuchus Location: Ophiuchus Coordinates: 17 h 57 m º41’36”(J2000) Coordinates:
Megacam Imaging of the Extended Groth Strip M. Ashby, B. McLeod, J.-S. Huang, P. Barmby, G. Fazio, C. Papovich, S. Willner.
Towards Creation of a JWST Astrometric Reference Field: Calibration of HST/ACS Absolute Scale and Rotation Roeland van der Marel Jay Anderson, Colin Cox,
The Kepler Input Catalog and Follow-Up Observations Dave Latham for the Kepler Team 6 June 2006.
Variable Stars in the Globular Cluster NGC 6496 Katherine Guldenschuh & Andrew Layden (Bowling Green State University) Douglas Welch (McMaster University),
Basic Astrometric Methods William van Altena Yale University Basic Astrometric Methods Yale University July 18-22, 2005.
Astrometry with the TMT S. R. Kulkarni California Institute of Technology Interdisciplinary Scientist Space Interferometry Mission.
UKIDSS SciVer Products E. A. Gonzalez-Solares (IoA, Cambridge) (+CASU) UKIDSS SV.
Proper-Motion Membership Determinations in Star Clusters Dana I. Dinescu (Yale U.)
Pan-STARRS Seminar: IPPEugene Magnier Pan-STARRS Image Processing Pipeline Astrometry and Photometry IFA Pan-STARRS Seminar 735 October 14, 2004.
Poretti et al. (2005): –„Potential secondary target in the Anticenter dir.” –„a 2M Sun, slightly evolved object” –„High-res. spectroscopy: perturbed line.
WFC3/IR LESSONS FOR WFIRST Jay Anderson STScI. WFC3/IR Lessons for WFIRST 1)Absolute astrometry 2)PSF modeling and variation (space/time) 3) Bulge-type.
The Status of the HST Fine Guidance Sensors B. E. McArthur, McDonald Observatory, U. of Texas E. P. Nelan STScI W. H. Jefferys and G.F. Benedict Formerly.
HST Archival Studies of HH 30 WFPC2 Data Retrieval and Reduction Liu, Jimmy Chun-Fan Supervisor: Dr. Shang, Hsien August 23, 2002 Summer Student Program.
E. BertinAstro-WISE workshop 11/ TERAPIX: SCAMP E.Bertin (IAP & Obs. de Paris/LERMA)
The Effect of Crowding on the GSMT Stellar Populations Science Case Knut Olsen, Bob Blum (NOAO), François Rigaut (Gemini) GSMT SWG Presentation Hilo 2002.
Astrometry of Binary Stars: What Are We Waiting For? Elliott Horch, Southern Connecticut State University 9/21/20081Stars in Motion BU 151AB 1 arcsec Andor.
Photometry and Astrometry of SIM Planetquest Globular Cluster Targets T. M. Girard (Yale), A. Sarajedini (U. Florida), B. Chaboyer (Dartmouth) Table 1.
The Chinese SONG proposal: scientific concerns Jianning Fu (Beijing Normal University) and Chinese SONG team Beijing ─ March 29, 2010 The third workshop.
U.S. Naval Observatory The Hipparcos Catalog Sean E. Urban U.S. Naval Observatory.
Zacharias & Gaume: UCAC and URAT; Journees, Paris 2010 Sep 21 1 UCAC and URAT: optical astrometric catalog observing programs Norbert Zacharias Ralph Gaume.
AST 443/PHY 517 : Observational Techniques November 6, 2007 ASTROMETRY By: Jackie Faherty.
Astrometry & the Yale/WIYN ODI Survey. Potential astrometric projects Local luminosity function (van Altena, et al.) obtain  ≤ 0.10 parallaxes to 150.
High Precision Astrometry and Parallax from Spatial Scanning Part 2 Adam Riess and Stefano Casertano.
A new geometric distortion solution for the STIS NUV MAMA Jesús Maíz-Apellániz Leonardo Úbeda TIPS 17 July 2003.
Gyöngyi Kerekes Eötvös Lóránd University, Budapest MAGPOP 2008, Paris István Csabai László Dobos Márton Trencséni.
Data Analysis Software Development Hisanori Furusawa ADC, NAOJ For HSC analysis software team 1.
Initial Results from the Chandra Shallow X-ray Survey in the NDWFS in Boötes S. Murray, C. Jones, W. Forman, A. Kenter, A. Vikhlinin, P. Green, D. Fabricant,
S. B. Holmes, P. Massey (Lowell Observatory) Detections Using data obtained with the MOSAIC 8k x 8k CCD at the 4-m Mayall telescope at KPNO, we have been.
Revised GALEX Ultraviolet Catalog of Globular Clusters in M31 Kyungsook Lee (1), Soo-Chang Rey (1), Sangmo Tony Sohn (2), and GALEX Science Team (1) Department.
AstroWise Workshop 14 – 18 november 2005 Astrometry in AW Overview of Astrometric processing.
X-ray sky survey of bright, serendipitous sources with 2XMMi at the AIP Speaker: Alexander Kolodzig Origin: Humboldt-Uni Berlin, Germany Institute:AIP.
POSSII IMAGES ASTROMÉTRIC REDUCTION Reduction methods and their influence on Theta and Rho measures Ignacio Novalbos O.A.N.L. Barcelona.
MGL/OATo 7th GSC2 Meeting, Barolo (I), 22 Oct 2001 The GSC2.2 Catalog: Global Properties Mario G. Lattanzi Osservatorio Astronomico di Torino.
HR diagram of 20,853 stars with distances and colors measured by Hipparcos (borrowed from Catherine Turon’s web site). Brighter Redder.
Physics 114: Lecture 13 Error Analysis, Part III Dale E. Gary NJIT Physics Department.
MSW Transforming Measured to Standard Coordinates: Models for wide-field astrographs and simplifications for long-focus telescopes - T. M. Girard.
MSW - July The Establishment of Astrometric Calibration Regions And the determination of positions for objects much fainter than existing reference.
Calibration for WFPC2 Vera Platais Astrometric X g =a 1 +a 2 X+a 3 Y+a 4 X 2 +a 5 XY+a 6 Y 2 +a 7 X 3 +a 8 X 2 Y+a 9 XY 2 +a 10 Y 3 Y g =b 1 +b 2 X+b.
Pisa, 4 May 2009 Alessandro Spagna A new kinematic survey (from GSC-II and SDSS-DR7) to study the stellar populations of the Milky Way Alessandro Spagna.
EXPLORE/OC: Photometry Results for the Open Cluster NGC 2660 K. von Braun (Carnegie/DTM), B. L. Lee (Toronto), S. Seager (Carnegie/DTM), H. K. C. Yee (Toronto),
26th October 2005 HST Calibration Workshop 1 The New GSC-II and it’s Use for HST Brian McLean Archive Sciences Branch.
Astrometry with Schmidt Plates Difficulty in attaining highly accurate positions -Bending of plates as they are placed in plate holder -Characteristics.
GSPC -II Program GOAL: extend GSPC-I photometry to B = V ˜ 20 add R band to calibrate red second-epoch surveys HOW: take B,V,R CCD exposures centered at.
WFC3 SMOV UVIS and IR Geometric Distortion Calibration and Multidrizzle Vera Kozhurina-Platais and WFC3 team.
C. Y. Hui & W. Becker Probing the Proper Motion of the Central Compact Object in Puppis-A Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Giessenbachstrasse.
Validation of HLA Source Lists Feb. 4, 2008 Brad Whitmore 1.Overview 2.Plots 3.Summary.
Star Catalog Comparison 2016 IOTA Annual Meeting Steve Preston.
J. Cohen, Concepcion, Feb 2006 Part 1 – the very young GCs in M31,
First results from BEST at OHP
ESO: Applications to the ESO Imaging Survey and to the VLT
ESAC 2017 JWST Workshop NIRSpec MSA Planning Tool (MPT)
A galaxy at redshift 10? Brigitta Eder Vera Könyves
Numeric Only Variables Binomials Trinomials Misc
GPI Astrometric Calibration
Gaia impact on asteroidal occultations
Gaia impact on asteroidal occultations
Observational Astronomy Astrometry
Master thesis Detection of Van Hoof effect in RR Lyrae stars from BOES observation Spectroscopy for RR Lyrae variables Target : TT Lyn, RR Leo, & SW Dra.
Towards the ICRF3: Comparing USNO 2016A VLBI Global Solution to Gaia and ICRF2 Megan Johnson in collaboration with Julien Frouard, Alan Fey, Valeri Makarov,
UCAC U.S. Naval Observatory CCD Astrograph Catalog T.J. Rafferty
Extra-Solar Planetary Transits
(National Astronomical Observatory of Japan)
Astrometric Catalogs: Untangling the Acronym Jungle
FMOS astrometry plan Masayuki Akiyama.
Meeting 9 Slitmask Planning Ken Nordsieck
Water Masers in NGC7538 Region
Presentation transcript:

Globular Cluster Astrometry (for fiber-positioning purposes) Overview Ata Sarajedini has MOSAIC data of many of our target globular clusters Ata (et al.) uses IRAF to detect & center stars, and obtain photometry Ata (et al.) provides (x,y,B,V) data per pointing My task is to provide precise (a,d) per star 1) “undo” the standard chip metrology & telescope OFAD 2) apply Platais et al. (2002) chip metrology 3) transform to an astrometric system, with OFAD terms T. Girard SIM Group Meeting: Nov. 5, 2004 – CfA

Globular Cluster Astrometry (for fiber-positioning purposes) Current Astrometry-Reduction Status Cluster Telesc. Frames Status (Ref. Cat.) M3 0.9-m 3x2 done 12/02 USNO-A2 M5 0.9-m 4x2 completed UCAC2 M12 0.9-m 10x2 completed UCAC2 M13 0.9-m 3x2 completed UCAC2 M55 4-m 5x2 in progress USNO-A2 NGC6352 4-m 9x2 in progress USNO-A2 M92 4-m 5x2 in limbo USNO-A2(?) T. Girard SIM Group Meeting: Nov. 5, 2004 – CfA

Globular Cluster Astrometry (for fiber-positioning purposes) Chip Metrology: NOAO (Davis) vs Platais XY File: b1.dat (Davis) Catalog: m12.ucac2 Tangent (a,d): 251.8250380 -1.9557720 Offsets (x,y): 4112.000 4116.000 RA solution: Nref/poss = 844 / 896 Nterms = 8 Std Err = 9.5811E-02 1 X -1.46798428E-03 3.7226E-06 (arcsec) 2 Y 4.24387812E-01 3.7958E-06 3 const -1.14337419E-01 5.3705E-03 4 X*X 8.36042363E-09 6.5647E-10 5 X*Y 2.83251062E-09 6.6252E-10 6 Y*Y -5.70794565E-09 6.9175E-10 11 X*X*X 3.91864103E-12 3.3452E-13 14 Y*Y*Y -1.88542212E-12 3.5859E-13 XY File: b1i.dat (Platais) RA solution: Nref/poss = 834 / 896 Nterms = 9 Std Err = 6.1631E-02 1 X -1.54435424E-03 1.4148E-06 (arcsec) 2 Y 4.25562268E-01 2.6089E-06 3 const -3.17320830E+00 3.4245E-03 4 X*X 1.37281377E-08 4.2065E-10 5 X*Y 1.59887878E-08 4.1840E-10 6 Y*Y -8.48054050E-10 4.4387E-10 12 X*X*Y -6.94081094E-11 1.9657E-13 13 X*Y*Y 2.99000816E-12 1.9299E-13 14 Y*Y*Y -6.95916310E-11 2.2761E-13 T. Girard SIM Group Meeting: Nov. 5, 2004 – CfA

Globular Cluster Astrometry (for fiber-positioning purposes) a,d Comparison of Two M3 Pointings: Davis metrology T. Girard SIM Group Meeting: Nov. 5, 2004 – CfA

Globular Cluster Astrometry (for fiber-positioning purposes) a,d Comparison of Two M3 Pointings: Platais metrology T. Girard SIM Group Meeting: Nov. 5, 2004 – CfA

Globular Cluster Astrometry (for fiber-positioning purposes) Reference Catalog: USNO-A2 vs UCAC2 (0.9-m) Catalog: m12.usno_a2 Tangent (a,d): 251.8250380 -1.9557720 Offsets (x,y): 4112.000 4116.000 RA solution: Nref/poss = 5027 / 5571 Nterms = 9 Std Err = 3.2029E-01 1 X -1.53008379E-03 3.1309E-06 (arcsec) 2 Y 4.25529346E-01 5.5497E-06 3 const -3.13432871E+00 7.0649E-03 4 X*X 1.73579491E-08 9.1096E-10 5 X*Y 1.73833149E-08 9.0220E-10 6 Y*Y 7.15634051E-09 9.3236E-10 12 X*X*Y -6.69394223E-11 4.1553E-13 13 X*Y*Y 2.33403259E-12 4.2223E-13 14 Y*Y*Y -6.82318137E-11 4.7373E-13 Catalog: m12.ucac2 RA solution: Nref/poss = 834 / 896 Nterms = 9 Std Err = 6.1631E-02 1 X -1.54435424E-03 1.4148E-06 (arcsec) 2 Y 4.25562268E-01 2.6089E-06 3 const -3.17320830E+00 3.4245E-03 4 X*X 1.37281377E-08 4.2065E-10 5 X*Y 1.59887878E-08 4.1840E-10 6 Y*Y -8.48054050E-10 4.4387E-10 12 X*X*Y -6.94081094E-11 1.9657E-13 13 X*Y*Y 2.99000816E-12 1.9299E-13 14 Y*Y*Y -6.95916310E-11 2.2761E-13 T. Girard SIM Group Meeting: Nov. 5, 2004 – CfA

Globular Cluster Astrometry (for fiber-positioning purposes) Reference Catalog: USNO-A2 vs UCAC2 (4-m) Catalog: m55.usno_a2 Tangent (a,d): 294.9718110 -30.9500000 Offsets (x,y): 4112.000 4116.000 RA solution: Nref/poss = 3721 / 4975 Nterms = 9 Std Err = 2.2115E-01 1 X 6.69570951E-04 2.4679E-06 (arcsec) 2 Y 2.66895238E-01 4.2907E-06 3 const -4.59408255E-02 6.5462E-03 4 X*X -3.12777111E-09 8.0623E-10 5 X*Y -3.06839423E-09 7.8624E-10 6 Y*Y 3.86500707E-09 8.5285E-10 12 X*X*Y -2.54949921E-12 3.5885E-13 13 X*Y*Y 9.34771029E-13 3.5732E-13 14 Y*Y*Y -2.40331812E-12 3.9444E-13 Catalog: m55.ucac2 Tangent (a,d): 294.9852100 -30.9517190 RA solution: Nref/poss = 127 / 154 Nterms = 8 Std Err = 6.4481E-02 1 X 6.30025013E-04 3.6198E-06 (arcsec) 2 Y 2.66900356E-01 6.5916E-06 3 const -4.13676360E+01 8.6718E-03 4 X*X 2.63380142E-09 1.6813E-09 5 X*Y 2.32749162E-09 1.7341E-09 6 Y*Y -6.49580433E-09 1.8042E-09 12 X*X*Y -2.20002629E-12 7.5849E-13 14 Y*Y*Y -2.96033678E-12 7.0737E-13 T. Girard SIM Group Meeting: Nov. 5, 2004 – CfA

Globular Cluster Astrometry (for fiber-positioning purposes) Estimated Astrometric Precision... based on a,d comparisons of two pointings in M3 (0.9-m) is 0.063 arcsec, “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ M12 “ “ 0.040 arcsec, but, is a function of magnitude (as one would expect). The M12 data (0.9-m) indicate a precision of... 0.025 arcsec for B < 16. T. Girard SIM Group Meeting: Nov. 5, 2004 – CfA

Globular Cluster Astrometry (for fiber-positioning purposes) Summary  Astrometric software/procedures for MOSAIC cluster data are working, 4 clusters are completed, (M3, M5, M12, M13)  Platais metrology + UCAC2 produces good results for 0.9-m data, precision is ~ 25 mas for well-measured stars, ~ 40 mas for all stars  4-m cluster data is still being explored, to determine optimum procedures T. Girard SIM Group Meeting: Nov. 5, 2004 – CfA