The R&D Anomaly in January

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cash Flow Budgeting: Chap.13 §What is a cash flow budget used for? §What items are included in cash inflows and cash outflows? §What adjustments can be.
Advertisements

Value Premium in International REITs ERES Conference 2014 Ytzen van der Werf and Fred Huibers 27 June 2014
Do Individual Day Traders Make Money? Evidence from Taiwan Brad Barber Yi-Tsung Lee Yu-Jane Liu Terrance Odean
Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Reporting and Interpreting Investments in Other Corporations Chapter 12.
SEASONALITY IN THE THAI STOCK INDEX
Chapter 10 Long-Term Liabilities. Conceptual Learning Objectives NOT COVERED: A1: Compare bond financing with stock financing. P4: Record the retirement.
Financial and Managerial Accounting Wild, Shaw, and Chiappetta Fifth Edition Wild, Shaw, and Chiappetta Fifth Edition McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013.
Part 3B: Equity, Dividends & Retained Earnings
(C) 2001 Contemporary Engineering Economics 1 Chapter 6 Principles of Investing Investing in Financial Assets Investment Strategies Investing in Stocks.
Annuities. Definitions of Annuities Fixed Account credited with a fixed interest rate Held in the insurance companies general account Need insurance license.
©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Financial Accounting, 6/e Harrison/Horngren 1 Long-Term Investments and International Operations Chapter 10.
© 2001 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Financial Accounting, 4/e Harrison and Horngren 10A-1 CHAPTER 10 Part A Accounting for Long-Term Investments and.
R&D-Intensity, Mispricing, and Stock Returns in Taiwan Stock Market.
The Global Cost and Availability of Capital
CHAPTER 13 Investments Empirical Evidence on Security Returns Slides by Richard D. Johnson Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights.
Performance Evaluation of Mutual Funds Himanshu Joshi.
BUS 120: Financial Accounting Chapter 13: Investments
Annual Report Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida Mandy Irwin ACG
Click to edit Master title style Investments in Stocks 14.
Jie Zhang, HKPU Forecasted Earnings per Share and the Cross Section of Expected Returns Ling Cen K.C. John Wei Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.
Investments, 8 th edition Bodie, Kane and Marcus Slides by Susan Hine McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights.
Financial Accounting Fundamentals John J. Wild Third Edition John J. Wild Third Edition McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies,
© McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Chapter 12 Reporting and Interpreting Investments in Other Companies.
Brazil’s Currency Crisis. 2 Brazil: Recent Problems (2002) 40% devaluation of the Real against the dollar Large public debt (~60% of GDP), default risk.
Slide 9-1 Market Efficiency 1. Performance of portfolio managers 2. Anomalies 3. Behavioral Finance as a challenge to the EMH 1/7/
Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
Cash Flow Management and Budgeting for Beef Production An Sci 426.
1 Arbitrage risk and the book- to-market anomaly Ali, Hwang and Trombley JFE (2003)
U.S. Housing Annual Home Sales New Existing New Existing
Basic View Main Menus Sub Menus 9-Aug-01 8-Aug-01 7-Aug-01 6-Aug-01
Jan 2016 Solar Lunar Data.
Equilibrium Asset Pricing
Intercorporate Investments and Consolidations
What Factors Drive Global Stock Returns?
Samsung Electronics.
Leverage, Financial Distress and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns
Milestones & Deliverables BENE III period Jan 06 - Jun07
Risk, Return, and Capital Budgeting
Average Monthly Temperature and Rainfall
dividend, liquidity and firm valuation: Evidence from China

Cash Flow Budgeting: Chap.13
Mammoth Caves National Park, Kentucky

Gantt Chart Enter Year Here Activities Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE

Calendar Year 2009 Insure Oklahoma Total & Projected Enrollment
Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
Figure 7.1 Efficient Frontier and Capital Market Line
Financial Liquidity Management
Electricity Cost and Use – FY 2016 and FY 2017
Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory
Empirical Research in Innovation

Investments and Fair Value Accounting
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE
Presentation transcript:

The R&D Anomaly in January Yuan Li University of Cambridge

Chan, Lakonishok and Sougiannis (2001 JF): Companies with high R&D to equity market value ratio earn large excess returns ---- the R&D anomaly (1) Companies with high physical investment (such as capital expenditure; change in inventory; change in operating assets; change in total assets) earn low future returns. (2) It defies the most recently developed factor models, such as Q and FF5 factors.

Debate Mispricing: Chan et al. (2001 JF); Cohen, Diether and Malloy (2013 RFS); etc. Risk: Berk, Green and Naik (2004 RFS); Chambers, Jennings, and Thompson II (2011 RAS); Li (2011, RFS); Lin and Wang (2016, TAR); Gu (2016, JFE); etc.

Summary of Findings (1) Most or all of the R&D premium resides in January. (2) The January R&D premium is robust to all existing factors and to all scale variables. (3) The January R&D premium lasts up to 20 annual lags. (4) About 70% (100%) of the January R&D premium is earned during the first five (ten) trading days of January. (5) Ad, organizational capital, and physical investment do not exhibit the January phenomenon. (6) Tax loss-selling? (a) No negative return in December; (b) The January R&D premium is stronger among past losers and firms with higher institutional ownership; (c) No clear pattern between low tax years and high tax years. Puzzle???

Fiscal year ending in calendar year y-1 End of JUN End of JUN LOWSRD (<=30%) MIDSRD (30% - 70%) HIGHSRD (>=70%) Fiscal year ending in calendar year y-1 End of JUN End of JUN Holding Period Y - 1 Y Y + 1 DEC DEC DEC Sample period: July 1976 to Dec 2016

Table 1 Raw Returns to RD-to-Market Equity Groups Panel A: VW&ALL MISSRD (52.54%) ZERORD (8.63%) LOWSRD (8.62%) MIDSRD (12.24%) HIGHSRD (17.87%) HIGHSRD-LOWSRD ALL MONTHS 0.61 0.86 0.51 0.67 0.88 0.37 (3.06) (3.52) (2.45) (3.15) (3.47) (2.34) NO JAN 0.65 0.91 0.56 0.66 0.80 0.24 (3.13) (3.58) (2.60) (2.97) (3.00) (1.45) JAN 0.19 0.28 -0.03 0.82 1.84 1.86 (0.26) (0.33) (-0.03) (1.07) (2.08) (3.34) JAN - NO JAN -0.46 -0.63 -0.58 0.16 1.04 1.62 (-0.61) (-0.70) (-0.69) (0.21) (1.13) (2.79) Panel B: EW&ABM (all but micro) 0.77 0.89 0.52 0.84 1.12 0.60 (3.26) (1.92) (3.04) (3.45) (4.43) 0.79 0.93 0.50 0.96 0.46 (3.44) (3.23) (1.79) (2.78) (2.84) (3.39) 0.62 0.49 0.73 1.30 2.91 2.18 (0.79) (0.55) (0.71) (1.27) (2.53) (3.62) -0.17 -0.43 1.95 1.71 (-0.21) (-0.46) (0.22) (0.48) (1.63)

Table 2: Factor-adjusted Returns Panel A: VW&ALL CAPM FF3 FF3+UMD FF5 Q SY ALL MONTHS 0.25 0.12 0.18 0.15 0.24 -0.03 (1.62) (0.85) (1.17) (1.03) (1.49) (-0.19) NO JAN 0.11 0.01 0.08 0.03 0.14 -0.21 (0.67) (0.04) (0.53) (0.16) (0.82) (-1.16) JAN 1.84 1.33 1.45 1.52 1.80 1.64 (3.20) (3.01) (3.34) (3.29) (3.05) (3.84) JAN - NO JAN 1.73 1.37 1.48 1.66 1.85 (2.91) (2.85) (2.95) (2.94) (2.71) (3.98) Panel B: EW&ABM 0.49 0.41 0.45 0.51 0.21 (3.72) (3.39) (2.99) (3.66) (3.38) (1.39) 0.34 0.29 0.31 0.02 (2.62) (2.46) (2.31) (2.60) (2.83) (0.13) 2.14 1.81 2.00 1.96 1.86 2.24 (3.5) (3.36) (3.91) (3.71) (2.55) (4.84) 1.69 2.23 (2.88) (2.76) (2.98) (1.95) (4.58)

Table 3: Different scale variables Panel A: VW&ALL (FF3) SALE LAGBV LAGAT LAGPPE LAGEMP CAPX FENDMV JUNEMV ALL MONTHS -0.03 0.07 0.06 0.1 0.17 0.13 0.01 (-0.19) (0.46) (0.42) (0.70) (1.47) (1.26) (0.89) (0.04) NO JAN -0.16 -0.05 -0.07 -0.02 0.05 -0.13 (-0.97) (-0.33) (-0.49) (-0.14) (0.84) (0.37) (0.06) (-0.90) JAN 1.39 1.47 1.44 1.01 1.55 1.28 1.36 (2.11) (2.27) (2.35) (2.41) (2.14) (2.92) (2.76) (3.26) JAN - NO JAN 1.45 1.54 1.46 0.91 1.49 1.27 (2.28) (2.40) (2.37) (1.86) (2.72) (2.61) (3.38) Panel B: EW&ABM (FF3) 0.12 0.10 0.11 0.15 0.28 0.4 0.41 (0.68) (0.66) (0.36) (1.93) (3.46) (3.39) 0.00 0.04 0.16 0.29 (-0.10) (-0.34) (0.01) (-0.37) (0.24) (1.1) (2.46) 1.42 1.48 1.09 1.22 1.19 1.78 1.81 (2.24) (2.62) (1.68) (1.91) (2.42) (3.60) (3.36) 1.52 1.29 1.14 1.50 (2.19) (1.62) (1.89) (1.77) (2.09) (2.96)

Table 4 Sub-sample Periods Panel A: VW&ALL(FF3) 1977-1986 1987-1996 1997-2006 2007-2016 ALL -0.02 -0.08 0.07 0.27 (-0.06) (-0.34) (0.21) (1.23) NO JAN -0.05 -0.27 -0.06 0.15 (-0.14) (-1.15) (-0.17) (0.69) JAN 1.88 3.18 2.24 1.90 (1.03) (8.59) (1.68) (3.71) JAN - NO JAN 1.93 3.46 2.30 1.75 (7.87) (1.67) (3.14) Panel B: EW&ABM (FF3) 0.25 0.31 0.62 0.38 (1.26) (1.55) (1.9) (1.81) 0.23 0.11 0.51 0.29 (1.19) (0.57) (1.61) (1.38) 1.89 3.80 2.81 1.34 (1.53) (9.23) (1.56) (2.43) 1.66 3.69 2.31 1.05 (1.32) (8.20) (1.78)

Figure 1 The R&D premium by calendar year

Figure 2 The January R&D Premium during the 20 years after portfolio formation VW&ALL(FF3) EW&ABM(FF3)

Table 5 The R&D premium during different trading days of January Ret-rf CAPM FF3 FF3+UMD FF5 Q SY ALL 0.09 0.07 0.08 0.06 (3.38) (3.37) (2.77) (3.2) (2.52) (2.41) (3.31) 1 to 5 0.25 0.17 0.24 0.21 0.15 0.32 (3.99) (3.98) (2.10) (4.61) (3.19) (2.78) (6.06) 6 to 10 0.12 0.11 0.10 (2.57) (2.62) (2.36) (2.02) (1.87) (2.25) 11 to 15 -0.01 0.00 -0.02 -0.03 -0.05 (-0.10) (0.01) (-0.45) (-0.4) (-0.34) (-0.55) (-0.97) more than 16 0.01 0.02 (0.16) (0.21) (-0.02) (0.50) (0.07) (-0.03)

Table 6 Fama-MacBeth Regression ALL NO JAN JAN logsrd 0.35 0.24 1.58 0.21 0.15 0.83 (6.82) (4.91) (6.94) (5.99) (4.49) (5.31) logmv -0.1 -0.08 -0.35 (-2.64) (-1.96) (-2.77) logbm 0.12 0.09 0.46 (2.28) (1.66) (2.22) beta 0.03 0.13 (0.35) (0.26) pre1mret -5.33 -4.69 -12.43 (-12.92) (-11.23) (-8.68) pre1yret 0.40 -1.91 (1.34) (2.51) (-3.04) pre3yret 0.02 0.08 -0.69 (0.49) (2.12) (-4.11) presmret 0.37 0.20 2.29 (1.35) (0.69) (3.18)

Table 6 Continued ALL NO JAN JAN divyield 0.43 0.41 0.68 (0.16) (0.15) (0.06) idvol -1.45 -3.93 26.27 (-0.98) (-2.72) (4.03) aq -2.36 -2.4 -1.98 (-2.14) (-2.1) (-0.49) exploss -0.23 -0.62 4.16 (-0.81) (-3.13) (1.69) preprc 0.00 0.01 (0.22) (-0.17) (0.88) illiquid -0.02 (-0.09) (0.00) (-0.31)

Panel A: Separated by Financial Constraints (KZ) Table 7 The R&D premium across firms with different characteristics Li (2011 RFS): A financial constrained R&D-intensive firm is more likely to suspend/discontinue their projects, and hence is riskier. Panel A: Separated by Financial Constraints (KZ) ALL&VW (FF3) ABM&EW (FF3) LOW MID HIGH HIGH-LOW ALL -0.12 0.14 0.49 0.61 0.38 0.29 0.51 0.13 (-0.77) (0.72) (2.18) (2.42) (2.32) (2.13) (3.26) (0.75) NOJAN -0.26 0.04 0.24 0.50 0.12 0.35 0.06 (-1.58) (0.19) (1.05) (1.93) (1.8) (0.85) (0.33) JAN 1.21 1.31 3.04 1.83 1.52 2.08 2.3 0.78 (1.91) (2.15) (4.6) (2.1) (2.02) (4.66) (3.59) (1.3)

Panel B: Separated by Competition (HHI) Table 7 Continued Gu (2006): “Competition increases the probability that potential future cash flows will be extinguished and in turn decreases the benefits of R&D investing and raises the chances that the project will be suspended if adverse shocks to future cash flows occur. “ Panel B: Separated by Competition (HHI) VW&ALL(FF3) EW&ABM(FF3) LOW MID HIGH HIGH-LOW ALL 0.39 0.02 -0.37 0.64 0.32 0.25 -0.39 (1.98) (0.14) (0.11) (-1.65) (4.12) (2.15) (2.12) (-2.32) NOJAN 0.27 -0.14 0.00 -0.27 0.46 0.15 0.2 -0.26 (1.33) (-0.84) (0.02) (-1.17) (2.98) (1.06) (1.71) (-1.48) JAN 1.77 1.67 0.03 -1.74 2.5 2.21 0.89 -1.61 (3.36) (2.81) (0.06) (-2.36) (4.27) (3.2) (1.93) (-2.71)

Panel C: Separated by innovate ability Table 7 Continued Cohen, Diether and Malloy (2013 RFS): Past track record of translating R&D into sales contains information about the ability of the firm to innovate, and investor ignore such information. Panel C: Separated by innovate ability VW&ALL(FF3) EW&ABM(FFE) LOW MID HIGH HIGH-LOW ALL 0.05 0.06 0.42 0.37 0.32 0.26 0.56 0.24 (0.25) (0.32) (2) (1.39) (1.94) (1.8) (3.48) (1.46) NOJAN -0.06 -0.04 0.28 0.34 0.07 0.11 0.41 (-0.28) (-0.19) (1.3) (1.31) (0.41) (0.73) (2.44) (1.93) JAN 1.02 1.16 1.82 0.8 2.64 1.87 2.03 -0.61 (1.32) (1.59) (2.56) (0.7) (4.97) (3.63) (3.53) (-1.25)

Table 8 The R&D Premium by Calendar Month VW&ALL (FF3) EW&ABM (FF3) Month est t JAN 1.33 (3.01) 1.81 (3.36) FEB -0.18 (-0.29) 0.13 (0.4) MAR -0.44 (-0.77) -0.32 (-0.84) APR 0.7 (1.14) -0.03 (-0.06) MAY 0.25 (0.91) 0.46 (1.74) JUN -0.41 (-1.14) -0.59 (-1.96) JUL 0.79 (1.55) 0.89 (2.76) AUG -0.37 (-1.21) 0.26 (0.96) SEP -0.64 (-1.61) 0.39 (1.15) OCT -0.04 (-0.07) -0.07 (-0.14) NOV 0.43 0.62 (1.26) DEC 0.04 (0.06) (-0.09)

Table 9 The R&D premium among firms with different tax-loss selling incentives and institutional ownership Panel A: Separated by firm size ALL&VW(FF3) ABM&EW(FF3) MICRO SMALL LARGE ALL 0.89 0.48 0.08 1.07 0.51 0.37 (5.85) (3.12) (0.54) (7.57) (3.41) (2.93) NOJAN 0.73 0.35 -0.05 0.91 0.44 0.21 (4.34) (2.09) (-0.31) (6.41) (2.88) (1.62) JAN 2.66 2.35 1.19 3.24 1.79 2.06 (4.97) (3.67) (2.54) (5.39) (2.49) (4.08) DEC 0.46 0.01 0.05 2.34 0.07 -0.07 (1.14) (0.02) (0.08) (3.78) (0.14) (-0.15)

Panel B: Separated by past one year return Table 9 Continued Panel B: Separated by past one year return VW&ALL(FF3) EW&ABM(FF3) LOW MID HIGH ALL 0.43 0.12 0.21 0.55 0.37 0.25 (2.15) (0.71) (1.19) (3.25) (1.68) NOJAN 0.26 -0.09 0.11 0.18 0.14 (1.25) (-0.54) (0.56) (2.52) (1.56) (0.87) JAN 2.45 1.46 1.06 2.53 1.85 1.38 (3.08) (3.06) (1.67) (3.46) (4.06) (2.36) DEC -0.5 0.61 0.02 -0.82 0.47 (-0.83) (0.95) (0.03) (-1.56) (1.17) (0.32)

Table 9 Continued Panel C: Separated by the ratio of current price to maximum price in the past one year VW&ALL(FF3) EW&ABM(FFE) LOW MID HIGH ALL 0.44 0.09 0.25 0.74 0.37 0.17 (2.06) (0.55) (1.53) (4.15) (2.96) (1.54) NOJAN 0.14 -0.1 0.16 0.62 0.24 0.01 (0.62) (-0.58) (0.90) (3.5) (1.79) (0.09) JAN 3.26 1.30 0.52 2.67 1.57 1.56 (4.35) (2.32) (1.17) (3.33) (3.51) DEC 0.32 0.3 0.59 -0.55 0.38 0.4 (0.59) (0.44) (1.00) (-0.99) (0.83) (1.26)

Panel D: Separated by institutional ownership Table 9 Continued Panel D: Separated by institutional ownership VW&ALL(FF3) EW&ABM(FF3) LOW MID HIGH ALL 0.25 0.15 0.55 0.36 0.48 0.45 (1.22) (0.83) (2.96) (2.05) (3.07) (2.82) NOJAN 0.19 -0.02 0.43 0.32 0.3 0.27 (0.89) (-0.12) (2.11) (1.82) (1.74) (1.63) JAN 1.36 1.3 2.61 1.72 2.12 2.67 (1.72) (2.59) (4.51) (2.12) (3.67) (4.55) DEC -1.06 -0.07 -0.50 -1.04 0.06 -0.11 (-1.38) (-0.11) (-0.79) (-1.7) (0.12) (-0.21)

Panel B: years with low and high tax rates for long-term capital gains Table 10 The Jan/Dec R&D premium in different tax regimes Panel A: years with low and high tax rates for short-term capital gains VW&ALL EW&ABM Low High DEC -1.81 1.08 -1.06 0.47 (-2.4) (1.52) (-1.25) (1.24) JAN 1.93 0.98 1.90 1.92 (4.67) (1.23) (3.3) (1.98) Panel B: years with low and high tax rates for long-term capital gains -0.7 0.72 -0.52 (-0.98) (1.09) (-0.94) (1.19) 1.2 1.96 1.65 2.84 (1.64) (2.75) (2.03) (5.19)

Table 11 December and Non-December Fiscal Year Ending ALL&VW (FF3) ABM&EW(FF3) Dec Non-Dec ALL 0.1 0.14 0.41 0.4 (0.67) (0.78) (3.22) (2.64) NOJAN -0.01 -0.02 0.29 0.27 (-0.09) (-0.13) (2.36) (1.79) JAN 1.11 2.21 1.7 2.02 (2.4) (2.89) (2.98) (3.23) JAN-NO JAN 1.13 2.24 1.41 1.74 (2.31) (2.85) (2.43) (2.71)

Table 12 Increase in R&D, Other intangible investment and physical investment Eberhart, Maxwell and Siddique (2004, JF): Firms unexpectedly increase their R&D by a significant amount earn higher future returns. Panel A: ALL&VW (FF3) INCREASE in R&D AD/MV OCA/AT CHANGE in AT CAPX/SALES INCREASE in CAPX ALL 0.52 0.04 0.43 -0.1 -0.04 -0.21 (1.82) (0.33) (4.47) (-1.27) (-0.47) (-1.3) NOJAN 0.26 0.11 0.45 -0.12 -0.07 -0.23 (0.88) (0.91) (4.52) (-1.64) (-0.7) (-1.41) JAN 3.47 -0.84 0.22 0.25 0.37 (2.61) (-1.61) (0.55) (0.66) (0.99) (0.46) DIFF 3.22 -0.95 -0.22 0.48 (2.37) (-1.77) (-0.53) (0.97) (1.13) (0.86)

Table 12 Continued Panel B: ABM&EW (FF3) INCREASE in R&D AD/MV OCA/AT CHANGE in AT CAPX/ SALES INCREASE in CAPX ALL 0.59 0.08 0.35 -0.32 -0.13 -0.30 (1.83) (0.82) (4.48) (-4.64) (-1.46) (-2.35) NOJAN 0.21 0.10 0.37 -0.35 -0.17 -0.33 (0.64) (0.96) (4.65) (-5.13) (-1.80) (-2.52) JAN 4.05 0.04 0.03 -0.22 0.34 -0.14 (2.79) (0.09) (-0.64) (1.12) (-0.38) DIFF 3.85 -0.06 -0.34 0.13 0.51 0.18 (2.59) (-0.15) (-1.03) (0.36) (1.61) (0.46)

Summary of Findings (1) Most or all of the R&D premium resides in January. (2) The January R&D premium is robust to all existing factors and to all scale variables. (3) The January R&D premium lasts up to 20 annual lags. (4) About 70% (100%) of the January R&D premium is earned during the first five (ten) trading days of January. (5) Ad, organizational capital, and physical investment do not exhibit the January phenomenon. (6) Tax loss-selling? (7) Risk explanation? (8) Mispricing? Puzzle???