HEL design, magnet system, e-beam generation and disposal

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
First Wall Heat Loads Mike Ulrickson November 15, 2014.
Advertisements

Hybrid QD0 Studies M. Modena CERN Acknowledgments: CERN TE-MSC CLIC Magnets Study Team: A.Aloev, E. Solodko, P.Thonet, A.Vorozhtsov “CLIC/ILC QD0” Meeting.
Superconducting Large Bore Sextupole for ILC
E. Todesco PROPOSAL OF APERTURE FOR THE INNER TRIPLET E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland With relevant inputs from colleagues F. Cerutti, S. Fartoukh,
Status of CEPC Detector magnet
October 4-5, Electron Lens Overall Design Alexander Pikin October 4, 2010 Electron Lens.
Focusing Lens for the SSR1 Section of PXIE Preliminary analysis of main options 3/13/2012I. Terechkine1.
Zian Zhu Magnet parameters Coil/Cryostat/Support design Magnetic field analysis Cryogenics Iron yoke structure Mechanical Integration Superconducting Magnet.
PSB dump: proposal of a new design EN – STI technical meeting on Booster dumps Friday 11 May 2012 BE Auditorium Prevessin Alba SARRIÓ MARTÍNEZ.
CLIC Workshop th -17 th October 2008 Thomas Zickler AT/MCS/MNC 1 CLIC Main Linac Quadrupoles Preliminary design of a quadrupole for the stabilization.
Muon Cooling Channel Superconducting Magnet Systems Muon Collider Task Force Meeting on July 31, 2006 V.S. Kashikhin.
CLIC Stabilisation Day’08 18 th March 2008 Thomas Zickler AT/MCS/MNC/tz 1 CLIC Quadrupoles Th. Zickler CERN.
FCC Week 2015, Washington Cooling the FCC beam screens
5 K Shield Study of STF Cryomodule (up-dated) Norihito Ohuchi KEK 2008/4/21-251FNAL-SCRF-Meeting.
Super Fragment Separator (Super-FRS) Machine and Magnets H. Leibrock, GSI Darmstadt Review on Cryogenics, February 27th, 2012, GSI Darmstadt.
Magnet R&D for Large Volume Magnetization A.V. Zlobin Fermilab Fifth IDS-NF Plenary Meeting 8-10 April 2010 at Fermilab.
AUGUST 3, 2010 BRYCE AUSTELL UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FERMILAB SIST INTERN ADVISOR: RYUJI YAMADA Muon-to-Electron Conversion Experiment (Mu2e) Detector Solenoid.
ENE 325 Electromagnetic Fields and Waves
Logo area HL LHC IT STRING M. Bajko CERN TE-TM and QXF Review.
24 June 2013 GSI, Darmstadt Helmholtz Institut Mainz Bertalan Feher, PANDA EMP First Measurements for a Superconducting Shield for the PANDA Polarized.
Yingshun Zhu Design of Small Aperture Quadrupole Magnet for HEPS-TF
Prototyping of Superconducting Magnets for RAON ECR IS S. J. Choi Institute for Basic Science S. J. Choi Institute for Basic Science.
Update on PANDA solenoid design
Some Design Considerations and R &D of CEPCB Dipole Magnet
MQXC Nb-Ti 120mm 120T/m 2m models
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
TAXS and TAXN ABSORBERS - OVERVIEW
Preliminary results for electron lens with beam current of 20 A
Heat load estimates for the Long Straight Sections of the HL-LHC
HFM Test Station Main Cryostat
A. Vande Craen, C. Eymin, M. Moretti, D. Ramos CERN
AEGIS Magnet System.
Development of the Canted Cosine Theta Superconducting Magnet
Challenges of vacuum chambers with adjustable gap for SC undulators
Advanced collimation design studies (TCT with wire, hollow e lens)
M. Alcaide Leon, Paolo Fessia
ELENA – Electron Cooler
M. Alcaide Leon, Paolo Fessia
PROGRESS REPORT OF A NLNS-FFAG ADS MAGNET
Magnetic System Overview Solenoid and DID
Additional ancillaries for the operation of the Hollow Electron Lens
Target and Horn status report
Adriana Rossi, Sergey Sadovich
HL-LHC Corrector Magnet Design & Construction Activity Status
Pierre-Alexandre Thonet
The 11T cryo-assembly: summary of design and integration aspects
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
Compact and Low Consumption Magnet Design The DESY Experience
Challenges for FCC-ee MDI mechanical design
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
ENE 325 Electromagnetic Fields and Waves
E. Métral, N. Mounet and B. Salvant
BESIII Collaboration Meeting, June 5~6, 2002, Zian Zhu
MQYY: superconducting Quadrupole magnet for Hl-lhc
PERMANENT MAGNET QUADRUPOLE FOR THE LINAC 4 CCDTL
Cooling aspects for Nb3Sn Inner Triplet quadrupoles and D1
Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels?
Problems
Muon Collider Magnet Technologies/Challenges
Status of the PANDA Solenoid Magnet Production in BINP
Muon Collider SR and IR Magnets
ENE/EIE 325 Electromagnetic Fields and Waves
as a prototype for Super c-tau factory
CEPC Collider Magnets CHEN, Fusan November 13, 2018.
CEPC Final Focus Superconducting Quadrupole and Anti-solenoid Magnets
IR Beam Transport Status
Status of QQXF cryostat
WP13 outsourcing: Hollow Electron Lens
F.Pasdeloup, H.Prin, L. Williams
S. Bettoni on behalf of the whole team
Presentation transcript:

HEL design, magnet system, e-beam generation and disposal International Review on the e-lens concept readiness for integration into the HL-LHC baseline. Diego Perini 19.10.2017

Acknowledgements Samuel Riekki, Jakko Harjuniemi, Ville Nikkarinen, J. Uurasmaa, J. Markkanen, E. Jussila, J. Puska – Lapland University of Applied Sciences. David Buglass, George Bowers Anderson - Oxford University Pascal Simon – University of Darmstadt. Federico Meneghetti – University of Padua Contributions of: Giulio Stancari (FNAL) Stefano Redaelli, Adriana Rossi, Glyn Kyrby, Giorgia Gobbi, Carlo Zanoni, Antti Kolehmainen (CERN).

Design of the main components Outlines Introduction Main parameters Design of the main components Solenoids , cryostats Gun and collector regions Conclusions More details in the presentations of Glyn Kirby and Giorgia Gobbi in the afternoon

What do we want to do? Ø ~ 1.8 mm Off-centre of the ring + 0.15 mm Reasonable precision of a middle size single component: + 0.05 mm. Reasonable precision of an assembly of many components: + 0.2-0.5 mm. Beam-beam overlapping: ~3m , e current intensity: 5 A. Use at injection and at collision level.

Where? Candidate locations for the electron lenses are RB-44 and RB-46 at Point 4, on each side of the interaction region IR4 . The beam to beam distance is 420 mm. The longitudinal available space is limited. Compact design

Confinement of an electron beam

Elements of an Hollow Electron lens LHC beam Electron gun solenoid and electron gun Correctors Bending solenoid(s) Main solenoid Bending solenoid(s) Collector Instrumentation, vacuum chamber, cryostats, supports etc.

B0 B1 > B0 The field level determines the radius of the e-beam. Cathode B1 > B0 The field level determines the radius of the e-beam. The dimensions of the electron beam in two points along its path follow the equation: Where r0 and r1 are the radii of the electron beam in point 0 (cathode) and 1 (main solenoid) and B0 and B1 are the magnetic field in points 0 and 1 respectively. To edit speaker name go to Insert > Header & Footer and apply to all slides except title page

Why two solenoids are not enough? B1  ZG B2 ZG, , B1 and B2 are not independent parameters. A change of the ratio B1/B2 calls for different ZG and  C. Zanoni

Critical regions Lower field and bends Cryostats Valve Instrumentation ‘Y’ shaped vacuum chamber It is necessary to iterate between mechanical design and simulations of e-beam dynamics.

Cathode design I = P V3/2 I = J A P = K A/d2 Free parameters: Cathode Surface: Ri , Ro Cathode – Anode distance I = P V3/2 I = J A P = K A/d2

Summary of the requirements The HEL must be compact. Magnetic fields in the solenoids must be reasonable. Magnetic fields in the transition regions must be smooth and high enough. Dimensions and current density of the cathode must be technically feasible. The HEL will be used at injection and at collision (very different e-beam size).

Important! The today design is based on computations: - of magnetic field flux lines of trajectories of single electrons. This is a first good approximation but not perfect (in particular for high currents). The computations of the displacement and stability of a ring of electrons under all the internal and external forces are going on. Therefore there could be small changes of size and relative position of the main components and some adjustments of the level of magnetic fields. The field of the main solenoid is the lowest possible under these approximations.

4T solenoid or more? Consequences on: L is in Henries μο is the Permeability of Free Space (4.π.10-7) n is the Number of turns A is the Inner Core Area (π.r 2) in m2 I is the current in Amperes ℓ is the length of the Coil in metres To increase the field one has either to increase the current or the number of turns or both. Consequences on: quench protection (stored energy, inductance) wire (cable) size, current lead size, heat load power supplies (including ramp time of the system).

Design of the main components E-gun solenoid (tuneable field) Fixed field part Nominal magnetic field of the main solenoid 4 T Nominal magnetic field in the e-gun cathode 0.2 T Inner radius of the hollow electron beam @ nominal fields 0.9 mm (3 σ) Outer radius of the hollow electron beam @ nominal fields 1.8 mm (6 σ) Inner diameter of the cathode 8.05 mm Outer diameter of the cathode 16.10 mm Inner radius of the hollow electron beam @ 4 T with 2 T @ cathode 5.67 mm Outer radius of the hollow electron beam @ 4 T with 2 T @ cathode 11.34 mm Nominal current at the cathode 5 A

Support structure + positioning tables Current leads e-gun Main solenoid Collector Bending s. Cryogenic jumper Support structure + positioning tables Discussions with the survey to define the position of their targets.

Ø 454 mm Ø 154 mm Survey space More details in the presentation of Maria Anparo Gonzalez de la Aleja Cabana.

Verification of the structure according to: EN 13445 Pressure vessels EN 13458 Cryogenic vessels F. Meneghetti, G. Gobbi, L. Dassa, C. Zanoni

Bending solenoids e-gun solenoids Space for instrumentation Main solenoid

Cryostat Corrector coils

e-gun solenoids Insertion region. e-gun Vacuum chamber. Impedance has been checked. It is ok Final optimization going on. e-gun Vacuum chamber. Discussions with vacuum group going on.

Collector Collector in ETP copper Maximum power absorbed 50 kW Maximum temperature 85oC Maximum speed of the cooling water 1 m/s Water flux 8 l/s Inner diameter 145 mm External diameter 175 mm Height 400 mm

Conclusions The Hollow Electron Lenses for HL-LHC are a complicate object with demanding performances (5 A current over a 3 m path, large range of e-ring sizes). We have a well advanced design and we are not far from the final configuration. We have a solid base to start discussions with the possible manufacturers. The HEL configuration will be frozen once the physic simulations will be completed and once the instrumentation will be defined.

Thank you for your attention

Existing electron lenses and HL-LHC hollow electron lenses RHIC EL Tevatron EL HL-LHC HEL Effective length [m] 2.1 2 2.9 Current from cathode [A] 1 0.6-3 5 Main solenoid field [T] 6 3 4(*) Solenoid inner bore [mm] 200 160 E-gun field [T] 0.2-0.8 0.3 0.2-2 (*) Cathode radius [mm] Cathode surface* [cm2] Current density [A/cm2] 4.1 @250GeV 7.5 @100GeV 0.53 @250GeV 1.77 @100GeV 1.89 @250GeV 0.53 @100GeV 7.5 1.77 1.69 4 – 8.05 Hollow 1.53 3.27 E-beam compression 1.6-5.5 3.26 1.41-4.47 (*) to be confirmed, could change