Towards connecting geospatial information and statistical standards in statistical production: two cases from Statistics Finland Workshop on Integrating.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Statistical Division Applying the GSBPM to Business Register Management Steven Vale UNECE
Advertisements

Background Defining and mapping business processes in statistical organisations started at least 10 years ago –“Statistical value chain” –“Survey life-cycle”
M ETADATA OF NATIONAL STATISTICAL OFFICES B ELARUS, R USSIA AND K AZAKHSTAN Miroslava Brchanova, Moscow, October, 2014.
Development of metadata in the National Statistical Institute of Spain Work Session on Statistical Metadata Genève, 6-8 May-2013 Ana Isabel Sánchez-Luengo.
The Adoption of METIS GSBPM in Statistics Denmark.
Modernisation of ESS infrastructure: The ESS instruments - a review E. di Meglio – P. Jacques – J.M. Museux.
Workshop on Quality Assurance in Geographical Data Production 1 Results of the Survey on Quality Asurance Routines Anders Östman University of Gävle SWEDEN.
1 MODERNIZATION OF BELARUSIAN STATISTICS _________________________________________________ IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROCESS APPROACH IN ORGANIZING THE STATISTICAL.
Current and Future Applications of the Generic Statistical Business Process Model at Statistics Canada Laurie Reedman and Claude Julien May 5, 2010.
Explaining the statistical data warehouse (S-DWH)
Statistics New Zealand’s End-to-End Metadata Life-Cycle ”Creating a New Business Model for a National Statistical Office if the 21 st Century” Gary Dunnet.
Revision Project of the Business Register (BR) and Business Statistics in September 2013 Tuula Viitaharju.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Statistical Division Mapping Data Production Processes to the GSBPM Steven Vale UNECE
Developing Statistical Information Systems and XML Information Technologies - Possibilities and Practicable Solutions Geneva,
Proposals on standardisation process in ESS, The Hague_ ESS net Preparation of Standardisation 1 Proposals on standardisation process.
Developing and applying business process models in practice Statistics Norway Jenny Linnerud and Anne Gro Hustoft.
Eurostat SDMX and Global Standardisation Marco Pellegrino Eurostat, Statistical Office of the European Union Bangkok,
United Nations Oslo City Group on Energy Statistics OG7, Helsinki, Finland October 2012 ESCM Chapter 8: Data Quality and Meta Data 1.
GSBPM as a framework for the production of spatial statistics Rina Tammisto 11 th October 2015 European Forum for Geography and Statistics.
Recent development in the metadata area at Statistics Sweden Klas Blomqvist
Joseph Lukhwareni Statistics South Africa Reengineering projects focusing on metadata and the statistical cycle Statistics South Africa, South Africa 3-5.
Metadata Framework for a Statistical Data Warehouse
GSBPM and GAMSO Steven Vale UNECE
ESS-net DWH ESSnet on microdata linking and data warehousing in statistical production.
Describe a layered S-DWH Technology Architecture Information Systems Architecture Business Architecture.
The business process models and quality issues at the Hungarian Central Statistical Office (HCSO) Mr. Csaba Ábry, HCSO, Methodological Department Geneva,
Data Management: Data Processing Types of Data Processing at USGS There are several ways to classify Data Processing activities at USGS, and here are some.
Statistical process model Workshop in Ukraine October 2015 Karin Blix Quality coordinator
Introduction to Statistics Estonia Study visit of the State Statistical Service of Ukraine on Dissemination of Statistical Information and related themes.
ROMA 23 GIUGNO 2016 MODERNISATION LAB - FOCUSSING ON MODERNISATION STRATEGIES IN EUROPE: SOME NSIS’ EXPERIENCES Insert the presentation title Modernisation.
statistiska_centralbyran_scbwww.linkedin.com/company/scb Panel Session A: Integrating Location in.
Metadata models to support the statistical cycle: IMDB
Implementation of Quality indicators for administrative data
Best GSBPM practices, Israel Central Bureau of Statistics Battia ATTALI, Elena DROR MEDSTAT IV, Training course on “Generic Statistical Business Process.
Structural and reference metadata in the European Statistical System
Contents Introducing the GSBPM Links to other standards
Global Statistical Geospatial Framework – interoperability challenges
Software Documentation
Integrating Geospatial Elements into the ABS Information Model
The Generic Statistical Information Model (GSIM) and the Sistema Unitario dei Metadati (SUM): state of application of the standard Cecilia Casagrande –
Geospatial Knowledge Base (GKB) Training Platform
Validation & conformity testing
GSIM Implementation at Statistics Finland Session 1: ModernStats World - Where to begin with standards based modernisation? UNECE ModernStats World Workshop.
Interoperable data formats: SDMX
Meeting of the Working Party
Generic Statistical Business Process Model (GSBPM)
11. The future of SDMX Introducing the SDMX Roadmap 2020
YTY − an integrated production system for business statistics
Tomaž Špeh, Rudi Seljak Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia
Metadata in the modernization of statistical production at Statistics Canada Carmen Greenough June 2, 2014.
2. An overview of SDMX (What is SDMX? Part I)
Ola Nordbeck Statistics Norway
GIS technology strategy of Statistics Finland
Johan Erikson Statistics Sweden Luxemburg, March 2012
SDMX in the S-DWH Layered Architecture
GSBPM and Data Life Cycle
The bottom-up approach: Challenges in the production of statistical grid data Rina Tammisto European Forum for Geostatistics, Workshop 1- 3 October 2008.
WISE Floods drafting Group
Recent developments in the Generic Statistical Business Process Model: Revisions and Quality Indicators Alice Born, Statistics Canada,
Contents Introducing the GSBPM Links to other standards
Mapping Data Production Processes to the GSBPM
Presentation to SISAI Luxembourg, 12 June 2012
The GEOSTAT project Work Package 2 Geostatistics Working Party/Meeting
Assessment of quality of standards
GSBPM AND ISO AS QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TOOLS: AZERBAIJAN EXPERIENCE Yusif Yusifov, Deputy Chairman of the State Statistical Committee of the Republic.
Metadata on quality of statistical information
Generic Statistical Information Model (GSIM)
Work Session on Statistical Metadata (Geneva, Switzerland May 2013)
Introduction to reference metadata and quality reporting
GSBPM Giorgia Simeoni, Istat,
Presentation transcript:

Towards connecting geospatial information and statistical standards in statistical production: two cases from Statistics Finland Workshop on Integrating Geospatial and Statistical Standards Stockholm, Sweden 6-8 November 2017 Essi Kaukonen, Standards and methods Rina Tammisto, ICT Management Statistics Finland

Background: Geospatial production at Statistics Finland Geospatial-related production, a long tradition at Statistics Finland. Over 25 years as a recognised production branch that has own datasets, production methods, tools and expertise Point-base foundation is the core of geospatial production (e.g. centroids of buildings), other geographical data is also utilised Geospatial information can be utilised in the whole statistical production process – it may be the starting point or the end-product of the process Most recent at Stat Fi: geospatial actions are included in strategic targeting and technological guidelines -> A Geospatial Reference Architecture (2018) The actions may relate to Maintenance, production and dissemination of geographical data or geospatial statistics Maintenance of location information Visualisation and geospatial analysis Application development for geospatial-related production and dissemination 7 November 2017 Statistics Finland

            Towards connecting geospatial information and statistical standards in statistical production: two cases from Statistics Finland A) Testing the GSBPM in the geospatial-related statistical production process: results B) Linking GSIM statistical areal classifications and corresponding geographies: future plans 7 November 2017 Statistics Finland

A) Testing the GSBPM in the geospatial-related statistical production process: results

Objective and approach of the GEOSTAT 2 work at Stat Fi Evaluate the Generic Statistical Business Process Model (GSBPM) from the point of view of geospatial data involved in the statistical production process Is the GSBPM usable when geospatial-related work phases are described? What does using of the model require? Does the model or its documentation need further development? Requires understanding the GSBPM and applying it to the production of geospatial statistics The GSBPM was introduced within the project group at Stat Fi Our geospatial-related process was described phase by phase (as is) Phases were reflected against the phases and sub-processes of the GSBPM 7 November 2017 Statistics Finland Case A) Testing the GSBPM in the geospatial-related statistical production process: results

Testing of the GSBPM at Stat Fi 7 November 2017 Statistics Finland Case A) Testing the GSBPM in the geospatial-related statistical production process: results

Findings: Specify Needs The geospatial dimension of statistical data should be recognised and taken into account when specifying the needs Statistical outputs should include maps or geospatial statistics In addition to statistical concepts, other related (e.g. geospatial) concepts should also be taken into account In the Check data availability sub-process integrability with geospatial data should also be evaluated 7 November 2017 Statistics Finland Case A) Testing the GSBPM in the geospatial-related statistical production process: results

Findings: Design Design Geospatial standards should also be noticed. When designing geospatial statistical data output, the scalability of disclosure control should be taken into account. When designing variable descriptions, the existing link between statistical classification and corresponding geographical data should be noted and described. Design collection should also include the mention of techniques for managing geospatial data, e.g. mobile technology. When routines to integrate datasets are designed, integration of statistical data and geospatial data should be noted 7 November 2017 Statistics Finland Case A) Testing the GSBPM in the geospatial-related statistical production process: results

Findings: Build Build In building and testing the production solution, geospatial data and services that are used should have a general and stable basis, not separate solutions for different production processes In case of geospatial data, data gathering usually concerns use of an existing web service (WMS, WFS). Direct connections or data storage procedures may be used. The data collection system should be able to handle geospatial data 7 November 2017 Statistics Finland Case A) Testing the GSBPM in the geospatial-related statistical production process: results

Findings: Collect Collect Geospatial data may be collected from different data sources, providers and by using several different methods (web services or other services, e-mails, register based data from (other) statistical system Geospatial data can be collected manually or automatically 7 November 2017 Statistics Finland Case A) Testing the GSBPM in the geospatial-related statistical production process: results

Findings: Process Process Integration Location quality Derivation The most concrete phase where the integration of statistical and geospatial data is present. Enriching the statistical data with location information or it may mean integrating the geospatial dataset to the aggregated dataset (integrate statistical data to corresponding boundaries) Includes maintaining geospatial data with updated areal classifications or vice versa Includes study of location information and identification of locational errors Editing of geospatial data may consist of merging or creating new geospatial elements or changing the location information of spatial objects Aggregation of data by areal classification Storing aggregated, integrated, edited or conducted data in data warehouses Integration Location quality Derivation Aggregation 7 November 2017 Statistics Finland Case A) Testing the GSBPM in the geospatial-related statistical production process: results

Findings: Analyse Analyse Accessibility measures, travel and time distance calculations Map visualisations Disclosure control for geospatial data depends on the scale of geospatial data Compiling metadata - also for geospatial data 7 November 2017 Statistics Finland Case A) Testing the GSBPM in the geospatial-related statistical production process: results

Findings: Disseminate Geospatial data outputs conform to the geospatial data dissemination standards (i.e. ISO, OGC, INSPIRE) The creation of geospatial web services (WFS, WMS) and user support 7 November 2017 Statistics Finland Case A) Testing the GSBPM in the geospatial-related statistical production process: results

Findings: Evaluate Evaluate Gathering information for evaluation of the geospatial process, data or created services Evaluation of this information Action plan for further development 7 November 2017 Statistics Finland Case A) Testing the GSBPM in the geospatial-related statistical production process: results

Conclusions, part A The GSBPM seems to be able to cover geospatial related statistical production; however, Use of descriptions of the GSBPM requires raising the level of abstraction when interpreting phases, a risk from the coherence point of view Our opinion is that the GSBPM model does not need new sub-processes for covering geospatiality but the descriptions should be reformed in order to cover the geospatial point of view It is not necessary to write down the geospatial approach specifically in the descriptions in every case – a wider scope of the meaning of the sub-process could suffice See also: Geostat 2 final report 7 November 2017 Statistics Finland Case A) Testing the GSBPM in the geospatial-related statistical production process: results

B) Linking GSIM statistical areal classifications and corresponding geographies: future plans

Big picture: Logical Data Warehouses at Statistics Finland and Geospatial Information 7 November 2017 Statistics Finland Case B) Linking GSIM statistical areal classifications and corresponding geographies: future plans

Case B) Linking GSIM statistical areal classifications and corresponding geographies: IGALOD project 2018- For Instance 7 November 2017 Statistics Finland Case B) Linking GSIM statistical areal classifications and corresponding geographies: future plans

Zooming in… IGALOD project GSIM: Statistical Classification Item         Zooming in… GSIM: Statistical Classification Item The Classification System has been renewed using the GSIM Statistical Classification Model Areal Classifications are included in the system (municipalities, counties, etc.) as GSIM Statistical Classifications Classifications and Code Lists are used in production from the new central system since 2016 The Classifications (including areal classifications) will be published on the web as open data in 2018 IGALOD project 091 Helsinki Geospatial Data: Geographies Geographies of the most common areal classifications are part of basic geospatial data production Since 2013 they have been also published as open data using standardised web services (WMS/WFS) This has been done as part of the INSPIRE implementation at Statistics Finland Today, there is no way to connect the areal classifications and the corresponding geographies directly 7 November 2017 Statistics Finland Case B) Linking GSIM statistical areal classifications and corresponding geographies: future plans

The expected outcomes of the IGALOD project New connections between areal classifications and corresponding geographies can be used together throughout the statistical production process whenever needed The expected outcomes of the IGALOD project The connections will also be published for our customers as Open Linked Data 7 November 2017 Statistics Finland Case B) Linking GSIM statistical areal classifications and corresponding geographies: future plans

Conclusions Geospatial information is an important part of the statistical production process. The GSBPM and the GSIM models, especially their guidelines, should be further elaborated to fully support the understanding and the coherent use of geospatial data in an NSO. Geospatial information and the direct linkages to areal classifications can have an important role in the development of the statistical production and in the customer-oriented services in the future. 7 November 2017 Statistics Finland

essi.kaukonen@stat.fi rina.tammisto@stat.fi Thank You! essi.kaukonen@stat.fi rina.tammisto@stat.fi