ESEA Consolidated Pre-Monitoring Meeting

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Advertisements

Procedures for ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Effective July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2014 Monitoring For Results.
NCLB Consolidated Monitoring Integrated Approach to Title III Monitoring.
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
A Multi-Year Improvement System and Schedule
Working Toward Accreditation Joan Ellison, Public Health Director Mary Margaret Stallone, Director Center for Preventive Services Livingston County Department.
Preparing for Compliance Monitoring Reviews Understanding CMS Protocols Used by Review Organizations January 14, 2009 Presented by: Margaret deHesse, RN,
5/2010 Focused Monitoring Stakeholders May /2010 Purpose: Massachusetts Monitoring System  Monitor and evaluate program compliance with federal.
ESEA Program Review Russ Sweet Preparing for ESEA Program Reviews of Titles I-A, II-A, VI-B (REAP), and X Summer 2014.
Final Determinations. Secretary’s Determinations Secretary annually reviews the APR and, based on the information provided in the report, information.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
Preparing for Title IIA Monitoring Review (FY14) February 24, 2015 Office of Educator Effectiveness Aviva Baff Isadora Choute Cynthia Mompoint Deborah.
Financial and Programmatic Monitoring ESEA/Act 807 ACSIP Arkansas Department of Education Division of Academic Accountability.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013 Monitoring and Program Effectiveness.
1 Monitoring Review: What Every New Coordinator Should Know Victoria Rankin and Greta Colombi, NDTAC.
Verification Visit by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) September 27-29, 2010.
Subrecipient Monitoring FY15 of Education Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Federal Programs Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III,
PREPARING FOR SUPPLEMENTAL MONITORING PERKINS COMPLIANCE Monieca West ADHE Federal Program Manager October 19, 2012.
Title I, Part A Fiscal Requirements for Comparability FY Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Title I, IIA, VI, & X December 2012.
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
Monitoring Schedule David Chappell, or
Successful Program Implementation: Meeting Compliance Statutes Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title.
PREPARING FOR A COMPLIANCE REVIEW PERKINS COMPLIANCE Monieca West ADHE Federal Program Manager October 19, 2012.
Audit and Audit Resolution Presented by Wendy Spivey ADECA Audit Manager.
1 NCLB Title Program Monitoring NCLB Title Program Monitoring Regional Training SPRING 2006.
Continuous Improvement and Focused Monitoring System US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Overview of the OSEP Continuous Improvement.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
Procedures for ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Effective July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2014 Monitoring For Results Reviewed & Revised with COP April 2011.
Title III Desk Monitoring Oregon Department of Education September 24,
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
What to Expect When You Are Expecting Consolidated Monitoring: Every Step of the Way Office of Federal Programs Oklahoma State Department of Education.
ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Office of Federal Programs December 10, 2013.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
On Site Review Process. 2 Overview of On Site Review Materials and Process.
Title I, Part A Preparing for Federal Program Monitoring Lynn Sodat Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability.
Subrecipient Monitoring FY14 Oklahoma State Department of Education Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III, VI and X.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute.
Subgrantee Compliance February 27, 2013 Preparing TPPS Subgrantees for Monitoring Shelby County Grants Office presents:
6/18/2016 DES / AzEIP 2011 Cycle Two Self Report Overview & Training Cycle Two Self Report Overview & Training.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
Preparing for Title IIA Monitoring Review (FY15) November 9, 2015 Deborah Walker Meagan Steiner David LeBlanc.
Parental Involvement Requirements
process and procedures for assessments
Federal Program Directors Summer Meeting
Uniform Guidance Discussion
A Multi-tiered Framework for Monitoring ESEA & IDEA Programs
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
Fiscal Monitoring in eGrants Management System (eGMS) July 26, 2018
Equitable Services Under ESSA
Perkins Monitoring Orientation
ESEA Consolidated Monitoring
Bureau of Indian Education School Board Training
HUD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT 2018 – 19 PUBLIC SERVICES PRE-APPLICATION WORKSHOP December 11th and 12th, 2017 City of White Plains Department.
School Business Division NC Department of Public Instruction
SPR&I Regional Training
Title II, Part A Federal Program Monitoring
Preparing for Title IIA Monitoring Review (FY15)
Preparing for Federal Program Monitoring Title I, Part D, Subpart 2
Title I, Part A Preparing for Federal Program Monitoring
2019 Spring & Fall Timeline May 10, 2019
Preparing for Federal Program Monitoring Title I, Part D, Subpart 1
Monitoring & Managing Your WIF Grant
TEXAS DSHS HIV Care services group
2011–2012 Federal Program Monitoring
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013
Presentation transcript:

2013-2014 ESEA Consolidated Pre-Monitoring Meeting Office of Federal Programs December 3, 2013 Bridgeport Conference Center

Agenda Welcome and Overview of Monitoring Guidance Document High Quality Schools Data Collection System LEA Indicator Document Working Lunch Discussion, Questions and Preparation Adjourn

ESEA Fiscal and Program Compliance General Education Provisions Act Sec. 440(a) Section 80.40 of EDGAR A-102 Common Rule and OMB Circular A-110 OMB Circular 133 Subpart D--Federal Agencies and Pass-Through Entities Responsibilities Federal regulations require the WVDE to enforce its legal obligations and ensure compliance with all policies and procedures. Various regulations are outlined on pages 1 & 2 of the procedure document. It is important to note that monitoring for specific program issues may be conducted at any time at the discretion of the West Virginia Department of Education in response to a written complaint/concern received by the WVDE, Office of Federal Programs.

ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Title I Title II Title III Title VI (RLIS) McKinney Vento Pg. 3

Two – Phase ESEA Compliance Monitoring Process Risk Assessment Criteria Approach to Identify LEAs for ESEA Compliance Monitoring Phase One: Cyclical Monitoring Process Phase Two: On-site Technical Assistance Monitoring Note: Not all Counties will receive both Phases of Monitoring

Phase One: Cyclical Monitoring Process Initiated during the 2013-14 year Utilizes Risk Assessment to Establish a Five-Year Schedule concluding in 2017-2018 11 LEAs Monitored Annually through a Desk-Audit Process The LEA will Electronically Upload Compliance Documentation to the HQSDCS as Outlined by the ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Indicators Pg. 4

2013-14 Desk Audit Monitoring Group 1 Submission Deadline: February 3, 2014 Group 2 Submission Deadline: May 1, 2014 Gilmer County Lincoln County Preston County Tucker County Boone County Brooke County Hancock County Harrison County Marshall County Mineral County Monroe County

Phase One: Review and Reporting SEA Staff will Review the LEA Uploaded Documentation SEA Monitoring Lead will Schedule a Teleconference with the LEA to Discuss and Verify Documentation A Monitoring Report will be Provided to the LEA within 60 days of the Documentation Submittal The LEA will have 30 Business Days to Respond to the Monitoring with Corrective Action Plans Pg. 5 The WVDE team leader will work with the LEA program staff to schedule a teleconference interview to discuss and verify documentation. Appropriate LEA staff members need to be available during the teleconference (e.g., finance officer, accountants/clerks, personnel director, federal program directors, attendance director, technology coordinator) in order to facilitate quick resolution of questions from all program perspectives. Phase 1 – Desk Monitoring Group 1 Document submission deadline:  February 3, 2014 Telephone Interview:  completed by February 28, 2014 Monitoring Report Issued:  March 28, 2014 Phase 1 – Desk Monitoring Group 2 Document submission deadline:   May 1, 2014 Telephone Interview:  completed by June 13, 2014 (extended timeframe due to May WESTEST window) Monitoring Report Issued:  July 14, 2014  

Phase One: Appeals Process LEA May Appeal if Evidence of a Finding is Inaccurate Submitted in Writing within 30 days of Receipt of the Monitoring Report Documentation to Support Appeal Must be Submitted to WVDE with the Response Pg. 5

Phase Two: On-Site Technical Assistance Monitoring Based on Annual Risk Assessment Rakings A Maximum of Five On-Site Monitoring Visits will be Conducted Each Year* Counties with a Rating of 13 or Higher May Receive an On-Site Visit this Year Scheduled at a Mutually Convenient Time in April 2014 Purpose:  to Develop a Plan for Addressing Concerns from Monitoring Report (no school visits will be conducted) *Note that monitoring for specific program issues may be conducted at any time at the discretion of WVDE in response to written complaint/concern received by WVDE, Office of Federal Programs Pg. 6

Phase Two: Preparation for Visit WVDE Team Leader will Collaborate with the LEA’s Designated Lead to Develop a Schedule The WVDE Team Leader will Confirm the Schedule at Least One Month prior to the On-Site Visit Pg. 6

Phase Two: Activities During the On-Site Visit On-Site will Focus on Clarification of Compliance Concerns and Technical Assistance for Corrective Action from Desk Audit Documentation for Each Year Since Last Monitoring Availability of Appropriate LEA Staff Development of a One-Year Workplan to Prioritize Correction of Non-Compliance and Identify Technical Assistance Pg. 6

Phase Two: On-Site Monitoring Report The Workplan Developed During the On-Site Visit will form an Addendum to the Report Compiled During the Desk Audit. The Report will be issued Electronically to the LEA by WVDE within 30 Business Days of the On-Site Visit. A Written Acknowledgement of the On-Site Addendum Shall be Provided by the LEA with the Signature of LEA Superintendent Pg. 7

Questions?

High Quality Schools Data Collection System for Uploading Monitoring Documentation Live Overview Utilize system to upload all documentation for monitoring Will see connectivity to indicators in the next section How to Access the System, How and Where to Uploaded Evidence, How to View Evidence that has been Uploaded Access via School Improvement or WEBTOP Entry (Must have Webtop Account, Must be assigned to the county level) Showcase Tabs Home-Standards-Evidence-Self -Reflection-Teams (interested in Standards and Evidence tabs for LEA Consolidated Monitoring working at the “My” level) Show standards and pull and make an example using one of the indicators. Demonstrate naming protocol and uploading of document Show the Evidence Tab and how to view

LEA Indicator Document

ESEA Compliance Indicators Organized under Seven West Virginia Standards for High Quality Schools Three Forms of Verification -Interview Questions (Teleconference) -WVEIS Data (Reviewed Internally by WVDE) -Documentation in HQSDCS (Uploaded by LEA for Desk Audit)

Questions?

Preparation and Discussion