Table 2. Result of intention to use

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1
Advertisements

before and after rehabilitation
Percentage of Polyethylene
Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education
Table 4. Filter Sand Sieve Analysis
Figure 3. Comparison of class performance
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 3. Quran memorization students survey responses about App
Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1
SON Nurse Practitioner Blackboard Community
Total Energy Consumed (%)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Teachers Response (N= 11)
Instructional materials
Management Philosophy
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 8. Drawing result before game
student achievement scores
Table 8. Unit Key Performance Indicators
Table 7. Clinical Practice
Table 4. Percentage of post-harvest waste reported by the farmers
Test Mean Std. Dev. Mathematics English Language
Table 1. Student’s attitude towards technology (%)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Rating of Water Quality
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio
Table 1. Rice yield in MT (Source-USDA, Foreign Agricultural Service)
Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)
Table 1. Diagnostic methods for systemic fungal infection (n=70)
Table 1. Characteristics (age, height, and weight) of the participants
Table 2. Modal parameters estimated by Pulse Reflex®
Table 7. Status of CF in Nepal as of 2009
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Entrapment Efficiency (%) ± S.D.
Table 2. Test of Normality
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 1. LLC Academics Outcome Report ( )
Simulation Frequency(Hz)
Number of questionnaires sent out
Table 1. Descriptive Statistics
Table 1. Descriptive Statistics
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Behavioral strategies
and Applications, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 2, doi: /jcsa-4-2-2
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 2. SUMMARIZED OBSERVATIONS FROM MODEL ANALYSIS
Cumulative Percentage
Cumulative Percentage
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment
reported practices score pre/post intervention
Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 4. Value creation (Y2)
Table 5. Daily Standard Deviation of Items
S. No. Product Name yield content
Table 2. Pre and Post Test Scores for the Plaid Condition(N=16)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Twice daily regimen N=45 MDI regimen N=28 P Value
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Average Execution Time in seconds
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 4. Independent Samples Test Application of ICT by Gender
Presentation transcript:

Table 2. Result of intention to use Elearning tools No. Mean Std dev Interactive WhiteBoard 273 2.37 1.20 MindMapping tool 2.23 1.21 Camtasia 2.79 1.44 Excel 2.50 1.49 Webquest 2.63 1.54 Enhanced powerpoint presentation 2.20 1.18 Weighted mean: 2.45 Percentage: 81.7% Adedoja Gloria et al. Pre-Service Teachers’ Ease of Use and Intention to Use Selected E-learning Technologies in Designing Instruction. American Journal of Educational Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 10, 1320-1323. doi:10.12691/ education-3-10-18 © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing.