Searching FRB with Jiamusi-66m Radio Telescope

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ben Barsdell Matthew Bailes Christopher Fluke David Barnes.
Advertisements

Team Presentation July 22, Jodrell Bank is the original arboretum for Manchester University. Immediately after World War II, first radio telescope.
1 Hough transform Some Fourier basics: –Nyquist frequency: 1/2 , with  the difference between time samples. If signal is bandwidth limited below Nyquist.
Zhen Yan, Zhi-Qiang Shen, Xin-Ji Wu On behalf of the Shanghai 65m Radio Telescope Team.
Pulsars with LWA1 Paul S. Ray and Sean Cutchin Naval Research Laboratory 2012 July 26 Basic research in radio astronomy at NRL is supported by NRL/ONR.
The Transient Radio Sky to be Revealed by the SKA Jim Cordes Cornell University AAS Meeting Washington, DC 8 January 2002.
Discovery (?) for new population of isolated neutron star “ Transient radio bursts from rotating neutron star ” M.A. McLaughlin et al., Nat. Feb. 16, 2006.
A bright millisecond radio burst of Extragalactic origin Duncan Lorimer, Matthew Bailes, Maura McLaughlin, David Narkevic and Froney Crawford Science (in.
The Transient Universe: AY 250 Spring 2007 Existing Transient Surveys: Radio I: Pulsars Geoff Bower.
Solar corona observations at decameter wavelengths Artem Koval Institute of Radio Astronomy Kharkov, Ukraine.
Panorama of the Universe: Daily all-sky surveys with the SKA John D. Bunton, CSIRO TIP, Ronald D. Ekers, CSIRO ATNF and Elaine M. Sadler, University of.
New observations of three AXPs at low radio frequencies Daria Teplykh & V.M. Malofeev, A.E. Rodin, S.V. Logvinenko. Pushchino Radio Astronomy Observatory.
Detection of Giant pulses from pulsar PSR B Smirnova T.V. Pushchino Radio Astronomy Observatory of ASC FIAN Pushchino Radio Astronomy.
Abstract Pulsars are highly magnetized, rotating neutron stars that emit a beam of electromagnetic radiation. The radiation can only be observed when the.
Long-term monitoring of RRAT J HU HuiDong Urumqi Observatory, NAOC July 27, 2009 Rotating Radio Transients Observation.
Wideband Imaging and Measurements ASTRONOMY AND SPACE SCIENCE Jamie Stevens | ATCA Senior Systems Scientist / ATCA Lead Scientist 2 October 2014.
Techniques for interference mitigation on RATAN-600 radio telescope in dm ranges A.B. Berlin, N. A. Nizhel'skij, M. G. Mingaliev, P. G. Tsybulev, D. V.
Mean pulse profiles and spectra at the low frequencies Malov O.I., Malofeev V.M. Malov O.I., Malofeev V.M. Pushchino Radio Astronomy Observatory.
Molecular Gas and Dust in SMGs in COSMOS Left panel is the COSMOS field with overlays of single-dish mm surveys. Right panel is a 0.3 sq degree map at.
Results of automatic, high time resolution GRB follow-up with the Parkes 12 m Keith Bannister Sydney Institute for Astronomy.
PULSAR SURVEYS (AO & GBT) Why? How deep can we go? (D max, V max ) Example surveys Hardware Funding.
Look, up in the sky! By: Lucas Bolyard, Luis Garcia, and Zach Ewen. Prep Fold Plots Looking at Pointings in the sky Up until this point in time, Team Disney.
Radio Observations of X-ray Binaries : Solitary and Binary Millisecond Pulsars Jeong-Sook Kim 1 & Soon-Wook Kim 2  Department of Space Science and Astronomy.
Field Trials of an RFI Adaptive Filter for Pulsar Observations M. Kesteven, R.N. Manchester, G. Hampson & A. Brown Australia Telescope National Facility.
Real-time Acquisition and Processing of Data from the GMRT Pulsar Back- ends Ramchandra M. Dabade (VNIT, Nagpur) Guided By, Yashwant Gupta.
Pulsar surveys at Arecibo and Green Bank David Champion Gravity Wave Meeting, Marsfield, Dec 2007.
Searching for Gravitational Waves with LIGO Andrés C. Rodríguez Louisiana State University on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SACNAS
Radio Emissions of Magnetars & Observations at Nanshan Xinjiang Astronomical Observatory Yuan Jianping, Wang Na, Liu Zhiyong Outline  Introduction of.
RadioAstron space VLBI mission: early results. XXVIII GA IAU, Beijing, August RadioAstron space VLBI mission: early results. XXVIII GA IAU, Beijing,
Rotating Radio Transients Maura McLaughlin West Virginia University 12 September 2007.
by Arjun Radhakrishnan supervised by Prof. Michael Inggs
Aristeidis Noutsos University of Manchester. The LOFAR Ionosphere See Ger’s talk, in Hamburg last year. Variations of ~3 rad m –2 were observed in the.
Pulsar Data analysis Desh, Anish RRI MWA Meeting Canberra, January
Rick Perley 2 Nov 2001 EVLA Correlator Conceptual Design Review 1 Science Drivers for the EVLA Correlator Rick Perley EVLA Project Scientist 2 Nov 2001.
A real-time software backend for the GMRT : towards hybrid backends CASPER meeting Capetown 30th September 2009 Collaborators : Jayanta Roy (NCRA) Yashwant.
Interstellar turbulent plasma spectrum from multi-frequency pulsar observations Smirnova T. V. Pushchino Radio Astronomy Observatory Astro Space Center.
Detection of giant component from pulsar PSR J V.M. Malofeev, D.A. Teplykh, O.I. Malov and S.V. Logvinenko Pushchino Radio Astronomy Observatory.
Solar observations with single LOFAR stations C. Vocks 1. Introduction: Solar Radio radiation 2. Observations with single LOFAR stations 3. Spectrometer.
Observations of SNR G at 6cm JianWen Xu, Li Xiao, XiaoHui Sun, Chen Wang, Wolfgang Reich, JinLin Han Partner Group of MPIfR at NAOC.
Polarized Radio Emission within Pulsar Magnetosphere & Pulsar Observation with JMS 66m PengFei Wang PengFei Wang ( 王鹏飞 )NAOC
IPS Observations Using the Big Scanning Array of the Lebedev Physical Institute: Recent Results and Future Prospects I.V.Chashei, V.I.Shishov, S.A.Tyul’bashev,
First result with PAF on a big single-dish radio telescope X. Deng, A. Chippendale, S. Johnston, G. Hobbs, D. George, R. Karuppusamy ASTRONOMY AND SPACE.
Andreas Horneffer for the LOFAR-CR Team
p no Bhaswati Bhattacharyya On behalf of GHRSS team
RFI Protection Activities in IAA RAS
Multi-beaming & Wide Field Surveys
Scalable cm-Wavelength Aperture Arrays
Finding the next Galactic extragalactic FRB
RFI Protection Activities in IAA RAS
FRB Backend First Light
The LOFAR Transients Key Project
Sergei A. Trushkin , Sergei N. Fabrika, Peter G. Tsybulev
MPIfR Results from the A. Chippendale ATUC, 14 Nov 2016
Pulsar Timing with ASKAP Simon Johnston ATNF, CSIRO
Delphine Perrodin INAF – Osservatorio Astronomico di Cagliari
An In-depth Analysis of Radio Astronomy
Pulsar Search Collaboratory
Ten Years of Millisecond Pulsar Timing at Kalyazin
Pulsar and Transient Science with the 12m Antenna
The High Time Resolution Universe Survey Backend
The Hunt for Pulsars Rowan County Pulsar Astronomers Abstract
Pulsar 3: Significant peaks, well above the noise
Observations of pulsar microstructure with the GMRT
Pulsar Data II Single-Pulse Plots
Amateur Pulsar Detection With EME Equipment
Polarization Properties of an Eclipsing Pulsar
Pulsar Data II Single-Pulse Plots
ALFA Pulsar Surveys: Searching for Laboratories of Extreme Physics
Rotating Radio Transients
ALFA/Arecibo pulsar surveys
Presentation transcript:

Searching FRB with Jiamusi-66m Radio Telescope Speaker: Yezhao Yu Supervisor: Jinlin Han NAOC 2015.7.4, Mingantu

Outline Fast Radio Burst FRB Searching Conclusion Jiamusi-66m Radio Telescope FPGA Based Digital Backend Pulsar Observation with JMS-66m Detectability and Test Conclusion

Farst Radio Burst 10 FRBs discovered (9 by Parkes) Peak flux density: ~0.3 to 30 Jy @1.3GHz Width: <1.1 to 9.4 ms @1.3GHz DM: 375 to 1072 cm-3pc Possible Origin: Binary Neutron Star Mergers Binary White Dwarf Mergers Associate with GRB Axion Stars Young SNR pulsars Quark Nova (Thornton et al. science, 2013)

FRB Searching JMS-66m S-band Digital Backend Power Spectrum Single Pulse Searching (Personal Computer) Remove RFI De-dispersion Calculate S/N Ratio Data Analyse Draw the Result

JMS-66m Radio Telescope Jimusi, Heilongjiang Cassegrain system S band Center @ 2250MHz Bandwidth: ~130MHz Tsys: ~74K X band Center @ 8310MHz Bandwidth: ~180MHz Tsys: ~78K Picture from Internet Jiamusi-66m (JMS-66m for shart) is one of the antenna of Chinese Deep Space Network (CDSN), providing measuring and control supprot for Chang'e III and IV missions. (Ministry of Science and Technilogy)

FPGA Based Digital Backend Made by Southeast University, Nanjing Main observe modes: Bandwidth 150M, 256 channels, sampling time 0.2ms Bandwidth 150M, 128 channels, sampling time 0.1ms hardware software interface

Pulsar Observation with JMS-66m 2015.4.15 ~ 4.23 @S-band 35 nulling pulsars and 3 millisecond pulsars 28 nulling pulsars' observed time ≥ 3 hour 2015.6.13 ~ 6.25 @S-band 34 pulsars, include 6 millisecond pulsars Each pulsar's observed time ≥ 0.5 hour Cassiopeia A for more than 6 hour All data recorded using PSRFITS format.

PSRB0329+54 Observe Time:11 hours Results: Clear single pluses (256 channels, 0.2 ms mode) Observe Time:11 hours Results: Clear single pluses Scintillation Nulling (Result from Chen Wang) Phase vs. Frequency Phase vs. Time (5 hours) Time vs. Frequency(12s)

MSP J2145-0750 Observe Time:25 minutes Results: (128 channels, 0.1 ms mode) Observe Time:25 minutes Results: Integrated pulse profile (Result from Pengfei Wang) Phase vs. Frequency Phase vs. Time (25 min)

Detectablity and Test Sensitivity Single-pulse Detectablility Test with Pulsars Next Step

Sensitivity Here, k is the Boltzmann constant, Tsys is the system noise temperature, η is the antenna efficiency, np is the number of polarisations, Δt is the sampling and the Δf is the observe bandwidth. For our system, Tsys = 74K, η= 60%, np = 2, Δt = 0.2ms, Δf = 130MHz The sensitivity ΔS = 0.437 Jy

Single-pulse Detectability Using a signal-to-noise ratio threshold (S/N)=7, and with smearing the sampling time into 0.4, 0.8 ms, we can calculate the weekest dectectable pulse peak flux density Speak Δt (ms) 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.6 Speak (Jy) 3.059 2.163 1.530 1.082 If used (S/N)=5, than the Speak would be 2.185, 1.545, 1.093 Jy Note that this is the sensitivity for single pulse. For pulsar, it can be much more sensitive.

For us: Directly dected Detect after smearing DM (pc cm-3) observed width @~1.3GHz (ms) peak flux density (Jy) Fluence @~1.3GHz (Jy ms) Lorimer burst 375 5 30±10 J1852-08 745 7.3 0.41 FRB 11020 910 5.6±0.1 1.3 8.0 FRB 110627 677 <1.4 0.4 0.7 FRB 110703 1072 <4.3 0.5 1.8 FRB 120127 521 <1.1 0.6 FRB 121102 557.4±3 3.0±0.5 FRB 011025 790±3 9.4±0.2 0.3 <2.82 FRB 140514 562.7(6) FRB 131104 779±0.2 1.1±0.1 For us: Directly dected Detect after smearing The FRB event rate RFRB(F>3Jy ms) = ~1.0×104 sky-1day-1 . For our system (beam width 7 arcmin), we may need >4years waiting for an FRB.

Test 1: Single-pulse search result for pulsar B0355+54 Name: B0355+54 DM: 57.1420 cm-3pc P0: 0.1563824177774 s S1400: 23 mJy RFI removed Pulser width: ~17ms @1.4GHz The left: DM value vs. time for all pulses with S/N ratio greater than 4σ. Right top: DM value vs. Number of pulses with S/N ratio greater than 4σ. Right bottom: DM value vs. S/N ratio of pulses with S/N ratio greater than 4σ.

Test 2: Single-pulse search result for pulsar B0525+21 Name: B0525+21 DM: 50.937 cm-3pc P0: 3.74553925030 s S1400: 9 mJy RFI removed Pulser width: ~210ms @1.4GHz (has two subpulsers, each width is ~105ms) The left: DM value vs. time for all pulses with S/N ratio greater than 4σ. Right top: DM value vs. Number of pulses with S/N ratio greater than 4σ. Right bottom: DM value vs. S/N ratio of pulses with S/N ratio greater than 4σ.

Next Step The searching program now is run in CPU. In order to detect the FRB faster, a GPU based single-pulse searching program is under development. What have been done: a. GPU based de-dispersion (direct & tree) b. GPU based S/N ratio calculation What will be done: a. GPU based RFI removment b. More automation

Conclusion Although JMS-66m is an antenna of CDSN, not for radio astronomy, we confirmed that it is able to do radio observation at its S band. Both hardware and software is prepared for single-pulse searching. Such searching will begin soon. Then what we need to do is waiting for a strong enough FRB. Thank you