Splash Screen.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sec 2-3 Concept: Deductive Reasoning Objective: Given a statement, use the laws of logic to form conclusions and determine if the statement is true through.
Advertisements

2-4 Rules of Logic What is deductive reasoning?
Targets Use the Law of Detachment. Use the Law of Syllogism. Lesson 2-3: Deductive Reasoning TARGETS.
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Geometry 1.0 – Students demonstrate understanding by identifying and giving examples of inductive and deductive reasoning.
Warm Up Make a conjecture based on the following information.  For points A, B and C, AB = 2, BC = 3, and AC = 4. A, B, and C form an equilateral triangle.
Review! It’s Go Time!.
Inductive Reasoning and Conjecture and Deductive Reasoning
Chapter 2-4 & 2-5 Reasoning and Proofs. Lesson 5 MI/Vocab postulate axiom theorem proof paragraph proof informal proof Identify and use basic postulates.
2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning. Objectives Use the Law of Detachment Use the Law of Detachment Use the Law of Syllogism Use the Law of Syllogism.
Splash Screen. Lesson Menu Five-Minute Check (over Lesson 2–3) Then/Now New Vocabulary Example 1: Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Key Concept: Law of.
Today’s Lesson is on DEDUCTIVE REASONING.
Deductive Reasoning Chapter 2 Lesson 4.
Chapter 2 Lesson 3 Objective: To use the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism.
 ESSENTIAL QUESTION  How can you use reasoning to solve problems?  Scholars will  Use the Law of Syllogism  Use the Law of Detachment UNIT 01 – LESSON.
Lesson 2-4 Deductive Reasoning Deductive reasoning- uses facts, rules, definitions, or properties to reach logical conclusions Law of Detachment: If p.
2.2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning. What We Will Learn Use inductive reasoning Use deductive reasoning.
EXAMPLE 1 Use the Law of Detachment Use the Law of Detachment to make a valid conclusion in the true situation. If two segments have the same length, then.
Unit 3 Lesson 4 Deductive Reasoning Honors Geometry.
Over Lesson 2–3 5-Minute Check 1 A.Hypothesis: 6x – 5 = 19 Conclusion: x = 4 B.Hypothesis: 6x – 5 = 19 Conclusion: x  4 C.Hypothesis: x = 4 Conclusion:
Welcome to Interactive Chalkboard Glencoe Geometry Interactive Chalkboard Copyright © by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Developed by FSCreations, Inc.,
Difference between inductive and deductive reasoning.
Splash Screen. Over Lesson 2–3 5-Minute Check 1 A.Hypothesis: 6x – 5 = 19 Conclusion: x = 4 B.Hypothesis: 6x – 5 = 19 Conclusion: x  4 C.Hypothesis:
Deductive Reasoning LESSON 2–4. Lesson Menu Five-Minute Check (over Lesson 2–3) TEKS Then/Now New Vocabulary Example 1: Real-World Example: Inductive.
2.3 Warm Up Warm Up Lesson Quiz Lesson Quiz Lesson Presentation Lesson Presentation Apply Deductive Reasoning.
Objective Apply the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism in logical reasoning.
Splash Screen.
1. Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of. “If
2-3 Apply Deductive Reasoning
Splash Screen.
Splash Screen.
2-3 Deductive Reasoning Warm Up Lesson Presentation Lesson Quiz
Drill: Tuesday, 10/14 2. Determine if the conditional “If x is a number then |x| > 0” is true. If false, give a counterexample. OBJ: SWBAT analyze.
UNIT 2 Geometric Reasoning 2.1
LESSON 2–4 Deductive Reasoning.
2.2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning
02-2: Vocabulary inductive reasoning conjecture counterexample
Splash Screen.
Splash Screen.
Conditional Statements
Deductive Reasoning Deductive Reasoning – Reasoning that uses facts, rules, definitions, or properties to reach logical conclusions. Law of Detachment.
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Splash Screen.
Vocabulary inductive reasoning conjecture counterexample
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
LESSON 2–4 Deductive Reasoning.
1. Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of. “If
1. Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of the conditional below and determine the truth value for each. “If the measure of an angle is less.
EXAMPLE 1 Use the Law of Detachment
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Objective Apply the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism in logical reasoning.
Splash Screen.
1-6: Deductive Reasoning
Splash Screen.
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Lesson 2 – 4 Deductive Reasoning
Splash Screen.
1-5: Inductive Reasoning
Welcome to Interactive Chalkboard
UNIT 2 Geometric Reasoning 2.1
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Learning Target Students will be able to: Apply the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism in logical reasoning.
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
2-3 Apply Deductive Reasoning
To solve problems by looking for a pattern
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
EXAMPLE 1 Use the Law of Detachment
Presentation transcript:

Splash Screen

Use the Law of Detachment. You used inductive reasoning to analyze patterns and make conjectures. (Lesson 2–1) Use the Law of Detachment. Use the Law of Syllogism. Then/Now

deductive reasoning valid Law of Detachment Law of Syllogism Vocabulary

Inductive and Deductive Reasoning A. WEATHER Determine whether the conclusion is based on inductive or deductive reasoning. In Miguel’s town, the month of April has had the most rain for the past 5 years. He thinks that April will have the most rain this year. Answer: Miguel’s conclusion is based on a pattern of observation, so he is using inductive reasoning. Example 1

Inductive and Deductive Reasoning B. WEATHER Determine whether the conclusion is based on inductive or deductive reasoning. Sandra learned that if it is cloudy at night it will not be as cold in the morning than if there are no clouds at night. Sandra knows it will be cloudy tonight, so she believes it will not be cold tomorrow morning. Answer: Sandra is using facts that she has learned about clouds and temperature, so she is using deductive reasoning. Example 1

A. Determine whether the conclusion is based on inductive or deductive reasoning. Macy’s mother orders pizza for dinner every Thursday. Today is Thursday. Macy concludes that she will have pizza for dinner tonight. A B A. inductive B. deductive Example 1

B. Determine whether the conclusion is based on inductive or deductive reasoning. The library charges $0.25 per day for overdue books. Kyle returns a book that is 3 days overdue. Kyle concludes that he will be charged a $0.75 fine. A B A. inductive B. deductive Example 1

Concept

q: The figure is a parallelogram. Use the Law of Detachment Determine whether the conclusion is valid based on the given information. If not, write invalid. Explain your reasoning. Given: If a figure is a square, then it is a parallelogram. The figure is a parallelogram. Conclusion: The figure is a square. Step 1 Identify the hypothesis p and the conclusion q of the true conditional. p: A figure is a square. q: The figure is a parallelogram. Example 2

Step 2 Analyze the conclusion. Use the Law of Detachment Step 2 Analyze the conclusion. The given statement the figure is a parallelogram satisfies the conclusion q of the true conditional. However, knowing that a conditional statement and its conclusion are true does not make the hypothesis true. The figure could be a rectangle. Answer: The conclusion is invalid. Example 2

The following is a true conditional The following is a true conditional. Determine whether the conclusion is valid based on the given information. Given: If a polygon is a convex quadrilateral, then the sum of the interior angles is 360. ABCD is a convex quadrilateral. Conclusion: The sum of the interior angles of ABCD is 360. A B C A. valid B. not valid C. cannot be determined Example 2

Judge Conclusions Using Venn Diagrams Determine whether the conclusion is valid based on the given information. If not, write invalid. Explain your reasoning using a Venn diagram. Given: If a triangle is equilateral, then it is an acute triangle. The triangle is equilateral. Conclusion: The triangle is acute. Understand Draw a Venn diagram. According to the conditional, if a triangle is equilateral, then it is acute. Draw a circle for acute triangles. Draw a circle for equilateral triangles inside the circle for acute triangles. Example 3

Plan We know that the given triangle is equilateral. Judge Conclusions Using Venn Diagrams Plan We know that the given triangle is equilateral. Solve Since all equilateral triangles are acute, the conclusion is valid. Answer: From the information given, all equilateral triangles are acute, so the conclusion is valid. Check No matter where you draw a dot for an equilateral triangle, it will always be inside the circle for acute triangles. Therefore, the conclusion is valid. Example 3

Determine whether the conclusion is valid based on the given information. If not, write invalid. Use a Venn diagram to help you. Given: If a figure is a square, then it has 4 right angles. A figure has 4 right angles. Conclusion: The figure is a square. A B A. valid B. invalid Example 3

Concept

Determine which statement follows logically from the given statements. (1) If Jamal finishes his homework, he will go out with his friends. (2) If Jamal goes out with his friends, he will go to the movies. A If Jamal goes out with his friends, then he finishes his homework. B If Jamal finishes his homework, he will go to the movies. C If Jamal does not go to the movies, he does not go out with his friends. D There is no valid conclusion. Example 4

p: Jamal finishes his homework. q: He goes out with his friends. Read the Test Item Let p, q, and r represent the parts of the given conditional statements. p: Jamal finishes his homework. q: He goes out with his friends. r: He goes to the movies. Solve the Test Item Analyze the logic of the given conditional statements using symbols. Statement (1): p → q Statement (2): q → r Example 4

Answer: The correct choice is B. Both statements are considered true. By the Law of Syllogism, p → r is also true. Write the statements for p → r. If Jamal finishes his homework, then he will go to the movies. Answer: The correct choice is B. Example 4

Determine which statement follows logically from the given statements Determine which statement follows logically from the given statements. (1) If your alarm clock goes off in the morning, then you will get out of bed. (2) If you ride a bus, then you go to work. A. If you ride a bus, then you get out of bed. B. If your alarm clock goes off, then you go to work. C. If you go to work, then you get of out bed. D. There is no valid conclusion. A B C D Example 4

p: It snows more than 5 inches. q: School will be closed. Apply Laws of Deductive Reasoning Draw a valid conclusion from the given statements, if possible. Then state whether your conclusion was drawn using the Law of Detachment or the Law of Syllogism. If no valid conclusion can be drawn, write no conclusion and explain your reasoning. Given: If it snows more than 5 inches, school will be closed. It snows 7 inches. p: It snows more than 5 inches. q: School will be closed. Answer: Since It snows 7 inches satisfies the hypothesis, p is true. By the Law of Detachment, a valid conclusion is School is closed. Example 5

Determine whether statement (3) follows from statements (1) and (2) by the Law of Detachment or the Law of Syllogism. If it does, state which law was used. If it does not, select invalid. (1) If a children’s movie is playing on Saturday, Janine will take her little sister Jill to the movie. (2) Janine always buys Jill popcorn at the movies. (3) If a children’s movie is playing on Saturday, Jill will get popcorn. A B C A. Law of Detachment B. Law of Syllogism C. invalid Example 5

End of the Lesson