Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
External Trade 1 5th Global Congress Combating Counterfeiting and Piracy Global and Regional IPR Enforcement Initiatives Luc-Pierre Devigne Head of Intellectual.
Advertisements

1 n European Commission 4th Global Congress: Combating Counterfeiting and Piracy Dubai – 3 February 2008 An Urgent Need to Better Respond to the Global.
BORDER MEASURES AND GOODS IN TRANSIT
1 WTO and medicines: from Doha to Cancún Germán Velásquez Essential Drugs and Medicines Policy World Health Organization Geneva, October 2003.
Actions Developing in Countries Accessing the WTO System Vung Tau, February 2006 “US – Brazil Compulsory licensing.
Elizabeth Ferris Bettina Garabelli ITRN 603 International Trade Relations.
The new offensive on enforcement of IPRs Domestic and international actions Domestic and international actions Pressures on developing countries Pressures.
Margie Milam Senior Policy Counselor ICANN 1 ( All views expressed are my own)
WTO Dispute DS362 China vs. United States
The Truth About ACTA Professor Michael Geist Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law University of Ottawa, Faculty of Law.
RECOMMENDATIONS BY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAWYERS ON LEGAL REFORM MOSES NKOMO LL.B, MIP.
Office of the U.S. Trade Representative Kira M. Alvarez CHIEF NEGOTIATOR AND DEPUTY ASSISTANT U.S.T.R. For intellectual property enforcement.
Strengthening the Protection and Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights in Ukraine Activity October 2014.
Challenges and Opportunities to Utilize TRIPS Flexibilities in Current Ukrainian Legislation: Potential Impact of IP Provisions in the Proposed EU FTA.
Priorities to Combat Counterfeiting and Piracy Koji Yonetani Director Intellectual Property Affairs Division Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan
Strengthening the Protection and Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights in Ukraine Activity October 2014.
1 Licensing Agreements and the Protection of Intellectual Property Chapter 17 © 2005 Thomson/West Legal Studies In Business.
Map of TPP negotiating countries:
Exception to rules on free trade Need to strike a balance between free trade and other values. Member can justify measures incompatible with WTO Agreements.
1 International Legal Framework for the Protection of Geographical Indications Warsaw, 26 April 2006 Denis Croze Acting Director Advisor Economic Development.
Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights in the Republic of Macedonia State Office of Industrial Property of the Republic of Macedonia ______________________________.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND ACCESS TO INFORMATION IN ZIMBABWE Kathy Matsika(Ms) National University of Science and Technology.
Intellectual Property in the Context of Growth and Development of the World Economy Luciano Daffarra, Attorney at Law Daffarra, d’Addio & Partners China-Italy.
Importance of Intellectual Property Central issue in multilateral trade relations –Need for organization to see that there are intellectual property procedures.
© 2007 by West Legal Studies in Business / A Division of Thomson Learning CHAPTER 7 Intellectual Property.
The emergence of an Enforcement Agenda Intellectual Property Rights and Access to Essential Medicines: Challenges and Opportunities in Free Trade Agreement.
LECTURE XI. INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS Copyright Law and Media Law JUDr. Eva Ondřejová, LL.M. 1.
© A. Kur Enforcing Intellectual Property Rights in Europe and in Third Countries - The Quest for Balance Prof. Annette Kur, MPI Munich.
Amy Palmer. Copyright, Design, Patent Copyright applies to any medium. This means that you must not reproduce copyright protected work in another medium.
Overview +Recap +Legal framework - points of interest +Next steps +Questions.
NOIP: Challenges and Strategies IPRTA forum Mexico City, July 9-11, 2008 Pham Phi Anh Deputy Director General National Office of Intellectual Property.
An Introduction to IPR Enforcement Tony Bonnici UNECE Skopje, 1 April 2009.
CAPACITY BUILDING TRAINING PROGRAMME ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND RELATED WTO ISSUES April 28-May 2, 2008 Session 3 Enforcement under the TRIPS.
Intellectual Property Rights in the WTO CARSTEN FINK The WTO and the Doha Development Agenda Washington, DC, April 26, 2005.
ENFORCEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS: NEW INITIATIVES International conference “Industrial Property for Competitiveness: EU and Global Experience”
The Doha Declaration and the Protocol amending the TRIPS Agreement Islamabad, 28 November 2007 Octavio Espinosa WIPO.
© 2008 International Intellectual Property June 24, 2009 Class 8 Patents: Multilateral Agreements (WTO TRIPS); Global Problem of Patent Protection for.
Why the Data Protection Act was brought in  The 1998 Data Protection Act was passed by Parliament to control the way information is handled and to give.
Regional Dialogue on EPAs, IP and Sustainable Development for ECOWAS Countries Dialogue organised by ICTSD, ENDA Tiers Monde & QUNO Saly (Dakar), Senegal,
SNB - REACT Business Perspective IPR Protection April 1, 2009 Presentation Eli Mufisovski.
Agreement on TRIPS TRIPS Agreement  When the WTO was established, it led to 18 specific agreements to which all members need to adhere. Members necessarily.
Enforcement under the TRIPS Agreement [Shortened version of presentation] Regional Conference – IP Enforcement Cairo, November 9, 2008 Ms. Louise van Greunen.
Jonathan Band Jonathan Band PLLC ACTA: A Quick Overview 1.
South Africa’s Acceptance of the Protocol Amending the TRIPS Agreement Xolelwa Mlumbi- Peter DDG: ITED 24 November 2015.
The Directive on Enforcement and The Customs Regulation Warsaw May 2006 Martin Ekvad Community Plant Variety Office Head of Legal Affairs.
ABA Annual Meeting All Rights Reserved Brief Overview of the Intellectual Property System in China Elizabeth Chien-Hale
1 M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 29 – Customs union Bilateral screening:
©2005 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning Fundamentals of Business Law 6 th Edition Chapter 5 Intellectual Property and Internet.
Article 4 [Obligations of Applicant] 4.1. As a sole and exclusive owner of the Application, Applicant warrants that.
ACTA & Public Safety: Counterfeit Agreement Peter Maybarduk Public Citizen October 28, 2010.
TRADE SECRETS workshop I © 2009 Prof. Charles Gielen EU-China Workshop on the Protection of Trade Secrets Shanghai June 2009.
Chapter 10 Intellectual Property and Internet Law.
Intro to Intellectual Property 3.0
Intellectual Property and Access to Affordable Medicines: TRIPS Plus
Essentials of the legal environment today, 5e
MGT601 SME MANAGEMENT.
ANTI-COUNTERFEITING TRADE AGREEMENT
WTO and medicines: from Doha to Cancún
Exception to rules on free trade
International IP Roundtable UNLV, 8 April Seizure of Goods in Transit
Intellectual Property Protection and Access to Medicines
Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement
By: Justin, Juan, Jian, and Jazlin
Canada and the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA)
Intellectual Property Rights in Global Markets
By Karwan dana Ishik university
Millennium HongQiao Hotel Shanghai
Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights in the Community Benoît Lory European Commission, DG Internal Market and Services Enforcement of Intellectual.
Prof. Dr. Martin Senftleben Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
SIMPLIFIED MEASURES FOR CUSTOMER’S IDENTIFICATION
Presentation transcript:

Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement ACTA New legislation for billions of people, made behind closed doors Ante Wessels, FFII, Vrijschrift Eth0, August 2010

Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement . . . . . . . . . . . United States, European Union, Japan, Australia, Canada, Mexico, Morocco, New Zealand, Republic of Korea, Singapore, Switzerland ~ billion people

Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement announced 23 October 2007 behind closed doors after much pressure: April 2010 text released new round of negotiations: no text compare WTO, WIPO EU: Council will decide, European Parliament veto, member states veto on criminal measures US: ACTA is State secret Executive Agreement, Congress not involved

Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement not only trade mark counterfeiting new rules for the enforcement of Copyright and Related Rights Trademarks Geographical Indications Industrial Designs Patents Layout-Designs (Topographies) of Integrated Circuits Protection of Undisclosed Information not only fake Gucci handbags

Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement threatens Internet freedom, access to medicine, fundamental rights and liberties, the right to a fair legal process

ACTA: new institution New institution not transparent not accountable to non-Parties and public interest organizations may push for ever-higher levels of intellectual property protection and enforcement without adequate safeguards and evidence-based policy making undermines WTO, WIPO New institution

Trade mark counterfeiting protected trademark on same type of goods Gucci label on handbags fake medicine criminal organization may justify destruction of production facilities

ACTA: other trade mark infringements Apple records versus Apple Computer protected trademark not used no counterfeiting confusion? trade mark infringement destroy Apple Computer's production facilities ? basic pattern: extreme measures for normal infringements

Patents - AIDS took millions of lives in Africa, 90ties medicine prices higher than in the US because of TRIPS, countries could not abolish patent system (NL abolished patents 1869 until 1912)

South Africa 1997, Mandela signs law to ensure affordable medicines U.S. prepares trade sanctions, 41 companies sue Mandela public outrage WTO Doha Declaration on TRIPS and Public Health, 2001 pharma: minimize Doha, label generic medicine as counterfeit

Dutch seizures of essential medicine 2008, 2009, NL seized essential generic medicine (f.i. AIDS), in transit not patented in India, not patented in developing countries, not enter EU markets - violation Doha Declaration EU Customs regulation: in transit – WTO case

Software development full of ideas full of patents legal minefield infringement unavoidable ignore software patents to some extent

Patent trolls broad claims on trivial methods infringement is unavoidable extort entrepreneurs damages based on retail price injunctions without exception destruction of production facilities

Remove patents from ACTA access to medicine spread of green technology spread of food technology software development remove patents

ACTA: Criminal Measures Each Party shall provide for criminal procedures and penalties to be applied at least in cases of willful trademark counterfeiting or copyright or related rights piracy on a commercial scale. [EU: [J: For the purpose of this Agreement,] [US: Infringements] Acts [Can: of piracy] carried out on a commercial scale are [US/CH: include at least] those carried out in the context of commercial activity for direct or indirect economic or commercial advantage; [[US/J/CH: however a Party may exclude][EU: this excludes] such acts carried out by end consumers.][US: Each Party may treat acts carried out by end consumers as outside the scope ot this Section.]

ACTA: Criminal Measures commercial advantage: spending less money, downloading, advertisement on web page end consumers: not if you share a file newspaper, whistle blower, weblog author revealing a document office worker forwarding a document remixer, filesharer

ACTA: Internet Internet providers responsible for the actions of subscribers act expeditiously on alleged infringements not only upon notice aware of facts and circumstances from which infringing activity is apparent

ACTA: Internet ISP: police and judge no checks and balances, no procedural safeguards cost effective to give in to rights holders remove links to infringing material

ACTA: Internet ACTA encourages cooperation between service providers and rights holders deal effectively with infringement encourages establishing guidelines (three strikes?)

ACTA: Internet vertical integration content industry and Internet providers will Hollywood define our freedom on the Internet? freeze broken, old-school measures on new developments? protect the right of access to the Internet fundamental discussion of copyright in the digital era Remove copyright

No evidence fighting counterfeiting is needed GAO study suggests claims are massively overstated study: within two years, 46 percent of buyers of fake luxury apparel subsequently purchased the authentic version of the same product

Prof. Annette Kur, MPI Munich: “Lastly, some rather “incorrect“ thoughts… The modern plagues of counterfeiting and piracy did not come out of nowhere – to some extent, they are rooted in the development of IP protection itself The wider the gap becomes between production costs and the gains achieved by protected items, the more illegal copying it will attract… If rightholders are compensated for their losses by granting ever stronger rights, also the attraction will increase, and so on It is doubtful whether imposing (ever more) drastic sanctions is able to break the vicious circle – experiences in other areas tell a different, sad story”

Fight dangerous products combat risks for public health is not primarily an IP issue resources are limited, especially in developing countries focus is needed fight dangerous products, whether IP rights are involved or not

Stop ACTA negotiations wrong focus flawed process if not stopped: remove patents and copyright limit to product counterfeiting introduce TRIPS and WIPO safeguards in ACTA Thank you! ante@vrijschrift.org http://wiki.vrijschrift.org/acta