10 October 2007 Pete Zacharias Acting Vice Chancellor

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Date Title (Select Purpose of your SWOT) Your Name Here.
Advertisements

Evaluator 101: An Introduction to Serving as a MSCHE Evaluator Dr. Luis G. Pedraja MSCHE Vice President.
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
9 November 2007 Cecilia de la Rosa Head of the Internal Quality Unit How to prepare for an external review Current trends in the European Quality Assurance.
Cedarville University Accreditation Self-Study Plan Presented by Dr. Thomas Mach.
University of the Western Cape HEQC /Finnish Project October 2008 Vincent Morta Quality Manager.
UC Denver* has been accredited since 1913 – accreditation was continued following consolidation in 2005 Upcoming site visit in April 3-6, 2011 Reaffirming.
HERA WORKSHOP Jane Hart Oksana Bolgarova Cartwright Wanda Kirby.
A new approach to appraisals within the University of Kent Liz Shrives working with: Melissa Bradley and Helena Torres.
Preparing for THE Visit: the PA Role in the Institutional Accreditation Report and Visit Ellie A. Fogarty, Ed.D., Vice President Middle States Commission.
Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.
Vaal University of Technology (formerly Vaal Triangle Technikon ) Ms A.J. GOZO Senior Director: Library and Information Services.
Slides from a workshop at the annual conference of the American Theological Library Association, New Orleans, June 2014 TD Lincoln.
Evaluation and Assessment What are they? Why do we need them? When do we use them?
LSEN - Manchester Learning, Skills and Employment Network Manchester.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
Influencing UK Policy All bills are scrutinised at committee stage, after second reading, which give opportunity to submit evidence.committee stage Current.
Accreditation Who does it? Why do it? How is it done?
Higher Learning Commission Accreditation Process Update
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Accreditation Essentials
The British Accreditation Council: ensuring standards
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Understanding VPNPP Advancement
GOVERNANCE COUNCILS AND HARTNELL’S GOVERNANCE MODEL
Athletics Certification Orientation
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
CBP Strategic Communications Plan
The Relationship with Grants Management & the Project director
Faculty of Science Review Staff Orientation Workshop
Surviving an Accreditation Visit and other accreditation hot topics
Shared Governance at Colorado State University:
Programme Site Visit Directorate of Quality Promotion QP_DN.
Building the Future of Housing with the External Review
REPORT TO THE YCCD BOARD OF TRUSTEES MARCH 9, 2017
Quality Workshop The Local Council Award Scheme is a great guide for good practice in our sector and a way for councils to build confidence in their.
2016 GOVERNANCE GROUP UPDATE
HERE report 2015 – good practices and recommendations
The IEPI Framework: Integrated Planning and Disaggregating Data
Introduction to the NSU Write from the Start QEP
TCPI Project Pathway: Session 3 of 8 Staff Engagement: Teamwork and Joy # 6 and 19 (24) To QIA for possible use: Thank you for taking my call and listening.
European TRAINING FOUNDATION
Reflection on OAC Manual Quality Audit- Learning By Sharing
Pathways 2017: HLC Accreditation Overview
Staff Forum 101 We Are Here For You.
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
Running an Effective Club at Clark University
ENQA Agency Reviews – main changes from the old review process
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010
Accreditation 2016 A student’s guide.
How did we do it? Case examples from AIC
HLC Update: Progress and Preparation for the Visit
TRAINING MATERIALS Module 5 Engaging Key Actors Purpose: Participants know how to engage key actors in the PMSD process by establishing relationships,
Your second annual progress review
Engaging All Faculty in Guided Pathways Janet Fulks, Faculty Lead- Capacity Building Carrie Roberson, ASCCC North Representative Lorraine Slattery-Farrell,
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
PSHE at Key Stages 1 – 2 Guidance on Assessment, Recording and Reporting If it is not assessment for learning – why are we doing it? Assessment must.
Laura Greason Mark Garner Policy & Practice Manager Project Manager
Reaccreditation and Illinois
AQIP Accreditation Systems Appraisal 2010
Strategy
To achieve improvement through: Self assessment Benchmarking
Lt Governor Training Club Planning Conference
Plymouth North High School
Aim of the institutional evaluation
Accreditation Leadership Committee Opening Meeting
Welcome to the AP® School Year
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

10 October 2007 Pete Zacharias Acting Vice Chancellor Campus Forum Report to the University Community on progress with the Institutional Audit 10 October 2007 Pete Zacharias Acting Vice Chancellor

Purpose of audits to allow the Council for Higher Education (CHE) to gauge standards of quality in HE to provide a structured process for SELF evaluation managed by the HEQC determine areas of best practice within universities and across the sector to allow for constant improvements gives us an opportunity to improve our systems

Purpose of audits (2) audits are not PUNITIVE and they are not for accreditation we have more to learn than the CHE does this is not an opportunity for constituencies within the University to argue for more resources! the Audit Panel is of peers (also outside SA) and have no operational jurisdiction so they can't close us down

Purpose of audits (3) however, failure to respond with an improvement plan will not be wise

Process CHE identifies when the audit will take place this is negotiated with the institution members of the University attended workshops at CHE to prepare us for the audit and a lot of guidance is available networks are formed of institutions already audited to allow peers to guide us several meetings are held with the University and the CHE about 15 months before the visit a self evaluation report is produced before the visit we must agree on the Audit Panel

Process (2) we prepare the Self Evaluation Report (SER) over 15 months and submit this three months before the visit The HEQC sends us their analysis a month before the audit panel then determine their ‘lines of enquiry’ ALL sectors of the university are under review in the process, but it concentrates on teaching, learning and research process and practice in all areas are viewed in terms of how they contribute to the core business of teaching, learning and research

Process (3) the visit lasts a week they interview about 800 people across the University! they review and study all policy, processes and practices and cross reference this to the interviews they visit areas of special interest to them we can not control their approach in any way they evaluate against 19 criteria

Who is doing it? we have an Institutional Audit Coordinating Committee (IACC) chaired by the VC it has seven task teams covering the entire University they match our seven strategic goals they have been working for nearly a year the TTs, Faculties and Schools have all done self reflection reports or are in this process a draft SER will be produced by the IACC workshops will be used to get inputs from all of us where necessary

So what should we all do? there is no doubt that this is to our benefit we should all learn as much as we can about it we should all participate in events that contribute however minor these may seem please pay attention to the regular bulletins put out by the VC about the audit we should all be familiar with the self evaluation report (SER) we should have expert knowledge of the SER for the areas we are responsible for in our work place respond positively by changing our practice in those areas we learn we need to improve

So how do we respond? take the exercise very seriously do not get anxious about it learn as much about ourselves as we can be proud of what we have achieved and fix those things we are not doing well respond to things we must fix before the panel gets here be realistic!

Where to get more details? We have an Audit Website at: http://iaudit.ukzn.ac.za/

Thank you for listening We will know where we stand on: Audit visit: 20-24 October 2008