Rectangular & Circular Plate Shock & Vibration

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Module 2 Modal Analysis ANSYS Dynamics.
Advertisements

The Stress-Velocity Relationship for Shock & Vibration
Unit 3 Vibrationdata Sine Sweep Vibration.
Shock Special Topics Unit 42 Vibrationdata 1.Accidental Drop Shock 2.Half-Sine Shock on Drop Tower 3.Half-Sine Shock on Shaker Table 4.Waveform Reconstructions.
1 Sine Vibration Vibrationdata Unit 2. 2 Vibrationdata Sine Amplitude Metrics.
Unit 40 Shock Fatigue Vibrationdata
Multi-degree-of-freedom System Shock Response Spectrum
Unit 46 Vibrationdata Two-degree-of-freedom System with Translation & Rotation Subjected to Multipoint Enforced Motion.
NESC Academy 1 Acoustic Fatigue By Tom Irvine Webinar 37.
Nazgol Haghighat Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Ir. Daniel J. Rixen
Circuit Board Fatigue Response to Random Vibration Part 2
Presented by Andrey Kuzmin Mathematical aspects of mechanical systems eigentones Department of Applied Mathematics.
Unit 6: Structural vibration An Introduction to Mechanical Engineering: Part Two Structural vibration Learning summary By the end of this chapter you should.
Vibrationdata AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS 1 Practical Application of the Rayleigh-Ritz Method to Verify Launch Vehicle Bending Modes.
Sine-on-Random Vibration
Vibrationdata 1 SDOF Response to Power Spectral Density Base Input Unit 13.
Introduction to Structural Dynamics:
Chapter 13 Oscillatory Motion.
1 HOMEWORK 1 1.Derive equation of motion of SDOF using energy method 2.Find amplitude A and tanΦ for given x 0, v 0 3.Find natural frequency of cantilever,
S1-1 SECTION 1 REVIEW OF FUNDAMENTALS. S1-2 n This section will introduce the basics of Dynamic Analysis by considering a Single Degree of Freedom (SDOF)
The Stress-Velocity Relationship
RESPONSE SPECTRUM METHOD
Chapter 9 The Vibrations of Drumheads and Soundboards.
Outline Lesson 1. Introduction to ANSYS Lesson 2. Basics Lesson 3. Solution phases Lesson 4. Modeling Lesson 5. Material Lesson 6. Loading Lesson 7. Solution.
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Vibrationdata 1 Unit 17 SDOF Response to Applied Force Revision A.
Vibrationdata 1 Unit 15 SDOF Response to Base Input in the Frequency Domain.
ME 440 Intermediate Vibrations Th, March 26, 2009 Chapter 5: Vibration of 2DOF Systems © Dan Negrut, 2009 ME440, UW-Madison.
Using GSA & Compos for dynamic and footfall analysis 1 Footfall induced vibration analysis using Compos Thomas Li (Software Technology Group)
The Finite Element Method A Practical Course
A PPLIED M ECHANICS Lecture 06 Slovak University of Technology Faculty of Material Science and Technology in Trnava.
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Unit 14 Synthesizing a Time History to Satisfy a Power Spectral Density using Random Vibration.
A PPLIED M ECHANICS Lecture 03 Slovak University of Technology Faculty of Material Science and Technology in Trnava.
1 CAEnable Ltd. Copyright 2006 CAEnable, Ltd – Confidential Information. Duplication or distribution prohibited. Engineering Competencies Design of Metal.
PAT328, Section 3, March 2001MAR120, Lecture 4, March 2001S14-1MAR120, Section 14, December 2001 SECTION 14 STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS.
Vibrationdata 1 Unit 15 SDOF Response to Base Input in the Frequency Domain.
NESC Academy Response to Classical Pulse Excitation Unit 23.
An Introduction to Rotorcraft Dynamics
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 1. Introduction Both cavities will be supported by the fundamental power coupler and a number of blade flexures.
Two-degree-of-freedom System with Translation & Rotation
Finite Element Analysis of the18 Turn Beam H. F. Fan November 5, 2004.
Power Spectral Density Functions of Measured Data
MODULE 08 MULTIDEGREE OF FREEDOM SYSTEMS. 2 Structure vibrating in a given mode can be considered as the Single Degree of Freedom (SDOF) system. Structure.
Vibrationdata Synthesizing a Time History to Satisfy a Power Spectral Density using Random Vibration Unit 14 1.
BASICS OF DYNAMICS AND ASEISMIC DESIGN
RELIABLE DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS Mehdi Modares, Robert L. Mullen and Dario A. Gasparini Department of Civil Engineering Case Western.
NESC Academy 1 Rainflow Cycle Counting for Continuous Beams By Tom Irvine Unit 34.
Vibrationdata 1 Unit 18 Force Vibration Response Spectrum.
Force Vibration Response Spectrum
Finite element method for structural dynamic and stability analyses
REAR RACK (MODAL) ANALYSIS
Chapter 7 Determination of Natural Frequencies and Mode shapes
ILC MDI Platform Concept
Unit 3 Vibrationdata Sine Sweep Vibration.
SDOF Response to Applied Force Revision A
Integration and Differentiation of Time Histories & Spectral Functions
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 18
1C9 Design for seismic and climate changes
E80 Modal Vibrations Spring 2009
Equivalent Static Loads for Random Vibration
Chapter 15 Oscillations.
Nastran FEA Base Excitation Response Spectrum
Unit 2 Vibrationdata Sine Vibration.
Avionics Component Shock Sensitivity
Nastran FEA Base Excitation with Multiple Response Spectrum Inputs
FEA PSD Response for Base Excitation using Femap, Nastran & Matlab
Nastran FEA Frequency Response Function for Base Input Revision B
Two-Degree-of-Freedom Systems
Presentation transcript:

Rectangular & Circular Plate Shock & Vibration Unit 31 Rectangular & Circular Plate Shock & Vibration By Tom Irvine Dynamic Concepts, Inc.

Introduction This unit will continue plate bending shock & vibration Plates modeled as continuous systems (Finite element analysis for plates will be covered in a future unit) First perform normal modes analysis Next Plates will be subjected to base excitation (enforced acceleration) Also consider stress-velocity relationship for plates

Rayleigh’s Method Exact natural frequencies and mode shape solutions can be found for certain boundary condition cases, such as rectangular plate simply-supported on all sides The Rayleigh method is used in other cases to determine the natural frequency and mode shape of a structure Rayleigh method is where KE = kinetic energy PE = potential energy

Rayleigh’s Method (cont) Rayleigh's method requires an assumed displacement function The method thus reduces the dynamic system to a single-degree-of-freedom system. The assumed displacement function introduces additional constraints which increase the stiffness of the system Rayleigh's method yields an upper limit of the true fundamental frequency So form a number of candidate trial displacement functions each of which satisfies the boundary conditions Select the winner as the function which yields the lowest natural frequency

Read Input Arrays vibrationdata > Import Data to Matlab Read in Library Arrays: NAVMAT PSD Specification & SRS 1000G Acceleration Time History

Rectangular Plate 12 x 8 x 0.125 inch vibrationdata > structural dynamics > Plates, Rectangular & Circular > Rectangular Fixed-Free-Fixed-Free

Fundamental Mode Shape

Enter Damping Q=10

PSD Base Input

Acceleration PSD

von Mises Stress

Shock Input

Base Excitation

Acceleration

von Mises Stress

Circular Bulkhead & Avionics Example in Sounding Rockets Penn State USC

Circular Bulkhead & Avionics Example in Sounding Rockets (cont) Armadillo Aerospace

Circular Homogeneous Plate, Simply-Supported vibrationdata > Structural Dynamics > Plates, Rectangular & Circular > Circular Plate > Homogeneous

Natural Frequency Results (Hz) n k C D root PF EMM 82.66 0 0 1.94266 0.034570 2.2314 0.8414 0.7079 231.35 1 0 2.48732 0.005247 3.7330 0.0000 0.0000 425.80 2 0 2.94619 0.001304 5.0644 0.0000 0.0000 493.98 0 1 2.94018 -0.000544 5.4549 -0.3487 0.1216 663.90 3 0 3.35390 0.000398 6.3239 0.0000 0.0000 805.36 1 1 3.33275 -0.000101 6.9651 0.0000 0.0000 944.19 4 0 3.72713 0.000137 7.5416 0.0000 0.0000 1164.57 2 1 3.68529 -0.000024 8.3756 0.0000 0.0000 1231.62 0 2 3.68427 0.000014 8.6133 0.2243 0.0503 1265.61 5 0 4.07501 0.000051 8.7313 0.0000 0.0000 1570.16 3 1 4.00968 -0.000007 9.7253 0.0000 0.0000 1627.36 6 0 4.40318 0.000020 9.9009 0.0000 0.0000 1706.69 1 2 4.00498 0.000003 10.1393 0.0000 0.0000 2020.93 4 1 4.31290 -0.000002 11.0333 0.0000 0.0000 2028.85 7 0 4.71539 0.000008 11.0549 0.0000 0.0000 2230.02 2 2 4.30231 0.000001 11.5901 0.0000 0.0000 2296.77 0 3 4.30199 -0.000000 11.7622 -0.1656 0.0274 n = nodal diameters k = nodal circles PF = participation factor EMM = effective modal mass ratio

Mode 1

Mode 4

Enter Uniform Damping Q=10

PSD Base Input

Acceleration

Relative Velocity

Relative Displacement

von Mises Stress

Arbitrary Input

Base Input

Acceleration

Relative Velocity

Relative Displacement

von Mises Stress

Shock Summary Peak Response Values at Center Acceleration = 423.2 G Relative Velocity = 89.9 in/sec Relative Displacement = 0.1609 in von Mises Stress = 3687 psi Peak Response Values at Half-Radius Acceleration = 102.5 G Relative Velocity = 53.1 in/sec Relative Displacement = 0.111 in von Mises Stress = 4125 psi