Soil Biological Communities and Aboveground Resilience

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Working Group on Soil Biodiversity Dr Jonathan Leake.
Advertisements

The Carbon Farming Initiative and Agricultural Emissions This presentation was prepared by the University of Melbourne for the Regional Landcare Facilitator.
Effect of Climate Change on Canada’s Forests and Rural Communities Senate Standing Committee on Agriculture & Forestry Avrim Lazar President & CEO Forest.
Carbon sequestration potential assessment in India by A/R activities and implementation of pilot studies Indo-Italian Business Seminar on Renewable Energy.
Czech Rural Development Programme for forestry.
Peter S. Curtis Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology The Ohio State University Managing Great Lakes Forests for Climate Change Mitigation.
Diagnostic canopy Prognostic canopy. Offline results: Combined influence of sun/shade and prognostic canopy scheme, compared to CLM3.0. CLM3-CN running.
1 On-line resource materials for policy making Ex-Ante Carbon-balance Tool Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO Learning how using.
INTRODUCTION Organogram of DoF My role In the Department of Forestry
Carbon Cycle and Ecosystems Important Concerns: Potential greenhouse warming (CO 2, CH 4 ) and ecosystem interactions with climate Carbon management (e.g.,
 November 12 - forest carbon 1, Tutorial 4  November 14 – carbon (cont)  Brief due  November 18 (Monday) – EBM simulation  November 19 (Lecture)
World Forests Forests cover 30% of the world’s land surface.
Managing forests for carbon storage Bill Keeton Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources University of Vermont.
FOREST SERVICE GHG ISSUES AND INFORMATION NEEDS Elizabeth Reinhardt, FS Climate Change Office.
Stakeholder consultation on discussion document on GHG mitigation potential within the agriculture and forest sector Portlaoise 15 May 2015 Eugene Hendrick.
Climate Change and Forestry Allan L. Carroll, Ph.D. Natural Resources Canada Canadian Forest Service Pacific Forestry Centre Victoria, Canada Senior Research.
IMPROVING LUCF GHG INVENTORY and the FAO FRA: the Philippine Case Rodel D. Lasco Environmental Forestry Programme University of the Philippines.
Carbon and forest management Robert Matthews Forest Research Biometrics, Surveys and Statistics Division Alice Holt Research Station, Farnham.
Effects of Forest Management on Carbon Flux and Storage Jiquan Chen, Randy Jensen, Qinglin Li, Rachel Henderson & Jianye Xu University of Toledo & Missouri.
FEG Autumn Symposium David Read UK Forests and Mitigation of Climate Change.
Global Emissions from the Agriculture and Forest Sectors: Status and Trends Indu K Murthy Indian Institute of Science.
EFIMOD – a system of models for Forest Management A.S. Komarov, A.V. Mikhailov, S.S. Bykhovets, M.V.Bobrovsky, E.V.Zubkova Institute of Physicochemical.
Fire Prevention as a GHG Mitigation Strategy Presented by Robert Beach, RTI International Brent Sohngen, The Ohio State University Presented at Forestry.
Climate change and the carbon cycle David Schimel National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder Colorado.
Long-term Climate Change Mitigation Potential with Organic Matter Management on Grasslands Presentation By Taylor Smith Authored By Rebecca Ryals, Melannie.
Carbon Sequestration in Farm and Forest Ecosystems Sarah Hines April 2009
Delivering PINEMAP Outcomes Tim Martin Gary Peter Tom Fox Martha Monroe PINEMAP Annual Meeting Atlanta, GA, May 16, 2012.
Lindsay Hutley (CDU) Jeremy Russell-Smith (NTG)
1 Expert workshop on components of EEA Ecosystem Capital Accounts (ECA) Focus on biomass carbon and biodiversity data 24/03/2015.
GIS bioenergy Options for GIS bioenergy projects Andreas Türk 25. April 2008.
CDM and Forestry Sector in India Carbon Pool of Forestry Sector in India The growing stock of the country has been estimated to be 4,740 million m³.
FOREST SECTOR MITIGATION IN INDIA Ravindranath, Sudha & Sandhya Indian Institute of Science Bangalore.
“STEWARDSHIP IN FORESTRY” Forestry Projects for Terrestrial Sequestration -- Regulatory and Public Acceptance Issues -- Jim Cathcart, Ph.D. Oregon Department.
Forestry Projects: Measurement and Monitoring Werner A. Kurz Natural Resources Canada Canadian Forest Service Victoria, BC, Canada Biological Sequestration.
Department of Forest and Ecosystem Science Disturbance, degradation, and recovery: forest dynamics and climate change mitigation Professor Rod Keenan Acknowledgements.
William S. Keeton University of Vermont, Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources Towards a Unified Vision of Forest Carbon Management.
Carbon Offsets and Financial Opportunities Coastal Fertilization Program Meeting Kevin Astridge – Forest Practices Branch February 4 th, 2008.
1 Protection of soil carbon content as a climate change mitigation tool Peter Wehrheim Head of Unit, DG CLIMA Unit A2: Climate finance and deforestation.
Tatsushi HEMMI Institute for Global Environmental Strategies COP 9 Decisions related to CDM in forestry sector – An update on implications for Asia IGES-URC.
Forest Knowledge Know-how Well-being State of Finland’s Forests 2012 Based on the Criteria and Indicators of Sustainable Forest Management.
Managing Forests for Adaptation to Climate Change Zoltán Rakonczay WWF – European Forest Programme Strategies for the Sound Use of Wood March, 2003,
Climate Change and Carbon Management USDA Forest Service Research and Development Dr. Richard A. Birdsey Dr. Alexander L. Friend Northeast Research StationNorth.
SAF 3/3/09 1 Potential Biomass Demand Impact on Forest Markets and Resources Bob Abt NC State University
Network for Certification and Conservation of Forests.
FORESTRY MITIGATION PROJECTS & SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT Prof. N. H. Ravindranath Indian Institute of Science.
Copa-Cogeca Workshop “Sustainable use of forests in Europe” EU 2020 Strategy, resource efficiency and the potential of EU forests Hilkka Summa.
Forest Carbon Calculator Forest Carbon Reporting Initiative of USAID’s Global Climate Change Program Nancy Harris, Winrock International Sandra Brown,
IEA Bioenergy Task 38 Case Study on the Greenhouse Gas Budgets of Peat Use for Energy in Ireland Kenneth Byrne and Sari Lappi Forest Ecosystem Research.
Biomass and Bioenergy Approaches to Assessing Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Potential Carly Green 20 November 2003IEA Bioenergy Task 38 National Meeting -
Tomas Lundmark SLU Sweden
Climate neutrality and forests
Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Targets
The carbon implications of restoring management to neglected forests in England Carly Whittaker, Robert Matthews, Ewan Mackie, and Ian Shield International.
23rd London Group Meeting San Jose Costa Rica, th October 2017
Raisa Mäkipää Natural Resources Institute Finland
CH19: Carbon Sinks and Sources
Forest Ecosystem and Management
Gary M Pierzynski, P.V.V. Prasad, C.W. Rice, B. Lynn, and R. Lollato
CH19: Carbon Sinks and Sources
Results of Workshop Organized by
West Virginia University
Climate Change Mitigation: Research Needs
Agreement on Domestic Sinks in the Kyoto Protocol (Bonn Agreement)
Rangeland Soil Carbon: State of Knowledge
Can managed forest land provide effective strategies for climate change mitigation ? - examples from Sweden IEA Bioenergy Canberra, March 26-30, 2001.
Global Forest Carbon Budget (tons of C/y)
Technical Press Briefing LIFE Sub-programme for Climate Action Commission proposal for a new LIFE Regulation ( ) 12 December 2011.
GEF-5 Focal Area Strategies
The Context - Evolution of forestry and natural resources
Forest and Landscape Restoration (FLR)
Presentation transcript:

Soil Biological Communities and Aboveground Resilience 22eP LIFE14 CCM/IT/000905 “Recovery of degraded coniferous Forests for environmental sustainability Restoration and climate change Mitigation” Lagomarsino Alessandra1, Chiavetta Ugo2, De Meo Isabella1, Cantiani Paolo2, Paletto Alessandro3, Radoglou Kalliopi4 1Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria (CREA), research centre for agrobiology and pedology (CREA-ABP); 2 CREA, forestry research centre (CREA-SEL); 3 CREA, research unit for forest planning and monitoring (CREA-MPF); 4 Democritus University of Thrace (DUTH) Degraded pine forests loss of biomass or reduced production  Decrease in canopy cover and regeneration, forest fragmentation, unstable structural conditions. Larger emission no more balanced by the C storage capacity in woody biomass and soil: reduced potential of these forests to act as a sink or even source of GHGs High fires risk   Objectives Mitigation options: Increase the net primary production Increase C accumulation in soil Contain green-house gas emissions from deadwood decomposition Fossil fuel substitution with bio-energy production 2. Forest sustainability To restore the ecological stability and enhance resistance and resilience of the target ecosystems To provide a list of “good practices” on forest management options for the conversion of degraded coniferous forests To reduce fire risk, through deadwood removal 3. Ecosystem services Maintain/improve ecosystem services including biodiversity, soil protection, recreational and touristic activities. To enter the C credit market. BENEFICIARIES Project coordinator alessandra.lagomarsino@entecra.it www.lifeforesmit.com Soil Biological Communities and Aboveground Resilience The 3rd annual meeting of FP1305 Biolink Cost Action - Rome, 17-19 November 2015

Implementation actions 22eP Lagomarsino et al. LIFE14 CCM/IT/000905 Implementation actions Implementation sites: Italy & Greece The stands are characterized by a dominant crop layer of Pinus nigra. The understory layer is mainly occupied by Cupressus spp. (with many decaying trees) and both younger individuals and regeneration of broadleaves. Application of silvicultural treatments : Control plot Traditional thinning Innovative selective thinning Traditional thinning It’s a low thinning that removes trees primarly from the lower canopy (about 30% of the trees). The aim is to concentrate the cut only on the trees not beloging to the main crop layer. Innovative selective thinning It is a selective thinning that considers the merits of individual trees. Best trees (according to vigour and stability) and are identified and their growth and development are actively promoted by removing all directs competitors.

LIFE14 CCM/IT/000905 Monitoring actions 22eP Lagomarsino et al. LIFE14 CCM/IT/000905 Monitoring actions C and N pools in above and belowground biomass, litter, dead wood and soil (IPCC 2003) Net primary productivity and C accumulation in soil after thinning treatments. Greenhouse gas fluxes from soil and dead-wood material. C sequestration potential and global warming potential in the short and medium-term. Harvested biomass for energy co-generation and C and N content C pools (IPCC, 2003) GHG emissions CO2 CH4 N2O bioenergy Organic matter degradation and transformation processes driven by soil biological communities will be crucial for the success of the proposed intervention. In particular, biological activity will determine the fate of dead organic matter and its role as C pool, sink, or source. The magnitude and direction of decomposition processes leading to C loss through microbial respiration and/or to C accumulation through microbial immobilization and storage in soil pools will be assessed.

LIFE14 CCM/IT/000905 Expected results 22eP Lagomarsino et al. Demonstration of the three mitigation options: reduction/prevention of emissions ii) sequestration – enhancing uptake of C and iii) substitution of fossil fuels for energy production with biological products. Increase of net primary production up to 40 – 60 %, due to the removal of non-growing or dead trees and the higher growth rates of remained vegetation. Increase of C accumulation in the soil up to 0.5 Mg ha-1 yr-1 An initial increase of greenhouse gas emissions is expected, followed by a stabilization and a reduction of heterotrophic respiration from deadwood material in the range of 5-15 % per year in the medium-long term Energy cogeneration of wood material as fossil fuels substitution option (2400 kWh m-3), with a neutral balance from living plants and a positive balance from dead trees. To use the resulted biomass from conversion in co-generators, reducing electricity production from fossil fuels. To enter the C credit market and to use the sold and received credits to produce benefits at local and regional level. 2. Provide “guidelines of good silvicultural practices” for degraded coniferous forests restoration integrating GHGs reduction objective in the frame of European mitigation targets. Creation of silvicultural guidelines for the conversion of pine plantations to mixed pine – broadleaved forests and broadleaved forests. Restoring natural functioning processes (e.g. natural regeneration, or more generally, self-organization), increasing their stability, resilience and self-perpetuating capacity. Development of management practices for the reduction of fire risk. Management planning guidelines for the best response of vegetation against future disturbances. This planning will be based in the sprouting ability of native broadleaved species and will target to fast vegetation cover and protection of soil from erosion. Promote recreational and touristic activities (peri-urban forests)