EDCI Retreat; Aug TJ Oakes Phillip VanFossen

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Writing an NCATE/IRA Program Report
Advertisements

Writing an IRA/NCATE SPA Report. IRA Requirements Programs must have: –Minimum of 24 credit hours of reading/literacy courses aligned with IRA Standards.
RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Culminating Academic Review Adams State College Department of Teacher education graduate programs.
February 2005Transition Services Preparation & Training Developing NCATE Assessment Rubrics: Modeling Best Practice For Our Students Pamela Luft Kent State.
National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education February 2006 image files formats.
REICH COLLEGE OF EDUCATION SPRING SEMESTER 2008 Opening Meeting WELCOME.
PREPARING FOR NCATE May 19, 2008 Teacher Education Retreat.
SB 578: Professional Development and Renewal Jeffrey A. Aranowski, Division Supervisor Public School Recognition/Office of the General Counsel Illinois.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | Teachers Know Their Content And Teach Effectively: CAEP Standard 1 Stevie Chepko,
Reflective Pathways from Theory to Practice Brewton-Parker College Education Division BPC Conceptual Framework.
The Program Review Process: NCATE and the State of Indiana Richard Frisbie and T. J. Oakes March 8, 2007 (source:NCATE, February 2007)
NCATE Institutional Orientation Session on PROGRAM REVIEW Moving Away from Input- based Programs Toward Performance-based Programs Emerson J. Elliott,
ACCREDITATION SITE VISITS.  DIVISION 010 – SITE VISIT PROCESS  DIVISION 017 – UNIT STANDARDS  DIVISION 065 – CONTENT STANDARDS.
1 NCATE Standards. 2  Candidate Performance  Candidate Knowledge, Skills, & Dispositions  Assessment System and Unit Evaluation  Unit Capacity Field.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Reflective Pathways from Theory to Practice Brewton-Parker College Education Division.
SCHOOL OF EDUCATION September 22, Do you know who your education advisor is? Do you visit MAP Works regularly?
Teacher Certification & University Program Accreditation Lynn Steffen Illinois State University
Joint Advisory Board/Working Group Meeting November 18, 2010 School of Education.
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
Department of Physical Sciences School of Science and Technology B.S. in Chemistry Education CIP CODE: PROGRAM CODE: Program Quality Improvement.
BY Karen Liu, Ph. D. Indiana State University August 18,
Measuring Dispositions Dr. Sallie Averitt Miller, Associate Dean Office for Assessment and Accreditation Columbus State University GaPSC Regional Assessment.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | Transitioning from NCATE and TEAC to CAEP: How? Patty Garvin, Senior Director,
Streamlined NCATE Visits Donna M. Gollnick Senior Vice President, NCATE 2008 AACTE Annual Meeting.
ACCREDITATION SITE VISITS.  DIVISION 010 – SITE VISIT PROCESS  DIVISION 017 – UNIT STANDARDS  DIVISION 065 – CONTENT STANDARDS.
The College of Saint Rose School of Education Department of Literacy and Special Education Teacher Candidate Assessment.
NCSS/NCATE SPA Review Process. New Program Review Process The report Web-based form Limited pages by section Will be able to access drafts.
2012 Regional Assessment Workshops Session 2 Dr. Maryellen Cosgrove, Dean School of Business, Education, Health and Wellness Gainesville State University.
NCATE STANDARD I REVIEW Hyacinth E. Findlay Carol Dawson Gwendolyn V. King.
Invention Convention Seth Krivohlavek Angie Deck.
Oregon State Program Review Process February 10-12, 2010 Commission Meeting.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
October 8,  Review TEAC Process  Faculty Presentations on Reflection/ Learning to Learn  Group Work on Evidence for Claim 3  Audit Update 
Preparing to Succeed with the Electronic NCSS/NCATE SPA Review Process Accreditation, Accountability, and Quality An Institutional Orientation and Professional.
PTEU Conceptual Framework Overview. Collaborative Development of Expertise in Teaching, Learning and Leadership Conceptual Framework Theme:
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
NCATE for Dummies AKA: Everything You Wanted to Know About NCATE, But Didn’t Want to Ask.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Assessment and Continuous Improvement in Teacher Education.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
Preparing Your ELCC Assessments for NCATE Accreditation Missouri Professors of Educational Administration Conference October 10, 2008.
Deciphering SPA Requirements Kathy Hildebrand, Ph.D., Assistant Dean of Assessment & Continuous Improvement, College of Education Cynthia Conn, Ph.D.,
Induction and Mentoring: Evidence From the Teacher Graduate Assessment Project Charles Rohn, Dean, Eastern Illinois University Andrew F. Wall, Project.
EdTPA Information taken from
Stetson University welcomes: NCATE Board of Examiners.
Unit Meeting Feb. 15, ◦ Appreciative Inquiry Process-BOT Steering Committee and Committee Structure. ◦ Four strategies identified from AIP: Each.
NCATE Program Review Process Margaret D. Crutchfield, Ph.D. September 2006
Standards-Based Teacher Education Continuous Assessment of Teacher Education Candidates.
Candidate Learning Outcomes. REPORTING AGENCIES STATE BOARD FOR EDUCATOR CERTIFICATION (SBEC) NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR THE ACCREDITATION OF TEACHER EDUCTION.
House Bill 97: Recent Legislation Impact on Educator Preparation Dr. Rebecca Garland Deputy State Superintendent Joyce Gardner Dr. Andrew Sioberg NCDPI.
Performance-Based Accreditation
Data Conventions and Analysis: Focus on the CAEP Self-Study
NCATE Unit Standards 1 and 2
NASP Program Review and Approval Eric Robinson, PhD
Eastern’s Assessment System
Partnership for Practice
Town Hall Meeting November 4, 2013
Office of Field and Clinical Partnerships and Outreach: Updates
Advanced Level Programs and NCATE Unit Review
Donna M. Gollnick Senior Vice President, NCATE April 2008
Refining & Aligning: Recommendations for preparation policy to support rti2 and Special Education in Tennessee Kim Paulsen, vanderbilt university Blake.
PROGRAM REVIEW AS PART OF THE CAEP ACCREDITATION PROCESS
April 17, 2018 Gary Railsback, Vice President What’s new at CAEP.
Program Approval Overview Commission Meeting April 6, 2016
SCHOOL OF EDUCATION February 9, 2017
SUMMARY OF Teacher Preparation In US
Deborah Anne Banker Committee Chair
Marilyn Eisenwine Committee Chair
Presentation transcript:

EDCI Retreat; Aug. 2006 TJ Oakes Phillip VanFossen NCATE Program Review EDCI Retreat; Aug. 2006 TJ Oakes Phillip VanFossen

A brief review…. Unit Program School, College, or Department of Education Program Specific Discipline Area

Unit Program NCATE SPA Reviewed by Board of Examiners Program Reviewers (or state) Process On-site Electronic Decision Accreditation Recognition Final Decision-Maker Unit Accreditation Board Audit Team/Program Reviewers

SPA = Specialized Professional Association

Programs for Which NCATE Does NOT Have Standards Art, music, dance, or drama education Business, speech, and vocational education Some advanced teacher education programs (e.g. M.Ed., Curriculum & Instruction) Guidance counselor These programs undergo state review or are accredited by other accrediting agencies.

6-8 Assessments: The Rules Institution must submit a minimum of six assessments, unless the SPA specifies more than six required assessments Institution may submit additional assessments when SPA does not specify all eight assessments Six specific types of assessments are required by all SPAs

Required Assessments in National Program Review State licensure exam for content Assessment of content knowledge Assessment of Planning (e.g., lesson plan or unit plan) Student teaching/internship assessment Assessment of candidate impact on student learning or providing a supporting learning environment Assessment that demonstrates candidates meet standards

What Criteria Are Used to Evaluate Assessments? Assessments are aligned to standards Assessments reflect the rigor of standards Assessments are free from bias Scoring guides clearly identify levels of proficiency Data provide evidence of candidate mastery of standards

Purpose of the Program Review Determine whether or not the program has in place a limited number (6-8) of comprehensive assessments that demonstrate candidate mastery of the SPA standards. Candidate performance on these assessments is appropriate to demonstrate mastery. Provide information for unit to use to respond to Unit Standard #1

How Much Data? For SPA reviews in 2010… Programs will need 3 years of data minimum… Remember: Data are only as good as the assessment/scoring guide

An Example from Eastern Illinois University

EIU UNIT ASSESSMENT ARTIFACTS Performance assessments required across unit: *Passing of Basic Skills Test, Illinois Content Area Test and APT Two Field Experience evaluations (one from an early field experience; one from later) Lesson Plan or Unit Plan Impact on P-12 learners Two content knowledge assessments (determined by the “Program”) Student Teaching Evaluation *Graduate and employer Follow-Up Survey data

Performance Assessments from Spec. Ed. Department (for SPA review) Field Experience I – Behaviors Observation Course (90 contact hours) Field Experience II – Methods Practica (120 contact hours) Content Discipline Specific Assessments – ASR and Lesson Plan Unit Plan Impact on P-12 – IEP Student Teaching Evaluation (aligned to CEC Standards)

Who to Contact at SPAs For questions related to the standards and what are appropriate assessments for a particular discipline: SPA Program Review Coordinators http://www.ncate.org/programreview/spacontact.asp?ch=88