The next generation of NCATE program standards

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Strategies to Measure Student Writing Skills in Your Disciplines Joan Hawthorne University of North Dakota.
Advertisements

National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education February 2006 image files formats.
PREPARING FOR NCATE May 19, 2008 Teacher Education Retreat.
Conceptual Framework What It Is and How It Works Kathe Rasch, Maryville University Donna M. Gollnick, NCATE October 2005.
1 Core Module Three – The Summative Report Core Module Three: The Role of Professional Dialogue and Collaboration in the Summative Report.
The Program Review Process: NCATE and the State of Indiana Richard Frisbie and T. J. Oakes March 8, 2007 (source:NCATE, February 2007)
ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS FOR TSPC ACCREDITATION Assessment and Work Sample Conference January 13, 2012 Hilda Rosselli, Western Oregon University.
1 NCATE Standards. 2  Candidate Performance  Candidate Knowledge, Skills, & Dispositions  Assessment System and Unit Evaluation  Unit Capacity Field.
Triple C Competency-based Curriculum: Implications for Family Medicine Residency Programs.
Principles of Assessment
Educator’s Guide Using Instructables With Your Students.
Common Core Orientation Transforming Teaching & Learning DELCAC Session March 20, 2013.
The Department of Educational Administration Assessment Report School of Education and Human Services Carol Godsave, Chair, Assessment Coordinator.
BY Karen Liu, Ph. D. Indiana State University August 18,
Engaging the Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky Working Together to Prepare Quality Educators.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | Transitioning from NCATE and TEAC to CAEP: How? Patty Garvin, Senior Director,
March 24, :00 pm to 3:00 pm Exhibition Lounge, Corey Union TEC Agenda and Notes.
1. Principles Equity Curriculum Teaching 3 Assessment Technology Principles The principles describe particular features of high-quality mathematics programs.
Standards-Based Education Curriculum Alignment Project Knowledge “One’s mind once stretched by a new idea, never regains its original dimension.” Oliver.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Periodic Program Review Guiding Programs in Today’s Assessment Climate LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
The NCATE Journey Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University AACTE/NCATE Orientation - Spring 2008.
1 Emerson Elliott Rachelle Bruno AACTE February 7, 2009 The Next Generation of NCATE Program Standards 1.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Preparing Your ELCC Assessments for NCATE Accreditation Missouri Professors of Educational Administration Conference October 10, 2008.
Developing Educational Leaders Who Create Tomorrow’s Opportunities: Issues for Partner Instructors in the College of Education April 10, 2008.
PE Standards. What are the purpose of educational standards? –All disciplines have them.
STANDARD 4 & DIVERSITY in the NCATE Standards Boyce C. Williams, NCATE John M. Johnston, University of Memphis Institutional Orientation, Spring 2008.
Update on Program Review Margie Crutchfield AACTE February, 2009.
Introduction to Content Standards Jacqueline E. Korengel, Ed.D.
Association of Washington Public Hospital Districts How to Chair a Great Meeting: 10 Things the Chair Must Do to be Successful WSHA Web Conference February.
SMARTER Balanced Assessment Consortium Technology Update State Superintendent’s Education Data Advisory Committee April 7,
1 Expanded ADEPT Support and Evaluation System Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty.
NCATE Program Review Process Margaret D. Crutchfield, Ph.D. September 2006
Stimulating Research and Innovation for Preservice Education of STEM Teachers in High-Need Schools W. James Lewis Deputy Assistant Director, Education.
NCATE Unit Standards 1 and 2
Court Administration: A Guide to the Profession
Stakeholder consultations
Improving Teaching Practices through the Use of Video-Case Analysis
Business Case Analysis
Program Quality Assurance Process Validation
California Teaching Performance Assessment
2016 CEEDAR Cross-State Convening
Curriculum and Accreditation
NCATE 2000 Unit Standards Overview.
AACSB’s Standard 9: Curriculum content
Clinical Practice Guidelines and Document Submission
Literature reviews and reading lists
A Guaranteed, Viable, and Engaging Curriculum
MGT 601 Competitive Success-- snaptutorial.com
MGT 601 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
MGT 601 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Program Review Update Webinar
The Art and Science of Teaching
Overview of the Teacher Work Sample (TWS)
Information Language Training Technologies for Engineers
LinguaFolio standards-based self-directed formative assessment tool
Writing a Teaching Philosophy Statement
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
Option C Reviewer Update
Analyze Student Work Sample 2 Instructional Next Steps
Topic Principles and Theories in Curriculum Development
Analyzing Student Work Sample 2 Instructional Next Steps
Curriculum Updates Spanish and French
Links for Academic Learning: Planning An Alignment Study
Common Measures 2.0: More than a Survey – A Tool for Program Planning
Standard one: revisions
What you assess makes a statement about what you value
Deborah Anne Banker Committee Chair
SLOs, Curriculum, and Other Things that Shape Your Classroom
Presentation transcript:

The next generation of NCATE program standards July 6, 2009 Rachelle Bruno, Task Force Chair Emerson Elliott, NCATE Please remember to set-up your audio Go to “tools”, then “audio”, then “audio set-up wizard” For those of you who have a microphone, we will do a “microphone sound check” one by one starting at 1:30 1:30pm – First audio sound check 1:45pm - Second audio sound check 1:55pm - Final audio sound check 2:00pm Webinar will begin 1 1

Orienting you to today’s web-conference format…

Agenda Why a Task Force? What will remain the same? What will change? The principles Formatting changes Questions? Comments?

What NCATE has been told about program standards and program reviews There are too many standards for any specialty area The standards look too different from one specialty to another and cover different kinds of topics The standards were written before NCATE’s shift in program review reports and evidence and do not fit program reviews The review process takes too much time The review process costs more than its value Reviewers reach inconsistent conclusions 5 5

SPA program standards are the basis for program review NCATE concluded in 2007 that guidelines for writing of SPA standards need to be updated and revised Take comments into account Look at the research and knowledge base Take account of the national debate on standards Create a Task Force on Program Standards Rachelle Bruno, Chair, Northern Kentucky University Gene Martin, former Chair of SASB, Texas State University-San Marcos Joe Prus, Executive Board, Winthrop University Gail Dickinson, Chair of SASB P&E Committee, Old Dominion University John Johnston, SASB, University of Memphis Charles Duke, Chair of SASB, Appalachian State University Ron Colbert, SASB, Fitchburg State University Work now ready for a final round of vetting 6

What guidelines remain the same? Standards focus on student learning Standards describe and use the knowledge base and evolution of state and national standards Standards describe what candidates should know and be able to do 7 7

What Guidelines are new? Four Principles to guide standards development Principles draw from current research findings Formatting guidelines to create a common structure Guidelines for evidence limit number of required assessments and limit program decision to “preponderance” of evidence.

The principles, p. 8 Candidates’ knowledge of content they plan to teach or use as other school professionals and their ability to explain important principles and concepts (p. 8). Effective teaching strategies that make the discipline comprehensible to P-12 students (p. 9). Candidates’ ability to apply their knowledge by creating and maintaining safe, supportive, fair, and effective learning environments for all students (p. 13). Candidates knowledge of professional practices in their field and readiness to apply them (p. 15). 9 9

About the principles p. 7 Serve several purposes Structure SPA standards so they will be perceived as more coherent by institutions Create a common expectation that SPAs will apply important research findings to their standards Direct the focus of standards to core areas of knowledge and skills that candidates need for teaching or other professional roles in education Assure alignment with NCATE unit standard 1 Draw directly from the model of “core propositions” or “principles” to guide standards writing that NBPTS and INTASC have followed

Questions or Comments?

Other School Professionals, p. 22 May make a case for adapting the principles Focus on student learning Base on research in the specialized field

About formatting, p. 17 Standards are written around the four principles Standards and elements; elements appear in the language of the standard Numerical limits – 4-7 standards up to 4 elements per standard Program review decisions made on the standard not element level based on preponderance of evidence SPA-specific not generic

Questions or Comments?

Optional features p. 23 SUPPLEMENTAL DOCUMENT - Elaborated and comprehensive description of good preparation programs. Might include: Curricula Clinical and field experiences Faculty qualifications Technology Assessments Relationship to school partners SPAs may specify up to one additional assessment beyond the five specified by NCATE (Assessment #6) SPAs may have a clinical/field standard when the field requires something different from the institutional norm

Other comments???

Additional opportunities for comment Meetings with SPAs (Emerson Elliott and Margie Crutchfield) Electronic input (www.ncate.org)

THANK YOU!!!