While Japan supports this idea basically,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How Many UN Regulations Can Be in IWVTA? Position by the expert from the Russian Federation September 2013 Transmitted by the expert from the Russian Federation.
Advertisements

17/1/2008 NRMM WG GRPE1 NRMM GTR Draft Technical procedure (chapters 7-9) As informal document to GRPE GRPE working group on the emissions from Non- Road.
T h e E u r o p e a n T y r e a n d R i m T e c h n i c a l O r g a n i s a t i o n New Snow Test Method for Tyre Class C2 Agenda 1.Scope 2.Requirements.
Advanced Emergency Braking System / Lane Departure Warning System OICA POSITION 1 Informal document No. GRRF-S08-10 Special GRRF brainstorming session.
T h e E u r o p e a n T y r e a n d R i m T e c h n i c a l O r g a n i s a t i o n UNECE Regulation No 117 Testing method for measuring the wet grip index.
UNECE-Regulation No. 64 Tyre Pressure Monitoring Systems (TPMS) Informal document No. GRRF (60th GRRF, September 2006 agenda item 5.3.)
ISO 28580: Information on Rolling Resistance (RR)
THE EUROPEAN TYRE AND RIM TECHNICAL ORGANISATION AT tyres: What are they? tyres inflated at very low inflation pressures (
UN WP.29 GTR on TYRES REPORT ON KICKOFF MEETING Paris, December 15, 2004 Informal document No. GRRF (57 th GRRF, 31 January-4 February 2005, Agenda.
ISO/IEC A review of the new standard for laboratory accreditation
GRB, 59th session January, 2014 Informal document GRB (59 th GRB, January 2014, agenda item 6) Method of Deceleration Measuring and Data.
Determination of System Equivalency – Starting note for WLTP IWG Meeting #8 in Pune, India Audi, EA-52, V2.0 WLTP-08-09e.
GRB, 58 th session 2-4 September 2013 DECELERATION CALCULATOR (Explanation) Informal document GRB (58 th GRB, 2-4 September 2013, agenda item 6)
Amendment of Rolling Resistance
Wet Grip for C3 tyres Minimum Type Approval Level
Proposal for Draft Amendment to Regulation No. 117
Regulation No. 117 – Annex 6 Annex 6 reflects part of ISO Standard (sections 1 – 9): mainly terms and definitions, test conditions and data analysis.
ETRTO - 56th GRRF - GTR - Tyres N°1 Global Technical Regulation for TYRES ETRTO PROPOSAL Informal document No. GRRF (56th GRRF, September 2004.
ETRTO GRRF55 Feb.2004 pag. 1 UN/ECE REGULATIONS proposal for optimization of regulatory framework and tyre type approval 55 TH GRRF 3 – 6 Feb ETRTO.
ECE Regulation No.79 Informal Document No. GRRF (61 st GRRF, 5-9 February 2007 agenda item 5.) Proposal for Amendments Presented by the Expert from.
Experimental research in noise influence on estimation precision for polyharmonic model frequencies Natalia Visotska.
Traffic Accidents caused by Lane Departure in Japan  Data of Traffic Accidents around Japan Transmitted by the expert from Japan Informal document GRRF
Global Harmonisation OICA Priorities UN/ECE/WP.29/AC3 13 November Informal document No. WP th WP.29, November 2008, agenda item.
Amendment to Regulation No.117, Concerning Manufacturer’s Information about Tyre Rolling Resistance Coefficients. RF experts - 15/02/2009 Informal document.
Worldwide Harmonized Heavy Duty Emissions Certification Procedure UNITED NATIONS 22nd WHDC, Geneva, 16 January 2008 GRPE/WHDC/FE08 Informal document No.
Rolling Resistance Standards Work at ISO (TC31 WG6) Prepared for GRB Review 19 Sep 2011 Angela Wolynski WG6 Convenor Informal document GRB (54th.
GRB, 57-th session 5-8 February, 2013 RF Experts LONG WAY TO THE RR NORMS GRRF ( ) GRB Informal document GRB (57th GRB, 5-7 February 2013,
Metrology for Chemical Analysis
Rolling Resistance Problem Consideration. History ( ) and Today Action C. Coulomb Law EC – GRRF/GRB – ETRTO – ISO TC31/WG6 RF experts –
WLTP gtr Annex 9 Determination of Method Equivalency - Progress Report
Report of the GRB informal Working Group on ASEP Transmitted by the Chairman of the Informal Group Informal document No. GRB-44-2 (44th GRB, 4-6 September.
Different Scenarios for the Implementation of the New Test Method 42. GRB5.-7. September 2005 Informal document No. GRB (42nd GRB, 5 – 7 September.
Transmitted by the expert from FRANCE Amendments to Regulations Nos. 30, 54 and 117 Informal document GRRF th GRRF, September 2015, agenda.
New EU Regulation on General Safety Implementation of Tyre Aspects Presentation to GRB and GRRF. Informal Document No. GRRF (67th GRRF, 2-5 February.
A Method to Approximate the Bayesian Posterior Distribution in Singular Learning Machines Kenji Nagata, Sumio Watanabe Tokyo Institute of Technology.
Amendment proposals for Regulations Nos. 9, 63 and 92 On behalf of the European Commission Transmitted by the expert from the European Commission Informal.
Agreement concerning the adoption of uniform conditions for periodical technical inspections of wheeled vehicles and the reciprocal recognition of such.
GRRF Ad-Hoc Working Group
Tyre GTR # 16 Progress report
Annex 6 Test procedure for measuring rolling resistance
Informal Working Group Tyre GTR
(France) (Russian Federation)
UNR116 splitting Informal document GRSG
Informal Working Group Tyre GTR
Informal Working Group Tyre GTR
European Tyre and Rim Technical Organisation - ETRTO
43rd Session GRB 21 February 2006 Geneva, Switzerland
Indoor pass by noise France Presented by Louis-Ferdinand PARDO
Drafting Subgroup Meeting Part of IWG #16, The Hague, October 2016
Development of Amendment # 2 to UN GTR No. 16 on Tyres
Transmitted by the expert
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Approval of replacement pollution devices within R49
Development of Amendment # 2 to UN GTR No. 16 on Tyres
Development of Amendment # 2 to UN GTR No. 16 on Tyres
Snow tyres provisions - status report
Informal document GRE-76-18
Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP
ASEP IMMA inputs to R51 ASEP IWG
Exchange of information with the WP.29 secretariat
Google Analytics Data for “Going Out There” website
Informal document GRPE-77-30
from Japan TFCS September 2018
Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP
Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP
Informal document GRRF-78-41
Title : Alternative warm-up procedure WLTP rev1e by Japan
Bill Coleman IWVTA Ambassador to GRPE
Japan Opinion for TF-BTA Proposals
Global Technical Regulation
Presentation transcript:

While Japan supports this idea basically, Informal Document No. GRRF-67-35 (67th GRRF, 2-5 February 2010, agenda item 9(f)) Proposal for Alignment procedure using RRC value among Technical Services   Background The EC proposal contains the provisions on technical services inter-laboratory comparison testing and machine alignment so as to minimize variances in the measurement results between technical services. While Japan supports this idea basically, ・The alignment procedures in the EC proposal seem to be lacking, ・Current test procedures specified in ISO28580 are not enough to keep the accuracy among each technical service test sites.

Japan proposal Japan proposes to insert TSs Alignment procedure of RRC standard value as the following slides

Higher RRC Alignment tyre Lower RRC Alignment tyre ① Decide two Specific Alignment Tyres ( Para. 3) H :Higher RRC L :Lower RRC ② Measurement of alignment tyres     (using same batch tyre) at Technical Services (TSs) Technical Services Higher RRC Alignment tyre Lower RRC Alignment tyre 10.3 7.0 11.0 7.2 10.2 6.8 Average 10.5 TS: A B C H L A B Adopting average value as ‘Standard Value’ C

Higher RRC Alignment tyre Lower RRC Alignment tyre ③ Calibration Formula Transforming each site’s measurement value to calibrated value by using the correlation line which is calculated from the standard values. A 7 10.5 10.3 Measurement Value Tested Tyre Calibrated value Measurement value in each site 7.2 7 10.5 11.0 B Calibrated value Measurement value in each site Technical Services Higher RRC Alignment tyre Lower RRC Alignment tyre 10.3 7.0 11.0 7.2 10.2 6.8 Standard Value 10.5 C 6.8 7 10.5 10.2 Calibrated value Measurement value in each site A B C

9.12 9.00 A ③ Calibration Formula If the measurement value is 9.00, (Example of transformation measurement value to calibration value) Approximation line A 10.5 9.12 7 7 10.3 Calibration Formula: 9.00 Calibration value (Evaluation value) = (1.0606 × Measurement value) – 0.4242 If the measurement value is 9.00, then the evaluation value is 9.12

Conclusion By adopting the alignment procedures among Technical Services proposed by Japan, it will be possible equally to compare the compliance test results among different Type Approval Authorities.