Devices for Stroke Prevention

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ghanem et al., J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:1427–32..
Advertisements

STS 2015 John V. Conte, MD Professor of Surgery Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine On Behalf of the CoreValve US Investigators Transcatheter Aortic.
Radial versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome the RIFLE STEACS study Enrico Romagnoli, MD PhD Principal investigators:
ACC 2015 Michael J Reardon, MD, FACC On Behalf of the CoreValve US Investigators A Randomized Comparison of Self-expanding Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic.
INTERNATIONAL. CAUTION: For distribution only in markets where CoreValve® is approved. Not for distribution in U.S., Canada or Japan. Medtronic, Inc
A shifting paradigm of care: Advances in transcatheter heart valve procedures Sandra Lauck MSN, RN, CCN(C) Clinical Nurse Specialist, Arrhythmia Management.
Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany Sabine Bleiziffer German Heart Center, Munich, Germany Johan Bosmans University Hospital.
UC c EN. Through Medtronic sponsored research, the Transcatheter Aortic Valves clinical portfolio is studying over 11,000 subjects at over 125.
INTERNATIONAL. CAUTION: For distribution only in markets where CoreValve® is approved. Not for distribution in U.S., Canada or Japan. Medtronic, Inc
: PROFI : A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Proximal Balloon Occlusion vs. Filter Embolic Protection in Patients Undergoing Carotid Stenting Klaudija.
Lessons from PARTNER I (A & B) CRT, Washington DC, Feb 5, 2012
TAVR in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease
Embolic Protection Devices in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Are We Barking Up the Wrong Vascular Tree? Circulation: cardiovascular intervention.
TriGuard Device for Cerebral Embolic Protection During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Multicenter Real-World Experience Masieh Abawi, Ermela.
What should be the optimal Design for TAVI Procedure.
Prof. Dr. med. H. R. Figulla Director at the University Hospital Jena
Eberhard Grube MD, FACC, FSCAI
Transfemoral Access Devices & Tips for Closure Devices
Transcatheter (TAVR) versus Surgical (AVR) Aortic Valve Replacement: Incidence, hazard, determinants, and consequences of neurological events in the PARTNER.
Subacute Subclinical Brain Infarctions after Transcatheter
CAROTID STENTING: Step-by-Step Technique
Is Transoesophageal Echocardiography during TAVR Essential?
The Lotus Device Design & FIM Experiences with a Repositionable Self Expanding Percutaneous Aortic Valve Ian T. Meredith MBBS, BSc(Hons), Ph.D, FRACP,
Regulatory Basics: Europe and the CE Mark
Direct Flow Medical Experience with a Conformable, Repositionable, Retrievable, Percutaneous Aortic Valve Reginald Low MD University of California,Davis.
Are we ready to perform TAVI in Intermediate Risk Patients?
Preventive Role of Embolic Protection Devices:
OUS Data: What does the CE Mark Really Mean?
TAVR: How We continue to Refine the Technology and Improve the Results
Bifurcation Management Update:
James P. Zidar, M.D., F.A.C.C., F.S.C.A.I
TAVR – The Trans-carotid Approach
Claret Cerebral Protection Device: Implications of the Sentinel Study
Transfemoral Access Devices & Tips for Closures Devices
A Novel “Stent-On-A-Wire”Ultra Low Profile Stent Delivery System
MITRALIGN: Direct Annuloplasty
CRT Washington, D.C. February 23, 2010 Tim A. Fischell, M.D. FACC
Direct Flow Medical Experience with a Conformable, Repositionable Retrievable Percutaneous Aortic Valve Reginald Low MD University of California, Davis.
TAVI „Catch me if you can!“
Keith Dawkins MD FRCP FACC FSCAI Global Chief Medical Officer
A Fixed Guidewire Stent Delivery System
Opportunities to Study Valve Iterations and Modifications in the US
Embolic Protection Devices for Stroke Prevention during TAVI
Harmonized Assessment by Randomized Multicenter Study of OrbusNEich’s COMBO StEnt Japan-USA HARMONEE: Primary Report of A Randomized Trial of a Bioabsorbable.
L. Nelson Hopkins, MD DISCLOSURES Consulting Fees
Medtronic - Core Valve Eberhard Grube, MD, FACC, FSCAI
CRT 2010 Washington DC, January 21, 2010
Progress with the Sadra Medical Lotus™ Valve System
Protection Devices in Stroke Prevention
Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany
CRT 2010 Washington DC, January 21, 2010
Instent Restenosis and Occlusion: Time for Surgical Revision?
One Year Outcomes in Real World Patients Treated with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation The ADVANCE Study Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart.
Second Generation Valves: What Will Be Different?
Transradial Intervention as Access of Choice in STEMI
Carotid Artery Stenting for Stroke Prevention
CRT 2012 Primer for Endovascular Interventions
Cardiovacular Research Technologies
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Intraprocedural imaging: Thoracic aortography techniques, intravascular ultrasound, and special equipment  Rodney A. White, MD, Carlos E. Donayre, MD,
Median total new lesion volume
How and why this study may change my practice ?
Carotid Artery Stenting for Stroke Prevention
Alexander Ghanem et al. JACC 2010;55:
Efficacy of a filter device in the prevention of embolic events during carotid angioplasty and stenting: An ex vivo analysis  Takao Ohki, MD, Gary S.
Total lesions on MRI at 48 hours
Clinical significance of embolic events in patients undergoing endovascular femoropopliteal interventions with or without embolic protection devices 
Failure modes of thoracic endografts: Prevention and management
BRAVO-3 Trial design: Patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to bivalirudin or UFH. They were followed for 30 days. Results.
Julia Seeger et al. JCIN 2017;j.jcin
Presentation transcript:

Devices for Stroke Prevention CRT 2013 Washington DC, February 24, 2013 Devices for Stroke Prevention Eberhard Grube MD, FACC, FSCAI Universitätklinik Bonn,Medizinische Klinik II, Bonn Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA

Eberhard Grube, MD Consulting: Medtronic CoreValve, Boston Scientific Corporation, Cordis Corporation, Johnson and Johnson and Abbott Vascular Honoraria: Boston Scientific Corporation and Biosensors International Stocks, Stock Options, other ownership interest: Medtronic CoreValve and Biosensors International Off-Label: Off-label use of stents and valve prosthesis 1

Embolic Protection Claret – Dual Filter Montage (Capture) CE Marked 6F Transradial or brachial delivery Keystone – Deflector Clinical Phase 9F Transfemoral delivery Edwards/Embrella - Deflector T V T 2 1 2

Current Devices in Development Emboline Lumen Biomedical Nitinol Frame – Nitinol Mesh Filter Material 7F Radial Filter/Occluder Dual Balloon Femoral Delivery, NiTi sleeve CRT 2013 4

Claret Montage 6F Claret Montage – Delivered over a 0.014” Coronary Guidewire Drilled Polyurethane – Nitnol Frame - One Deflects - One Filters Debris CRT 2013 5

New Handle Design – Montage 2 CE Mark FEB-2013 1 - Proximal Filter 2 - Deflect Tip 3 - Distal Filter 6

Claret Montage Distal Filter Proximal Filter T V T 2 1 2

Claret Captures Clinical experience: Over 500 cases worldwide… Drilled Polyurethane – Nitnol Frame - One Deflects - One Filters Debris Clinical experience: Over 500 cases worldwide… CRT 2013 9

Claret – Filter Embolic Debris V T 2 1 2

Claret Montage Device Montage - Dual filter capture Only protection system CE Marked 6F radial insertion over a 0.014” wire Minimalistic approach (“nothing in the aorta”) 140 micron pore size 10-15 ml single contrast needed to place T V T 2 1 2

Keystone – Deflector T V T 2 1 2

Keystone – Deflector 9 French compatible retrievable device ‘stabilizer’ 9FR Cook sheath ‘feelers’ 6 Fr Pigtail 9 French compatible retrievable device Protects entire cerebro-vascular system Eliminates need for third access site during TAVI Rapidly deploys and self-positions Does not interfere with TAVI procedure T V T 2 1 2

Keystone - Deflector Device Body protecting all three take-offs Vertical Stabilizer positioned in innominate artery Tether for deployment & retrieval Leading Edge apposition to aortic wall T V T 2 1 2

Keystone – Deflector Results to date Bench tests 98.5% reduction of cerebral emboli Animal studies (sheep & pigs) No arch or artery damage (in-dwelling time 2 to 48 hours) No migration—stable in designated location No blood clot formation (Surmodics Applause™ coating) FIM pilot study, P Stella (PI) et al, EuroIntervention 8;1:51-57, 2012 Total n=35, n=15 with EDD and 10 with DWI, n=20 without EDD Safe—no adverse events Fast, simple deployment— average procedure time 7±2 min Easy retrieval Significant, 44% reduction in DWI findings; 3.2 vs 7.2 new lesions per patient with and without EDD resp.

Edwards Embrella – Deflector Porous membrane designed to deflect embolic debris Nitinol® Frame & Shaft Hydrophillic Coating with antithrombogenitc properties 3 Radiopaque Markers Suture; Monofilament Nylon T V T 2 1 2

Edwards Embrella – Deflector FIM Site Number Center Principal Investigator Number of Subjects Enrolled 01 St. Paul’s Hospital Vancouver, BC John Webb, M.D. 5 02 HELIOS Hospital Center Siegburg, DE Ralf Müller, M.D. Ulrich Gerckens, M.D. 10 03 University Hospital Hamburg, DE Joachim Schofer, M.D. 01

Edwards Embrella - Deflector FIM * Embrella subjects 1 BAV, 14 TF TAVI **Ghanem et al, J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:1427–32 (TF TAVI) ***Astarci et al, Abstract presentation EACTS 2010 (TF TAVI) 27

Case selection: Heart Team (high-risk) PROTAVI - C Severe AS + Symptoms Case selection: Heart Team (high-risk) Randomization 1:1 Standard TAVR Standard TAVR + Deflection Primary Endpoint: Volume of DW-MRI brain lesions @ 1 wk Re-Randomization 1:1 ASA alone for 3 months ASA + clopidogrel for 3 months 2nd Primary Endpoint: composite stroke/TIA + bleeding @ 1 year Co-PIs: Profs Vahanian and Beversdorf

Thank you…. CRT 2013