Channel Catfish Habitat Use in the Middle Mississippi River Andrew P

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Brooke Penaluna USFS PNW Research Station Oregon State University
Advertisements

Action Effectiveness Monitoring in the Upper Columbia (Chapter 4) Karl M. Polivka, Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service.
Restore Lawyer Creek Habitat: Targeting Steelhead and Chinook Salmon.
Washington Department
Blind Slough Restoration Project Project Sponsors:Clatsop Diking Improvement Company # 7 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Columbia River Estuary Study Task.
UMR = Balance of Environment and Transportation 1. Pool # 8 - Environmental Management Project 2. Transportation Route – human habitation & settlement.
Long-Term Studies in Port Valdez, Alaska Long-Term Studies in Port Valdez, Alaska A. L. Blanchard, Howard. M. Feder, Carrie Parris and Hilary Nichols Institute.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® RIVER RESOURCES ACTION TEAM BOAT TRIP Upper Mississippi River (Pools 24, 25, and Mel Price) St. Louis District.
Climate Change: Challenge of Invasive Species Pam Fuller Florida Integrated Science Center U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey.
Long-distance movements by flannelmouth sucker in big river habitats Matthew J. Breen & Trina N. Hedrick, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources.
Lec 12: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP’s)
Analyses of Bering Sea bottom- trawl surveys in Norton Sound: Absence of regime shift effect on epifauna and demersal fish Toshihide “Hamachan” Hamazaki.
Use of Headcount Surveys to Estimate the Relative Abundance of Diamondback Terrapins (Malaclemys terrapin centrata) at Masonboro Island, North Carolina.
Characteristics of Channel Darter Habitat in the Winooski River, Vermont Douglas E. Facey and Shannon M. O ‘Brien Department of Biology Saint Michael’s.
Habitat Use and Substrate Preference of Eastern Sand Darters in Vermont Shannon O’Brien and Douglas E. Facey Department of Biology, Saint Michael’s College.
Introduction Out of the nearly 75,000 dams in the lower 48, the Pacific Northwest contains about 2,048 and many are adding to river degradation, as affected.
1 Update on the Ongoing ESA Section 7 Consultation and DEIS Development for the Southeast Shrimp Fishery Louisiana Shrimp Task Force November 29, 2011.
1. 2 A Case History of Fishing Regulations in Great Smoky Mountains National Park: Matt A. Kulp and Steve E. Moore Great Smoky Mountains National.
Planning for Restoration of the Mississippi River in the Twin Cities Christian Lenhart.
Mississippi River. River Facts Begins 200 miles north of Minneapolis at Lake Itasca State Park. Length: 2,352 miles Width: 20 ft at headwaters to 1 mile.
Large Wood Treatment on Habitats and Fish Populations of Green River and Crab Creek Bio-Surveys, LLC 2007 Presented by Esteban Quiles.
Sustainable Renewable Energy for Rural Areas
Mississippi River Water Quality: Implications for Freshwater Diversions Coastal Wetland Planning, Preservation, and Restoration Act (CWPPRA) Outreach Committee.
Jeremy Cram 1, Christian Torgersen 2, Ryan Klett 1, George Pess 3, Andrew Dittman 3, Darran May 3 1. University of Washington, School of Forest Resources,
Hancock Springs A natural lab for studying the roles of physical habitat, nutrient availability, and non-native species to inform river restoration John.
Understanding Instream Flow Incremental Methodology (IFIM) Joey Kleiner.
Introduction Oithona similis is the most abundant copepod in the Gulf of Alaska, and is a dominant in many ecosystems from the poles to the sub-tropics.
Spatial Fisheries Values in the Gulf of Alaska Matthew Berman Institute of Social and Economic Research University of Alaska Anchorage Ed Gregr Ryan Coatta.
Identifying Hydric Soil Inclusions in Designated Nonhydric Primary Farmlands via Soil Analysis Azfar Syed Department of Biological Sciences, York College.
Linda C. Schaffner AIWA Conference November 18, 2010.
Modeling the Effects of Stream Microhabitat on Group Size and Foraging Success of Juvenile Coho Salmon William Hintz, Matthew Faust, and Mitch Banach Dr.
Temporal and Spatial Distribution of Fish Larval Assemblages of the Tebrau Straits South Western Johore Peninsular Malaysia By A. Arshad, Roushon A., S.
Lessons Learned from BMP evaluation studies in the nontidal streams and river in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Katie Foreman University of Maryland Center.
Study 466 Trawl Update Mt. Clemens Fisheries Research Station Prepared for the Saginaw Bay Coordination Meeting - Feb. 26, 2003 Spottail shiner.
200+ Years of Global Dam Development Each point on the globe represents one of 6,000+ dams built from Dams impact the hydrological cycle and.
1 Do traits of freshwater species predict vulnerability to climate change? Bruce Chessman Climate Change Science, NSW DECCW.
WRIA 9 Watershed Ecosystem Forum Adaptive Management Plan Report Presentation Large Wood, Wood Jam, & Pool Conditions in the Green River Watershed Presented.
Dry Creek Fish Habitat Enhancement Feasibility Study Current Conditions Summary.
Séminaire Indicang 18 et 19 mai 2005 Indicang – Interreg III Situation of European eel in the Oria river basin and progress of the project.
Created by: Jordan Bauer, Andrew Dumask and Aaron Johnson Faculty Sponsor: Dr. Michael Bessert University of Wisconsin-Stout Introduction Surveying fishermen.
Fish Assemblages of the Wabash River Mark Pyron. Wabash River Fishes 1.Large river 2.High diversity 3.History of human impact 4.Fish assemblages respond.
Large Rivers Less physical stability Difficult to sample Highly modified Commercial fishing on large rivers.
Jennifer M. Marsh M.S. Fisheries Student School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences University of Alaska Fairbanks.
Are Kootenai River White Sturgeon Bad Parents or Have We Just Messed Up Their Habitat?
Long-term variation in the Wabash River ecosystem The Wabash River Workshop IUPUI Dec 13, 2013 Mark Pyron Center of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries Environmental.
Former Channel Habitats of the Sacramento River: Physical and Ecological Processes and Restoration Potential Presented by Ingrid C. Morken By G. M. Kondolf,
FWCO FALL2013/SPRING2014 MMRPM Summary of Effort and Catch River Resources Action Team 2014.
Ecology --- primary definition The scientific study of how organisms interact with the natural world.
River systems. Runoff vs. Infiltration Factors determining runoff, or infiltration 1.Soil composition & pore space Coarse-grains & lots of humus = good.
Effects of Stream Restoration: A Comparative Study of Pine Run in Felton, Pennsylvania Luke Mummert, Department of Biological Sciences, York College of.
Coastal and marine ecosystems are endowed with unique habitats with a rich biodiversity and abundance of species. Information on the habitat preference.
People  science  environment  partners Economic, Social and Ecological Issues in the Lower Mekong Basin Countries Mahfuzuddin Ahmed WorldFish Center,
Initial Assessment of Habitat Use by Stocked Lake Sturgeon in the Genesee River D. E. DITTMAN 1 and E. C. ZOLLWEG 2 1 Tunison Laboratory of Aquatic Science,
Estuaries Portal DRAFT Mock-up of Fish Content (This is content developed by several CEMW group members and has not been approved)
Landscape Conservation Cooperative (LCC) Supported Assessment Tools Gulf of Mexico Alliance Tools Café June 2016 Southeast Aquatic Connectivity Assessment.
An Assessment of Hydrologic Variability on
FISHERIES POSTER SESSION
Pallid Sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus Albus)
DISTRIBUTION OF LAKE STURGEON FOLLOWING 11 YEARS OF STOCKING
Results & Discussion Cont. Acknowledgements & References
Amanda Smith and Chris Lorentz, Ph.D. Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L)
TERMINOLOGY Macrohabitat – water quality and hydrology
Gordon Becker Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration
KOOTENAI RIVER RESIDENT FISH MITIGATION
Study Update Tailrace Slough Use by Anadromous Salmonids
Nathan Servey, Brennan Dow, Brittany Burant and Mason Loden
Sea Cucumbers Resource Stock Assessments
Quinton Phelps West Virginia University Morgantown, West Virginia
IBI’s: How It’s Done.
IBI’s: An Introduction
Presentation transcript:

Channel Catfish Habitat Use in the Middle Mississippi River Andrew P Channel Catfish Habitat Use in the Middle Mississippi River Andrew P. Braun1 and Quinton E. Phelps1,2 Missouri Department of Conservation, Big Rivers and Wetlands Field Station1 Southeast Missouri State University2 INTRODUCTION RESULTS DISCUSSION The Middle Mississippi River has been subjected to river modifications such as channelization, dredging, and levees, which have reduced the availability and quality of habitats used by some river fishes (Alexander et al. 2012). Channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) are important ecologically because of their relatively high abundance and biomass, and their ability to occupy several niches or trophic levels (Colombo 2007). In addition, channel catfish are commercially and recreationally important to people of the Mississippi River basin (Eder 2011). Conservation of channel catfish depends on understanding habitat use, but there appears to be a lack of consensus regarding this topic. Our objective was to study channel catfish macrohabitat and mesohabitat use in the Middle Mississippi River using data from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Long-Term Resource Monitoring Program. Channel catfish SCPUE was highest in off-channel habitats with shallow water and sandy substrates. Channel catfish appear to use a range of velocities, but likely do so at different stages of their life history. Channel catfish evolved with the primeval Mississippi River, so habitats that reflect the pre-modification quality of the river are likely most important. Conservation of side channels and other shallow, sandy areas should provide suitable habitat for channel catfish in the Middle Mississippi River. Future studies could examine microhabitat use, foraging, energy conservation, or other aspects of channel catfish life history within the suitable habitats identified here to further understand the ecological requirements of this important species. Channel catfish SCPUE was lowest near main channel wing dikes, and highest in off-channel habitats (F = 9.49; df = 4, 3778; p <0.0001) METHODS Channel catfish SCPUE was highest in sandy habitats (F = 0.82; df = 3, 2984; p = 0.4831) Channel catfish were captured in the summer and fall between 1993 and 2012 during the Long-Term Resource Monitoring Program’s fish monitoring periods in the Middle Mississippi River. A variety of habitats were sampled using 15-minute daytime electrofishing runs and large and small hoop nets baited with soybean cake and set for two trap nights. Total length was recorded for all channel catfish. Water depth (m) and velocity (m/s) were measured at each set, and dominant substrate type (gravel, sand, silt, or soft particulate) and macrohabitat type (main channel border, unstructured [MCB-U], main channel border, wing dike [MCB-W], open and closed side channel [SCB-O, SCB-C], and tributary mouth [TRI] were qualitatively assessed and recorded. Catch-per-unit-effort was standardized across gear types (SCPUE; Phelps et al. 2009). Differences in SCPUE across mesohabitat and macrohabitat types were analyzed using ANOVA and Bonferroni pairwise comparisons. LITERATURE CITED Alexander, J.S., R.C. Wilson, and W.R. Green. 2012. A Brief History and Summary of the Effects of River Engineering and Dams on the Mississsippi River System and Delta. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1375. Colombo, R.E. 2007. Demographics and the Ecological Role of Channel Catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) in Commercially Exploited and Unexploited Reaches of the Wabash River with Implications for the Flathead Catfish (Pylodictis olivaris). Doctoral Dissertation. Southern Illinois University Carbondale. Phelps, Q.E., D.P. Herzog, R.C. Brooks, V.A. Barko, D.E. Ostendorf, J.W. Ridings, S.J. Tripp, R.E. Colombo, J.E. Garvey, and R.A. Hrabik. 2009. Seasonal Comparison of Catch Rates and Size Structure Using Three Gear Types to Sample Sturgeon in the Middle Mississippi River. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 29:1487-1495. A trend for specific velocity classes is not apparent. Channel catfish appear to use a broad range of velocities (F = 2.84; df = 10, 2841; p = 0.0016) Overall, channel catfish appear to use shallow habitats more than deep habitats (F = 20.5; df = 10, 3228; p < 0.0001) ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This study was funded by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Upper Mississippi River Restoration - Environmental Management Program’s Long Term Resource Monitoring component implemented by the U.S. Geological Survey, Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center and carried out by the Missouri Department of Conservation.