Shape Dimension and Approximation from Samples

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Distance Preserving Embeddings of Low-Dimensional Manifolds Nakul Verma UC San Diego.
Advertisements

1 st Meeting, Industrial Geometry, 2005 Approximating Solids by Balls (in collaboration with subproject: "Applications of Higher Geometrics") Bernhard.
Tyler White MATH 493 Dr. Wanner
Hyperbola Directrix e>1 O: center F1, F2: foci V1, V2: vertices
Surface Reconstruction From Unorganized Point Sets
Proximity graphs: reconstruction of curves and surfaces
KIM TAEHO PARK YOUNGMIN.  Curve Reconstruction problem.
The Voronoi Diagram David Johnson. Voronoi Diagram Creates a roadmap that maximizes clearance –Can be difficult to compute –We saw an approximation in.
Sample Shuffling for Quality Hierarchic Surface Meshing.
Flow Complex Joachim Giesen Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena.
Discrete Exterior Calculus. More Complete Introduction See Chapter 7 “Discrete Differential Forms for Computational Modeling” in the SIGGRAPH 2006 Discrete.
Convex Hulls in 3-space Jason C. Yang.
Discrete Geometry Tutorial 2 1
1st Meeting Industrial Geometry Computational Geometry ---- Some Basic Structures 1st IG-Meeting.
Xianfeng Gu, Yaling Wang, Tony Chan, Paul Thompson, Shing-Tung Yau
Computing Stable and Compact Representation of Medial Axis Wenping Wang The University of Hong Kong.
Computing Medial Axis and Curve Skeleton from Voronoi Diagrams Tamal K. Dey Department of Computer Science and Engineering The Ohio State University Joint.
Shape and Dynamics in Human Movement Analysis Ashok Veeraraghavan.
Asst. Prof. Yusuf Sahillioğlu
Shape and Dynamics in Human Movement Analysis Ashok Veeraraghavan.
T. J. Peters, University of Connecticut K. Abe, A. C. Russell, J. Bisceglio, E.. Moore, D. R. Ferguson, T. Sakkalis Topological.
UMass Lowell Computer Science Advanced Algorithms Computational Geometry Prof. Karen Daniels Spring, 2007 Chapter 5: Voronoi Diagrams Wednesday,
UMass Lowell Computer Science Advanced Algorithms Computational Geometry Prof. Karen Daniels Spring, 2004 Chapter 5: Voronoi Diagrams Monday, 2/23/04.
Tamal K. Dey The Ohio State University Delaunay Meshing of Surfaces.
T. J. Peters Computational Topology : A Personal Overview.
CS CS 175 – Week 3 Triangulating Point Clouds VD, DT, MA, MAT, Crust.
Surface Reconstruction with MLS Tobias Martin CS7960, Spring 2006, Feb 23.
Voronoi diagrams of “nice” point sets Nina Amenta UC Davis “The World a Jigsaw”
UMass Lowell Computer Science Advanced Algorithms Computational Geometry Prof. Karen Daniels Spring, 2001 Lecture 3 Chapter 4: 3D Convex Hulls Chapter.
1 Street Generation for City Modeling Xavier Décoret, François Sillion iMAGIS GRAVIR/IMAG - INRIA.
Tamal K. Dey The Ohio State University Computing Shapes and Their Features from Point Samples.
1/61 Department of Computer Science and Engineering Tamal K. Dey The Ohio State University Delaunay Refinement and Its Localization for Meshing.
A Navigation Mesh for Dynamic Environments Wouter G. van Toll, Atlas F. Cook IV, Roland Geraerts CASA 2012.
Gerald Dalley Signal Analysis and Machine Perception Laboratory The Ohio State University 07 Feb 2002 Linux Clustering Software + Surface Reconstruction.
Dobrina Boltcheva, Mariette Yvinec, Jean-Daniel Boissonnat INRIA – Sophia Antipolis, France 1. Initialization Use the.
Planning Near-Optimal Corridors amidst Obstacles Ron Wein Jur P. van den Berg (U. Utrecht) Dan Halperin Athens May 2006.
Algorithms for Triangulations of a 3D Point Set Géza Kós Computer and Automation Research Institute Hungarian Academy of Sciences Budapest, Kende u
Tamal K. Dey The Ohio State University Computing Shapes and Their Features from Point Samples.
Jifeng Dai 2011/09/27.  Introduction  Structural SVM  Kernel Design  Segmentation and parameter learning  Object Feature Descriptors  Experimental.
Lecture 7 : Point Set Processing Acknowledgement : Prof. Amenta’s slides.
1/43 Department of Computer Science and Engineering Delaunay Mesh Generation Tamal K. Dey The Ohio State University.
Geometry of Shape Manifolds
Detecting Undersampling in Surface Reconstruction Tamal K. Dey and Joachim Giesen Ohio State University.
PMR: Point to Mesh Rendering, A Feature-Based Approach Tamal K. Dey and James Hudson
A New Voronoi-based Reconstruction Algorithm
9 of 18 Introduction to medial axis transforms and their computation Outline DefinitionsMAS PropertiesMAS CAD modelsTJC The challenges for computingTJC.
UNC Chapel Hill M. C. Lin Delaunay Triangulations Reading: Chapter 9 of the Textbook Driving Applications –Height Interpolation –Constrained Triangulation.
Shape Reconstruction from Samples with Cocone Tamal K. Dey Dept. of CIS Ohio State University.
With Tamal Dey, Qichao Que, Issam Safa, Lei Wang, Yusu Wang Computer science and Engineering The Ohio State University Xiaoyin Ge.
Tamal K. Dey The Ohio State University Surface and Volume Meshing with Delaunay Refinement.
Rongjie Lai University of Southern California Joint work with: Jian Liang, Alvin Wong, Hongkai Zhao 1 Geometric Understanding of Point Clouds using Laplace-Beltrami.
Bigyan Ankur Mukherjee University of Utah. Given a set of Points P sampled from a surface Σ,  Find a Surface Σ * that “approximates” Σ  Σ * is generally.
Lecture 9 : Point Set Processing
CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry Spring 2017
Decimating Samples for Mesh Simplification
Image Representation and Description – Representation Schemes
Image Morphing © Zooface Many slides from Alexei Efros, Berkeley.
Variational Tetrahedral Meshing
Classification Nearest Neighbor
Outline Nonlinear Dimension Reduction Brief introduction Isomap LLE
Localizing the Delaunay Triangulation and its Parallel Implementation
Nearest-Neighbor Classifiers
Shape Segmentation and Applications in Sensor Networks
Meshing of 3-D Data Clouds for Object Description
13.7 day 2 Tangent Planes and Normal Lines
Localized Delaunay Refinement for Volumes
Point-Cloud 3D Modeling.
Data Mining Classification: Alternative Techniques
Topological Signatures For Fast Mobility Analysis
Chapter 3: Simplicial Homology Instructor: Yusu Wang
Presentation transcript:

Shape Dimension and Approximation from Samples T. Dey, J. Giesen, S. Goswami, W. Zhao Dept. of CIS Ohio State University

Shapes and their dimensions Shapes for us are smooth compact manifolds embedded in an Euclidean space.

Sampling

Motivations Manifold learning Shape reconstruction

Local feature size and sampling Medial axis A Local feature size f : Rd R, f(p) is the smallest distance to A -sampling [ABE98] d(p): Euclidean distance of p to nearest sample   d(p)/f(p)

Sampling and Ambiguity -sampling and all samples are > f(p) away ([DFR01],[Erick01]) /2 <  < 

Tangent and Normal Spaces Space spanned by tangents T(p) Space spanned by normals N(p)

Voronoi Diagram / Delaunay triangulation

Tangent and Normal Polytopes T(p) = V(p)T(p) N(p) = V(p)N(p)

Voronoi Subpolytopes V(p,i)  V(p), 1 i  d pole pi+ ([AB98]) pole vector v(p,i)

Heights pole vector v(p,i) heights H(p,i)= ||v(p,i)||

Idea M is a k-manifold in Rd, P is an (,)-sample heights H(p,i) are small for 1i k and big for k>i Compare with H(p,1)

Normal Lemma

Height Lemma

Pole-Normal Lemma

Small-Height Lemma

Height Theorem

Ratio gap for 

Algorithm Dimension

Experiments CGAL library  =0.3

Shape Reconstruction Compute a simplicial complex K with dist(|K|,M)=O() times local feature size In R2 and R3, |K| and M are homeomorphic

Cocone C(p) C(p): x in V(p) making angle < /8 with V(p,k) Compute all dual simplices to (d-k)-dimensional Voronoi edges intersecting C(p)

CoconeShape

Shape Distance Theorem Follows from normal and small-height Lemma

Manifold Extraction(?) How to extract a k-manifold out of K? Manifold extraction in R3 Pruning Walking

Homeomorphism(?) ?

Experimental Results

Result in R4 w=x2 + y2+ z2 111111 grid (1331 points) 3d points 615, 2d points 582, 1d points 134 Ideally 637,578,116

Conclusions We generalized the curve and surface reconstruction to shape reconstruction. How to handle boundaries? Manifold extraction? Immersion instead of embedding? Avoid Voronoi computation?