(Best Current Operational Practice for operators)

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

IPv6 Troubleshooting for Helpdesks using isp.test-ipv6.com document Jan Žorž.

Advertisements

Best current operational practices (BCOP) Richard Jimmerson.

Jan Žorž Rome Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment (and other stuff...) Sander Steffann, Jan Žorž 1 RIPE61, November.

About removing the next IPv6 deployment speed-bumps IPv6 Troubleshooting for Helpdesks using isp.test-ipv6.com document Jan Žorž.

Doc.: IEEE /527r1 Submission November 2001 John Barr, MotorolaSlide 1 Project: IEEE Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)

Title: Removing the IPv6 deployment speed-bumps Jan Žorž.

RIPE-501bis Merike Kaeo Sander Steffann Jan Žorž.

Doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 Submission July 2007 Terry Cole, AMDSlide Common Editorial Comment Resolution Process Date: Authors:

Original author of previous version of this presentation: Jordi Palet

Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan Revised Terms of Reference

BCOP Taskforce Administrative Matters

On Campus Internship Work Plan Creation

Technical Info, BCOP, DNSSEC Coordination, ION Conferences

June 18 January 2011 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: TG4k LECIM Closing Report for Los.

Unit 2: Design Development Dr

Best Current Operational Practice for operators: IPv6 Prefix Assignment for end-customers – persistent vs non-persistent and what size to choose …known.

Proposal – Non-Voice Training Certification Program for Support

LACNOG BCOP WG.

Best Current Operational Practice for operators: How to run your server on IPv6 – and survive… Jan Žorž BCOP IPv6 Prefix Assignment.

Mary Barnes (WG co-chair) Paul Kyzivat (WG co-chair)

September 18 March 2011 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: TG4k LECIM Closing Report for.

Professional Skepticism and Professional Judgment

CMGT 410 NEW Become Exceptional/ newtonhelp.com. CMGT 410 All Assignments (New Syllabus) For more course tutorials visit CMGT 410 Assignment.

doc.: IEEE <doc#>

Submission Title: SG-VLC Midweek Report for Dallas November 2008

Quantification of BMP Impacts on CBP Management Strategies

IPv6 prefix assignment for end-customers - persistent vs non-persistent, and what size to choose. …known as… RIPE-690 (Best Current Operational Practice.

December 18 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: TGg Liaison Report, May 2003 Date Submitted:

Activities of the UNECE-UNODC Task Force on Victimization Surveys

Doc: xyz January 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG5 Closing Report]

Submission Title: TG-VLC Closing Report for LA January 2010

Easy Chair Online Conference Submission, Tracking and Distribution Process: Getting Started + Information for Reviewers AMS World Marketing Congress /

6th Address Policy SIG Report

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: TG4e Closing Report for Waikoloa Sep.

Mar Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [SG4w March 2018 Plenary Closing Report] Date.

January 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG w January Closing Report] Date.

Submission Title: f Task Group Closing Report for Atlanta, Georgia

Submission Title: f Task Group Mid-Week Report for Atlanta, Georgia

<month year> doc.: IEEE < e> January 2012

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: TG4e Closing Report for Waikoloa Sep.

802.11REVmc Editor’s Report – Jan 2013

March 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG w March 2019 Closing Report] Date.

Jul 15, /15/10 07/15/10 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: TG4g-SUN Closing Report.

April 19 September 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: LECIM-SG Closing Report for.

January 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG w January 2019 Closing Report]

IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: REVP Title: m Session #72 Opening Notes Date Submitted: January 18, 2016 IEEE session.

May 19 March 2011 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: TG4k LECIM Closing Report for Singapore.

Language Arts: Monday 2-11

Nov 2012 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Closing report for TG4j (MBAN) Task Group, Nov.

March 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG w March 2019 Closing Report] Date.

Submission Title: [WG-TG3 Opening Report Jan02]

doc.: IEEE <doc#>

Neighbor Report Comment Resolution clause

doc.: IEEE g-Trends-in-SUN-capacity

Open Source Working Group

Submission Title: [WG-TG3 closing Report Sept02]

doc.: IEEE <doc#>

doc.: IEEE <doc#>

May 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG w May 2019 Closing Report] Date.

Nov 2012 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Closing report for TG4j (MBAN) Task Group, Nov.

MANRS Implementation Guides

July 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG w July 2019 Closing Report] Date.

July 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG w July 2019 Closing Report] Date.

doc.: IEEE <doc#>

doc.: IEEE <doc#>

July 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG w July 2019 Midweek Report] Date.

doc.: IEEE <doc#>

doc.: IEEE <doc#>

September 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG w September 2019 Closing Report]

doc.: IEEE <doc#>

Presentation transcript:

(Best Current Operational Practice for operators) IPv6 prefix assignment for end-customers - persistent vs non-persistent, and what size to choose. (Best Current Operational Practice for operators)

What is this document all about? This document discusses the main issues related to the operational practices for the assignment of IPv6 prefixes for end-customers. Making wrong choices when designing your IPv6 network will sooner or later have negative implications on your deployment and require further effort such as renumbering when the network is already in operation. The temptation to take “easy” approaches for quicker deployment should therefore be resisted.

Co-authors Jan Žorž <zorz@isoc.org>, Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>, Primož Dražumerič <Primoz.Drazumeric@telekom.si>, Mark Townsley <townsley@cisco.com>, Andrew Alston <andrew.alston@liquidtelecom.com>, Gert Doering <gert@space.net>, Jordi Palet <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>, Jen Linkova <furry@google.com>, Luis Balbinot <lbalbinot@brfibra.com.br>, Kevin Meynell <meynell@isoc.org>, Lee Howard <lee.howard@retevia.net>

Draft v.1 https://sinog.si/docs/draft-IPv6pd-BCOP-v1.pdf [root@webserver]# grep draft-IPv6pd-BCOP-v1.pdf sinog-ssl_access_log* | wc -l 909

Draft v.2 https://sinog.si/docs/draft-IPv6pd-BCOP-v2.pdf Number of comments and suggestions on-list and off-list… Presented and gathered some comments also at RIPE BCOP TF meeting on Monday Majority of co-authors, present at RIPE74 meeting in Budapest gathered in a lobby bar on Tuesday to do the editorial cycle, followed by language pass. Sent to RIPE IPv6 mailing list on 11th May at 02:44am

Editing draft v.2

Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Nathalie Kunneke-Trenaman, Mikael Abrahamsson, Jason Fesler, Martin Levy, Ian Dickinson, Philip Homburg, Ivan Pepelnjak, Matthias Kluth, Ondřej Caletka, Nick Hilliard, Paul Hoffman and Roman Nurul Islam for constructive critic, suggestions and ideas how to make this document better. Special thanks go to RIPE IPv6 Working Group community and Chairs for accepting this document for technical review, and also the RIPE BCOP Task Force community and Chairs for ensuring it does conform with actual best operational practice.

Q&A Suggestions? Comments? Ideas? Way forward?