Beta decay for neutron capture

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nuclear Astrophysics Experiments in ATOMKI Gy. Gyürky Institute of Nuclear Research (ATOMKI) Debrecen, Hungary.
Advertisements

HIGS2 Workshop June 3-4, 2013 Nuclear Structure Studies at HI  S Henry R. Weller The HI  S Nuclear Physics Program.
Giant resonances, exotic modes & astrophysics
n_TOF meeting November 2007, BARI.
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory SciDAC Reaction Theory LLNL-PRES Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P. O. Box 808, Livermore, CA
Joint IAEA-ICTP Workshop on Nuclear Reaction Data for Advanced Reactor Technologies Student’s presentation Calculation of correction factors for neutron.
1 TCP06 Parksville 8/5/06 Electron capture branching ratios for the nuclear matrix elements in double-beta decay using TITAN ◆ Nuclear matrix elements.
J.N. Wilson, EFNUDAT workshop, CERN, August 2010 Level Densities, Decay Probabilities and Cross sections in the Actinide Region J.N. Wilson Institut de.
Coupled-Channel Computation of Direct Neutron Capture and (d,p) reactions on Non- Spherical Nuclei Goran Arbanas (ORNL) Ian J. Thompson (LLNL) with Filomena.
Heat Capacities of 56 Fe and 57 Fe Emel Algin Eskisehir Osmangazi University Workshop on Level Density and Gamma Strength in Continuum May 21-24, 2007.
Α - capture reactions using the 4π γ-summing technique Α. Lagoyannis Institute of Nuclear Physics, N.C.S.R. “Demokritos”
Ohio University: A.V. Voinov, S.M. Grimes, C.R.Brune, T. Massey, B.M. Oginni, A.Schiller, Oslo University: M. Guttormsen, A.C. Larsen, S.Siem, N.U.H. Syed.
Gamma-ray strength functions obtained with the Oslo method Ann-Cecilie Larsen July 8, 2008 Workshop on Statistical Nuclear Physics and Applications in.
Where next (with HDU)? Q-value mass. excitation energies. Angular distributions of recoils l -value spectroscopic information.
Cross-sections of Neutron Threshold Reactions Studied by Activation Method Nuclear Physics Institute, Academy of Sciences of Czech Republic Department.
Some aspects of reaction mechanism study in collisions induced by Radioactive Beams Alessia Di Pietro.
Challenges on phase transitions and
The concept of compound nuclear reaction: a+B  C  d+F The particle transmission coefficients T are usually known from cross sections of inverse reactions.
Nuclear Astrophysics ARUNA Workshop, Notre Dame, IN Carl R. Brune Ohio University, Athens Ohio June 12-13, 2014.
THEORETICAL PREDICTIONS OF THERMONUCLEAR RATES P. Descouvemont 1.Reactions in astrophysics 2.Overview of different models 3.The R-matrix method 4.Application.
Determining the rp-Process Flow through 56 Ni 56 Ni is a Waiting Point and imposes a delay Decay Lifetime: 2.3x10^4 s ; Burst Time: 10 – 100 s Largest.
INPC, Firenze, Italy 2-7 June J. Magraf et al., Phys. Rev. C 42, 771 (1990) O. Yevetska et al., Phys. Rev. C 81, (2010) INPC, Firenze, Italy.
Low-energy enhancement of nuclear  strength and its impact on astrophysical reaction rates Ann-Cecilie Larsen, Post doc, OCL/SAFE, University of Oslo.
1 Cross sections of neutron reactions in S-Cl-Ar region in the s-process of nucleosynthesis C. Oprea 1, P. J. Szalanski 2, A. Ioan 1, P. M. Potlog 3 1Frank.
Many-Body Effects in a Frozen Rydberg Gas Feng zhigang
Pg  Provides a tool for identifying and quantitating elements  Investigates how changing the number of subatomic particles unleashing new.
Beta decay spectroscopy studies of novae and x-ray bursts
We ask for 4 new shifts (to be combined with 2 shifts left for IS386 from 2005) of radioactive beam of 229Ra in order to search for the alpha decay branch.
Probe into the nuclear charge radii of superheavy and exotic nuclei via the experimental decay data Yibin Qian Department of Applied Physics, Nanjing University.
Extracting β4 from sub-barrier backward quasielastic scattering
Reactor anti-neutrinos and neutrinos
Presented by Hendrik Schatz Michigan State University
György Gyürky Institute for Nuclear Research (Atomki)
(Xin-Heng Guo, Bing-Lin Young) Beijing Normal University
A. Casanovas (UPC), C. Domingo-Pardo (IFIC), C. Guerrero (U
Workshop & conferences
Cross-section Measurements of (n,xn) Threshold Reactions
Marilena AvrigeanuMarilena Avrigeanu
György Gyürky Institute of Nuclear Research (Atomki) Debrecen, Hungary
for the NUCL-ex and HECTOR collaboration
7. Gamma-ray strength functions
3. The optical model Prof. Dr. A.J. (Arjan) Koning1,2
The neutron capture cross section of the s-process branch point 63Ni
Evolution of octupole collectivity in 221Th
gamma-transmission coefficients are most uncertain values !!!
Decay spectroscopy with LaBr3(Ce) detectors at RIKEN and GSI
Rebecca Surman Union College
The astrophysical p-process
Probing core polarization around 78Ni:
Carbon, From Red Giants to White Dwarfs
Bucharest-Magurele, Romania M. BOROMIZA - Trieste, October, 2017
Novel technique for constraining r-process (n,γ) reaction rates.
Peripheral collisions Hans-Jürgen Wollersheim
Neutron Detection with MoNA LISA
A New Measurement of the Half-Life of 60Fe
Radiation and The Geiger-Müller Counter
Status of the A=56, 64, and 68 X-ray burst waiting points
probability of surviving
Neutrino Reaction in Nuclear-Astro Physics
Indirect Methods in Nuclear Astrophysics
Val Kostroun and Bruce Dunham
Astrophysical implications of the (n,
Elastic alpha scattering experiments
Institut de Physique Nucléaire Orsay, France
Nuclear Chemistry Essential Question: What are the different types of radioactive decay? How does each type change the nucleus?
A Study in Garnet & Gold – Unveiling mysteries with the SE-SPS
Probing correlations by use of two-nucleon removal
Nuclear Experimentation
Presentation transcript:

Beta decay for neutron capture Sean Liddick ICNT, June 7th, 2016

r-process calculations neutron star merger hot wind cold wind Abundance pattern is different for the different astrophysical scenarios. Does one of them reproduce the observed abundances best? Why can’t we tell? M. Mumpower, J. Cass, G. Passucci, R. Surman, A. Aprahamian, AIP Adv. 4, 041009 (2014)

Nuclear Physics Uncertainties: (n,γ) (n,γ) uncertainties 1000 100 10 5 Monte-Carlo variations of (n,γ) rates within a factor 100 – 10 – 2 (light – darker – dark bands) S.N. Liddick, A. Spyrou, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. (in press) R. Surman and J. Engel, Phys. Rev. C, 64, 035801 (2001)

Current (n,γ) measurements

Neutron Capture – Uncertainties Hauser – Feshbach Nuclear Level Density Constant T+Fermi gas, back-shifted Fermi gas, superfluid, microscopic γ-ray strength function Generalized Lorentzian, Brink-Axel, various tables Optical model potential Phenomenological, Semi-microscopic Level density γ-strength function ALL 95Sr(n,γ)96Sr OMP TALYS

Uncertain extrapolations: gamma-ray strengths and level densities g-ray strength functions Unexpected structural features. Level densities What is N,Z dependence of a? Level density parameter, a, depends only on mass. A.C. Larsen et al., Phys. Rev. C, 82, 014318 (2010) Al-Quraishi et al., Phys. Rev. C 63, 065803 (2001)

One indirect technique: Oslo method Reaction based Populate the compound nucleus of interest through a transfer or inelastic scattering. Extract level density and γ-ray strength function. Calculate (n,γ) cross section. Excellent agreement with measured (n,γ) reaction cross section. Applicable close to stability. T.G. Tornyi, M. Guttormsen,et al., Phys. Rev. C 2014

Beta decay and reactions Measure beta decay of nucleus. Extract level densities and gamma-ray strength function Need total excitation energy of the daughter isotope.

Total Absorption Spectroscopy Need to know initial excitation energy Can’t use beta-decay electron (three body process). Measure total g-ray energy. Require high detection efficiency (low resolution detector). Knowledge of multiplicities.

It Works A. Tonchev, et al. Photoscattering exeriment – HIγS Talk at Oslo workshop 2015 A. Voinov, T. Renstrom, A.-C. Larsen, et al. Preliminary Analysis - 70Zn(7Li,p)76Ge reaction Experiment at Ohio University

It Works

69Ni (n,g) 70Ni 64Ni 69Ni 70Ni (b) (n,g) 70Co Highlight 69ni S.N. Liddick, A. Spyrou et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. (in press) R. Surman et al., AIP Advances, 4, 041008 (2014)

70Ni – Level Density and Gamma Strength Note paucity of known excited states in 70Ni

69Ni(n,g)70Ni

69Ni(n,g)70Ni Impact

Uncertainties

Next Region Higher mass nuclei Z = 50, N = 82 Compare statistical and direct neutron capture predictions. For example: 130Sn R. L. Kozub et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 172501 (2012). M. Mumpower et al., Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 86, 86 (2016). Y. Xu et al., Phys. Rev. C, 90, 024604 (2014).

Practical Aspects 10+1 (n,g) 10-2 Masses 10-4 Half-lives

Thanks Michigan State University Artemis Spyrou S.N. Liddick B.P. Crider K. Cooper A.C. Dombos D.J. Morrissey R. Lewis F. Naqvi C.J. Prokop S.J. Quinn A. Rodriguez C.S. Sumithrarachchi R.G.T. Zegers University of Oslo A.C. Larsen M. Guttormsen L. Crespo Campo S. Siem T. Renstrøm Central Michigan University G. Perdikakis S. Nikas Notre Dame M. Mumpower A. Simon R. Surman LLNL D.L. Bluel LANL A. Couture S. Mosby Universidad de Valencia B. Rubio This research was supported by Michigan State University and the Facility for Rare Isotope Beams and was funded in part by the NSF under Contract Nos. PHY-1102511 (NSCL), 1350234 (CAREER), 1430152 (JINA-CEE), 0822648 and 1419765 (M.M. and R.S) and the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-SC0013039 (R.S.), DE-AC52-07NA27344 (LLNL), and the National Nuclear Security Administration under Award No. DE-NA0000979. Funding is also acknowledged from the European Research Council, ERC Starting Grant GA 637686, the Research Council of Norway grant no. 210007 and by the Spanish Ministry MINECO under contract FPA2014-52823-C2-1-P.