Multi Topology Routing (MTR) for OSPF

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IPv6 Routing.
Advertisements

Introduction to OSPF Mark Tinka. Routing and Forwarding  Routing is not the same as Forwarding  Routing is the building of maps Each routing protocol.
OSPF Two-part Metrics Jeffrey Zhang Lili Wang Juniper Networks 88 th IETF, Vancouver.
Introduction to OSPF.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco PublicITE I Chapter 6 1 Implement Inter- VLAN Routing LAN Switching and Wireless – Chapter 6.
Lonnie Decker Multiarea OSPF for CCNA Department Chair, Networking/Information Assurance Davenport University, Michigan August 2013 Elaine Horn Cisco Academy.
1 © 2000, Cisco Systems, Inc. Integrated-ISIS Route Leaking.
Designing OSPF Networks
RIP V2 W.lilakiatsakun.  RFC 2453 (obsoletes –RFC 1723 /1388)  Extension of RIP v1 (Classful routing protocol)  Classless routing protocol –VLSM is.
IPv6 Routing IPv6 Workshop Manchester September 2013
© 2007 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Public 1 Addressing the Network – IPv4 Network Fundamentals – Chapter 6.
© 2007 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Public ITE PC v4.0 Chapter 1 1 Addressing the Network – IPv4 Network Fundamentals – Chapter 6.
© 2008 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 Chapter 6: Multiarea OSPF Scaling Networks.
© 2007 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Public 1 Version 4.1 Routing Working at a Small-to-Medium Business or ISP – Chapter 6.
Nov 11, 2004CS573: Network Protocols and Standards1 IP Routing: OSPF Network Protocols and Standards Autumn
1 ELEN 602 Lecture 20 More on Routing RIP, OSPF, BGP.
1 Relates to Lab 4. This module covers link state routing and the Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) routing protocol. Dynamic Routing Protocols II OSPF.
© 2007 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Public ITE PC v4.0 Chapter 1 1 Link-State Routing Protocols Routing Protocols and Concepts – Chapter.
© 2009 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. ROUTE v1.0—3-1 Implementing a Scalable Multiarea Network OSPF- Based Solution Improving Routing Performance.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS v2.2—5#-1 MPLS VPN Implementation Configuring OSPF as the Routing Protocol Between PE and CE Routers.
OSPF Two-part Metrics Jeffrey Zhang Juniper Networks 89 th IETF, Landon.
Objectives After completing this chapter you will be able to: Describe hierarchical routing in OSPF Describe the 3 protocols in OSPF, the Hello, Exchange.
1 Relates to Lab 4. This module covers link state routing and the Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) routing protocol. Dynamic Routing Protocols II OSPF.
Routing and Routing Protocols Routing Protocols Overview.
© 2008 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 Chapter 7: Enhanced Interior Gateway Protocol (EIGRP) Scaling Networks.
1 © 2001, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.© 2003, Cisco Systems, Inc. OSPF and ISIS v6 Khalid Raza
TCOM 515 Lecture 2. Lecture 2 Objectives Dynamic Routing Distance Vector Routing Link State Routing Interior vs Exterior RIP - Routing Information Protocol.
© 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc OSPF Overview RFC 2328, 2178, 1583.
© 2007 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Public 1 Version 4.0 Link-State Routing Protocols Routing Protocols and Concepts – Chapter 10.
RIP2 (Routing Information Protocol) Team Agile. Routing Protocols Link State – OSPF – ISIS Distance vector – RIP (version 1 and 2) – IGRP (Cisco Proprietary)
© 2002, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Determining IP Routes.
Introduction to OSPF Nishal Goburdhan. Routing and Forwarding Routing is not the same as Forwarding Routing is the building of maps Each routing protocol.
1 © 2003, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. CCNA 3 v3.0 Module 2 Single-Area OSPF.
1 Multi Topology Routing for OSPFv3 (draft-mirtorabi-mt-ospfv3-00.txt) Sina Mirtorabi
 Development began in 1987  OSPF Working Group (part of IETF)  OSPFv2 first established in 1991  Many new features added since then  Updated OSPFv2.
1 © 2003, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. CCNA 3 v3.0 Module 9 Virtual Trunking Protocol.
Routing and Routing Protocols
© 2008 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 Chapter 8: Single-Area OSPF Routing Protocols.
© 2008 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 Chapter 8: Single-Area OSPF Routing Protocols.
111 © 2006, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. OSPF-MTR-MIB-IETF OSPFv2 MIB for Multi Topology Routing (MTR) Namita Rawat Rashmi Shrivastava David.
Cisco Confidential © 2010 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. 1 draft-pillay-esnault-ospf-service-distribution-00.txt Padma Pillay-Esnault.
© 2007 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Public 1 Version 4.0 Link-State Routing Protocols Routing Protocols and Concepts – Chapter 10.
OSPFv3 John Rullan Cisco Certified Instructor Trainer Thomas A. Edison CTE HS Stephen Lynch Network Architect, CCIE #36243 ABS Technology Architects.
1 © 2004, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. CCNA 1 v3.1 Module 10 Routing Fundamentals and Subnets.
© 2009 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. ROUTE v1.0—3-1 Implementing a Scalable Multiarea Network OSPF- Based Solution Configuring and Verifying.
Extended procedures and Considerations for Loop Free Alternatives draft-chunduri-rtgwg-lfa-extended-procedures-01 Uma Chunduri Ericsson Inc. Jeff Tantsura.
Draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospf-extension-03 draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospfv3-extension-00 IETF 88, November 3-8, 2013 P. Psenak, S.Previdi,
111 © 2003, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. CCNA 3: Switching Basics and Intermediate Routing v3.0.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. BSCI v3.0—8-1 Implementing IPv6 Defining IPv6 Addressing.
© 2007 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Public 1 Version 4.1 Routing Working at a Small-to-Medium Business or ISP – Chapter 6.
1 Relates to Lab 4. This module covers link state routing and the Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) routing protocol. Dynamic Routing Protocols II OSPF.
© 2008 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 Chapter 8: Single-Area OSPF Routing & Switching.
Open Shortest Path First (OSPF)
Working at a Small-to-Medium Business or ISP – Chapter 6
Requirements for LER Forwarding of IPv4 Option Packets
Link State Routing protocol
Multi-Instances ISIS Extension draft-ietf-isis-mi-08.txt
OSPF (Open Shortest Path First)
Dynamic routing Routing Algorithm (Dijkstra / Bellman-Ford) – idealization All routers are identical Network is flat. Not true in Practice Hierarchical.
Link-State Routing Protocols
13.3 OSPF: Open Shortest Path First.
CCNA 3 v3 JEOPARDY Module 2 CCNA3 v3 Module 2 K. Martin.
Link-State Routing Protocols
Dynamic Routing and OSPF
Chapter 8: Single-Area OSPF
Separating Routing Planes using Segment Routing draft-gulkohegde-spring-separating-routing-planes-using-sr-00 IETF 98 – Chicago, USA Shraddha Hegde
Link-State Routing Protocols
Working at a Small-to-Medium Business or ISP – Chapter 6
IETF103 IS-IS V6/MT Deployment Considerations draft-chunduri-lsr-isis-preferred-path-routing-01 Uma Chunduri [Huawei USA] Jeff Tantsura [Apstra] LSR WG,
IETF105 IS-IS V6/MT Deployment Considerations draft-chunduri-lsr-isis-mt-deployment-cons-02 Uma Chunduri [Futurewei] Jeff Tantsura [Apstra] Shraddha Hegde.
Presentation transcript:

Multi Topology Routing (MTR) for OSPF draft-psenak-mt-ospf-00.txt

MTR Goals Support multiple independent topologies over one physical topology Influence the path certain type of traffic takes over the network to reach the destination Traffic separation across the network links are dedicated to certain types of traffic prevent a link to be used for some type of traffic incongruent topologies for unicast and multicast

OSPF MTR extension Extend OSPF to support multiple topologies: advertise multiple topology specific metrics compute multiple topology specific SPFs compute prefix reachability for each topology

Advertising Topology Metrics RFC1583 supported TOS based routing later removed from the spec LSA format did not change Only TOS0 metric used today Redefined TOS to MT-ID and TOS metrics to MT-ID metrics Used in Router LSA, Summary LSAs External LSAs to describe the metric for multiple topologies

Advertising Topology Metric – Router LSA | LSA Header | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |*|*|*|N|W|V|E|B| 0 | #links | | Link ID | | Link Data | | | Type | # MT-ID | metric | | MT-ID | 0 | MT-ID metric | | ... |

Advertising Topology Metric – Summary LSAs | LSA Header | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Network Mask | | | 0 | metric | | MT-ID | MT-ID metric | | ... |

Advertising Topology Metric – External LSAs | LSA Header | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Network Mask | | |E| 0 | metric | | Forwarding Address | | External Route Tag | |E| MT-ID | MT-ID metric | | ... | |E| MT-ID | MT-ID metric | | ... |

Advertising Topology Metric MTID range 0 – 127 0 reserved for base topology Explicit metric advertisement if the topology metric for a certain link/prefix is not advertised, that link/prefix does not participate in that topology this has changed compared to RFC1583

Topology Specific SPF & Route Calculation SPF for an area is computed for each topology independently, using only metrics belonging to that topology Network LSA has no metric and is used by all topologies During inter-area and external route calculation for each topology, only metric belonging to that topology is considered

Adjacencies Single adjacency formed even when link participates in multiple topologies OSPF control packets are sent using the base topology as today

Excluding the Link/Prefix from Base Topology How to exclude link/prefix from base topology: In Summary/External LSA set the TOS0 metric to 0xFFFFFF (compatible with the RFC2328) In Router LSA area must be in the MTR Enabled mode in which case TOS0 metric in Router LSA is ignored. MT#0 metric is used instead and is optional.

Interoperability with non-MTR Aware Routers If there is no need to exclude link from the base topology, there is no interoperability problem MTR unaware routers will only participate in base topology When there is a need to exclude the link from the base topology, area MTRoutingCapability must be set to Enabled on all routers in the area: MT- bit (old T-bit) set in Hello packets If received Hello does not have MT-bit set, it’s ignored TOS0 metric is not used, MT#0 metric used instead

WG draft proposal for draft-psenak-mt-ospf-00.txt to be accepted as a OSPF WG document

RST-372 © 2002, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. 14 14 14

Comparison Between MTR and TBR TBR (TOS Based Routing) can’t exclude selectively link from a single TOS unspecified TOS metrics defaults to the TOS 0 metric “Unreachable” metric would have to be defined inefficient if link participate in few topologies, where other topologies would have to be advertised as “Unreachable” MTR include only metrics for those topologies that are active on the link