Availsim runs and questions

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Update of RTML, Status of FNAL L-band and CLIC X-band BPM, Split SC Quadrupole Nikolay Solyak Fermilab (On behalf of RTML team) LCWS2010 / ILC 10, March.
Advertisements

CLIC Energy Stages D. Schulte1 D. Schulte for the CLIC team.
Issues in ILC Main Linac and Bunch Compressor from Beam dynamics N. Solyak, A. Latina, K.Kubo.
Positron Source Update Jim Clarke Deepa Angal-Kalinin James Jones Norbert Collomb At Daresbury Laboratory and Cockroft Institute 21/07/2009.
ILC RF phase stability requirements and how can we demonstrate them Sergei Nagaitsev Oct 24, 2007.
Proton Source Workshop Booster Downtime Wednesday, December 8, 2010 T. Sullivan.
Operations and Availability GG3. Key decisions Summary of Key Decisions for the Baseline Design The linac will have two parallel tunnels so that the support.
AGS pp Status Feb. 6, 2015 RSC Meeting Haixin Huang.
Experimental hall in Japanese mountain site Y. Sugimoto ILD MDI/Integration 1.
5Feb07 Beijing GDE meeting 1 S2 Task Force Status (String test definition) Tom Himel.
ILC RTML Lattice Design A.Vivoli, N. Solyak, V. Kapin Fermilab.
Accelerators for ADS March 2014 CERN Approach for a reliable cryogenic system T. Junquera (ACS) *Work supported by the EU, FP7 MAX contract number.
For Draft List of Standard Errors Beam Dynamics, Simulations Group (Summarized by Kiyoshi Kubo)
1 Availsim DRFS and klyClus setup, assumptions, questions Tom Himel August 11, 2009.
GDE meeting September 29, Availability Task Force Progress Report Tom Himel for the Availability Task Force Putting the Linac in a single tunnel.
F Project X Overview Dave McGinnis October 12, 2007.
Discussion for Keep Alive Source /Auxiliary Positron Source KURIKI Masao Hiroshima U. /KEK 10/25/2011 ILC Technical Baseline Review, 2011, DESY 1.
Date Event Global Design Effort 1 ILC UPDATE Vancouver to Valencia Ewan Paterson Personal Report to SiD Collaboration Oct 27, 2006.
Global Design Effort 1 Possible Minimum Machine Studies of Central Region for 2009 Reference, ILC Minimum Machine Study Proposal V1, January 2009 ILC-EDMS.
Thickness of the Kamaboko Tunnel Shield Wall under Different Assumptions Ewan Paterson Technical Board June 23,
N.Solyak, RTMLALCPG 2009,Albuquerque, Oct.2 1 ILC RTML Upgrade in SB2009 Nikolay Solyak Fermilab.
1 Availability and Controls Tom Himel SLAC Controls GG meeting January 20, 2006.
SINGLE-STAGE BUNCH COMPRESSOR FOR ILC-SB2009 Nikolay Solyak Fermilab GDE Baseline Assessment Workshop (BAW-2) SLAC, Jan , 2011 N.Solyak, Single-stage.
Proton Improvement Plan Bill Pellico April 19, 2013 NOvA collaboration Meeting Bill Pellico NOvA.
20 July 2006 Vancouver GDE Meeting Global Design Effort 1 Ring to Main Linac Peter Tenenbaum SLAC.
Beam Dynamics WG K. Kubo, N. Solyak, D. Schulte. Presentations –N. Solyak Coupler kick simulations update –N. Solyak CLIC BPM –A. Latina: Update on the.
CLIC Energy Stages D. Schulte1 D. Schulte for the CLIC team.
John Carwardine, Ewan Paterson, Marc Ross 14/15 July 2009 Availability Task Force: Subgroup #2.
PHG - AD&I DESY - May 29, 2009 ILC - Global Design Effort 1 Cost Estimating for the AD&I Studies X Differential Estimates What we need from you! Peter.
Thickness of the Kamaboko Tunnel Shield Wall under Different Assumptions Ewan Paterson ADI Meeting July 2, ADI Meeting Ewan Paterson 7/2/15.
Status of RTML design in TDR configuration A.Vivoli, N. Solyak, V. Kapin Fermilab.
N. Walker, K. Yokoya LCWS ’11 Granada September TeV Upgrade Scenario: Straw man parameters.
Simulations - Beam dynamics in low emittance transport (LET: From the exit of Damping Ring) K. Kubo
Block Diagram e- source e- DR e- RTML e- ML e+ source e- BDS e+ BDS e+ ML e+ RTML e+ DR Factor availability of single-tunnel housing out of overall availability.
DRAFT: What have been done and what to do in ILC-LET beam dynamics Beam dynamics/Simulations Group Beijing.
1 Positron Source AD & I Report Jim Clarke ASTeC & Cockcroft Institute Daresbury Laboratory.
LC availability Simulation done for the LC comparison task force Tom Himel SLAC.
Availability studies for SB2009 Focus: relative availability performance of proposed single tunnel schemes (with respect to RDR) – Klystron Cluster – Distributed.
HISTORY OF SNS DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY CHOICES PROJECT X WORKSHOP NOVEMBER 12-13, 2007 R. KUSTOM.
N.Solyak, RTMLLCWS’08, Chicago Nov.16-20, RTML progress 2008 Nikolay Solyak.
Dark Current in ILC Main Linac N.Solyak, A.Sukhanov, I.Tropin ALCW2015, Apr.23, 2015, KEK LCWS'15, Tsukuba, 04/2015Nikolay Solyak1.
S2 Progress Report for EC H. Padamsee and Tom Himel For the S2 Task Force.
21 July 2006, Vancouver Global Design Effort 1 PPS - division into zones and shield wall locations - N. Terunuma KEK.
1 DR 10 Hz Repetition Rate S. Guiducci (LNF) AD&I webex, 23 June 2010.
Frank Stulle, ILC LET Beam Dynamics Meeting CLIC Main Beam RTML - Overview - Comparison to ILC RTML - Status / Outlook.
1 Positron Source Configuration Masao KURIKI ILC AG meeting at KEK, 2006 Jan. Positron Source Configuration KURIKI Masao and John Sheppard  BCD Description.
Baseline Technical Review – Central Region Accelerator Systems
From Beam Dynamics K. Kubo
K. Yokoya CRWG, ECFALC2016, KEK
Multi-bunch Operation for LCLS, LCLS_II, LCLS_2025
Engineering in High Availability
ILC - Upgrades Nick Walker – 100th meeting
MPE-PE Section Meeting
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
ILC Z-pole Calibration Runs Main Linac performance
Availability Task Force Progress Report
Integration Ideas for the Central Region Some old some new
Summary of WG2 :CFS for staging
Staging in the TDR.
AD & I : BDS Lattice Design Changes
Accelerator Physics Technical System Group Review
Cost Comparison of Undulator and e-Driven Systems
Availability and Reliability Issues for the XFEL Tom Himel SLAC/DESY
ILC Cryogenics -- Technical Design Report Planning
Commissioning, Operations, and Reliability Status
Thickness of the Kamaboko Tunnel Shield Wall under Different Assumptions and the Impact on Operations Ewan Paterson LCWS15 Meeting NOV 3, /24/2019.
ILC - Global Design Effort
Super-B Factory in a “4400m” Tunnel
J. Seeman Perugia Super-B Meeting June 2009
Reliability, MPS, Operations and Tuning Work Packages
Presentation transcript:

Availsim runs and questions Tom Himel August 4, 2009

Very Preliminary Results have NOT been thoroughly checked. There are quite a few guesses as to numbers of components. Likely to stay guesses. Just ran out of time.

RDR simulation input deck Did not have central injector (DRs were at low energy ends of linac) Had long e+ transport in linac tunnel, but not long e+ and e- low emittance RTML transport lines Had e+ source at 150 GeV Did not have low P option (had 24 cavities per RF unit) 2 vs 1 tunnel changed almost everything from being accessible with beam on to not in all regions (including DR and BDS)

ILC105: Updated towards RDR and SB2009 Put DRs in single tunnel near the IP Put transport lines from DRs through part of BDS, all of linac to turnaround and then into a single stage bunch compressor. Solyak provided numbers of magnets. Accurate for compressor, scaled from RDR for transport lines. Have used 1 PS per magnet as Solyak said to. (Turn-around bends will have some stringing but he did not say how much.) May have too much MPS, controls, pumps in new sections as copied from an old one. We end up with fewer PPS zones due to the transport lines. Can no longer have people in linac or BDS when beam is in compressor. E+ source is now at 250 GeV point. Guessed at reduced magnet count of high emittance e+ transport which now only goes to near IP instead to low energy end of e+ linac (300->100) Have slightly more tunetimefraction because of extra beamlines Run 5 months then 1 month shutdown

Region definitions, PPS zones Added ability to have each region independently be in one or two tunnels. Note that 0.5% MD is 4 shifts per year.

How often to warm up? In past have done it once per year, fixing all broken items that required warm-up That was probably too often Twice a year is clearly too often, also not sure 1 month down is really long enough.

Repairs during long downtime 6570.00 mainloop: Long shutdown repaired all 1 e- source linac Cavity tuner cavity Cavity tuner cavity 6570.00 mainloop: Long shutdown repaired all 4 e- source linac Cavity piezo tuner cavity Cavity piezo tuner cavity 6570.00 mainloop: Long shutdown repaired all 1 e- compressor Cavity tuner cavity Cavity tuner cavity 6570.00 mainloop: Long shutdown repaired all 1 e- compressor Cavity piezo tuner cavity Cavity piezo tuner cavity 6570.00 mainloop: Long shutdown repaired all 20 e- linac upstream Cavity tuner cavity Cavity tuner cavity 6570.00 mainloop: Long shutdown repaired all 38 e- linac upstream Cavity piezo tuner cavity Cavity piezo tuner cavity 6570.00 mainloop: Long shutdown repaired all 2 e- linac upstream power coupler disc coupler power coupler disc coupler 6570.00 mainloop: Long shutdown repaired all 12 e- linac downstream Cavity tuner cavity Cavity tuner cavity 6570.00 mainloop: Long shutdown repaired all 30 e- linac downstream Cavity piezo tuner cavity Cavity piezo tuner cavity 6570.00 mainloop: Long shutdown repaired all 3 e- linac downstream power coupler disc coupler power coupler disc coupler 6570.00 mainloop: Long shutdown repaired all 1 e+ source e+ linac Cavity piezo tuner cavity Cavity piezo tuner cavity 6570.00 mainloop: Long shutdown repaired all 1 e+ compressor Cavity piezo tuner cavity Cavity piezo tuner cavity 6570.00 mainloop: Long shutdown repaired all 1 e+ linac Cavities cavity Cavities cavity 6570.00 mainloop: Long shutdown repaired all 45 e+ linac Cavity tuner cavity Cavity tuner cavity 6570.00 mainloop: Long shutdown repaired all 66 e+ linac Cavity piezo tuner cavity Cavity piezo tuner cavity 6570.00 mainloop: Long shutdown repaired all 3 e+ linac power coupler disc coupler power coupler disc coupler In 9 month run this is about 1.7 GeV energy loss per linac. MTBF of tuner is 1,000,000 hours, of piezo tuner is 500,000. Lose 31 and 5 MeV.

Availsim results

Compare 2 and 1 tunnel ILC105: 2 tunnel, 21.1% down

Remaining questions Should opportunistic repairs be done? - no Do we want to have scheduled maintenance days? -yes Should we repair things on those days? -yes Including klystrons? – TBD by Ross, Nobu, Fukuda Correct to assume running 5 months followed by 1 month downtime (including recovery)? - yes How should cryogenic repairs be handled? - Akira Are there MTBF changes I should make in advance (e.g ignore flow switches, circuit breakers and what else)? – John Tom needs to fix problem that e- BDS went to 1 tunnel but e- compressor did not.

MTTF/MTTR Improvement Factors