ATom GRIPs project (M. Prather, Mar16) – NEW SLIDES (M. Prather Jul12)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Use of Steam Tables Saturated Vapor or Liquid
Advertisements

Cloud Formation and Stratospheric Dehydration During ATTREX M. Schoeberl, STC L. Pfister and E. Jensen, ARC E. Dessler and T. Wang, TAMU M. Avery, LaRC.
Integrating satellite observations for assessing air quality over North America with GEOS-Chem Mark Parrington, Dylan Jones University of Toronto
Comparisons of TES v002 Nadir Ozone with GEOS-Chem by Ray Nassar & Jennifer Logan Thanks to: Lin Zhang, Inna Megretskaia, Bob Yantosca, Phillipe LeSager,
Tracers in ATTREX: What we learn from CR-AVE, TC- 4, and HIPPO Steve Wofsy Elliot Atlas Presented at the ATTREX Science Team meeting, DFRC 26 Aug 2010.
METO 637 Lesson 13. Air Pollution The Troposphere In the Stratosphere we had high energy photons so that oxygen atoms and ozone dominated the chemistry.
Sensitivity of Methane Lifetime to Sulfate Geoengineering: Results from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) Giovanni Pitari V. Aquila,
BPS - 5th Ed. Chapter 171 Inference about a Population Mean.
Orbit Characteristics and View Angle Effects on the Global Cloud Field
Improved representation of boreal fire emissions for the ICARTT period S. Turquety, D. J. Jacob, J. A. Logan, R. M. Yevich, R. C. Hudman, F. Y. Leung,
Dataset Development within the Surface Processes Group David I. Berry and Elizabeth C. Kent.
Non-hydrostatic Numerical Model Study on Tropical Mesoscale System During SCOUT DARWIN Campaign Wuhu Feng 1 and M.P. Chipperfield 1 IAS, School of Earth.
Figure (a-c). Latitude-height distribution of monthly mean ozone flux for the months of (a) January, (b) April and (c) July averaged over years 2000 to.
GASES.
Model Evaluation Comparing Model Output to Ambient Data Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, California.
For more information about this poster please contact Gerard Devine, School of Earth and Environment, Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT.
Retrieval of Methane Distributions from IASI
INTERCONTINENTAL TRANSPORT OF OZONE AND ITS SEASONAL VARIATIONS IN EUROPE Dick Derwent rdscientific 2 nd ICAP Workshop Chapel Hill, North Carolina October.
BAe-146 GV Global Hawk CAST flight planning and analysis using NAME- Jan-Feb 2013 Neil Harris, Michal Filus, Matt Ashfold, Alistair Manning and John Pyle.
Model evolution of a START08 observed tropospheric intrusion Dalon Stone, Kenneth Bowman, Cameron Homeyer - Texas A&M Laura Pan, Simone Tilmes, Doug Kinnison.
Study of the Atmospheric Degradation, Radiative Forcing and Global Warming Potentials of CH 2 FCH 2 OH, CHF 2 CH 2 OH and CF 3 CH 2 OH S. R. Sellevåg a,
Ozone time series and trends Various groups compute trends in different ways. One goal of the workshop is to be able to compare time series and trends.
Vertical transport of chemical compounds from the surface to the UT/LS: What do we learn from SEAC 4 RS? Qing Liang 1 & Thomas Hanisco 2, Steve Wofsy 3,
Status of MOZART-2 Larry W. Horowitz GFDL/NOAA MOZART Workshop November 29, 2001.
Climatic implications of changes in O 3 Loretta J. Mickley, Daniel J. Jacob Harvard University David Rind Goddard Institute for Space Studies How well.
2007 INTEX Data Meeting The Vertical Distribution of HCl over the Pacific during INTEX-B Saewung Kim, Bob Stickel, Greg Huey, Melody Avery, Jack Dibb,
UTLS Workshop Boulder, Colorado October , 2009 UTLS Workshop Boulder, Colorado October , 2009 Characterizing the Seasonal Variation in Position.
Spatial patterns in the seasonal evolution of ozone and CO as seen by TES, and the effects of the geographically variable a-priori used in the TES retrieval.
GASES. Gases  The physical state of gases is defined by several physical properties  Volume  Temperature  Amount (commonly expressed as number of.
QM2004 Version1 Measurements of the  ->     with PHENIX in Au+Au Collisions at 200 GeV at RHIC PPG016 Figures with Final Approval Charles F. Maguire.
Lecture 7: Bivariate Statistics. 2 Properties of Standard Deviation Variance is just the square of the S.D. If a constant is added to all scores, it has.
OsloCTM2  3D global chemical transport model  Standard tropospheric chemistry/stratospheric chemistry or both. Gas phase chemistry + essential heteorogenous.
CAPACITY User Requirements by Albert P H Goede 7 April 2004, KNMI Objective of Work Package 1000 Definition of User Requirements for Operational Monitoring.
R. Kass/W04 P416 Lec 3 1 Lecture 3 The Gaussian Probability Distribution Function Plot of Gaussian pdf x p(x)p(x) Introduction l The Gaussian probability.
UCI 4 Jan h Quick Look at the NASA Atmospheric Tomography (ATom) Mission: Profiling and Model-Measurement Analysis Michael Prather & the ATom.
Overview of ATom mission objectives
SO254 Introduction to Meteorology
Overview of ATom mission objectives
Summary of t-Test for Testing a Single Population Mean (m)
NASA Atmospheric Tomography Mission:
Meteorological drivers of surface ozone biases in the Southeast US
Workshop on Air Quality Data Analysis and Interpretation
Statistics: The Z score and the normal distribution
A New Tropopause Definition for Use in Chemistry-Transport Models
Model Team Presentations – Science Goals, Model Capabilities
Atmospheric modelling of the Laki eruption
A New Method for Evaluating Regional Air Quality Forecasts
Winds in the Polar Regions from MODIS: Atmospheric Considerations
C. Nolte, T. Spero, P. Dolwick, B. Henderson, R. Pinder
Scientific Measurement
Erin McCabe Alison Gray, Keith Rodgers, Ping Zhai
Real Driving Emission A proposal for a realistic temperature range Bart Degraeuwe 17 November 2018.
Statistical Methods For Engineers
OH KINETICS IN A SHIELDED ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE PLASMA JET
Extratropical stratoshere-troposphere exchange in a 20-km-mesh AGCM
Winter-Quiz- Intermezzo
Vertical transport of surface fire emissions observed from space
大气圈地球化学及其环境效益.
Intercontinental Transport, Hemispheric Pollution,
Asian outflow and chemical evolution of ozone and nitrogen oxides over the Pacific Mathew Evans, Daniel Jacob, Harvard Group, TRACE-P Science Team et al.
American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting
Validation for TPW (PGE06)
Effects of global change on U.S. ozone air quality
Variation of Protonated Ions and H2 as observed by MAVEN NGIMS
Hartmut Bösch and Sarah Dance
Basic Practice of Statistics - 3rd Edition
Essential Statistics Inference about a Population Mean
Measurement Needs for AQ Models
Climatic implications of changes in O3
Presentation transcript:

ATom GRIPs project (M. Prather, Mar16) – NEW SLIDES (M. Prather Jul12) These slides looks at the statistics of the Reactivity of the air parcels as will be measured by ATom. For the Representativeness, see earlier notes and later examples. For now, reactivity is measured as P-O3 (using only the ROO+NO & HO2+NO rates) and L-O3 (using only the three loss rates: O(1D)+H2O and O3+HOx) and L-CH4 (tbd exactly how we best standardize this – currently UCI is doing troposphere only, and using the OH loss freq with a constant 1800 ppb CH4). Results are taken from an ATom slice at 180W of all the air parcels in the UCI CTM run at T319L60. The initial conditions are taken from 0000GMT Jan 16 2005 (exact date and year do not matter) and then integrated for 24 hours without transport or emissions (discussed earlier). Our results are in absolute units (e.g., kg/day or kg) and then scaled to correspond to a 1.0-degree wide slice. Statistics here are for latitude-pressure ‘Boxes’, e.g., 60S to 60N and 0-12 km(approx). The clouds, temperatures and water vapor change as per our met fields for the following 24 hours. For an ATom slice with Box = 60S-60N x 0-12km, we have about 27 x 212 = 5724 air parcels. These are now sorted by NOx (or H2O2 or...) abundance in ppt and put into 10 bins per decade (i.e., 30 bins from 1 to 1000 ppt covers all NOx in our simulation.) We then recalculate the Reactivity in response to 10% or absolute ppt increase in NOx and H2O2 (with additional 24-hour simulations). The 10% tells us if additions have a linear impact back to zero, and the absolute increases (+10 ppt) give us an idea of how addtional pollution may impact the integrated reactivity.

pair of CO & NOx the scale is normalized such that a uniform From the models we want a single, core data set for each model for the ~16 Aug simulations with floating point values in 4-D (see list of quantities below): (I=longitude grid, J=latitude grid, K = model layer from 0 to 13 km or so, N = species index below) This allows us to sub-sample and test for a range of issues across the models.  This is obviously set for netcdf.  For our high resolution model (~ 0.5 deg) we have about 160 x106 quantities, can cut a bit by 60S-60N limits (probably need some latitude range).  I would suggest all longitudes at this time. This is a manageable/transferable data set for us to start comparisons.  The attached plots are typical     1) we digitize all mole fraction to 20 per decade from 0.1 ppt to 1 ppm (index M=1,140)             values below 0.1 are given M=1 and above 1000000 ppt are given M=140     2) we plot tracer-tracer correlations (CO_NOx in attached plots) as density plots where the relative density in each box = amount of air mass (moles) with that pair of CO & NOx the scale is normalized such that a uniform 1 decade by 1 decade would have values = 1     3) we can pick different pairs of interest     4) we also plot the total P-O3, L-O3, L-CH4 in a parallel density plot (ppb/day x air mass) to show where the activity lies.     5) we need to come up with a log-scale color bar I think.

N = Index for gird-box Quantities:. 1 Air in each cell (moles) N = Index for gird-box Quantities: 1    Air in each cell (moles) 2   Strat-trop tracer (e90, O3, or PV or diag to split strat-trop cells, also give the edge value) Tracer Species: (all in mole fraction) 3    O3           4    NOx = NO+NO2 5   HONO2        6   HO2NO2 7   C2H3NO5 = PAN 8   RONO2   (if any)      9   H2O2      10   CH3OOH       11   HCHO        12  C2H5OOH     13  CH3CHO  = acetaldehyde 14  CH3CO3   = peroxyacetyl radical (?important)    15  C3H6O = acetone 16  CO 17   C2H6       18   Alkane (>C2)  19  Alkene       20  C5H8 = Isoprene  Derived Products (mole fraction / day) 21 L-CH4 (OH+CH4, but scale to 1800 ppb CH4, so get OH*k) 22  P-O3 (HO2/RO2 + NO only) 23 L-O3 (O1d+H2O, OH+O3, HO2+O3 only) 24 ?? dO3/dt (actual daily change in O3, a checksum for missing terms in P & L)

60S-60N x 0-12km x 1°(@180W) Jan16 sorted by NOx NOx (and all other species) are sorted by abundance with 10 bins per decade. In case, all of the air mass (Peta-moles) in the 1° wide tomographic slice has NOx between 2 and 400 ppt. Most is 30-100 ppt range, but there is a second peak at 4 ppt. NB – the low-NOx air mass is probably tropical lower trop, and this could be readily pulled out if we take a different ‘box’, like 24S-24N x surf-800hPa. Another look plots the total amount NOx in the slice (Kilo-moles) and of course most of it lies at the higher abundances, peaking about 60-70 ppt.

60S-60N x 0-12km x 1°(@180W) Jan16 sorted by NOx The 3 Reactivities (Mega-moles/day) are then plotted as a function of NOx. Note that LCH4 is multiplied by 2 so that its similarity with LO3 is more apparent. PO3 peaks with the high-NOx air masses. The low-NOx (4 ppt) is important for LCH4 and LO3. should read: LCH4 x 2 (Mmol/d)

60S-60N x 0-12km x 1°(@180W) Jan16 sorted by NOx Test for NOx and H2O2 linearity: Recalculate reactivity with 1.1*NOx and 1.1*H2O2. Scale these up assuming linearity. PO3(lin-NOx) = [PO3(1.1*NOx) – PO3(std)] x 10 i.e., how well does dPO3/dNOx ~ PO3/NOx ? NOx almost linearly drives PO3, has no impact on LO3, but some impact on LCH4

60S-60N x 0-12km x 1°(@180W) Jan16 sorted by NOx Test for NOx and H2O2 absolute errors: Recalculate with +10 ppt NOx in all air parcels and separately with +100 ppt H2O2. dPO3(+10 ppt-NOx) = PO3(+10 ppt-NOx) – PO3(std) Which air parcels are most sensitive to additional NOx or H2O2 or ???. Also allows for estimate of the source of model-model differences.

24S-24N x 2-8km x 1°(@180W) Jan16 sorted by H2O2 H2O2 sorted in smaller domain: mid-trop in tropics. mode peak mass = 550 ppt, max = 2 ppb

24S-24N x 2-8km x 1°(@180W) Jan16 sorted by H2O2 H2O2 sorted in smaller domain: mid-trop in tropics.

24S-24N x 2-8km x 1°(@180W) Jan16 sorted by H2O2 H2O2 sorted in smaller domain: mid-trop in tropics.

Reactivity summary tables for our 1°-wide Box: 60S-60N x 0-12km x 1°(@180W) Jan16 sorted by NOx   std lin-NOx lin-H2O2 +10 ppt NOx +20ppt / 2 +100ppt H2O2 +200ppt / 2 air (Pmol) 336.3 NOx (Mmol) 13.7 PO3 (Mmol/d) 464.8 276.4 21.9 103.9 100.1 9.8 9.2 LO3 (Mmol/d) 575.7 25.8 17.3 11.9 11.2 4.5 4.4 LCH4 (Mmol/d) 254.2 36.3 14.2 15.4 15.1 3.2 3.1 24S-24N x 2-8km x 1°(@180W) Jan16 sorted by H2O2   std lin-NOx lin-H2O2 +10 ppt NOx +20ppt / 2 +100ppt H2O2 +200ppt / 2 air (Pmol) 90.1 H2O2 (Mmol) 58.9 PO3 (Mmol/d) 175.5 7.4 1.7 LO3 (Mmol/d) 228.2 7.0 1.3 LCH4 (Mmol/d) 94.6 5.3 1.9

Joint PDFs for global (60-60, 0-12km) vs tropical Pacific (20-20, 0-12km) Example of NOx x CO, plotting relative amount of total in log-log pixels ½ - 12

Joint PDFs for global (60-60, 0-12km) vs tropical Pacific (20-20, 0-12km) Example of NOx x CO, plotting relative amount of total in log-log pixels overflow, >1,000 ppb ½ - 12

Joint PDFs for global (60-60, 0-12km) vs tropical Pacific (20-20, 0-12km) Example of NOx x CO, plotting relative amount of total in log-log pixels ½ - 12

Joint PDFs for global (60-60, 0-12km) vs tropical Pacific (20-20, 0-12km) Example of NOx x CO, plotting relative amount of total in log-log pixels ½ - 12 0.78 ppb/day 1.01 ppb/day

Joint PDFs for L-O3 vs L-CH4 Example of NOx x CO, plotting relative amount of total in log-log pixels ½ - 12

Joint PDFs for L-O3 vs L-CH4 Example of NOx x CO, plotting relative amount of total in log-log pixels ½ - 12 1.01 ppb/day

One critical ATom measurement is the production of O3 (P-O3) in the 30-sec air parcels. Below is a model sampling of the ATom Pacific flights in January. We select a NOx measurement threshold of 14 ppt since 90% of the O3 is produced in air parcels with NOx > 14 ppt. > 14 ppt = 90% of P-O3 Note that in terms of total air mass, about 28% has NOx < 14 ppt, but the reactivity in these parcels is not sensitive to the NOx levels, and hence a measured upper limit is adequate.