Informational Needs During Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Patient-reported Measures: KCCQ and CHF outcomes Aanand D. Naik, MD Houston Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence.
Advertisements

Supported by grants from: National Human Genome Research Institute (ELSI) HG/AG (The REVEAL Study); National Institute on Aging AG (The MIRAGE.
Title Patient Patient Advisory CouncilAdvisory Council Patient Advisory Council.
® Introduction Low Back Pain and Physical Function Among Different Ethnicities Adelle A Safo, Sarah Holder DO, Sandra Burge PhD The University of Texas.
Prostate Needle Biopsy: The Pitfalls and the Role of the Pathologist – Patient Track Prostate Cancer Symposium “Intriguing Cases / Emerging Strategies.
Electronic Medical Record Use and the Quality of Care in Physician Offices National Conference on Health Statistics August 17, 2010 Chun-Ju (Janey) Hsiao,
Help! I’m On James A Colbert MD Newton-Wellesley Hospital Brigham & Women’s Hospital Bradley H Crotty MD MPH FACP Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.
Driving the Transition to Individualized Cancer Treatment by Addressing Critical Questions 1 Do I need surgery? chemotherapy? radiation? INVASIVE BREAST.
1 Rachel Torres, MPH, CHES Department of Health & Behavior Studies Teachers College, Columbia University Relationships between Health Literacy, Self- efficacy.
1 Evidence and the next stage of health care reform: Why consumer engagement is so important Steven D. Pearson, MD, MSc President, Institute for Clinical.
Darren A. DeWalt, MD, MPH Division of General Internal Medicine Maihan B. Vu, Dr.PH, MPH Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention University.
Self-reported cognitive and emotional effects and lifestyle changes shortly after preventive cardiovascular consultations in general practice Dea Kehler.
Silent Voice Survey A survey of prostate cancer patients in Europe OVERVIEW OF RESULTS.
Routine PSA: Evaluating the Evidence Sheldon Greenfield, MD Health Policy Research Institute University of California, Irvine October 23, 2012.
Evaluating a Research Report
1 Measurement Challenges in Reducing Disparities in Health Care Sheldon Greenfield, MD Executive Director University of California, Irvine Center for Health.
Prostate Cancer Coalition of NC A statewide collaborative effort by concerned organizations and individuals to support awareness, early detection, and.
The Implications of Health Literacy for Customer-Centered Health Communication and Marketing Cynthia Baur, Ph.D. National Center for Health Marketing Centers.
Unit 10b: HIT and Aspects of Patient-Centered Care Component 7 – Working with HIT Systems This material was developed by Johns Hopkins University, funded.
Promoting Patient Involvement in Medication Decisions David H. Hickam, MD, MPH Professor, Dept. of Medicine Oregon Health & Science University Portland,
From EBM to SDM: Michel Labrecque MD PhD Michel Cauchon MD Department of Family and Emergency Medicine Université Laval Teaching how to apply evidence.
The Interface between Primary Care and Specialty Care in Primary Treatment of Cancer Jonathan Sussman Supportive Cancer Care Research Unit Laura-Mae Baldwin.
Motivation to Quit Smoking Among Relatives of Lung Cancer Patients Ellen J. Hahn, DNS, RN Mary Kay Rayens, PhD Jennifer Hatcher, RN, PhD Mei Zhang, MPH,
Background References Conclusions and Future Directions Acknowledgements Results The United States spends more money on healthcare than all other industrialized.
Actualizing The EHR Implications For Residency Training.
Literacy, Knowledge, Health Beliefs, and Self-efficacy among Urban, Low-income, Obese African American Women Feleta L. Wilson, PhD, RN 1 May T. Dobal,
Results Conclusions Students had positive views of statements in the interprofessional teamwork and team-based practice and patient outcomes from collaborative.
From EBM to SDM: Michel Labrecque MD PhD Michel Cauchon MD Department of Family and Emergency Medicine Université Laval Teaching how to apply evidence.
Project funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Through interpreters’ eyes: roles in the clinical encounter Ellen Rosenberg, MD Yvan Leanza,
Program overview Special arrangement with Cleveland Clinic for access to electronic second opinions through their MyConsult Online Medical Second Opinion.
Family Web Study Can online communication from health professionals help families at increased risk of bowel cancer to share information? Selina Goodman.
Omega Best Cancer Hospital - India
Primary Care Research: An Introduction (To Some Really Important Concepts) John B. Schorling, M.D., M.P.H. Professor of Medicine and Public Heath Sciences.
DATA COLLECTION METHODS IN NURSING RESEARCH
Disparities in Chronic Disease Management and Prevention: Findings from the 2006 National Healthcare Quality Report Authors: Anika Hines, MPH; Karen Ho,
Not your parent’s health care: Adolescent perspectives on patient-centered care April 27, 2015 Elizabeth Uy-Smith1 MD MPH MAS Hayley Lofink Love2 PhD.
Evaluation of new medical school curricula: identifying and treating
Quality of Physician-Patient Communication during Hospitalization
Understanding Your Role
Group 7 Hospital Readmission Predictive Analytics
UCSF Fresno Family and Community Medicine Dept.
Tope Osiyemi, PharmD; Kristina Bundra, PharmD; Sonie Lama, PharmD.
Optimal Ways to learn about and communicate Evidence Based Medicine
Mahsa Parviz, BS1 and Jennifer K. Cheng, MD, MPH1
Rachel Bramson, MD, MS Scott and White Clinic, College Station, Texas
How Patients Discuss Their Risk: Words and Numbers
Presentation for the SCTR Scientific Retreat on Aging Related Research
Lisa Weiss, M.D. Brian F. Pendleton, Ph.D. Susan Labuda Schrop, M.S.
Veterans’ Preferences for Proactive Outreach
Information networks: Is the public ready?
What Are Clinical Trials?
Maya B. Mathur Castilleja School, Palo Alto, CA
Public Health Implications
Building a Physician Led Prostate Cancer Quality Improvement Regional Collaborative Christopher Foote DO1; Claudette Fonshell RN, BSN2; Thomas Guzzo MD3,
Participant Characteristics
Transition The planning required to live your best life
S1316 analysis details Garnet Anderson Katie Arnold
Jennifer Bryer PhD, RN, CNE Virginia Peterson-Graziose DNP, RN, CNE
Shannon Phillips, PhD, RN
Compensation Disparities by Gender in Internal Medicine
Friends of Cancer Research
Volume 72, Issue 6, Pages (December 2017)
Physical and Psychological Sequelae of Breast Cancer in Men
Hepatitis B Vaccination Assessment Adults Aged Years National Health Interview Survey, 2000 Gary L. Euler, DrPH1, Hussain Yusuf, MBBS2, Shannon.
Active Surveillance for Low Risk Prostate Cancer
LITERATURE REVIEW by Moazzam Ali.
Evaluating AETC NCRC Partnerships for Impact
Assessing Self-Reporting Statuses of Mother’s and Child’s Weights
The National Data Guardian review & Government response
Are School Wellness Policies Associated with Weight
Presentation transcript:

Informational Needs During Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: A Qualitative Study Stacy Loeb MD MSc, Caitlin Curnyn MPH, Angela Fagerlin PhD, Scott Braithwaite MD MSc, Mark D. Schwartz MD, Herbert Lepor MD, H. Ballentine Carter MD, Erica Sedlander MPH 1. INTRODUCTION 4. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Active surveillance (AS) is an important strategy to reduce overtreatment of low-risk prostate cancer Objective: to understand informational needs during AS for prostate cancer from the perspectives of both patients and providers Features and Characteristics of Informational Resources “We really need a reliable source of information on a website that’s very carefully controlled and agreed upon by multiple specialties. I really think you need a multidisciplinary group that’s out there putting out good information.” - Provider Topics for Informational Resources “Or that red meat is directly associated with prostate cancer, or this food, or this lifestyle, or this activity, or whatever it is. You know? That to me is valuable information” - Patient Definition and explanation of AS Frequency of follow-up testing Types of monitoring tests and interpretation of results Biopsy features (e.g. Gleason score) Predictive tools (e.g. nomograms) Research updates Lifestyle (diet, exercise and alternative medicine) Treatment options if cancer progresses Trusted and vetted by professional organizations No industry bias Multidisciplinary Data security and confidentiality Multiple formats/mediums (e.g. paper and web-based) Resources for family and friends Interaction with other patients Appropriate literacy and numeracy “The healthcare literacy of the bulk of my patients is an issue in terms of our ability to counsel them and help them to understand their disease process. A lot of patients don't even know what a prostate is, let alone understand what the implications of prostate care are.” - Provider “There’s a lot of jargon, and it’s putting all the pieces together. Remembering what the Gleason score is. All I remember is that it exists and a higher number is bad.” - Patient 2. METHODS Identified patients on AS through an electronic health record query Purposively sampled physicians with a range of clinical expertise from across the U.S. All participants completed a demographic survey and patients filled out 2 health utilities Qualitative study data analyzed using applied thematic analysis Perceptions of Gleason Grading Health State Utilities Significant confusion about traditional Gleason scores Patients presented with new grade group classification system 84% agreed it is clearer using a scale of 1-5 instead of 6-10 80% more comfortable with AS for grade group 1 vs “Gleason 6” Gleason Score Grade Group ≤6 1 3+4=7 2 4+3=7 3 8 4 9-10 5 General high quality of life among AS patients EQ-5D-3L (3 items) measures general health utilities and PORPUS (10 items) is prostate cancer-specific Mean EQ-5D: 0.90 ±1.6 Mean PORPUS: 0.98 ±0.03 Correlation: 0.87 (p<0.0001) 3. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING 7 focus groups with 37 patients on AS From NYU and VA Hospital Median age: 66 (range, 48-84) 65% white, 30% black, 2% other 65% had at least 4-year degree In-depth interviews with 24 physicians who manage men on AS 83% urologist, 13% radiation oncologist, 4% naturopathic doctor Median years in practice: 10 (range, 1-40) 5.CONCLUSIONS While patients on AS experience a relatively high quality of life, there are many gaps in current informational resources Gleason grading is a major source of confusion and the new grade group classification may improve patient counseling Patients also sought additional information on testing options and interpretation, research updates and lifestyle recommendations Optimal resources should be unbiased, multidisciplinary and available in multiple formats These results are useful to inform the design of educational materials and decision support tools for AS This study was supported by the Prostate Cancer Foundation, the Edward Blank and Sharon Cosloy-Blank Family Foundation, The Gertrude and Louis Feil Family, the New York State Department of Health (#105879), The Laura and Isaac Perlmutter NYU Cancer Center (P30CA016087), and the National Institutes of Health (K07CA178258). For more information, contact Stacy Loeb (stacyloeb@gmail.com)