Where are we in Integrated modeling? S. Jardin Mature 1½ D evolution code packages exist with reduced modules for most processes –Japan: BPSI: (TASK, TOPICS)

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

EXTENDED MHD MODELING: BACKGROUND, STATUS AND VISION

Advertisements

Magnetic Relaxation in MST S. Prager University of Wisconsin and CMSO.

EXTENDED MHD SIMULATIONS: VISION AND STATUS D. D. Schnack and the NIMROD and M3D Teams Center for Extended Magnetohydrodynamic Modeling PSACI/SciDAC.

Physics Basis of FIRE Next Step Burning Plasma Experiment Charles Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory U.S.-Japan Workshop on Fusion Power Plant.

Extension of IEA Implementing Agreement on Large Tokamak Facilities Presented to Committee on Energy Research Technologies October 18-19, 2005 Paris, France.

ASSOCIATION EURATOM HELLENIC REPUBLIC (and CYPRUS) (HELLAS) FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-HELLAS NATIONAL CENTRE FOR SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH “DEMOKRITOS”

Korean Modeling Effort : C2 Code J.M. Park NFRC/ORNL In collaboration with Sun Hee Kim, Ki Min Kim, Hyun-Sun Han, Sang Hee Hong Seoul National University.

The Swiss Association vision for the period Presented by M. Q. Tran on behalf of the CRPP.

6 th ITPA MHD Topical Group Meeting combined with W60 IEA Workshop on Burning Plasmas Session II MHD Stability and Fast Particle Confinement General scope.

An Introduction to WGOMD Stephen Griffies NOAA/GFDL/Princeton USA Working Group for Ocean Model Development (WGOMD) Presentation to WGOMD 25 August 2007.

Exploration of Fusion Plasmas Using Integrated Simulations Jill Dahlburg, Naval Research Laboratory Presented by Dale Meade, Princeton University With.

European Taskforce on Integrated Tokamak Modelling A Brief Overview Oak Ridge, June 7 Joint ORNL/Indiana University Workshop.

Anomalous Transport Models Glenn Bateman Lehigh University Physics Department Bethlehem, PA SWIM Workshop Toward an Integrated Fusion Simulation Bloomington,

Progress & plans for advanced components Xianzhu Tang On behalf of the FSP component team & FSP management team.

The SWIM Fast MHD Campaign Presented by S. C. Jardin Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory P.O. Box 451 Princeton, NJ Simulation of Wave Interaction.

D. McCune 1 Plasma State Representation XPLASMA – Tool for Representation of Equilibrium, Fields and Profiles Available at:

Nonlinear Frequency Chirping of Alfven Eigenmode in Toroidal Plasmas Huasen Zhang 1,2 1 Fusion Simulation Center, Peking University, Beijing , China.

Association EURATOM-Belgian State LPP-ERM/KMS SCK-CEN ULB M.Van Schoor, V.Massaut, D.Carati.

Overview of MHD and extended MHD simulations of fusion plasmas Guo-Yong Fu Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Princeton, New Jersey, USA Workshop on ITER.

Hybrid Simulations of Energetic Particle-driven Instabilities in Toroidal Plasmas Guo-Yong Fu In collaboration with J. Breslau, J. Chen, E. Fredrickson,

TH/7-2 Radial Localization of Alfven Eigenmodes and Zonal Field Generation Z. Lin University of California, Irvine Fusion Simulation Center, Peking University.

Database structure for the European Integrated Tokamak Modelling Task Force F. Imbeaux On behalf of the Data Coordination Project.

Particle Distribution Modification by TAE mode and Resonant Particle Orbits POSTECH 1, NFRI 1,2 M.H.Woo 1, C.M.Ryu 1, T.N.Rhee 1,,2.

Status and Plans Transport Model Validation in ITER-similar Current-Ramp Plasmas D. R. Mikkelsen, PPPL ITPA Transport & Confinement Workshop San Diego.

Integrated Modeling and Simulations of ITER Burning Plasma Scenarios C. E. Kessel, R. V. Budny, K. Indireshkumar, D. Meade Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory.

Discussions and Summary for Session 1 ‘Transport and Confinement in Burning Plasmas’ Yukitoshi MIURA JAERI Naka IEA Large Tokamak Workshop (W60) Burning.

The european ITM Task Force data structure F. Imbeaux.

D.P. BRENNAN DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS AND ENGINEERING PHYSICS THE UNIVERSITY OF TULSA PRESENTED AT THE HPC USER FORUM HOUSTON, TEXAS WEDNESDAY, APRIL 6, 2011.

PTRANSP Predictive TRANSP Code Plans and Progress Presented by Glenn Bateman Lehigh University On behalf of the PTRANSP collaboration involving: General.

Computational Plasma Physics: Examples from Turbulence Research W Dorland University of Maryland With images from: W M NevinsD Applegate G W HammettG D.

The Dialogue Between the Science of Turbulence and Transport and a Burning Plasma Experiment E.J. Synakowski Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory December.

TRANSP Needs for Physics Modules R. J. Hawryluk TRANSP Users Group Meeting March 24, 2015.

LH Meeting, Prague 17 December, Integrated Predictive Modelling at JET V. Parail, G. Corrigan, D. Heading, J. Spence, P. Belo, G. Huysmans, F. Imbeaux,

ITPA Meeting, PPPL, April, y1999: two core and two SOL transport codes with about 15 users, who worked locally at JET; y2000: Secondees from.

Towards Comprehensive Simulation of Fusion Plasmas Stephen C. Jardin Princeton University Plasma Physics Laboratory P.O. Box 451, Princeton, NJ Oct.

Global Stability Issues for a Next Step Burning Plasma Experiment UFA Burning Plasma Workshop Austin, Texas December 11, 2000 S. C. Jardin with input from.

Integrated Modeling for Burning Plasmas Workshop (W60) on “Burning Plasma Physics and Simulation 4-5 July 2005, University Campus, Tarragona, Spain Under.

Hinode 7, Takayama, Japan, th November, 2013 Solar Cycle Predictions Recent Advances in Modeling and Observations Dibyendu Nandy Center for Excellence.

D. McCune 1 PTRANSP Predictive Upgrades for TRANSP.

B WEYSSOW 2009 Coordinated research activities under European Fusion Development Agreement (addressing fuelling) Boris Weyssow EFDA-CSU Garching ITPA 2009.

Summary CDBM IMAGE meeting, 07 IMAGE SUMMARY IMAGE set up to provide a venue for discussion between the different Integrated Modelling (IM) activities.

Comprehensive ITER Approach to Burn L. P. Ku, S. Jardin, C. Kessel, D. McCune Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory SWIM Project Meeting Oct , 2007.

1 A Proposal for a SWIM Slow-MHD 3D Coupled Calculation of the Sawtooth Cycle in the Presence of Energetic Particles Josh Breslau Guo-Yong Fu S. C. Jardin.

TRANSP for core particle transport studies M. Maslov.

Steady State Discharge Modeling for KSTAR C. Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory US-Korea Workshop - KSTAR Collaborations, 5/19-20/2004.

Physics Analysis and Flexibility Issues for FIRE NSO PAC-2 Meeting January 17-18, 2001 S. C. Jardin with input from C.Kessel, J.Mandrekas, D.Meade, and.

Presented by High Performance Computing in Magnetic Fusion Energy Research Donald B. Batchelor RF Theory Plasma Theory Group Fusion Energy Division.

Moving fast in fusion reactors: ASCOT – race track for fast ions

IMP3 1 RITM – code Computation with stiff transport models presented by D.Kalupin 12th Meeting of the ITPA Transport Physics (TP) Topical Group 7-10 May.

Integrated Modeling for Burning Plasmas Workshop (W60) on “Burning Plasma Physics and Simulation 4-5 July 2005, University Campus, Tarragona, Spain Under.

BOUT++ Towards an MHD Simulation of ELMs B. Dudson and H.R. Wilson Department of Physics, University of York M.Umansky and X.Xu Lawrence Livermore National.

Center for Extended MHD Modeling (PI: S. Jardin, PPPL) –Two extensively developed fully 3-D nonlinear MHD codes, NIMROD and M3D formed the basis for further.

ITPA CDB&M and TP Topical Group Meetings, Lausanne, 7-10 May D Campbell ITER International Organization Acknowledgements: W Houlberg, V Mukhovatov,

Simulations of Energetic Particle Modes In Spherical Torus G.Y. Fu, J. Breslau, J. Chen, E. Fredrickson, S. Jardin, W. Park Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory.

Nonlinear Simulations of Energetic Particle-driven Modes in Tokamaks Guoyong Fu Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Princeton, NJ, USA In collaboration.

NSTX Meeting name – abbreviated presentation title, abbreviated author name (??/??/20??) Goals of NSTX Advanced Scenario and Control TSG Study, implement,

Integrated Plasma Simulations C. E. Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Workshop Toward an Integrated Plasma Simulation Oak Ridge, TN November 7-9,

Energetic Particles Interaction with the Non-resonant Internal Kink in Spherical Tokamaks Feng Wang*, G.Y. Fu**, J.A. Breslau**, E.D. Fredrickson**, J.Y.

NSTX-U Waves & Energetic Particles Theory/Experiment Joint Research Topics Supported by Gary Taylor Mario Podestà Nikolai Gorelenkov NSTX-U NSTX-U Theory.

6 th ITPA MHD Topical Group Meeting combined with W60 IEA Workshop on Burning Plasmas Summary Session II MHD Stability and Fast Particle Confinement chaired.

Long Pulse High Performance Plasma Scenario Development for NSTX C. Kessel and S. Kaye - providing TRANSP runs of specific discharges S.

VNC: Application of Physics and Systems Science methodologies to Forecasting of the Radiation Belt Electron Environment S. N. Walker1, M. A. Balikhin1,

Field-Particle Correlation Experiments on DIII-D Frontiers Science Proposal Under weakly collisional conditions, collisionless interactions between electromagnetic.

J. Menard for the MHD Science Focus Group Tuesday, November 22, 2005

Current-Hole Experiments have been performed on JET and JT-60

Plasma Wall Interaction Panel-Potential Thrusts

Forecast Verification

Simulations of energetic particle driven instabilities and fast particle redistribution in EAST tokamak Fishbone simulation by M3D-K: The simulation results.

Integrated Modeling for Burning Plasmas

No ELM, Small ELM and Large ELM Strawman Scenarios

Presentation transcript:

Where are we in Integrated modeling? S. Jardin Mature 1½ D evolution code packages exist with reduced modules for most processes –Japan: BPSI: (TASK, TOPICS) – EU: Integrated Tokamak Modeling Task Force, JET initiative (ASTRA,CRONOS,JETTO,RITM), DINA/CRONOS coupling – US: NTCC-PTRANSP, TSC/TRANSP, BALDUR, ONETWO, CORSICA More fundamental physics models exist in most areas: – 5D Gyrokinetics – Nonlinear Extended MHD with energetic particle effects – Full wave RF codes coupled with Fokker-Plank solvers – Edge/PSI codes

Where do we want to go ? Hierarchy of codes with range of speed/physics – Reliable validated transport-timescale code packages with improved modules for all processes with reliable ranges of validity Improved fundamental first principles nonlinear models that can quantitatively reproduce existing experimental results and future regimes – Coupled fundamental models to examine strongly interacting physics issues RF stabilization of MHD turbulence effects on MHD modes core/edge/materials coupling ….. Code Applications Experimental preparation Very fast codes for real time forecasting and control Post-discharge analysis

How do we get there ? Encourage each of the parties to continue their modeling projects – Improve documentation and standards – Interact with Computer Science and math communities – Periodic workshops devoted to comparative modeling and developing international standards Increased emphasis on Verification and Validation at all levels – individual physics modules – entire reduced model code predictions – first principles codes Standardized discharges for comparative analysis Effort requires continued support and recognition by funding agencies