Preliminary injector linac design

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Capture Section Design for the CLIC Positron Source A. VIVOLI* Thanks to: L. RINOLFI (CERN) R. CHEHAB (IPNL & LAL / IN2P3-CNRS) O. DADOUN, P. LEPERCQ,
Advertisements

Ion Accelerator Complex for MEIC January 28, 2010.
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, MW AGS proton driver (M.J. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas,
Beam loading compensation 300Hz positron generation (Hardware Upgrade ??? Due to present Budget problem) LCWS2013 at Tokyo Uni., Nov KEK, Junji.
CLIC Drive Beam Linac Rolf Wegner. Outline Introduction: CLIC Drive Beam Concept Drive Beam Modules (modulator, klystron, accelerating structure) Optimisation.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
SRF Results and Requirements Internal MLC Review Matthias Liepe1.
1 C-Band Linac Development Satoshi Ohsawa 2004.Feb.19LCPAC.
Preliminary design of SPPC RF system Jianping DAI 2015/09/11 The CEPC-SppC Study Group Meeting, Sept. 11~12, IHEP.
Photocathode 1.5 (1, 3.5) cell superconducting RF gun with electric and magnetic RF focusing Transversal normalized rms emittance (no thermal emittance)
Electron Source Configuration Axel Brachmann - SLAC - Jan , KEK GDE meeting International Linear Collider at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
PROTON LINAC FOR INDIAN SNS Vinod Bharadwaj, SLAC (reporting for the Indian SNS Design Team)
CLARA Gun Cavity Optimisation NVEC 05/06/2014 P. Goudket G. Burt, L. Cowie, J. McKenzie, B. Militsyn.
RF scheme of electron linear accelerator with energy MeV Levichev A.E. Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS.
Review 09/2010 page RF System for Electron Collider Ring Haipeng Wang for the team of R. Rimmer and F. Marhauser, SRF Institute and Y. Zhang, G. Krafft.
Bunch Separation with RF Deflectors D. Rubin,R.Helms Cornell University.
1 Historical overview Moscow Mechanical Institute was founded in The main purpose of foundation – training of researchers and engineers for USSR.
LINAC4 and the Upgrade of the LHC Injector Complex R. Garoby 26 February, 2013.
P I T Z Photo Injector Test Facility Zeuthen Design consideration of the RF deflector to optimize the photo injector at PITZ S.Korepanov.
S. Bettoni, R. Corsini, A. Vivoli (CERN) CLIC drive beam injector design.
Page 1 Polarized Electron Sources for Linear Colliders October, 2010 A. Brachmann, J. C. Sheppard, F. Zhou SLAC SLAC October 18-22, 2010.
Helical Accelerating Structure with Controllable Beam Emittance S.V. Kuzikov 1, A.A. Vikharev 1, J.L. Hirshfield 2,3 1 Institute of Applied Physics RAS,
C/S band RF deflector for post interaction longitudinal phase space optimization (D. Alesini)
ALBA RF Systems Francis Perez.
Main Technical Issues of theSuper B Injector Main Technical Issues of the Super B Injector SuperB Meeting, Isola d’Elba, May 31st – June 3rd, 2008 D. Alesini,
X-band Based FEL proposal
Feasibility and R&D Needed For A TeV Class HEP e+e- Collider Based on AWA Technology Chunguang Jing for Accelerator R&D Group, HEP Division, ANL Aug
Advancements on RF systems D. Alesini (LNF-INFN) Quinto Meeting Generale Collaborazione LI2FE, Frascati 15-16/03/2011.
A CW Linac scheme for CLIC drive beam acceleration. Hao Zha, Alexej Grudiev 07/06/2016.
Status of the sub-harmonic bunching system for the CLIC DB injector front end Hamed Shaker School of Particles and Accelerators, Institute for Research.
HOMs in high-energy part of the Project-X linac. V. Yakovlev, N. Solyak, J.-F. Ostiguy Friday 26 June 2009.
An Electron source for PERLE
S.M. Polozov & Ko., NRNU MEPhI
Multi-bunch Operation for LCLS, LCLS_II, LCLS_2025
Preliminary result of FCC positron source simulation Pavel MARTYSHKIN
Abstract EuSPARC and EuPRAXIA projects
Development of X-band 50MW klystron in BVERI
Status and prospects of VEPP-5 Injection Complex
Status of the CLIC main beam injectors
NC Accelerator Structures
INJECTION SYSTEM UPDATE
Brief Review of Microwave Dielectric Accelerators
CEPC injector high field S-band accelerating structure design and R&D
A. Plastun¹, B. Mustapha, Z. Conway and P. Ostroumov
High Efficiency X-band Klystron Design Study
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
Bunch Separation with RF Deflectors
Superbeams with SPL at CERN
Injection facility for Novosibirsk Super Charm Tau Factory
Few Slides from RF Deflector Developments and Applications at SLAC
SuperB project. Injection scheme design status
Operational Experience with the Cornell ERL Injector SRF Cavities
CEPC RF Power Sources System
ERL Main-Linac Cryomodule
CLIC source update CLIC main beam injectors reminder
S-band RF gun based on new type accelerating structure
Capture and Transmission of polarized positrons from a Compton Scheme
Electron Source Configuration
Status of the CLIC Injector studies
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
Injector: What is needed to improve the beam quality?
CEPC Injector positron source
Pulsed Ion Linac for EIC
ATF project meeting, Feb KEK, Junji Urakawa Contents :
Electron sources for FCC-ee
Physics Design on Injector I
Accelerator Physics Particle Acceleration
ERL Director’s Review Main Linac
小型X線源の性能確認実験計画 高輝度・RF電子銃研究会 広島大学 高エネルギー加速器研究機構 浦川順治
Multi-Ion Injector Linac Design – Progress Summary
Presentation transcript:

Preliminary injector linac design M.V. Lalayan, S.M. Polozov, N.P. Sobenin, T.V. Bondarenko National Research Nuclear University – Moscow Engineering Physics Institute FCC Meeting May 11-15 2016, Rome

Beam parameters and general linac layout (preliminary); Beam dynamics in RF-gun; Beam dynamics in regular section; RF-gun electrodynamics simulations. ED of regular section incl. 2000 and 3000 MHz comparison. General results and discussion. Technology and other possible MEPhI activities

Beam parameters and general linac layout (preliminary) Base injection parameters: Intensity up to 4·1013 e-/s; 4·1010 e- / bunch, 10 ps bunches, 10 bunches per pulse, bunches are separated with distance 25 or 50 ns (very good, decreases beam loading influence), up to 100 Hz pulse repetition rate; Record space charge domination!!! About 6 nC per bunch We preliminary discuss two operating frequencies: traditional 3000 MHz and novel 2000 MHz which gives brilliant matching with 400 MHz accelerating cavities proposed for booster. Both give 25 (50) ns bunches separation easily. It gives (for 10 ps laser pulse): 3000 MHz 2000 MHz RF period ~330 ps 500 ps Bunch phase length 10 degree 6.7 degree Physical bunch length (theoretically) 3 mm 5 mm Current pulse duration (10 bunches per pulse) 25 or 50 ns ???

Beam parameters and general linac layout (preliminary) We study two scenarios: high, but not extreme bunch charge as 200-300 pC to define general structure layout and further to design a RF gun for extreme 6 nC (step-by step, starting with 1 nC). We can use traditional biperiodical accelerating structure (BAS) in storage energy regime, on μ=π/2 RF mode, having high shunt impedance and accelerating gradient. We will have no problem with RF power load and coupling here. But other types of accelerating structures should be studied and compared in future (travelling wave DLW with E and M coupling, diaphragms and washers, etc.) When we accelerate very short bunch (~5 mm) in the storage energy mode, we need to realize some conditions for BAS: Low time of power feeding transient process leads to design of high group-velocity structure; We need Vg about 0.10-0.12c to fill 3m length structure during 200 ns; If we have 200 ns transient process + 100 ns for reserve, we can decrease time of the SLED storage or klystron power; Structure should operate in storage mode and RF coupler will be designed for critical coupling.

Beam parameters and general linac layout (preliminary) RF-gun 10-20 regular sections for 2 GeV in total (3000 or 2000 MHz) 3000 MHz or 2000 MHz ? π/2 mode, st. wave 12 BAS periods ~60 cm of length 12 MeV output 350 kV/cm on axe (for ~50 nC) Not enough place for first coupling cell ! side coupling should be used π/2 mode, st. wave 61 BAS periods 305 cm length 400/600/900 kV/cm 70/105/160 MeV per section π/2 mode, st. wave 41 BAS periods 307.5 cm length 400/600/900 kV/cm 75/110/170 MeV per section High (12-14 %) coupling coefficient to achieve high group velocity and low time of transient process!!!

2. Beam dynamics in RF-gun (for hundreds of pC bunches) 12 acc. cells, Ez=350 kV/cm, Bsol=0.03 T, side coupling for 1-2 cells BEAMDULAC-BL code was used for beam dynamics study. It was developed in MEPhI for beam dynamics simulation in e-linacs taking into account Coulomb and beam loading selfconsistently

2. Beam dynamics in RF-gun (for hundreds of pC bunches) I=1 A, focusing field B=0.03 T, Et =10 cm·mrad, r0=5 mm Bunch length ~19 mm ( is 10 ps to long ??? ) Energy spectrum ~0.7 %

2. Beam dynamics in RF-gun (for hundreds of pC bunches) Coulomb field and beam loading B=30 mT for I<20 A 50 mT for 20 70 mT for 25 100 for 30 no tr. loses RF-gun will further optimized to minimize δγ Beam loading influence is not sufficient for 10-30 A of pulse current and separated bunches : after bunch Ez is less than 0.3 % lower than for unloaded structure. For example, if Ez will differs 0.5 %, we will have 11.91 MeV comparatively 11.97 MeV.

2. Beam dynamics in RF-gun Beam dynamics in RF-gun for extreme 6 nC bunches (first results are for 1 nC) Ez=400 kV/cm (was 350), Bsol=0.40 T (was 0.10) Aperture was enlarged to 15 mm (was 8 mm) Kt is only 75-80 % After optimization energy spectrum was improved to ±(1.5-2.0) % Further for 6 nC it will much more interesting !!!

3. Beam dynamics in regular section Injection energy is ~12 MeV, length of regular section ~3 m. Ez, kV/cm 3000 MHz 2000 MHz KT, % ΔWsec, MeV 400 98.4 69.9 98.2 74.2 600 104.9 111.4 900 157.5 98.3 166.9 Low field scenario Real scenario Optimistic scenario Pulse current 30 A, injection distribution is taken after RF-gun, ΔWsec is energy gain per section, KT is current transmission for first regular section kV/cm 400 600 900 I0=30 A B=100 mT 3000 MHz 2000 MHz

3. Beam dynamics in regular section Coulomb field and beam loading Current transmission and bunch length v. pulse current (3000 MHz left, 2000 MHz right) 400 kV/cm 600 900 Ez, kV/cm 3000 MHz 2000 MHz 100 % of Ez 99.5 % of Ez 400 82.4 * 82.04 85.7 85.35 600 116.4 115.9 122.9 122.4 900 169.0 168.2 178.4 177.6 Beam loading influence is not sufficient for 30 A and 10 ps of pulse current : after bunch Ez is less than 0.25 % lower than before bunch. If Ez will differs 0.5 %, we will have (Table) * Energy (MeV) after RF-gun and first regular section

4. RF-gun electrodynamics simulations Section parameters: π/2 mode standing wave f=3000 MHz 12 BAS periods (one side-coupled), 59 cm of length 12 MeV output Ez= 350 kV/cm Storaged energy mode Coupling with RF source - critical Q-factor 6600 (first cell) and 15500 (regular cell) Rsh=80 MOhm/m (regular cells) Coupling coefficient (regular cells) 11.5 % and 4 % (1-2 cells, should be increased further) Time of transient process ~120 ns Necessary RF power Prf=26 MW We haven't enough place for first coupling cell and side coupling for 1st and 2nd accelerating cavities was simulated

5. Electrodynamics of regular section 3000 MHz 2000 MHz π/2 mode Standing wave Storaged energy mode Coupling with RF source - critical Acc. cell diameter, mm 76 116 Length of acc. cell, mm 38 63 Length of coupling cell, mm 4 4 Q-factor 15500 13700 Rsh, MOhm/m 79.5 49.7 Coupling coefficient, % 11.5 11.0 Group velocity 0.102c 0.11c Time of transient process, ns 200 185

5. Electrodynamics of regular section 3000 MHz: 61 acc. cells, 305 cm 2000 MHz: 41 acc. cells, 307.5 cm Necessary RF power, MW Ez, kV/cm 3000 MHz 2000 MHz 400 61 99 600 138 223 900 311 501 For traditional SLED amplification coefficient eq. 4 it gives 15/35/75 of necessary klystron power for 3000 MHz or 25/56/125 for 2000 MHz (is amp. Factor =6 available ???)

6. General results and discussion 3000 MHz vs. 2000 GHz Well known Brilliant matching with 400 MHz frequency in booster Many klystrons are available (SLAC, Thales, Toshiba, …) Higher Rsh and lower necessary RF power No problem in design of RF-gun first cell Higher (~5 %) rate of the energy gain No simple matching with 400 MHz frequency in booster Conceptually new (but 1.3 and 1.8 GHz bands are widely used) Difficulties in design of RF-gun first cell No RF power sources Lower Rsh → twice higher necessary RF power

7. Technology and other possible MEPhI activities MEPhI + Korad Co., LLC project of 10 MeV/20 kW industrial linac 16 Commissioned in Sep. 2015

7. Technology and other possible MEPhI activities HL-LHC: DEVELOPMENT OF THE SUPERCONDUCTING 800 MHZ HARMONIC CAVITY Different higher order modes damping techniques were proposed and compared HIGHER ORDER MODES DAMPING IN SPS TW ACCELEARING CAVITY AT 200 MHz Several longitudinal HOM’s near 630 MHz could limit the maximum beam intensity in SPS accelerator. MEPhI RF-Lab is also contributing in the development of the improved HOM damping system

7. Technology and other possible MEPhI activities DESIGN OF HIGH POWER INPUT COUPLER FOR CORNELL ERL INJECTOR CAVITIES Adjustable power coupler for superconducting injector cavities of Cornell ERL project has been designed. Feeds 75 kW CW @1.3GHz. Several couplers produced at Beverly Microwave (CPI) and tested. BEAM DEFLECTOR SYSTEMS for PITZ (X-FEL) developed (cooperation with Nuclear Research Institute of RAS and Introscan LLC as industrial partner. Now under commissioning at DESY.

7. Technology and other possible MEPhI activities MULTIPACTOR DISCHARGE SIMULATIONS Codes: MultP-STL (by MEPhI) and CST PS (By CST AG), Spoke cavity for TRIUMF TRIUMF QWR NICA buncher cavity 19 [ ] Multipacting simulation in accelerating RF structures, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 599 (1), pp. 100-105

7. Technology and other possible MEPhI activities New RFQ injector for NICA (JINR) collider JINR+MEPhI+ITEP project for Nuclotron-NICA injection complex modernization COMISSIONED 11-12.11.2015

Thank you! 21