Current State of Processing of the PECAN Microphysics Dataset

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Radar/lidar observations of boundary layer clouds
Advertisements

Enhancement of Satellite-based Precipitation Estimates using the Information from the Proposed Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) Part II: Drizzle Detection.
7. Radar Meteorology References Battan (1973) Atlas (1989)
To perform statistical analyses of observations from dropsondes, microphysical imaging probes, and coordinated NOAA P-3 and NASA ER-2 Doppler radars To.
By : Kerwyn Texeira. Outline Definitions Introduction Model Description Model Evaluation The effect of dust nuclei on cloud coverage Conclusion Questions.
Microstructure of Israeli Clouds and their Suitability for Seeding Eyal Freud and Daniel Rosenfeld יום עיון מחקרי רשות המים, 21 ביוני 2011.
Section highlights Organic Aerosol and Field Studies.
Page 1© Crown copyright The Facility for Airborne Atmospheric Measurements (FAAM) BAe-146 Steve Abel First VOCALS Regional Experiment (REx) Preparatory.
Clouds and Climate: Forced Changes to Clouds SOEE3410 Ken Carslaw Lecture 4 of a series of 5 on clouds and climate Properties and distribution of clouds.
Remote sensing of Stratocumulus using radar/lidar synergy Ewan O’Connor, Anthony Illingworth & Robin Hogan University of Reading.
A 21 F A 21 F Parameterization of Aerosol and Cirrus Cloud Effects on Reflected Sunlight Spectra Measured From Space: Application of the.
Investigation of the Aerosol- Cloud relation in polluted clouds Göran Frank Dept. of Physics, Div. of Nuclear Physics Lund Institute of Technology, Lund.
Observational approaches to understanding cloud microphysics.
Illumination Independent Aerosol Optical Properties n Extinction Scattering Absorption n Volume scattering function (phase) n Transmittance.
Particles in the Atmosphere CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Physical properties 3. Particle formation and growth 4. Chemical composition 5. Radiative properties.
Atmosphere Sciences Instrumentation Lab Organized by David Delene - November 20, 2008 Overview of Instruments – 3:00 Clifford Hall 470 Lab Demonstrations.
Absorption by ambient aerosols during CalNex Chris Cappa (UCD) Paola Massoli Tim Onasch Doug Worsnop Katheryn Kolesar Jani Hakala Shao-Meng Li Ibraheem.
Cloud Aerosol Research in the Marine Atmosphere (CARMA) A multi-year project to look primarily at the interaction of aerosols and clouds in the marine.
CalWater2 Workshop NOAA P-3 and G-IV Jim McFadden, Jack Parrish and LCDR Justin Kibbey NOAA Aircraft Operations Center 1.
Lidar algorithms to retrieve cloud distribution, phase and optical depth Y. Morille, M. Haeffelin, B. Cadet, V. Noel Institut Pierre Simon Laplace SYMPOSIUM.
- 1 - A Simple Parameterization For Mid-latitude Cirrus Cloud Ice Particle Size Spectra And Ice Sedimentation Rates David L. Mitchell Desert Research Institute,
Measurements of microphysical properties of convective clouds in the tropics and the mid-latitudes.
Bryan A. Baum 1 Ping Yang 2, Andrew Heymsfield 3 1 NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 2 Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 3 National Center.
Summary of Modifications for C6 Ice Cloud Models Bryan Baum, Ping Yang, Andy Heymsfield Microphysical data: a. more field campaigns (ARM, TRMM, SCOUT,
CCN measurements at an urban location Julia Burkart University of Vienna Istitute of Aerosol Physics, Biophysics and Environmental Physics.
1 Cloud microphysical properties in cirrus during ATTREX Sarah Woods 1, Sara Lance 1, Eric Jensen 2, Nick Krause 1, R. Paul Lawson 1, Bruce Gandrud 1,
Hurricane Cloud Physics
CloudNet: TARA status and database H. Russchenberg, O. Krasnov Delft University of Technology – IRCTR, The Netherlands.
LOAC (Light Optical Aerosol Counter)
Department of Mechanical Engineering The Pearlstone Center for Aeronautical Engineering Studies Ben-Gurion University of the Negev P.O.B. 653, Beer Sheva.
Aristeidis K. Georgoulias Konstantinos Kourtidis Konstantinos Konstantinidis AMFIC Web Data Base AMFIC Annual Meeting - Beijing October 2008 Democritus.
Size Distributions Many processes and properties depend on particle size –Fall velocity –Brownian diffusion rate –CCN activity –Light scattering and absorption.
DEVELOPING HIGH RESOLUTION AOD IMAGING COMPATIBLE WITH WEATHER FORECAST MODEL OUTPUTS FOR PM2.5 ESTIMATION Daniel Vidal, Lina Cordero, Dr. Barry Gross.
Representation of Sea Salt Aerosol in CAM coupled with a Sectional Aerosol Microphysical Model CARMA Tianyi Fan, Owen Brian Toon LASP/ATOC, University.
1 Optimal Channel Selection. 2 Redundancy “Information Content” vs. “On the diagnosis of the strength of the measurements in an observing system through.
RICO Modeling Studies Group interests RICO data in support of studies.
Fog- and cloud-induced aerosol modification observed by the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) Thomas F. Eck (Code 618 NASA GSFC) and Brent N. Holben (Code.
Distribution of Liquid Water in Orographic Mixed-Phase Clouds Diana Thatcher Mentor: Linnea Avallone LASP REU 2011.
Northeast Winter C&V Program Roy Rasmussen NCAR Wes Wilson MIT/LL.
The role of boundary layer clouds in the global energy and water cycle: An integrated assessment using satellite observations Ralf Bennartz University.
INUPIAQ/CLACE 2014 University of Manchester Data availability.
Daniel Grosvenor, Thomas Choularton, Martin Gallagher (University of Manchester, UK); Thomas Lachlan Cope and John King (British Antarctic Survey). Daniel.
Particle Size, Water Path, and Photon Tunneling in Water and Ice Clouds ARM STM Albuquerque Mar Sensitivity of the CAM to Small Ice Crystals.
Towards parameterization of cloud drop size distribution for large scale models Wei-Chun Hsieh Athanasios Nenes Image source: NCAR.
Update on progress with the implementation of a new two-moment microphysics scheme: Model description and single-column tests Hugh Morrison, Andrew Gettelman,
Microphysics Measurements During CLACE 2014 G.J. Lloyd 1, R. Farrington, P.Connolly 1 T.W. Choularton 1, M. Gallagher 1 and K. N. Bower 1 1 Centre for.
Introduction Instruments designed and fabricated at the Desert Research Institute, Reno Emphasis on the Integrating Nephelometer for scattering measurements.
- 1 - Satellite Remote Sensing of Small Ice Crystal Concentrations in Cirrus Clouds David L. Mitchell Desert Research Institute, Reno, Nevada Robert P.
UNIVERSITY OF BASILICATA CNR-IMAA (Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche Istituto di Metodologie per l’Analisi Ambientale) Tito Scalo (PZ) Analysis and interpretation.
© Crown copyright Met Office Cloud observations at Cardington Simon Osborne (OBR, Cardington) OBR Conference, 11 th -13 th December 2012.
Cloud Droplet Probe (CDP) and Two-Dimensional Imaging Probe (2DC) Al Cooper NCAR.
Aerosol Microphysical Properties (AMP) Measurements for ATom and cloud! 1) Where do particles come from in the remote troposphere? New particle formation.
Microphysics observations from MICRO-SCOPE J. Crosier, Z. Liu, J. Taylor, K. Bower, T. Choularton University of Manchester COPE meeting - Leeds - April.
B3. Microphysical Processes
UND Citation Aircraft OLYMPEX Data
EO Information Model Overview Concepts and Relations
Probing clouds: why its necessary to use multiple instruments.
University of Illinois OAP Processing Software
Influences of Particle Bulk Density of Snow and Graupel in Microphysics-Consistent Microwave Brightness Temperature Simulations Research Group Meeting.
ATMOSPHERIC EFFECTS ON ELECTRO-OPTICAL SENSORS AND SYSTEMS
GAP Measurements and Instrumentation
Group interests RICO data required
ECV definitions Mapping of ECV product with OSCAR variables
Development of a New Parameterization for Below-Cloud Scavenging of Size-Resolved Particles by Rain and Snow Xihong Wang1, Leiming Zhang2, and Michael.
Citation Data Comparison
Aerosol Production in Lead-protected and Flibe-protected Chambers
Density Ratios and Heat Flux within the Beaufort Sea Utilizing WHOI Ice-Tethered Profiler Data By LCDR Greg Caro.
Instrument errors due to DIFFRACTION and
Dual-Aircraft Investigation of the Inner Core of Hurricane Nobert
Group interests RICO data in support of studies
Presentation transcript:

Current State of Processing of the PECAN Microphysics Dataset Greg M. McFarquhar1, Daniel M. Stechman1, Robert M. Rauber1, Robert A. Black2 and Brian F. Jewett1 1University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 2National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration – Hurricane Research Division, Miami, FL

Instrumentation: Imaging Probes Cloud Imaging Probe (CIP) 64 laser diodes with 25 µm resolution (~125 µm to 1600 µm) Good quality data Precipitation Imaging Probe (PIP) 64 laser diodes with 100 µm resolution (~0.6 mm to 6.4 mm) Data quality not as good, but some data recoverable 150 um chosen as lower bound because there are many uncertainties concerning the validity of particles smaller than this e.g., Shattered particles PIP probe was also used, though there were lots of fogging problems. We’re carefully assessing the reliability of this data and working to incorporate it into future analyses.

These data can be trusted for liquid droplets Instrumentation: Droplet Probes Cloud Droplet Probe (CDP) Size measured by forward scattering of light (2 mm to 50 mm) Cloud Aerosol Spectrometer (CAS) Size measured by forward scattering of light (0.53 to 50 mm) 150 um chosen as lower bound because there are many uncertainties concerning the validity of particles smaller than this e.g., Shattered particles PIP probe was also used, though there were lots of fogging problems. We’re carefully assessing the reliability of this data and working to incorporate it into future analyses. These data can be trusted for liquid droplets

Instrumentation: Hot Wire Probes SEA hot-wire probe Directly measures LWC 0-10 g/m3 for airspeeds < 150 m/s 150 um chosen as lower bound because there are many uncertainties concerning the validity of particles smaller than this e.g., Shattered particles PIP probe was also used, though there were lots of fogging problems. We’re carefully assessing the reliability of this data and working to incorporate it into future analyses.

Processing Optical Array Probe Data Use UIOPS (University of Illinois Optical Array Probe Processing Software) Three primary steps in UIOPS: Process raw binary image data, and convert to netCDF Reject particles & determine morphology of each particle Calculate 1-second particle size distributions (PSDs) and bulk microphysical quantities

Quality Control Following particles are rejected: Shattered artifacts Short interarrival time suggests shattered artifact Out of focus particles Often yields “hollow” particles due to probe depth of field limitations “Streakers” and stuck bits

Calculated Quantities Size Distribution Bulk Properties Total number concentration Total extinction Total ice water content Total reflectivity Effective radius Median mass dimension Mass-weighted terminal velocity Precipitation rate Particle-by-Particle Properties Maximum dimension Projected area Aspect ratio Area ratio Estimated mass Identified habit

Size Distribution Data 1-sec averages for archived data We suggest using at least 5-sec average for statistical significance

Total Number Concentration

Mass Distribution Functions Need PIP data for a complete analysis

Partially Corrupt Data (PIP) PIP Data Quality Fogging and/or icing caused data quality issues and at times complete failure of PIP Good Data (CIP) Partially Corrupt Data (PIP)

PIP Data Quality We will be analyzing the PIP data on a second-by-second basis to determine which periods contain usable data

CAS Probe

Representative Particle Images Images of all particles will be available on archive as function of time For spirals, we will generate plots showing selected images binned by temperature

Complete – Ready for Archive Incomplete – Pending PIP QC PECAN Spirals P ! X Complete – Ready for Archive Ready to Produce Incomplete – Pending PIP QC No Data 20150617 - IOP 11 Spiral # CIP PbP Data CIP SD Data CIP Rep. Particle Plot PIP PbP Data PIP SD Data PIP Rep. Particle Plot 1 P ! 2 3 4 5 6 7 20150706 - IOP 20 Spiral # CIP PbP Data CIP SD Data CIP Rep. Particle Plot PIP PbP Data PIP SD Data PIP Rep. Particle Plot 1 P ! 2 3 4 5 6 7 20150620 - UFO 4 Spiral # CIP PbP Data CIP SD Data CIP Rep. Particle Plot PIP PbP Data PIP SD Data PIP Rep. Particle Plot 1 P ! 2 3 4 5 6 20150709 - IOP 21 Spiral # CIP PbP Data CIP SD Data CIP Rep. Particle Plot PIP PbP Data PIP SD Data PIP Rep. Particle Plot 1 P ! 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 20150701 – IOP 17 Spiral # CIP PbP Data CIP SD Data CIP Rep. Particle Plot PIP PbP Data PIP SD Data PIP Rep. Particle Plot 1 P ! 20150702 – UFO 8A Spiral # CIP PbP Data CIP SD Data CIP Rep. Particle Plot PIP PbP Data PIP SD Data PIP Rep. Particle Plot 1 P X 2 3 **No spirals during IOP 25, UFO 12, and IOP 27**

Archival We will begin uploading QC’d data to the archive soon (will be assigned a DOI) Ready for upload to the data archive: CIP particle-by-particle and size distribution data Select representative particle image plots No/limited processing: PIP particle-by-particle and size distribution data SEA, CAS, and CDP data Raw CIP/PIP data Not currently on the archive (obtained from NOAA HRD) Should they be on archive?

Archival Encourage collaborative use of the data Looking for friendly users to use data in their investigations  Contact Greg McFarquhar if interested mcfarq@illinois.edu