ICF Research Institute at MSH Medical School Hamburg Germany

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Disability. Goals and Indicators Methodological issues Needs proper adaptation to the conditions and language of country The indicator provides a screening.
Advertisements

What is District Wide Accreditation? Ensure Desired Results Improve Teaching & Learning Foster a Culture of Improvement A powerful systems approach to.
How to Apply for an Interlibrary Cooperation Grant from the Alaska State Library March 23, 2013 Alaska Library Association Conference Valdez.
Cooperative Learning in the Modern Era of PET/CT Imaging Education and Training: Philippine Experience TNB Pascual a, JFY Santiago b a Section of Nuclear.
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements.
1 Assistive Technology? What Does It Have to Do with Me? Joy Zabala,, M.Ed., ATP Assistive Technology and Leadership Lake Jackson, Texas
Introduction Title Typhoon Yolanda struck the Philippines on November 8, 2013 with strong winds of over 300 km/h. It was one of the strongest tropical.
USDE and DHHS Listening and Learning Panel on Family Engagement
Abstract Rankin and Reason (2005; Reason & Rankin 2006) have suggested than women and students of color experience more harassment on college campuses.
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
The mission of TnT is threefold: (1) to study prevalence, policy and resources, individualized decision making, training and support and other factors.
Encourage and Support University Teachers to Use ICT in Education Sonja Prišćan, Daliborka Pašić.
Council for Exceptional Children/Division of Early Childhood Conference October 2010 Kim Carlson, Asst. Director/619 Coordinator Ohio Department of Education.
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
Frank D. Lanterman Regional Center Expenditure Data for Fiscal Year Public Stakeholders Meeting Presented on June 26, 2013.
1 The Special Education Assessment and IEP Process EDPOWER Teacher Institute 2013.
NAME Evaluation Report Name of author(s) Name of institution Year.
Ninth Annual Meeting of the WG: Objectives and Agenda Jennifer H. Madans U.S.A.
Belgoaid Early childhood intervention in Belgium.
CJD Eutin is part of the nationwide CJD. Non-governmental association founded in 1947 Nationwide over 160 institutions 8,000 employees, annually 90,000.
Researching Technology in South Dakota Classrooms Dr. Debra Schwietert TIE Presentation April 2010 Research Findings.
Age Appropriate Assessments: A Necessary Component to Transition.
General Disability Measurement in Uganda Focusing on Improvement in Methodology and Concepts used By Nabukhonzo Pamela Uganda Bureau of Statistics.
The D irectory of C ommunity R esources Texas Transition Conference, 2010 Lauren Cifuentes, Ph.D. Amy N. Sharp, Ph.D.
V 2.1 Version 2.1 School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory.
Funding Opportunities at the Institute of Education Sciences Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Teaching and Learning Division National Center for Education Research.
ICF in Finland – background Verdana 36 Bold Title Conclusions The ICF was translated to Finnish in However, lack of systematic education, clinical.
1 st International Conference of the Linguistic Association of Pakistan Kinnaird College for Women, Lahore. October 7 — 9, 2015.
Monitoring & Evaluation Capacity Strengthening Workshop WORKSHOP INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW.
Interpreting and Summarizing Published Research Cruise, P., & Fisher, S. (2002)Teachers’ Attitudes toward No Child Left Behind Cruise, P., & Fisher, S.
Shubhangi Arora1; Eden Haverfield2; Gabriele Richard2; Susanne B
Bosnia & Herzegovina Statistical Training
An HL7-CDA2 standard template for the ICF-based
Abstract # An innovative model for prioritizing health care needs for women, infants and children in Texas: Lessons from a Texas-wide.
2nd International Conference of the Linguistic Association of Pakistan
WHO - FAMILY OF INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS NETWORK ANNUAL MEETING 2014 Measuring Disability and Health in Emergencies: implementing a disability survey.
FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH WITH CEREBRAL PALSY IN RUSSIA: A NOVEL APPROACH
The Relationship of Early Intervention and Early Child Characteristics
NC State Improvement Project
WHO The World Health Survey General Introduction
APHA 135th Annual Meeting and Expo November 3-7, 2007 Washington, DC
End of Life: The Role of the AUCD Network
NGI Operations readiness report
Jean-Claude Desenclos
A’Dreanna Truesdell Ta’Tanese Epps ABSTRACT:
The first steps towards a global convention on recognition
CHILDREN AND YOUTH WITH CP
JET Education Services: Innovations in Teacher Support and Curriculum Development Presentation to the Care and Support for Teaching and Learning Regional.
Improving Quality Systemwide
Materials & Methods Introduction Abstract Results Conclusion
Impact of a public education program on promoting rational use of medicines:
Measuring Outcomes for Programs Serving Young Children with Disabilities Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC at FPG/UNC June 2,
Kandeke C, Chibuta C, Banda D
Evidence Based Curriculum & Instruction
Take Home Implementation Tools for Safety Evaluation
Bureau of Family Health: Infant Toddler Services
Template Eposter for scientific paper
Measuring Outcomes for Programs Serving Young Children with Disabilities Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC at FPG/UNC June 2,
NC Preschool Pyramid Model Leadership Team Summit January 9-10, 2019
Materials & Methods Introduction Abstract Results Conclusion
16 April 2019 Report on the Vienna Convention Trust Fund for Research and Systematic Observation Agenda Item 5(b) (UNEP/OzL.Conv.9/5)
Materials & Methods Introduction Abstract Results Conclusion
Template Eposter for scientific paper
Head Start Research Conference Washington, DC July 2014
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference August 2008
Return to Work of Mentally Ill Persons in Germany A systematic review
Materials & Methods Introduction Abstract Results Conclusion
Materials & Methods Introduction Abstract Results Conclusion
Dr. Robert Perry, Dr. Mick Arnold,
Presentation transcript:

ICF Research Institute at MSH Medical School Hamburg Germany WHO - FAMILY OF INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS NETWORK ANNUAL MEETING 2017 Who speaks ICF? Implementation of ICF in early childhood intervention centers in Germany 16-21 October 2017 Mexico City, Mexico Poster Number 8 Authors: Liane Simon, Sven Kottysch, Sonja Bröning, Alexander Mevs, Julia Paulsen ICF Research Institute at MSH Medical School Hamburg Germany , Within the last year, the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) has become well known in early childhood interventions centers (EICs) in Germany. To date, its usage has not yet been systematically reviewed. Here, we present the results of a survey (Summer 2017) sent to all early childhood intervention centers in Germany (N= 1000). Abstract Introduction Results Results Since Germany passed a new participation law (Bundesteilhabe-gesetz - BTHG), in which use of the ICF was declared mandatory for rehabilitation and social institutes in Germany starting in 2018, ICF has become well known. However, only few ICF based methods and instruments exist yet. The ICF Research Institute at MSH Medical School Hamburg started the project “ICF Mapping” in 2016. The primary objective is to explore the status of ICF use for all EICs (N= 1000) in Germany and learning/training needs of professionals. Germany consists of 16 federal states. The EICs within these federal states are in various stages of an ICF implementation. The 329 returned answers can be allocated to federal states, showing regional differences in usage (see chart 2). Within the sample (n=329) 154 EICs use the ICF in some way. Most of them participate in ICF training or introduction classes at least once a year (79,7 %).   Chart 3:79,9 % of 156 EICs that use the ICF participate in introduction classes as well. Methods & Materials The online survey took place in July 2017. A questionnaire with seven closed questions was developed. We sent a link of the online survey to all leaders of early childhood intervention centers (EIC´s) in Germany (N=1000). Data collection was conducted in summer 2017. 329 questionnaires were returned, rendering a response rate of 32,9 %. These questions were asked: The zip code The amount of employees What kind of EIC (3 possibilities) The way they use the ICF The extent of using the ICF per child/year The number of employees using the ICF The number of ICF training or instruction classes taken Conclusions The german participation law explicitly requires the use of the ICF in the determination of restrictions of participation from next year onwards. It is planned to completely restructure the social system over the next five years. Nevertheless, the ICF is not widely used in EICs yet. The majority of those who do make use of it only apply it as a framework and underlying attitude, while using the ICF for coding does not seem to be a common practice yet. We conclude that there is a compelling need for special ICF based tools or instruments adapted to the daily routine in EICs. Within the next years, all EICs are required to implement the ICF. Together with the previous results within the project „ICF Mapping“ (Simon et al., 2017) these findings indicate that the use of ICF as a common language needs to become more attractive to EICs in Germany. In addition, we observe a strong need for training and introduction classes. The next important goal of ICF Mapping is the development of recommendations for specific programs that facilitate the implementation of the ICF. © GeoBasis-DE / BKG (2017), data changed Chart 2: use of ICF in the 16 provinces of Germany(multiple answers possible) Within the sample (n=329), 175 EICs do not use the ICF in any way yet. The majority has not participated in ICF training or introduction classes yet, either (60,6 %). Results Within our sample (n=329), 154 EICs are using the ICF in different ways (46,8 %): 111 EICs use ICF as a framework/attitude (72,1%) 44 EICs use the ICF-checklists (28,6%) and 69 EICs use codes or the ICF Items for intervention plans (44,8%) (multiple answers possible) Acknowledgements or Notes Chart 3:104 of 175 EICs not using the ICF have also not yet participated in introduction classes. Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales (2017): Bundesteilhabegesetz, Internetquelle: https://www.bmas.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/PDF-Meldungen/2016/bundesteilhabegesetz.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=7 (05.09.2017). Simon, L., Kottysch, S. Irmler, M., Kindervater, A.(2017):Do you speak ICF? Poster 2nd international symposium on ICF education, Cape Town, South Africa. ICF Mapping is funded by MSH Medical School Hamburg, IRIs (icf-research-institute) http://www.icf-research-institute.de Chart 1: How do you use ICF? Answers of 329 EICs in Germany (multiple answers possible)