MPLS-TP Shared Mesh Protection

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MPLS-TP Alarm Suppression tool
Advertisements

Migration Considerations and Techniques to MPLS-TP based Networks and Services Nurit Sprecher / Nokia Siemens Networks Yaacov Weingarten / Nokia Siemens.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 MPLS –TP Fault OAM draft-ietf-mpls-tp-fault-01 George Swallow
Yaacov Weingarten Stewart Bryant Nurit Sprecher Daniele Ceccarelli
MPLS-TP - 74th IETF (SanFran)1 Linear Protection for MPLS-TP draft-weingarten-mpls-tp-linear-protection-01.txt Stewart Bryant Yaacov Weingarten Nurit Sprecher.
MPLS-TP Ring Protection draft-weingarten-mpls-tp-ring-protection
1 Luyuan Nabil Raymond Zhang
Extensions to the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) for Point-to-Multipoint Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-05.txt.
MPLS - 74th IETF San Francisco1 Composite Transport Group (CTG) Framework and Requirements draft-so-yong-mpls-ctg-framework-requirement-01.txt draft-so-yong-mpls-ctg-framework-requirement-01.txt.
MPLS-TP Shared Mesh Protection draft-cheung-mpls-tp-mesh-protection-04 IETF 82 – Taipei, November 2011 Taesik Cheung and Jeong-Dong Ryoo (ETRI) Yaacov.
OSPF-TE extensions for GMPLS Control of Evolving G.709 OTN draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-g709v3-00 CCAMP WG, IETF 82 nd Taipei.
MAC Withdraw Signaling for static PW draft-boutros-l2vpn-mac-wd-03.txt Himanshu Shah - Ciena Siva Sivabalan, Sami Boutros – Cisco Sam Aldrin - Huwei.
MPLS-TP Linear Protection ietf-mpls-tp-linear-protection Nurit Sprecher Annamaria Fulignoli
Draft-ietf-mpls-tp-mib-management-overview-03 Multiprotocol Label Switching Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) MIB-based Management Overview draft-ietf-mpls-tp-mib-management-overview-03.
© 2009 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 IETF 84 – Vancouver August 2012 LSP Ping Support for P2MP PWs (draft-jain-pwe3-p2mp-pw-lsp-ping-00.txt)
Framework and Requirements for Shared Mesh Protection in MPLS-TP
1 Framework for GMPLS based control of Flexi-grid DWDM networks draft-ogrcetal-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk-02 CCAMP WG, IETF 86 Oscar González de Dios, Telefónica.
CCAMP WG, IETF 81th, Quebec City, Canada draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g txt Authors & Contributors GMPLS Signaling Extensions for the Evolving.
1 IETF- 56 – TE WG- SAN FRANCISCO Inter-AS MPLS Traffic Engineering draft-vasseur-inter-AS-TE-00.txt Jean-Philippe Vasseur – Cisco Systems Raymond Zhang.
82 nd IETF – Taipei, Taiwan, November 2011 Extensions to Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) for Hierarchical Path Computation Elements.
PCE-based Computation Procedure To Compute Shortest Constrained P2MP Inter-domain Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths draft-zhao-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures-02.txt.
Support Shared Mesh Protection in MPLS-TP IETF 83 March, 2012 Ping Pan, Rajan Rao, Biao Lu (Infinera) Andrew G. Malis (Verizon) Luyuan Fang (Cisco) Fatai.
Support Shared Mesh Protection in MPLS-TP March 27, 2011 Ping Pan (Infinera) Sam Aldrin (Huawei) Luyuan Fang (Cisco)
RSVP-TE Extensions to Notification for Shared Mesh Protection CCAMP WG, IETF 81th draft-he-ccamp-notification-shared-mesh-protection-00 Wenjuan He
Luyuan Fang Nabil Bitar Raymond Zhang Masahiro DAIKOKU Ping Pan
MPLS-TP Shared Mesh Protection draft-cheung-mpls-tp-mesh-protection-05 IETF 83 – Paris, March 2012 Taesik Cheung and Jeong-dong Ryoo (ETRI) Yaacov Weingarten.
The Application of the Path Computation Element Architecture to the Determination of a Sequence of Domains in MPLS & GMPLS draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-fwk-00.txt.
The Application of the Path Computation Element Architecture to the Determination of a Sequence of Domains in MPLS & GMPLS draft-king-pce-hierarchy-fwk-01.txt.
82 nd Taipei Protection Mechanisms for LDP P2MP/MP2MP LSP draft-zhao-mpls-mldp-protections-00.txt Quintin Zhao, Emily Chen, Huawei.
MPLS-TP OAM Analysis Nurit Sprecher / Nokia Siemens Networks Tom Nadeau / BT Huub van Helvoort / Huawei Yaacov Weingarten / Nokia Siemens Networks.
MPLS-TP Shared Ring Protection (MSRP) Mechanism
Daniel King, Old Dog Consulting Adrian Farrel, Old Dog Consulting
Jean-Philippe Vasseur – Cisco Systems Raymond Zhang - Infonet
Framework for GMPLS based control of Flexi-grid DWDM networks draft-ogrcetal-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk-01 CCAMP WG, IETF 85 Oscar González de Dios, Telefónica.
P2MP MPLS-TE Fast Reroute with P2MP Bypass Tunnels
MPLS-TP Fault Management Draft draft-boutros-mpls-tp-fault-01
RSVP-TE Extensions for Associated Co-routed Bidirectional Label Switched Paths (LSPs) draft-gandhishah-teas-assoc-corouted-bidir-01 Author list: Rakesh.
Requirements for Ring Protection in MPLS-TP
SD-Triggered Protection Switching in MPLS-TP draft-zhl-mpls-tp-sd-01
Daniel King, Old Dog Consulting Adrian Farrel, Old Dog Consulting
MPLS LSP Instant Install draft-saad-mpls-lsp-instant-install-00
MPLS-TP Survivability Framework
Daniel King, Old Dog Consulting Adrian Farrel, Old Dog Consulting
Protection & Restoration Design Team - CCAMP WG
IPv6 Router Alert Option for MPLS OAM
draft-ietf-mpls-tp-rosetta-stone
Guoman Liu ) ) Yuefeng Jian Jinghai ) Zongpeng )
Extensions to Resource Reservation Protocol For Fast Reroute of Traffic Engineering GMPLS LSPs draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-lsp-fastreroute-06 Authors: Mike Taillon.
Signaling RSVP-TE P2MP LSPs in an Inter-domain Environment draft-ali-mpls-inter-domain-p2mp-rsvp-te-lsp-01.txt Zafar Ali, Cisco Systems.
Signaled PID When Multiplexing Multiple Payloads over RSVP-TE LSPs draft-ali-mpls-sig-pid-multiplexing-case-00.txt Zafar Ali, Cisco Systems.
draft-merge-ccamp-otn-b100g-fwk-01
Fast Reroute for Node Protection in LDP- based LSPs
N. Kumar, C. Pignataro, F. Iqbal, Z. Ali (Presenter) - Cisco Systems
Greg Mirsky IETF-99 July 2017, Prague
Greg Mirsky Jeff Tantsura Mach Chen Ilya Varlashkin
LSP Fast-Reroute Using RSVP Detours
BFD Directed Return Path draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed-07
Optical Fast Reroute Adrian Farrel : Old Dog Consulting
Technical Issues with draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed
Fast Reroute for Node Protection in LDP- based LSPs
Eusebi Calle, Jose L Marzo, Anna Urra. L. Fabrega
Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping for IPv6 Pseudowire FECs
PW Control Word Stitching
Deterministic Networking Application in Ring Topologies
Jia He Italo Busi Jeong-dong Ryoo Bin Yeong Yoon Peter Park
Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) for EVPN Ethernet Segment Failover Use Case draft-zwm-bess-es-failover-00 BESS WG IETF104# Prague Sandy Zhang.
Signaling Extensions for Wavelength Switched Networks
Time-to-Live TLV for LSP-Ping draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-ttl-tlv-01 Sami Boutros Siva Sivabalan George Swallow Vishwas.
An Overview of Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Mechanisms draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview Tal Mizrahi Marvell Nurit Sprecher Nokia Siemens.
E. Bellagamba, Ericsson P. Sköldström, Acreo D. Ward, Juniper
Presentation transcript:

MPLS-TP Shared Mesh Protection IETF 82 – Taipei, November 2011 Authors of draft-cheung-mpls-tp-mesh-protection Authors of draft-pan-shared-mesh-protection

Solutions under Discussion Draft-cheung-mpls-tp-mesh-protection Taesik Cheung and Jeong-Dong Ryoo (ETRI) Yaacov Weingarten and Nurit Sprecher (NSN) Daniel King (Old Dog) Draft-pan-shared-mesh-protection Ping Pan, Rajan Rao and Biao Lu (Infinera) Fatai Zhang, Sam Aldrin (Huawei) Luyuan Fang (Cisco) Andrew G. Malis (Verizon) Fei Zhang (ZTE) Mohana Singamsetty (Tellabs)

SMP Objectives Sharing of protection resources Rapid failover (optimized for packet) Reliable message exchange All corner cases covered Back out on failure of protection Notification to unprotected LSPs Re-use of existing protection mechanisms where possible

What is SMP? (Required per MPLS-TP Requirements (Req 68, 69, RFC5654)) Key properties: Protection LSPs’ are pre-established. Protection switching priority is assigned for each protection path (need to be known by shared nodes). Upon failure, a working LSP can be protected based on the priority. It may pre-empt the other LSP’s. Unprotected LSP’s are notified. The resources on P-Q-R are shared by multiple working LSP’s

Corner Cases to be Covered Unnecessary service interruption P3 and P4 should not be interrupted by P2 which will be rejected by Q. Race condition P and Q receive requests from different LSP’s having same priority. P and Q should decide how to resolve it.