From: JAMM: a peak finder for joint analysis of NGS replicates

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
From: An open day in the metric space
Advertisements

Fig. 1. Schematic overview of diffusion maps embedding
Figure 1 The spatial and temporal distribution of diarrhoea rates
Figure 1. Flow diagram of participants recruited into the study.
From: The Geographic Imagination of Civil War-Era American Fiction
Functional Elements in the Human Genome
Fig. 2. In adaptive permutation, the pool of candidate SNPs decreases as p-value estimates become more precise. Running time increases with the number.
Fig. 3 Evolutionary game types as a function of relatedness and synergy where each plot is a different social group size. The payoffs used to generate.
Figure 1. The annual cycle of the migratory monarch butterfly occurs in four main stages: (1) overwintering, (2) spring migration and breeding, (3) summer.
From: Political Leadership and Power Redistribution
Figure 1. Overview of the Ritornello approach
Fig. 3. ACE outperforms plmDCA in recovering the single variable frequencies for models describing (a) ER005, (b) LP SB, (c) PF00014, (d) HIV.
Figure 1. Programme provisions, eligibility, evaluation period and geographical coverage of programme over time From: Impact evaluation of free delivery.
Fig. 1. Sample NGS data in FASTQ format (SRA's srr032209), with parts being shortened and numbered: (1) read identifiers; (2) sequence of bases; (3) ‘+’
Figure 1. Annotation and characterization of genomic target of p63 in mouse keratinocytes (MK) based on ChIP-Seq. (A) Scatterplot representing high degree.
Figure 1. MS<sup>E</sup> data of THC-COOH
Fig. 1. proFIA approach for peak detection and quantification
Figure 1. Logos appearing in the choice experiment
Fig. 3. The values of Wc(k) and We(k) for L = n = 4.2 mil., ℓ = 70, w = 21, p = 0.01 are shown in the left plot, whereas the right.
Figure 1. Conceptual model of well-being related to involvement in theatre. From: Theatre Involvement and Well-Being, Age Differences, and Lessons From.
Fig. 1 Overview of model components to identify if hormonal pleiotropy constrains or facilitates phenotypic responses to selection. The environment imposes.
Fig. 2. Frequency of participants with a specific number of abnormal WCST T-scores at each cut-off. Performance of Non-neurological Older Adults on the.
Xiaoshu Chen, Jianzhi Zhang  Cell Systems 
From: Where do we go from here
Figure 1. Overall survival of patients receiving alternative medicine (solid lines) vs conventional cancer treatment (dashed lines). Overall survival of.
Example 14. Schubert, Quartet in G Major, D
Fig. 2 Expression and subcellular localization of MSL8–GFP expressed from endogenous sequences. (A) Quantitative RT–PCR amplification of MSL8 transcripts.
Figure 1. Whisker-evoked intrinsic signal in S1
Figure 1. Time of initiation of therapeutic hypothermia according to who initiated it. Note the logarithmic scaling of the vertical axis. From: Initiation.
Fig. 1. Constructing a local coordinate frame about a tetrahedral Cα coordinate centre. The Cα atom is placed at the origin, the.
From: Trust Busting: The Effect of Fraud on Investor Behavior
Fig. 2 System flowchart. Each of the four iterations contains two models (SS, and ASA/HSE/CN/ANGLES), for a total of eight LSTM-BRNN based models. The.
Figure 2. Ritornello captures the FLD from single-end sequencing data
Fig. 1. Overview of the entire method for aggregated strings generation. (a) Extraction of 3-tags from the input set of deconvoluted MS/MS spectra. (b)
Fig. 5. A GC content and het/nonref-hom ratio relationship for exome regions. B GC content and het/nonref-hom ratio relationship for intron regions. C.
Figure 1. Distinct chromatin regions isolated by the N-ChroP strategy
Figure 1. (A) Number of 8-oxodGs per million of dGs (8-oxodg/106 dG) measured by LC-MS/MS in untreated (NT), UV-irradiated (UV) and NAC-treated.
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages e6 (July 2017)
Roger B. Deal, Steven Henikoff  Developmental Cell 
Figure 4. (A) Scatterplot of RPC4 T statistic (between TP0 and TP36) for the indicated groups of isolated tRNA genes (RPC4 peak only, n = 35; RPC4 + H3K4me3.
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
HS induces sustained H3K4me3 and H3K4me2 methylation at HSP22
Lucas J.T. Kaaij, Robin H. van der Weide, René F. Ketting, Elzo de Wit 
Formation of Chromosomal Domains by Loop Extrusion
Latent Regulatory Potential of Human-Specific Repetitive Elements
Integrative Multi-omic Analysis of Human Platelet eQTLs Reveals Alternative Start Site in Mitofusin 2  Lukas M. Simon, Edward S. Chen, Leonard C. Edelstein,
Supplementary Figure S1: Purity for naïve and memory subsets
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (November 2016)
Cell-type Phylogenetics and the Origin of Endometrial Stromal Cells
Srinivas Ramachandran, Kami Ahmad, Steven Henikoff  Molecular Cell 
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages e6 (September 2017)
Figure 1. Nanopore methylation calls are consistent with expected results and established technologies. (A) Metaplot of ... Figure 1. Nanopore methylation.
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Human Promoters Are Intrinsically Directional
Volume 72, Issue 2, Pages e5 (October 2018)
Evolution of Alu Elements toward Enhancers
Volume 132, Issue 2, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Gene Density, Transcription, and Insulators Contribute to the Partition of the Drosophila Genome into Physical Domains  Chunhui Hou, Li Li, Zhaohui S.
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Fig. 1. Neighborhood map (N) and the Shouji bit-vector, for text T=GGTGCAGAGCTC and pattern P=GGTGAGAGTTGT for E =  Fig. 1. Neighborhood map (N)
Divergent Transcription from Active Promoters
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (July 2017)
High Sensitivity Profiling of Chromatin Structure by MNase-SSP
Manfred Schmid, Agnieszka Tudek, Torben Heick Jensen  Cell Reports 
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (August 2016)
Fig. 3. Phylogenetic relationship of the replicons of the family Burkholderiaceae. An unrooted RAxML maximum ... Fig. 3. Phylogenetic relationship of the.
Volume 26, Issue 11, Pages e3 (March 2019)
Presentation transcript:

From: JAMM: a peak finder for joint analysis of NGS replicates Fig. 1. An overview of JAMM’s peak finding steps From: JAMM: a peak finder for joint analysis of NGS replicates Bioinformatics. 2014;31(1):48-55. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu568 Bioinformatics | © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com

From: JAMM: a peak finder for joint analysis of NGS replicates Fig. 2. Transcription Factor Peak Finding. ( a ) Average normalized accuracy score over three benchmarks (see Section 3, Supplementary Text , Supplementary Tables S1 and Supplementary Data ) ( b ) An example of JAMM-I’s improved spatial resolution because of replicate integration (CTCF, K562) ( c ) Peak width determination: Average Signal Ratio indicates the ratio of extended-read counts in the 20 bp upstream to that in the 20 bp downstream of the indicated location, averaged over all peaks. Negative numbers on the x-axis indicate locations outside the peak and positive numbers indicate locations inside the peak (CTCF, HeLa-S3). Increased signal ratio outside the peaks indicates peak width underestimation. Increased signal ratio inside the peak indicates peak width overestimation. ( d ) The corresponding heatmaps to (c) for JAMM-P (top) and MACS (bottom). Heatmaps are centered on peak center, ranked by peak width and show extended-read count intensity and the corresponding peak edges (gray squares). See Supplementary Figures S4 and Supplementary Data for other peak finders and datasets From: JAMM: a peak finder for joint analysis of NGS replicates Bioinformatics. 2014;31(1):48-55. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu568 Bioinformatics | © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com

From: JAMM: a peak finder for joint analysis of NGS replicates Fig. 3. Resolving Punctate Histone Modification Peaks (HeLa-S3 H3K4me3). Only JAMM and PeakRanger can recover the resolution of the dataset ( a ) in the peaks called ( b ) and ( c ). (b) Shows the average number of peaks per cluster at different cluster ranges. Cluster range is the maximum distance separating peaks in the same cluster (for example, if two peaks are 50 bp apart, they will be grouped together in one cluster if cluster range is 50 bp or more). See Supplementary Figures S8 and Supplementary Data for TSS peak coverage of other HeLa-S3 histone modification datasets From: JAMM: a peak finder for joint analysis of NGS replicates Bioinformatics. 2014;31(1):48-55. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu568 Bioinformatics | © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com

From: JAMM: a peak finder for joint analysis of NGS replicates Fig. 4. ENCODE HeLa-S3 H3K27me3 (Pooled Replicates). Overview of peak calls, region shown is from chromosome 19. See also Supplementary Figure S7 From: JAMM: a peak finder for joint analysis of NGS replicates Bioinformatics. 2014;31(1):48-55. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu568 Bioinformatics | © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com

From: JAMM: a peak finder for joint analysis of NGS replicates Fig. 5. JAMM’s Peak Scoring. ( a ) Results for IDR analysis on biological replicates for ENCODE HeLa-S3 CTCF using JAMM. Dashed vertical line corresponds to the number of peaks selected with an IDR threshold of 0.02 (38 853 peaks). Recommendations for setting IDR thresholds are available on the IDR webpage. Input to the IDR pipeline included the top 150 000 peaks called by JAMM. The number of matched peaks increases as one descends through the sorted peak list up to the point where peaks become irreproducible between replicates. ( b ) ENCODE H3K4me3 HeLa-S3 ChIP-Seq. Black (JAMM) and gray (PeakRanger) letter labels indicate the peaks called. Numeric labels indicate peaks’ relative rankings as defined by each peak finder From: JAMM: a peak finder for joint analysis of NGS replicates Bioinformatics. 2014;31(1):48-55. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu568 Bioinformatics | © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com