EuroCirCol: 16T dipole based on common coils (DRAFT)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Superconducting Magnet Program S. Gourlay CERN March 11-12, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory IR Quad R&D Program LHC IR Upgrade Stephen A.
Advertisements

Mechanical Analysis of Dipole with Partial Keystone Cable for the SIS300 A finite element analysis has been performed to optimize the stresses in the dipole.
Mechanical Design & Analysis Igor Novitski. Outlines Electromagnetic Forces in the Magnet Goals of Finite Element Analysis Mechanical Concept Description.
S. Caspi, LBNL HQS Progress Report High Field Nb 3 Sn Quadrupole Magnet Shlomo Caspi LBNL Collaboration Meeting – CM11 FNAL October 27-28, 2008.
Twin Solenoid Twin Solenoid - conceptual design for FCC-hh detector magnet - Matthias GT Mentink Alexey Dudarev Helder Pais Da Silva Leonardo Erik Gerritse.
Superconducting Large Bore Sextupole for ILC
1 Design of Solenoid and iron yoke for GLD KEK Hiroshi Yamaoka Ken-ichi Tanaka July 13, ‘05.
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Further optimization of the solenoid design A.Efremov, E.Koshurnikov, Yu.Lobanov, A.Makarov, A.Vodopianov GSI, Darmstadt,
FCC Week 2015Design Options for 16 T LTS Dipoles – G. Sabbi 1 Overview of Magnet Design Options for LTS Dipoles in the 16 T Range GianLuca Sabbi, LBNL.
CERN Accelerator School, Erice 2013 Tiepida-2 case-study 3: High field – large aperture magnet for a cable facility TiEpIdA2 design team: I. Mondino: Project.
First approaches J. García, F. Toral, J. Munilla – CIEMAT.
Permanent Magnet Quadrupoles for the CLIC Drive Beam Jim Clarke, Norbert Collomb, Neil Marks, James Richmond, and Ben Shepherd STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
S. Caspi, LBNL HQ Progress and Schedule Shlomo Caspi LBNL LARP Collaboration Meeting – CM13 Port Jefferson November 4-6, 2009.
R. Bonomi R. Kleindienst J. Munilla Lopez M. Chaibi E. Rogez CERN Accelerator School, Erice 2013 CASE STUDY 1: Group 1C Nb 3 Sn Quadrupole Magnet.
MQXF support structure An extension of LARP experience Helene Felice MQXF Design Review December 10 th to 12 th, 2014 CERN.
Superconducting Magnet Group Superconducting magnet development for ex-situ NMR LDRD 2003 Paolo Ferracin, Scott Bartlett 03/31/2003.
Subscale quadrupole (SQ) series Paolo Ferracin LARP DoE Review FNAL June 12-14, 2006.
Hybrid Structure with Cooling John Cozzolino LARP Collaboration Meeting Port Jefferson, NY November 4-6, 2009.
Magnet design, final parameters Paolo Ferracin and Attilio Milanese EuCARD ESAC review for the FRESCA2 dipole CERN March, 2012.
Dipole design at the 16 T frontier - Magnet R&D for a Future Circular Collider (FCC) at Fermilab Alexander Zlobin Fermilab.
Muon Cooling Channel Superconducting Magnet Systems Muon Collider Task Force Meeting on July 31, 2006 V.S. Kashikhin.
CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study 3 Paolo Ferracin ( ) European Organization for Nuclear Research.
16 T Dipole Design Options: Input Parameters and Evaluation Criteria F. Toral - CIEMAT CIEMAT-VC, Sept. 4th, 2015.
Cold test of SIS-300 dipole model Sergey Kozub Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP), Protvino, Moscow region, Russia.
S. Lassiter, P. Brindza, M. Fowler, E. Sun - Jefferson Lab G. Markham - NovaTech, B. Wands - Fermi Lab Abstract—Jefferson Laboratory is developing a set.
CLIC Stabilisation Day’08 18 th March 2008 Thomas Zickler AT/MCS/MNC/tz 1 CLIC Quadrupoles Th. Zickler CERN.
Nonlinear Analyses of Modular Coils and Shell structure for Coil Cool-down and EM Loads Part 1 – Results of Shell Structure and Modular Coils H.M. Fan.
SC Quadrupole Discussion Chris Adolphsen. Comments from Fernando Toral on SC Development for XFEL and ILC.
1 BNL -FNAL - LBNL - SLAC P. Wanderer IR’07 - Frascati 7 November 2007 U.S. LARP Magnet Programme.
DESIGN STUDIES IR Magnet Design P. Wanderer LARP Collaboration Meeting April 27, 2006.
Status of DCH Mechanical Structure 13 Dec S. Lauciani2 Summary Proposal for a mechanical structure of DCH Stringing strategy and analysis of deformations.
16 T dipole in common coil configuration: mechanical design
Mechanical behavior of the EuroCirCol 16 T Block-type dipole magnet during a quench Junjie Zhao, Tiina Salmi, Antti stenvall, Clement Lorin 1.
Massimo Sorbi on behalf of INFN team:
WORK IN PROGRESS F C C Main Quadrupoles FCC week 2017
HQ Mirror Assembly R. Bossert
TQS Structure Design and Modeling
Mechanical tolerance analysis for the MQXF prototype structures
16 T Cosq DIPOLE Mechanical Analysis
At ICFA Mini-Workshop on High Field Magnets for pp Colliders,
CERN-INFN, 23 Febbraio 2017 Stato del programma 16 T Davide Tommasini.
Cosq configuration - Mechanics
SiD Solenoid Status and Plans
Plans for the PSI Canted-Dipole Program
Mechanical Modelling of the PSI CD1 Dipole
FRESCA2 Update on the dipole design and new calculations
EuroCirCol: 16T dipole based on common coils
16 T dipole in common coil configuration: mechanical design
Bore quench field vs. critical current density
Mechanical results on the double aperture Version V20ar
the MDP High Field Dipole Demonstrator
Block design status EuroCirCol
16T Cosθ Dipole Configuration
MKQXF FEA Model Haris Kokkinos
Large aperture Q4 M. Segreti, J.M. Rifflet
Conceptual design of superconducting correctors for Hi-Lumi Project
11T Dipole for the LHC Collimation upgrade
MQXF coil cross-section status
CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study 2 Paolo Ferracin European Organization for Nuclear Research.
High Precision Magnet Production for NSLSII at IHEP
P.Fabbricatore & S.Farinon
Large aperture Q4 M. Segreti, J.M. Rifflet
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Conceptual design of superconducting correctors for Hi-Lumi Project (v2) F. Toral - CIEMAT CIEMAT, March 7th, 2013.
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Q4 development M. Segreti, J.M. Rifflet, E. Todesco
J. García, F. Toral (CIEMAT) P. Fessia (CERN)
CEPC Booster Ring Magnets
Cross-section of the 150 mm aperture case
S. Bettoni on behalf of the whole team
Presentation transcript:

EuroCirCol: 16T dipole based on common coils (DRAFT) T. Martinez, J. Munilla, F. Toral - CIEMAT FCC Week, April 13th, 2016

Outline Introduction 2-D magnetic design 2-D mechanical design 2

Introduction (I) The common coil layout is based on two flat coils. A unique support structure for two apertures, placed at the same vertical plane. Main advantage: pure flat coils. Disadvantages: large stored energy and electromagnetic forces, assembly. Traditionally, American labs (BNL, LBNL, Fermilab) have worked on this layout, even for high fields. Chinese colleagues (IHEP) are working on a 20-Tesla dipole design based on common coils. In the framework of EuroCirCol project, CIEMAT is working on a 16-Tesla dipole design based on common coils. Courtesy R. Gupta (BNL) 3

Introduction (II) The starting parameters are common for the three design options under study (cos-theta, block and common coil): 4

2-D magnetic design The influence of a number of parameters has been analyzed to optimize the 2-D magnetic design and to better understand the sensitivity factors: Intra-beam distance. Iron outer diameter. Nominal current. Cable: number of strands, strand diameter. Number of coils. Magnet protection. 5

2-D magnetic design: intra-beam distance A short intra-beam distance implies a strong cross-talk between apertures: The superconductor efficiency decreases. The field quality is very difficult to achieve. 6

Outline Introduction 2-D magnetic design 2-D mechanical design 7

Overview 8

General remarks Magnetic forces calculation: Ansoft Maxwell Imported to structural Ansys Mechanical Wires modelled in Ansoft “Coil” material for each stack of wires on Ansys 9

General remarks Mechanical feasibility of a Common Coil design has been analyzed. Internal grading version of the magnet is considered the baseline option Mechanical properties for materials from previous agreements. Stress limit (MPa) 293/4 K E (GPa) P α (293 to 4.2 K) Coil 150 200 Ex=52 Ey=44 Gxy=21 0,3 X=3,1e-3 Y=3,4e-3 316LN 350 1050 193 210 0,28 2,8e-3 7075 480 690 70 79 4,2e-3 Iron 180 720 213 224 2,0e-3 Titanium 800 1650 130 1,7e-3 10

Coils Coils are modeled according two different assumptions: Whole Package made of mean coil material Coil blocks made of Coil material All coils are bonded together Coils are just supported by frictionless supports Supports include keys for horizontal and vertical preload Aluminum shrinkage is around iron Loaded cases: Assembly Cool down (4,2 K) Magnet ON – 16 T Magnet ON – 18 T 11

Iron and Shell Different Iron configurations are being studied: Split in vertical or horizontal axis Alternative arrangement of iron (vertical/horizontal) Aluminum shrinkage (cylindrical) is included, value of initial clearance is under evaluation Values of preload and clearance of V & H keys under study Improved stiffness is being studied by different possibilities, including for example by two-halves SS cylinder 12

First Results Horiz. Stress Vert. Stress Good news: Coils stresses: < 200 MPa @16 T (Sligthly higher @18T) Main challenges: Big displacements in the coils Iron stresses Results considering symmetry in x edge for iron 13

Challenges: Coils Displacement Horiz. Displ. (mm) Vert. Displ. (mm) Total displacement in the order of mm in x axis It includes small rotation of coils Not enough lateral stiffness from iron and shell to withstand magnetic forces Several approaches are being studied to reduce this effect Shell deformation (enlarged) 14 Results considering symmetry in x edge for iron

Challenges: Iron Iron (Von Misses): 16T @ 4,2K Von Mises = 736 Mpa Max. Prin. Stress = 232 Results considering symmetry in x edge for iron 15

Conclusions 2D Mechanical model for Common Coil is being studied (Internal grading) is included Mechanical design seems to be feasible for this kind of magnet, but more work is needed Assembly tolerances are being included The coil is considered completely bonded Contacts between coil and supports are frictionless Effect of manufacturing processes on contacts, gaps, not included Axial support for 3D structure is not considered yet 16