Computational design of protein function

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Miklós Vargyas, Judit Papp May, 2005 MarvinSpace – live demo.
Advertisements

Case Study: Dopamine D 3 Receptor Anthagonists Chapter 3 – Molecular Modeling 1.
AutoDock 4 and AutoDock Vina -Brief Intruction
Rosetta Energy Function Glenn Butterfoss. Rosetta Energy Function Major Classes: 1. Low resolution: Reduced atom representation Simple energy function.
Jürgen Sühnel Institute of Molecular Biotechnology, Jena Centre for Bioinformatics Jena / Germany Supplementary Material:
Molecular Modeling: Molecular Mechanics C372 Introduction to Cheminformatics II Kelsey Forsythe.
How to approximate complex physical and thermodynamic interactions? Employ rigid or flexible structures for ligand and receptor (Side-chains or Back-bone.
Molecular Docking G. Schaftenaar Docking Challenge Identification of the ligand’s correct binding geometry in the binding site ( Binding Mode ) Observation:
Lecture 3 – 4. October 2010 Molecular force field 1.
Tertiary protein structure viewing and prediction July 1, 2009 Learning objectives- Learn how to manipulate protein structures with Deep View software.
Two Examples of Docking Algorithms With thanks to Maria Teresa Gil Lucientes.
Protein Docking and Interactions Modeling CS 374 Maria Teresa Gil Lucientes November 4, 2004.
Protein Primer. Outline n Protein representations n Structure of Proteins Structure of Proteins –Primary: amino acid sequence –Secondary:  -helices &
FLEX* - REVIEW.
Development and Validation of a Genetic Algorithm for Flexible Docking Gareth Jones, Peter Willet, Robert C. Glen, Andrew R. Leach and Robin Taylor J.
. Protein Structure Prediction [Based on Structural Bioinformatics, section VII]
Enhancing the C-48 STAT3 Inhibitor
BL5203: Molecular Recognition & Interaction Lecture 5: Drug Design Methods Ligand-Protein Docking (Part I) Prof. Chen Yu Zong Tel:
Design of Small Molecule Drugs Targeted to RNA RNA Ontology Group May
Molecular Docking Using GOLD Tommi Suvitaival Seppo Virtanen S Basics for Biosystems of the Cell Fall 2006.
Structural biology and drug design: An overview Olivier Taboureau Assitant professor Chemoinformatics group-CBS-DTU
Protein Structure Prediction Samantha Chui Oct. 26, 2004.
Protein-protein and Protein- ligand Docking The geometric filtering.
LSM2104/CZ2251 Essential Bioinformatics and Biocomputing Essential Bioinformatics and Biocomputing Protein Structure and Visualization (3) Chen Yu Zong.
The Geometry of Biomolecular Solvation 1. Hydrophobicity Patrice Koehl Computer Science and Genome Center
Inverse Kinematics for Molecular World Sadia Malik April 18, 2002 CS 395T U.T. Austin.
Computational Design of Ligand-binding Proteins with High Affinity and Selectivity Liping Xu Literature Report.
Cédric Notredame (30/08/2015) Chemoinformatics And Bioinformatics Cédric Notredame Molecular Biology Bioinformatics Chemoinformatics Chemistry.
Construyendo modelos 3D de proteinas ‘fold recognition / threading’
Module 2: Structure Based Ph4 Design
Rational Drug Discovery PC session Protein sequence analysis Biocomputing Primary etc structure X-ray crystallography Structural genomics Homology modelling.
Proteins  Organic compounds made of C, O, H, N and S  Building blocks – 20 different amino acids  Peptide and Polypeptides: Dehydration (Condensation)/
A genetic algorithm for structure based de-novo design Scott C.-H. Pegg, Jose J. Haresco & Irwin D. Kuntz February 21, 2006.
y-sa/2.0/. Integrating the Data Prof:Rui Alves Dept Ciencies Mediques Basiques, 1st.
 Four levels of protein structure  Linear  Sub-Structure  3D Structure  Complex Structure.
Flexible Multi-scale Fitting of Atomic Structures into Low- resolution Electron Density Maps with Elastic Network Normal Mode Analysis Tama, Miyashita,
Derivatives of Backbone Motion Kimberly Noonan, Jack Snoeyink UNC Chapel Hill Computer Science.
Altman et al. JACS 2008, Presented By Swati Jain.
Rational Drug Design : HIV Integrase. A process for drug design which bases the design of the drug upon the structure of its protein target. 1.Structural.
Virtual Screening C371 Fall INTRODUCTION Virtual screening – Computational or in silico analog of biological screening –Score, rank, and/or filter.
Computer-aided drug discovery (CADD)/design methods have played a major role in the development of therapeutically important small molecules for several.
R L R L L L R R L L R R L L water DOCKING SIMULATIONS.
Structure- based Structure-based computer-aided drug discovery (SB-CADD) approach: helps to design and evaluate the quality, in terms of affinity, of series.
Chemistry XXI Unit 3 How do we predict properties? M1. Analyzing Molecular Structure Predicting properties based on molecular structure. M4. Exploring.
Developing a Force Field Molecular Mechanics. Experimental One Dimensional PES Quantum mechanics tells us that vibrational energy levels are quantized,
Structural classification of Proteins SCOP Classification: consists of a database Family Evolutionarily related with a significant sequence identity Superfamily.
Mean Field Theory and Mutually Orthogonal Latin Squares in Peptide Structure Prediction N. Gautham Department of Crystallography and Biophysics University.
CoMFA Study of Piperidine Analogues of Cocaine at the Dopamine Transporter: Exploring the Binding Mode of the 3  -Substituent of the Piperidine Ring Using.
2014 Using machine learning to predict binding sites in proteins Jenelle Bray Stanford University October 10, 2014 #GHC
Elon Yariv Graduate student in Prof. Nir Ben-Tal’s lab Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tel Aviv University.
Protein-Protein Interactions. A Protein may interact with: –Other proteins –Nucleic Acids –Small molecules Protein Interactions.
Structural Bioinformatics Elodie Laine Master BIM-BMC Semester 3, Genomics of Microorganisms, UMR 7238, CNRS-UPMC e-documents:
Page 1 Computer-aided Drug Design —Profacgen. Page 2 The most fundamental goal in the drug design process is to determine whether a given compound will.
CHM 708: MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Proteins Organic compounds made of C, O, H, N and S
Simplified picture of the principles used for multiple copy simultaneous search (MCSS) and for computational combinatorial ligand design (CCLD). Simplified.
Rong Chen Boston University
Protein Structure Prediction and Protein Homology modeling
Atoms & Elements Molecules Compounds
Outline Introduction : computational method used Paper discussion
Virtual Screening.
Ligand Docking to MHC Class I Molecules
Binding and Conformational Change
Enzymes A special class of proteins that are vital to an organism’s survival. They work by lowering the energy it takes to start a chemical reaction. Biological.
Accounting for side-chain flexibility in protein-ligand docking: 3D Interaction Homology as an approach of quantifying side-chain flexibility of Tyrosine.
Basic procedure for MD simulations
Mr.Halavath Ramesh 16-MCH-001 Dept. of Chemistry Loyola College University of Madras-Chennai.
Mr.Halavath Ramesh 16-MCH-001 Dept. of Chemistry Loyola College University of Madras-Chennai.
Mr.Halavath Ramesh 16-MCH-001 Dept. of Chemistry Loyola College University of Madras-Chennai.
Mr.Halavath Ramesh 16-MCH-001 Dept. of Chemistry Loyola College University of Madras-Chennai.
Presentation transcript:

Computational design of protein function Loren Looger Hellinga lab

1. Allowable structures for proteins, DNA, small molecules Progesterone

2. Pseudo-geometric potential electrostatics H-bonds sterics solvation

Pretty much like CHARMM...

Hydrogen bonds, too... anchor r H A  D  -8 · { } · ·

Area-based solvation energy P P P = polar H = hydrophobic H H H

Electrostatic potential     is a function of atom-type pair & protein environment. Parameterized to fit experimental data.

3. Algorithm for choosing best structure(s) from all available

Protein (PBP) scaffolds Complementary Surface Construction: Ligand coordinates Protein Poly-alanine PCS Rotational ligand ensemble Docking grid Force field Placed Fixed ligand Side-chain rotamers Evolved Ranked PCS Experiments Periplasmic Binding Protein (PBP) scaffolds Molten zone Evolving zone Fixed zone

Metabolites Neurotransmitters Drugs Kd = 2 µM Kd = 6 µM Kd = 2 nM [L-lactate] (µM) 0.5 1 40 80 F x Kd = 2 µM 52.5 100 Kd = 6 µM [serotonin] (µM) 12.5 25 Kd = 2 nM [TNT] (nM) 150 300 Kd = 4 nM [5-fluorouracil] (nM) 50 [MTBE] (µM) 0.25 Kd = 45 nM [PMPA] (µM) TNT RDX MTBE D-lactate L-lactate 5-fluorouracil ibuprofen PMPA~soman serotonin dopamine & Pollutants Explosives Chemical Threats

QSAR Results for binding affinities for L-lactate & TNT Receptors -8 -6 log Kd (obs) -4 -2

L-lactate designs GBP QBP RBP 1 100µM 10 100mM 0.1 HBP ABP

The use of QSARs in the predictions improves the designs: D-lactate GBP QBP RBP 1 100µM 10 100mM 0.1 HBP ABP

Construction of biological sentinels for chemical threats and pollutants modulation binary expression [inducer]

Unicellular sentinels for chemical threats and pollutants - + - + TNT Ribose Lactate MTBE 5 Fluoro-uracil

Dose Response of TNTa Signaling IPTG 0 mM TNT 100 mM 2,4-DNT 100 mM 2,6-DNT 100 mM 10 mM 1 mM 0.1 mM 0.01 mM 0.001 mM [TNT]

Optically pure enantiomers Absorbance 210nm L D Kdlactate D L none none 200µM 3µM 0.8µM 10µM Racemic mix Optically pure enantiomers Wt Gbp Immobilized receptors L-Lac.G1 D-Lac.G1 Fraction #

Computational design of ligand-binding sites Strategy #2: predefined geometries { l, w1, w2, q1, q2, q3 }n geometrical description of essential features in the complementary surface Complementary surface construction (1010-10200 rotamers) Site 1 Site 2 +... Calculation #2 Complementary surface construction (PCS + SCS) +... Site 1 Site 2 Combinatorial search (108 sequence 1012 rotamers) Calculation #1 Initial placement of PCS on scaffold backbone Design scaffold coordinates side-chain rotamer library Pairwise of atomic interactions

Triose phosphate isomerase chemistry

Acknowledgements Mary Dwyer Jeff Smith Shahir Rizk