Current work on GALPROP

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
H 2 Formation in the Perseus Molecular Cloud: Observations Meet Theory.
Advertisements

Fermi LAT Observations of Galactic and Extragalactic Diffuse Emission Jean-Marc Casandjian, on behalf of the Fermi LAT collaboration 7 questions addressed.
The Galactic diffuse emission Sabrina Casanova, MPIK Heidelberg XXth RENCONTRES DE BLOIS 18th - 23rd May 2008, Blois.
Observations of the isotropic diffuse gamma-ray emission with the Fermi Large Area Telescope Markus Ackermann SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory on behalf.
Fermi-LAT Study of Cosmic-Ray Gradient in the Outer Galaxy --- Fermi-LAT view of the 3 rd Quadrant --- Tsunefumi Mizuno (Hiroshima Univ.), Luigi Tibaldo.
Testing astrophysical models for the PAMELA positron excess with cosmic ray nuclei Philipp Mertsch Rudolf Peierls Centre for Theoretical Physics, University.
Challenges in Revealing Dark Matter from the High Energy Gamma-Ray Background (Continuum) Ranga-Ram Chary Spitzer Science Center, Caltech
Galactic Diffuse Gamma-ray Emission, the EGRET Model, and GLAST Science Stanley D. Hunter NASA/GSFC Code 661
Diffuse Gamma-Ray Emission Su Yang Telescopes Examples Our work.
SLAC, June 23 rd Dark Matter in Galactic Gamma Rays Marcus Ziegler Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
Igor V. Moskalenko NASA Goddard Space Flight Center with Andy W. StrongStepan G. Mashnik Andy W. Strong (MPE, Germany) & Stepan.
Potential Positron Sources around Galactic Center Department of Physics National Tsing Hua University G.T. Chen 2007/11/29.
Igor V. Moskalenko (Stanford) with S. Digel (SLAC) T. Porter (UCSC) O. Reimer (Stanford) O. Reimer (Stanford) A. W. Strong (MPE) A. W. Strong (MPE) Diffuse.
Simulating the Gamma Ray Sky Andrew McLeod SASS August 12, 2009.
Igor V. Moskalenko (Stanford) Challenges in Astrophysics of CR (knee--) & γ-rays  Intro to the relevant physics  Some of the challenges…  Modeling of.
Igor V. Moskalenko (Stanford) GALPROP Model for Galactic CR propagation and diffuse γ -ray emission.
The 511 keV Annihilation Emission From The Galactic Center Department of Physics National Tsing Hua University G.T. Chen 2007/1/2.
Igor V. Moskalenko & Andy W. Strong NASA/GSFC MPE, Germany with Olaf Reimer Bochum, Germany Topics to cover: GALPROP: principles, internal structure, recent.
Cosmic Rays Discovery of cosmic rays Local measurements Gamma-ray sky (and radio sky) Origin of cosmic rays.
Igor V. Moskalenko (Stanford U.) with A.Strong (MPE), S.Digel (SLAC), T.Porter (USCS), O.Reimer (SU) Modeling of the Galactic diffuse continuum γ-ray emission.
Igor V. Moskalenko (Stanford U.) Challenges in Astrophysics of CR (knee--) & γ-rays Topics covered:  Intro to the relevant physics  Modeling of the CR.
HEAD 2010 – Mar.3, 2010 :: IVM/Stanford-KIPAC 1IVM/Stanford-KIPAC 1 PAMELA Workshop, Rome/May 12, 2009 Igor V. Moskalenko (stanford/kipac) Leptons in Cosmic.
Aspen 4/28/05Physics at the End of the Galactic Cosmic Ray Spectrum - “Below the Knee” Working Group “Below the Knee” Working Group Report - Day 3 Binns,
38 th COSPAR, Bremen – July 18, 2010 :: IVM/Stanford-KIPAC 1 Galactic Cosmic Rays Igor V. Moskalenko Stanford & KIPAC Igor V. Moskalenko Stanford & KIPAC.
ASTR112 The Galaxy Lecture 7 Prof. John Hearnshaw 11. The galactic nucleus and central bulge 11.1 Infrared observations (cont.) 11.2 Radio observations.
Tsunefumi Mizuno 1 Fermi_Diffuse_ASJ_2010Mar.ppt Fermi-LAT Study of Galactic Cosmic-Ray Distribution -- CRs in the Outer Galaxy -- Tsunefumi Mizuno Hiroshima.
Analysis methods for Milky Way dark matter halo detection Aaron Sander 1, Larry Wai 2, Brian Winer 1, Richard Hughes 1, and Igor Moskalenko 2 1 Department.
Tsunefumi Mizuno 1 Fermi_Diffuse_2009Mar.ppt Diffuse Gamma- Rays seen by Fermi- LAT and Cosmic- Ray Distributions Tsunefumi Mizuno Hiroshima Univ. on behalf.
MARCH 11YPM 2015  ray from Galactic Center Tanmoy Mondal SRF PRL Dark Matter ?
Diffuse Emission and Unidentified Sources
Propagation of CR electrons and the interpretation of diffuse  rays Andy Strong MPE, Garching GLAST Workshop, Rome, 17 Sept 2003 with Igor Moskalenko.
E.G.Berezhko, L.T. Ksenofontov Yu.G.Shafer Institute of Cosmophysical Research and Aeronomy Yakutsk, Russia Energy spectra of electrons and positrons,
Gamma-ray Measurements of the distribution of Gas and Cosmic Ray in the Interstellar Space Yasushi Fukazawa Hiroshima University.
Multi-wavelength signals of dark matter annihilations in the Galactic diffuse emission (based on MR and P. Ullio, arXiv: )‏ Marco Regis University.
論文紹介 _2010-Jan.ppt Tsunefumi Mizuno 1 Fermi 衛星でみた拡散ガンマ線放射と銀河宇宙線 Tsunefumi Mizuno Hiroshima Univ. June 15, 2009 "Fermi Large Area Telescope Measurements.
GLAST LAT Project I. MoskalenkoGLAST-for-lunch, Jan Local Group of Galaxies in the EGRET era and perspectives for GLAST Igor V. Moskalenko Stanford.
Fermi LAT Observations of Galactic and Extragalactic Diffuse Emission Jean-Marc Casandjian, on behalf of the Fermi LAT collaboration 7 questions addressed.
ISCRA – Erice July 2004 Ana Sofía Torrentó Coello - CIEMAT THE AMS EXPERIMENT Ana Sofía Torrentó Coello – CIEMAT (Spain) On behalf of AMS Collaboration.
Interstellar gamma-rays: first large-scale results from Fermi-LAT Andy Strong on behalf of Fermi-LAT collaboration ICRC Lodz 7-15 July 2009 OG2.1 ID 0390.
Modified from talk of Igor V. Moskalenko (Stanford U.) GALPROP & Modeling the Diffuse  -ray Emission.
Topics on Dark Matter Annihilation
Diffuse Galactic Emission
V.N.Zirakashvili, V.S.Ptuskin
High Energy Neutrinos and Gamma Rays from the Galactic Center
Cosmic Rays & Supernova Remnants love story: The Importance
HARD X-RAY/SOFT g-RAY OBSERVATIONS OF THE GALACTIC DIFFUSE EMISSION WITH INTEGRAL/SPI SPI SPECTROMETER (20 keV – 8 MeV, foV 30°) ONBOARD INTEGRAL OBSERVATORY.
Dark Matter in Galactic Gamma Rays
20 diffuse catalogue fans
A Turbulent Local Environment
Fermi LAT Limits on High-Energy Gamma Lines from WIMP Annihilation
Can dark matter annihilation account for the cosmic e+- excesses?
Cosmic-Rays Astrophysics with AMS-02
Optimizing Galaxy Simulations using FGST Observations
Status and issues for the LAT interstellar emission model
Status and issues for the LAT interstellar emission model
High Energy emission from the Galactic Center
Splinter section: Diffuse emission
Particle Acceleration in the Universe
Testing the origin of high- energy cosmic rays
Propagation of cosmic rays
Isotopic abundances of CR sources
Galactic Diffuse Emission for DC2
V.N.Zirakashvili, V.S.Ptuskin
Galactic Cosmic-Rays Observed by Fermi-LAT
宇宙線スペクトルと GeV-TeV diffuse-g emission
on behalf of the Fermi-LAT Collaboration
Diffuse Gamma-Rays seen by Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope
Using Z≤2 data to constrain cosmic-ray propagation models
More on Milagro Observations of TeV Diffuse Emission in Cygnus
Presentation transcript:

Current work on GALPROP Igor V. Moskalenko & Andy W. Strong NASA/GSFC MPE, Germany Topics covered: Intro to the physics that we are working with (γ-ray – CR connection) GALPROP modeling of diffuse emission GALPROP principles What needs to be done

Diffuse Galactic Gamma-ray Emission Tracer of CR (protons, electrons) interactions in the ISM: Study of CR species in distant locations (spectra & intensities) CR acceleration (SNRs, W-R stars etc.) and propagation Emission from local clouds → local CR spectra CR variations, Solar modulation May contain signatures of exotic physics (dark matter etc.) Cosmology, SUSY, hints for accelerator experiments Background for point sources Besides: “Diffuse” emission from other regular galaxies Cosmic rays in other galaxies ! Foreground in studies of the extragalactic diffuse emission Extragalactic diffuse emission (blazars ?) may contain signatures of exotic physics (dark matter, BH evaporation etc.)

Nuclear component in CR: What we can learn? Nucleo- synthesis: supernovae, early universe, Big Bang… Stable secondaries: Li, Be, B, Sc, Ti, V Propagation parameters: Diffusion coeff., halo size, Alfvén speed, convection velosity… Radio (t1/2~1 Myr): 10Be, 26Al, 36Cl, 54Mn Dark Matter (p,đ,e+,γ) - K-capture: 37Ar,49V, 51Cr, 55Fe, 57Co Energy markers: Diff. reacceleration, solar modulation Diffuse γ-rays Galactic, extragalactic: blazars, relic neutralino Short t1/2 radio 14C & heavy Z>30 Local medium: Local Bubble Solar modulation Heavy Z>30: Cu, Zn, Ga, Ge, Rb Material & acceleration sites, nucleosynthesis (r-vs. s-processes)

CR Interactions in the Interstellar Medium 42 sigma (2003+2004 data) HESS Preliminary SNR RX J1713-3946 PSF ISM X,γ e + - synchrotron Chandra B IC P He CNO ISRF diffusion energy losses reacceleration convection etc. bremss gas e + - π π + - GLAST gas P _ LiBeB Flux p He CNO 20 GeV/n CR species: Only 1 location modulation ACE BESS AMS helio-modulation

CR Propagation: Milky Way Galaxy 1 kpc~3x1018 cm Optical image: Cheng et al. 1992, Brinkman et al. 1993 Radio contours: Condon et al. 1998 AJ 115, 1693 NGC891 100 pc Halo Gas, sources 40 kpc 0.1-0.01/ccm 1-100/ccm Sun 4-12 kpc Intergalactic space R Band image of NGC891 1.4 GHz continuum (NVSS), 1,2,…64 mJy/ beam

Fixing Propagation Parameters: Standard Way Using secondary/primary nuclei ratio: Diffusion coefficient and its index Propagation mode and its parameters (e.g., reacceleration VA, convection Vz) B/C Interstellar Be10/Be9 Ek, MeV/nucleon Radioactive isotopes: Galactic halo size Zh Zh increase Ek, MeV/nucleon

Peak in the Secondary/Primary Ratio Leaky-box model: fitting path-length distribution -> free function Diffusion models: Plain diffusion Diffusive reacceleration Convection Damping of interstellar turbulence Etc. B/C Measuring many isotopes in CR simultaneously may help to distinguish

Nuclear Reaction Network+Cross Sections Secondary, radioactive ~1 Myr & K-capture isotopes Co57 Fe55 Mn54 Cr51 V49 Ca41 Ar37 Cl36 β-, n Al26 p,EC,β+ Be7 Be10 Plus some dozens of more complicated reactions. But many cross sections are not well known…

Gas Distribution Molecular hydrogen H2 is traced using J=1-0 transition of 12CO, concentrated mostly in the plane (z~70 pc, R<10 kpc) Atomic hydrogen H I (radio 21 cm) has a wider distribution (z~1 kpc, R~30 kpc) Ionized hydrogen H II (visible, UV, X) small proportion, but exists even in halo (z~1 kpc) Z=0,0.1,0.2 kpc Sun

Interstellar Radiation Field Energy density Stellar Dust CMB Energy density Sun

Transport Equations ~90 (no. of CR species) sources (SNR, nuclear reactions…) diffusion convection diffusive reacceleration E-loss convection fragmentation radioactive decay ψ(r,p,t) – density per total momentum

CR Variations in Space & Time SNR number density R, kpc More frequent SN in the spiral arms Historical variations of CR intensity over 150 000 yr (Be10 in South Polar ice) Konstantinov et al. 1990 Electron/positron energy losses Different “collecting” areas A vs. p

Electron Fluctuations/SNR stochastic events GeV electrons 100 TeV electrons GALPROP/Credit S.Swordy Energy losses Bremsstrahlung E(dE/dt)-1,yr Ionization IC, synchrotron Electron energy loss timescale: 1 TeV: ~300 000 yr 100 TeV: ~3 000 yr Coulomb 107 yr 1 GeV 1 TeV 106 yr Ekin, GeV

Wherever you look, the GeV -ray excess is there ! 4a-f

Diffuse Gammas at Different Sky Regions Hunter et al. region: l=300°-60°,|b|<10° Inner Galaxy: l=330°-30°,|b|<5° Outer Galaxy: l=90°-270°,|b|<10° corrected l=40°-100°,|b|<5° Intermediate latitudes: l=0°-360°,10°<|b|<20° Intermediate latitudes: l=0°-360°,20°<|b|<60° Milagro

Longitude Profiles |b|<5° 50-70 MeV 0.5-1 GeV 2-4 GeV 4-10 GeV

Latitude Profiles: Inner Galaxy 50-70 MeV 0.5-1 GeV 2-4 GeV 4-10 GeV 20-50 GeV

Latitude Profiles: Outer Galaxy 50-70 MeV 0.5-1 GeV 2-4 GeV 4-10 GeV

Extragalactic Gamma-Ray Background Predicted vs. observed E2xF Sreekumar et al. 1998 Elsaesser & Mannheim, astro-ph/0405235 Strong et al. 2004 E, MeV Blazars Cosmological neutralinos

Distribution of CR Sources & Gradient in the CO/H2 CR distribution from diffuse gammas (Strong & Mattox 1996) SNR distribution (Case & Bhattacharya 1998) Pulsar distribution (Lorimer 2004) sun XCO=N(H2)/WCO: Histo –This work, Strong et al.’04 ----- -Sodroski et al.’95,’97 1.9x1020 -Strong & Mattox’96 ~Z-1 –Boselli et al.’02 ~Z-2.5 -Israel’97,’00, [O/H]=0.04,0.07 dex/kpc

Again Diffuse Galactic Gamma Rays Very good agreement ! More IC in the GC –better agreement ! The pulsar distribution vs. R falls too fast OR larger H2/CO gradient

GALPROP Input: galdef-files GALPROP is parameter-driven (user can specify everything!) Grids 2D/3D –options; symmetry options (full 3D, 1/8 -quadrants) Spatial, energy/momentum, latitude & longitude grids Ranges: energy, R, x, y, z, latitude & longitude Time steps Propagation parameters Dxx, VA, VC & injection spectra (p,e) X-factors (including R-dependence) Sources Parameterized distributions Known SNRs Random SNRs (with given/random spectra), time dependent eq. Other Source isotopic abundances, secondary particles (pbar , e±, γ, synchro), anisotropic IC, energy losses, nuclear production cross sections…

Grids Z R,x,y 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 -1 Typical grid steps (can be arbitrary!) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 -1 Typical grid steps (can be arbitrary!) Δz = 0.1 kpc, ΔΔz = 0.01 kpc (gas averaging) ΔR = 1 kpc ΔE = x1.2 (log-grid)

GALPROP Output/FITS files Provides literally everything: All nuclei and particle spectra in every grid point (x,y,R,z,E) -FITS files Separately for π0-decay, IC, bremsstrahlung: Emissivities in every grid point (x,y,R,z,E,process) Skymaps with a given resolution (l,b,E,process) Output of maps separated into HI, H2, and rings to allow fitting X, metallicity gradient etc.

GALPROP user’s community GLAST (‘07) – spectrum of the diffuse emission (Galactic, extragalactic) & background model Pamela (’05!), AMS (‘08) – accurate CR measurements (H-C, pbars, e±), dark matter searches ACE, TIGER – interpretation of nuclear isotopic abundances HEAT – electrons, positrons +many independent researchers world-wide Each experiment addresses some part of the whole picture “Milky Way galaxy” → results of each experiment are important for others

algorithm primary source functions (p, He, C .... Ni) source abundances, spectra primary propagation -starting from maxA=64 source functions (Be, B...., e+,e-, pbars) using primaries and gas distributions secondary propagation tertiary source functions tertiary propagation (i) CR –fixing propagation -rays (IC, bremsstrahlung, πo-decay) radio: synchrotron (ii) γ-rays

Vectorization options GALPROP Calculations Constraints Bin size (x,y,z) depends on the computer speed, RAM; final run can be done on a very fine grid ! No other constraints ! –any required process/formalism can be implemented Calculations (γ -ray related) Vectorization options Now 64 bit to allow unlimited arrays Heliospheric modulation: routinely force-field, more sophisticated model ? With propagated CR spectra: calculate the emissivities (π0-decay, IC, bremss) in every grid point Integrate the emissivities over the line of sight: GALPROP has a full 3D grid, but currently only 2D gas maps (H2, H I, H II) Using actual annular maps (column density) at the final step High latitudes above b=40˚ -using integrated H I distribution

Near Future Developments Full 3D Galactic structure: 3D gas maps (from S.Digel, S.Hunter and/or smbd else) 3D interstellar radiation & magnetic fields (A.Strong & T.Porter) Cross sections: Blattnig et al. formalism for π0-production Diffractive dissociation with scaling violation (T.Kamae –param.) Isotopic cross sections (with S.Mashnik, LANL; try to motivate BNL, JENDL-Japan, other Nuc. Data Centers) Modeling the local structure: Local SNRs with known positions and ages Local Bubble, local clouds –may be done at the final calculation step (grid bin size ??) Energy range: Extend toward sub-MeV range to compare with INTEGRAL diffuse emission (continuum; 511 keV line) Heliospheric modulation: Implementing a modern formalism (Potgieter, Zank etc.) Visualization tool (started) using the classes of CERN ROOT package: images, profiles, and spectra from GALPROP to be directly compared with data Improving the GALPROP module structure (for DM studies)

More developments Point sources: develop algorithm(s) for modeling the background and interface to the rest of GLAST software Instrumental response: how to implement? Diffuse emission analysis has to include point source catalog! At least, two diffuse models: with/without the “excess” Develop test case(s) to test the accuracy of the numerical model (simple gas distribution, no energy losses, uniform ISRF etc.) Complete C++ package: rewrite several fortran routines in C++ Develop a dedicated Web-site: Controlled changes in GALPROP: tests +documentation +… Allow for communication with users Post relevant information: best models, gas maps, ISRF, nuclear cross sections… Ability to run GALPROP on-line… Develop a fitting procedure to make automatic fitting to B/C ratio, CR spectra and abundances

More details at tomorrow’s splinter section