Test and Measurement Conference Evaluation of machines and CMMs using a laser tracer 1 August 2017 Kenneth Manana TQM-5134-1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Axtrusion Based Lathe
Advertisements

Zeki Aydan / / 1 of 19 FIT FOR THE FUTURE ???
Microspectrophotometry Validation. Reasons for Changing Instruments Reduced reliability. Limited efficiency. Limited availability and cost of replacement.
Franco Barnard M&V Project Engineer Baseline Service Level Adjustments of ECM on Compressed Air Systems 16 August 2012.
Chapter Four Fits and Tolerances: Linear and Geometry.
22-Nov-2004 © Renishaw plc Not to be reproduced without written permission from Renishaw Laser & Calibration Products Division Slide 1 Laser.
Laser Cutting Performance and Quality Evaluation via Web-Based Machine Vision and CMM Principal Investigators: Dr. Richard Chiou, Dr. Michael Mauk Research.
Robert Ruland MMF Bench/CMM Procurement Plan October 14, 2004 MMF Review 1 MMF Bench / CMM Procurement Plan Robert Ruland Procurement.
Use of a commercial laser tracker for optical alignment James H. Burge, Peng Su, Chunyu Zhao, Tom Zobrist College of Optical Sciences Steward Observatory.
Yurii Levashov LCLS Undulator Fiducialization October 20, 2005 *Work supported in part by DOE Contract DE-AC02-76SF LCLS.
Warsaw University LiCAS Linear Collider Alignment & Survey IWAA08, G. Moss 1 The LiCAS LSM System First measurements from the Laser Straightness.
Data Handling l Classification of Errors v Systematic v Random.
The Calibration Process
Pre-alignment solutions applied to girders 1/19 Sylvain GRIFFET, 06/07/2010.
© NMISA 2010 Multilateration Laser Tracker Systems Speaker : Pieter Greeff
Dimensional Metrology Dimensional Metrology Program Steve Phillips Program Manager MEL Metrology Support for Laser Trackers and Scanners Supports Industrial.
This slide presentation was created by Carl Ingalls and Ed Giesler for CMM International 2003 Conference Using Laser Engraving in Tissue Embossing Presented.
Zachary Wolf Undulator Oct 12, LCLS Undulator Tuning Zack Wolf, Yurii Levashov, Achim Weidemann, Seva Kaplounenko,
DELTA Quadrant Tuning Y. Levashov, E. Reese. 2 Tolerances for prototype quadrant tuning Magnet center deviations from a nominal center line < ± 50  m.
1 © 2005 Independent Quality Labs, Inc. CTMA 2005 Tools for Improving Machine Tool Volumetric Accuracy Robert (Buz) Callaghan Chief Engineer.
Error Analysis Accuracy Closeness to the true value Measurement Accuracy – determines the closeness of the measured value to the true value Instrument.
Maintenance of Machine tools
Project Tracking. Questions... Why should we track a project that is underway? What aspects of a project need tracking?
LASER AND ADVANCES IN METROLOGY
Automotive Test & Measurement Case Studies SAAMF Roadshow Durban CSIR NML Eddie Tarnow Metrologist: Torque & Automotive 14 June 2006.
H. MAINAUD DURAND PACMAN WP1 OUTLINE Tasks & role of associated partner Plans for training.
Straight Lines Learning Outcomes  Revise representing a function by an arrow diagram, using the terms domain and range and notation f(x) = x+1 for x →
January 25, 2005GRETINA 2004 Review1 GRETINA 2004 Annual Review Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Mechanical System.
Develop procedures to determine geometric measurement errors after work-piece machining Dirk Beger, Lisa Groos, Klaus Wendt TIM Workshop, London 5 th November.
CALIBRATION METHODS. For many analytical techniques, we need to evaluate the response of the unknown sample against the responses of a set of standards.
Short range alignment strategy in CLEX and first results CLIC Workshop January 2015 on behalf of : Hélène Mainaud-Durand, Mateusz Sosin Mathieu.
Quality control & Statistics. Definition: it is the science of gathering, analyzing, interpreting and representing data. Example: introduction a new test.
Modeling of disk machining for the CLIC RF accelerating structures MeChanICs project meeting Joni Turunen 1.
CLIC Beam Physics Working Group CLIC pre-alignment simulations Thomas Touzé BE/ABP-SU Update on the simulations of the CLIC pre-alignment.
The MesoMill™ An Off-The-Shelf Small Milling Machine By Roger Cortesi MIT Precision Engineering Research Group.
WP3 The LiCAS Laser Straightness Monitor (LSM) Greg Moss.
© 2001 MIT PSDAM AND PERG LABS ADJUSTABLE GEOMETRIC CONSTRAINTS.
Contents: 1. Introduction 2. Gyroscope specifications 3. Drift rate compensation 4. Orientation error correction 5. Results 6. Gyroscope and odometers.
Company LOGO Technology and Application of Laser Tracker in Large Space Measurement Yang Fan, Li Guangyun, Fan Baixing IWAA2014 in Beijing, China Zhengzhou.
1 Research on laser tracker measurement accuracy and data processing Liang Jing IHEP,CHINA
Asteroid Strike! Research the answers to these questions: What caused the extinction of the dinosaurs? What is the evidence for this theory? What were.
Alignment and stability session
Mr P Mulholland AS Design and Technology St Joseph’s HS Crossmaglen
Estimating standard error using bootstrap
Installation of the waveguides between MB T0#2 and DB T0#2
Magnetic Measurements At SLAC
Fits and Tolerances: Linear and Geometry.
Robotics: Unit-I.
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL AND MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING
Accuracy Significance in Measurement.
Recent developments on micro-triangulation
Workshop on Tau-Charm at High Luminosity
GONIOMETER SWITCH POSITIONS
Stages for the SSW translation system for PACMAN
Prepared By: Gp Capt Dr. Hamid Ullah Khan Niazi
The Calibration Process
Welcome to the National Physical Laboratory
LCLS Undulator Fiducialization
Electronic Control Systems Week 4 – Signaling and Calibration
Risk Management with Minimum Weight
METHOD VALIDATION: AN ESSENTIAL COMPONENT OF THE MEASUREMENT PROCESS
MBF1413 | Quantitative Methods Prepared by Dr Khairul Anuar
J.-F. Pâris University of Houston
Prediction and Accuracy
Paige Thielen, ME535 Spring 2018
SPA Physics Theory Lesson
Introduction to Robotics
Measurements & Error Analysis
SB Installation Tools Installation Tools
Presentation transcript:

Test and Measurement Conference Evaluation of machines and CMMs using a laser tracer 1 August 2017 Kenneth Manana TQM-5134-1

Outlook This presentation will address the following questions. What is machine or CMM evaluation? Why is a machine or CMM evaluated? Which instruments are used during the evaluation and why? How do these instruments work? Conclusion TQM-5134-1

Machine or CMM evaluation It is a process where by the performance condition of a machine or CMM is assessed against the manufacturer’s specification TQM-5134-1

Reason for doing the evaluation Machines (lathe, miling machine) Machines are build with gears and belt which break and wear out. This affect the machines ability to produce accurate parts. This is essential in industries such as production of parts or various components where high accuracy is required to ensure that the manufactured component will be fit for its purpose. CMMs CMMs contain bearings which in most cases run on air, they can easily be damaged by dust, oil or water. This can result in inaccurate measurement results. TQM-5134-1

Previous instrument(s) Previously NMISA was using a linear laser interferometer to perform evaluations of machines. This instrument can only do a single axis at a time. TQM-5134-1

New instrument Laser tracer TQM-5134-1

New instrument Laser tracer TQM-5134-1

Advantages of using a laser tracer Evaluation of linear axes (all component errors and squareness) Evaluation of rotary axes (all component errors and squareness) The evaluation is done according to ISO 10360 No alignment is necessary, the laser tracks the reflector and does self-alignment TQM-5134-1

NMISA ZEISS CMM The CMM has an accuracy of 0,5µm Volume: (900x1300x650) mm TQM-5134-1

Evaluation of a ZIESS CMM using a laser tracer The Tracer covers systematic geometry deviations of a 3 axes machine, 21 parameters in total with the notation according to ISO 10360 (for CMMs) and ISO 230 (for machines) TQM-5134-1

Errors and their directions Deviation from ideal motion Deviation from ideal position TQM-5134-1

Results Positions and volume evaluated TQM-5134-1

Results Results table Group Parameter Deviation (range) Umax (95%) xtx Position xtx 2.1 µm 0.3 µm yty 3.7 µm 0.4 µm ztz 0.5 µm Straightness xty 1.3 µm 0.2 µm xtz ytx 1.2 µm ytz 0.8 µm ztx 0.7 µm 0.1 µm zty Pitch / Yaw / Roll xrx 1.9 µrad 0.4 " 0.4 µrad 0.1 " xry 0.9 µrad 0.2 " 0.7 µrad xrz 2.3 µrad 0.5 " 2.1 µrad yrx 10.5 µrad 2.2 " yry 1.8 µrad yrz 3.0 µrad 0.6 " 0.5 µrad zrx 22.7 µrad 4.7 " zry 19.3 µrad 4.0 " 2.8 µrad zrz 14.6 µrad 3.0 " Squareness xwy 3.3 µrad 0.7 " xwz 5.3 µrad 1.1 " ywz -21.8 µrad -4.5 " 0.6 µrad TQM-5134-1

Results Results table TQM-5134-1

Conclusion The laser tracer is a useful instrument since it can evaluate all axes in a single alignment. The results show that the CMM requires calibration and/or adjustment. The squareness in the z-axis is shown to have a big deviation. Evaluation of CMMs and machines is essential because it provides information on whether the specific instrument is still within specification. TQM-5134-1

Thank You kmanana@nmisa.org TQM-5134-1